PTGER1 is a 42 kDa transmembrane protein encoded by the PTGER1 gene, functioning as a receptor for prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). It activates G(q) proteins, triggering phosphatidylinositol-calcium signaling pathways . PTGER1 is implicated in renal function modulation, smooth muscle contraction, pain perception (algesia), blood pressure regulation, and cancer progression .
| Property | Details |
|---|---|
| Gene Name | PTGER1 |
| Protein Name | Prostaglandin E2 receptor EP1 subtype |
| Molecular Weight | 42 kDa (observed); 41.8 kDa (calculated) |
| UniProt ID | P34995 |
| Transmembrane Domains | 7 |
| Tissue Distribution | Kidney, prostate, epidermis, brain |
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Host Species | Rabbit (most common), Goat |
| Clonality | Polyclonal |
| Applications | WB, IHC, ELISA, Immunofluorescence (IF) |
| Reactivity | Human, Mouse, Rat |
| Immunogen | Synthetic peptides (e.g., Human PTGER1 aa 50-150 or C-terminal regions) |
| Validation | Tested in WB/IHC with positive controls (e.g., human 293T, PC-3 cells) |
PTGER1 antibodies are widely used to investigate receptor expression and function in disease models:
Cancer Research:
Neurological Studies:
Dermatology:
Antibody specificity is confirmed through rigorous testing:
| Sample Type | Band Size | Dilution | Detection Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Human 293T cells | 42 kDa | 1:200 | Chemiluminescence (ECL) |
| Mouse kidney lysate | 42 kDa | 1:200 | HRP-conjugated secondary antibody |
Human Prostate/Kidney: Strong staining in epithelial and renal tubules at 1:200 dilution .
Mouse Kidney: Distinct cytoplasmic localization in tubular cells .
Recent studies highlight PTGER1's diverse roles:
Pain and Inflammation:
Cancer Metastasis:
Endocrine Regulation:
PTGER1 (Prostaglandin E Receptor 1, Subtype EP1) is a 42kDa G protein-coupled receptor that mediates responses to prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). It functions through G(q) proteins which activate a phosphatidylinositol-calcium second messenger system. PTGER1 plays important roles in renal function and smooth muscle contractile responses to PGE2 in various tissues . Research targeting PTGER1 is significant for understanding inflammatory processes, pain signaling, and various physiological responses mediated by prostaglandin signaling.
Based on current validation data, PTGER1 antibodies are primarily validated for:
Western blotting (WB)
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
Immunohistochemistry (IHC, IHC-P, IHC-fro)
Immunocytochemistry (ICC)
Immunofluorescence (IF, IF-cc, IF-p)
Different antibodies may be optimized for different applications, so researchers should select antibodies specifically validated for their experimental needs.
Commercial PTGER1 antibodies demonstrate reactivity primarily with:
Human
Mouse
Rat
Many antibodies show cross-reactivity between these species, but specific epitope recognition may vary . Always verify the specific reactivity of your selected antibody before designing cross-species experiments.
Optimal dilutions vary by application and specific antibody:
Western blot: 1/500-1/2000
ELISA: ~1 μg/ml
Immunohistochemistry: Application-specific (e.g., 17 μg/ml for some antibodies)
Immunofluorescence: Typically 1/200-1/500
| Application | Typical Dilution Range |
|---|---|
| Western Blot | 1/200-1/2000 |
| ELISA | 0.5-1 μg/ml |
| IHC-P | 5-20 μg/ml |
| ICC/IF | 1/200-1/500 |
These ranges are guidelines; optimal dilutions should be determined empirically for each experimental system .
Successful PTGER1 antibodies have been generated using several immunogen strategies:
Synthetic peptides corresponding to specific regions (e.g., C-terminus, internal regions)
Peptides conjugated to carrier proteins (e.g., Keyhole Limpet Hemocyanin)
Specific amino acid sequences (e.g., AA 61-160, AA 300-400, AA 380-402)
For researchers developing custom antibodies, targeting conserved domains may enhance cross-species reactivity, while targeting unique epitopes may improve specificity.
