PTPRE antibodies are immunological reagents designed to bind specifically to the PTPRE protein, a receptor-type tyrosine phosphatase involved in modulating signal transduction pathways. PTPRE regulates critical processes such as macrophage activation , oncogenic kinase signaling , and chemoresistance in cancers . These antibodies are typically produced in hosts like rabbits or mice and are validated for applications such as:
Western blotting (WB)
Immunohistochemistry (IHC)
Immunofluorescence (IF)
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
Key characteristics of PTPRE antibodies include:
Target epitopes: Often raised against specific regions of PTPRE, such as amino acid sequences 20–200 or 511–600 .
Cross-reactivity: Human, mouse, rat, and other species depending on the antibody .
PTPRE antibodies have been instrumental in elucidating the role of PTPRE in macrophage polarization:
PTPRE-AS1 lncRNA interaction: PTPRE-AS1, a long non-coding RNA, directly regulates PTPRE expression by modulating histone H3K4me3 methylation at the PTPRE promoter. Antibody-based assays confirmed that PTPRE-AS1 knockdown reduces PTPRE protein levels, enhancing M2 macrophage activation and exacerbating allergic inflammation .
Pathway modulation: PTPRE inhibits MAPK/ERK 1/2 signaling in macrophages, a mechanism validated via Western blotting using PTPRE-specific antibodies .
PTPRE antibodies are critical for studying its dual roles in cancer progression:
KIT receptor regulation:
Retinoblastoma (RB):
Chemoresistance: PTPRE expression is elevated in etoposide-resistant RB cells (e.g., WERI_Etop). Antibody-based Western blots showed that PTPRE knockdown reduces cell viability by 40–60% and re-sensitizes tumors to chemotherapy .
Downstream targets: PTPRE regulates SGK3 and miR631, with antibody-driven assays linking its expression to apoptosis resistance and anchorage-independent growth .
Mechanistic studies: PTPRE antibodies validated its interaction with WDR5 in macrophages and its regulation of KIT mutants in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) .
Therapeutic potential: In retinoblastoma, PTPRE knockdown via shRNA reduced tumor weight by 50% in vivo (CAM assay) and increased caspase-3/7 activity by 2.5-fold .
Biomarker utility: Reduced PTPRE expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells correlates with allergic asthma severity .
PTPRE (Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase Epsilon) exists in multiple isoforms, each with distinct roles. Isoform 1 is crucial for signal transduction pathways and phosphoprotein network topology in red blood cells and may be involved in osteoclast formation and function. Isoform 2 negatively regulates insulin receptor (IR) signaling in skeletal muscle, modulating insulin-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of IR and insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS-1), as well as the phosphorylation of protein kinase B and glycogen synthase kinase-3, ultimately impacting glucose uptake. Both isoforms 1 and 2 negatively regulate FceRI-mediated signal transduction, influencing cytokine production and degranulation, potentially through modulation of SYK and downstream events such as SLP76 and LAT phosphorylation and Ca2+ mobilization.
PTPRE is a receptor-type protein tyrosine phosphatase belonging to the protein-tyrosine phosphatase family. In humans, the canonical protein consists of 700 amino acid residues with a molecular mass of approximately 80.6 kDa. PTPRE is primarily localized in the cell membrane and cytoplasm, where it functions in protein dephosphorylation pathways . The protein plays important roles in signal transduction, cell differentiation, and metabolism regulation. PTPRE has been reported to be expressed in giant cell tumor (osteoclastoma rich in multinucleated osteoclastic cells), suggesting its potential involvement in bone metabolism and pathological conditions .
PTPRE antibodies are versatile tools employed across multiple experimental techniques. The most widely used application is Western Blotting (WB), which allows researchers to detect and quantify PTPRE protein expression in cellular extracts . Additionally, these antibodies are frequently used in Immunohistochemistry (IHC) to visualize the spatial distribution of PTPRE in tissue sections, Flow Cytometry to analyze PTPRE expression at the single-cell level, Immunofluorescence (IF) for subcellular localization studies, and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) for quantitative protein detection . The selection of the appropriate application depends on the specific research question and experimental design.
The choice between polyclonal and monoclonal PTPRE antibodies depends on your experimental requirements:
| Antibody Type | Advantages | Disadvantages | Best Applications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Polyclonal | - Recognizes multiple epitopes - Higher sensitivity - More robust to protein denaturation - Less affected by minor changes in protein structure | - Batch-to-batch variability - Higher background in some applications - Less specificity than monoclonals | - Western blotting - Immunoprecipitation - IHC of fixed tissues |
| Monoclonal | - High specificity for single epitope - Consistent results between batches - Lower background in some applications - Ideal for distinguishing between protein isoforms | - May not recognize partially denatured proteins - May be more sensitive to fixation conditions - Typically less sensitive than polyclonals | - Flow cytometry - Applications requiring high specificity - Detecting specific protein conformations |
For initial characterization, polyclonal antibodies may be preferable due to their ability to recognize multiple epitopes, while monoclonal antibodies like clone 4B2 are more suitable for experiments requiring high specificity and reproducibility .
For optimal Western blotting results with PTPRE antibodies, consider the following protocol:
Sample preparation: Extract proteins using RIPA or NP-40 buffer containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors.
Protein loading: Load 20-50 μg of total protein per lane.
Gel separation: Use 8-10% SDS-PAGE gels to properly resolve the ~80.6 kDa PTPRE protein.
Transfer conditions: Transfer proteins to PVDF membrane at 100V for 90 minutes in cold transfer buffer containing 20% methanol.
Blocking: Block membranes with 5% non-fat dry milk in TBST for 1 hour at room temperature.
Primary antibody incubation: Dilute PTPRE antibody (typically 1:500-1:2000, depending on the specific product) in blocking solution and incubate overnight at 4°C.
Secondary antibody: Use appropriate HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (anti-rabbit or anti-mouse, depending on the primary antibody host) at 1:5000-1:10000 dilution.
Detection: Use enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) detection system with exposure times ranging from 30 seconds to 5 minutes.
If targeting specific PTPRE domains, select antibodies recognizing appropriate amino acid regions, such as those targeting AA 511-600 for C-terminal studies or AA 20-200 for N-terminal studies .
For effective immunohistochemical detection of PTPRE in tissue samples:
Fixation: Use 10% neutral buffered formalin for 24-48 hours, followed by paraffin embedding.
Sectioning: Cut 4-6 μm sections and mount on positively charged slides.
Antigen retrieval: Perform heat-induced epitope retrieval using citrate buffer (pH 6.0) for 20 minutes.
Endogenous peroxidase blocking: Incubate sections with 3% hydrogen peroxide for 10 minutes.
Protein blocking: Block with 5% normal serum from the same species as the secondary antibody for 1 hour.
Primary antibody: Incubate with PTPRE antibody (typically 1:100-1:500 dilution) overnight at 4°C.
Detection system: Use biotin-streptavidin or polymer-based detection systems for enhanced sensitivity.
Counterstaining: Counterstain with hematoxylin for nuclear visualization.
Controls: Always include positive and negative controls to validate staining specificity.
For frozen sections, fix briefly in cold acetone or 4% paraformaldehyde prior to immunostaining and adjust antibody dilutions accordingly. Some PTPRE antibodies have been specifically validated for IHC applications, including those targeting the cytoplasmic domain, which may provide superior results in tissue staining applications .
Cross-reactivity is a critical consideration when selecting PTPRE antibodies. Many PTPRE antibodies demonstrate reactivity across multiple species, which can be advantageous for comparative studies but requires careful validation. Based on the available products, consider the following cross-reactivity patterns:
| Antibody Target Region | Species Reactivity | Potential Cross-Reactive Proteins |
|---|---|---|
| Cytoplasmic Domain | Human, Cow, Dog, Horse, Bat, Chicken, Monkey, Hamster | Other PTPs with similar cytoplasmic domains |
| AA 20-200 (N-terminal) | Human | Limited cross-reactivity with other PTPs |
| AA 468-517 | Human | May cross-react with closely related PTP family members |
| AA 511-600 | Human, Mouse, Rat | Potential cross-reactivity with PTPRK |
| AA 558-589 (C-term) | Human | Higher specificity due to C-terminal uniqueness |
To ensure specificity, validate antibodies using positive and negative controls, including PTPRE knockout or knockdown samples. Additionally, pre-absorption controls with the immunizing peptide can help confirm specificity . Some antibodies have been specifically purified by antigen affinity methods to reduce non-specific binding.
Investigating PTPRE phosphorylation states requires a multi-faceted approach:
Phospho-specific antibodies: If available, use antibodies that specifically recognize phosphorylated PTPRE at known regulatory sites. Alternatively, use anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies following PTPRE immunoprecipitation.
Phosphatase assays: Measure PTPRE enzymatic activity using:
In vitro assays with purified PTPRE and synthetic phosphopeptide substrates
Para-nitrophenyl phosphate (pNPP) assays for general phosphatase activity
32P-labeled substrates for higher sensitivity quantification
Mutagenesis studies: Generate phospho-mimetic (e.g., Tyr→Glu) or phospho-deficient (e.g., Tyr→Phe) PTPRE mutants to functionally assess the impact of phosphorylation at specific residues.
Correlation with cellular functions: After treatments that modulate PTPRE phosphorylation, analyze:
Changes in substrate phosphorylation using phospho-specific antibodies
Alterations in protein-protein interactions via co-immunoprecipitation
Subcellular localization shifts using fractionation or immunofluorescence
Functional outcomes through cell-based assays (migration, proliferation, etc.)
Mass spectrometry: For unbiased identification of phosphorylation sites, immunoprecipitate PTPRE and analyze by LC-MS/MS.
This integrative approach allows researchers to establish connections between PTPRE phosphorylation status and its functional roles in signaling pathways.
When facing contradictory PTPRE expression data between different antibodies, implement the following systematic troubleshooting approach:
Epitope mapping: Confirm the exact epitopes recognized by each antibody. Different antibodies targeting distinct domains may yield different results if:
Certain epitopes are masked by protein-protein interactions
Post-translational modifications affect antibody binding
Protein conformation varies between experimental conditions
Alternative splicing generates isoform-specific epitopes
Validation with orthogonal methods:
Complement antibody-based detection with mRNA quantification (RT-qPCR)
Use CRISPR/Cas9 or siRNA knockdown controls to confirm specificity
Overexpress tagged PTPRE to verify antibody recognition
Systematic comparison of experimental conditions:
Standardize sample preparation (lysis buffers, protease inhibitors)
Test multiple blocking agents to reduce non-specific binding
Optimize antibody concentrations with titration experiments
Evaluate multiple detection systems (chemiluminescence vs. fluorescence)
Statistical analysis: Perform replicate experiments and apply appropriate statistical tests to determine if differences are significant or within expected experimental variation.
By implementing this comprehensive approach, researchers can reconcile contradictory data and establish reliable PTPRE expression profiles across experimental systems.
PTPRE exists in multiple isoforms with distinct subcellular localizations and potentially different functions. To distinguish between these isoforms:
Isoform-specific antibodies: Select antibodies targeting unique regions of specific PTPRE isoforms. For instance:
Antibodies against the transmembrane domain specifically detect receptor PTPRE
Antibodies against cytoplasmic PTPRE-specific sequences detect non-receptor isoforms
Molecular weight discrimination:
Receptor PTPRE: ~80.6 kDa (full-length)
Cytoplasmic PTPRE: ~72 kDa
Subcellular fractionation: Separate cellular compartments (membrane, cytosol, nucleus) before immunoblotting to enrich for specific isoforms based on their localization patterns.
Isoform-specific functional assays:
| Isoform | Subcellular Localization | Suggested Functional Assays |
|---|---|---|
| Receptor PTPRE | Cell membrane | - Membrane-impermeable substrate assays - Cell surface biotinylation - Receptor clustering studies |
| Cytoplasmic PTPRE | Cytoplasm | - Cytosolic substrate dephosphorylation - Interactions with cytoskeletal components - Nuclear translocation studies |
Isoform-specific expression: Use isoform-specific qPCR primers to quantify mRNA expression levels of different isoforms across tissues or experimental conditions.
CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing: Design guide RNAs targeting isoform-specific exons to create isoform-selective knockout cell lines for comparative functional studies.
This multi-modal approach enables comprehensive analysis of PTPRE isoform-specific expression patterns and functions.
Non-specific binding and high background are common challenges in immunodetection experiments. For PTPRE-specific troubleshooting:
Antibody validation and selection:
Test multiple PTPRE antibodies from different suppliers
Select antibodies that have been affinity-purified against the specific antigen
Verify antibody specificity using PTPRE knockout or knockdown samples
Blocking optimization:
Test different blocking agents (BSA, normal serum, commercial blockers)
Increase blocking time (2-3 hours at room temperature or overnight at 4°C)
Add 0.1-0.3% Triton X-100 to blocking solution to reduce hydrophobic interactions
Antibody dilution and incubation:
Titrate primary antibody concentration (typically 1:500-1:2000 for Western blots)
Extend primary antibody incubation time (overnight at 4°C)
Add 0.05-0.1% Tween-20 to antibody diluent
Washing optimization:
Increase washing duration and frequency (5-6 washes of 10 minutes each)
Add higher concentrations of detergent (0.1-0.2% Tween-20) to wash buffer
Use automated washers for consistent and thorough washing
Application-specific adaptations:