Rigorous validation requires:
Positive controls: Cell lines with confirmed PTGER1 expression (e.g., human 293T, PC-3, HEL cell lysates)
Negative controls: Samples lacking PTGER1 or with PTGER1 knockdown
Blocking peptide controls: Pre-incubation with immunizing peptide should abolish signal
Secondary antibody-only controls: To detect non-specific binding
Cross-reactivity assessment: Testing against related prostaglandin receptors (EP2, EP3, EP4)
Validation across multiple techniques strengthens confidence in antibody specificity and sensitivity .
Distinguishing between EP receptor subtypes (EP1-EP4) requires:
Using highly specific antibodies validated against all EP receptor subtypes
Implementing pharmacological approaches with specific antagonists:
Confirming results with functional assays measuring distinct signaling pathways:
PTGER1: calcium mobilization assays
PTGER2: cAMP accumulation assays
Employing receptor knockout/knockdown models as negative controls
Using co-localization with other markers in microscopy applications
Researchers investigating multiple EP receptors should consider combination approaches rather than relying solely on antibody detection .
For tissues with low PTGER1 expression:
Signal amplification techniques:
Tyramide signal amplification (TSA) for IHC/IF
Enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) with extended exposure for Western blot
Sample enrichment:
Immunoprecipitation before Western blotting
Membrane fraction isolation to concentrate receptor proteins
Alternative detection systems:
Validated positive controls:
Including samples with known high expression
Using recombinant PTGER1 protein as reference standard
PTGER1, being a GPCR with seven transmembrane domains, requires special considerations:
Use of conformation-sensitive antibodies that recognize native epitopes
Implementation of the bilayer-dialysis method for antigen preparation, which maintains protein structure during cell-free synthesis
Gentle non-denaturing lysis buffers for sample preparation
Avoiding harsh detergents that disrupt membrane protein structure
Using fresh or properly preserved samples to maintain receptor conformation
Considering native-PAGE rather than SDS-PAGE for certain applications
Employing fixation protocols optimized for membrane proteins in IHC/IF applications
These adaptations are especially crucial when studying receptor-ligand interactions or functional aspects of PTGER1 .
Non-specific bands are common challenges with PTGER1 antibodies:
Validation steps:
Protocol optimization:
Sample preparation refinements:
Include protease inhibitors to prevent degradation fragments
Consider membrane fraction enrichment to increase target:background ratio
Proper denaturation conditions optimized for membrane proteins
Multiple factors can affect PTGER1 detection:
Expression variability:
Cell type-specific expression patterns
Regulation by inflammatory mediators or treatment conditions
Developmental or disease state differences
Technical considerations:
Sample preparation methods (fixation protocols, lysis conditions)
Antibody accessibility to epitopes in different applications
Buffer composition effects on antibody-antigen interaction
Post-translational modifications:
Glycosylation state variations
Phosphorylation affecting epitope recognition
Receptor internalization or trafficking affecting surface detection
Species-specific differences:
For meaningful interpretation of PTGER1 detection:
Combine antibody-based detection with functional assays:
Consider coupling detection with:
Prostaglandin E2 stimulation experiments
Receptor trafficking and internalization studies
Co-localization with downstream signaling components
Evaluate receptor activity alongside detection:
Advanced research applications include:
Temporal signaling dynamics:
Time-course immunofluorescence studies following PGE2 stimulation
Analysis of receptor internalization and recycling
Correlation with calcium signaling kinetics
Multi-parameter analyses:
Co-staining with phospho-specific antibodies for downstream effectors
Combined detection with other prostaglandin receptors
Integration with G-protein subunit localization
Complex biological models:
PTGER1 antibodies enable investigation of:
Cancer biology:
Inflammatory conditions:
Detection in tissue samples from inflammatory disease models
Analysis of receptor regulation during inflammation
Study of therapeutic targeting of prostaglandin signaling
Renal physiology:
Reproductive biology:
Cutting-edge approaches include:
Advanced imaging techniques:
Super-resolution microscopy for receptor clustering analysis
Live-cell imaging with tagged antibody fragments
FRET-based approaches for receptor-protein interactions
Novel detection systems:
Systems biology integration:
Therapeutic development platforms: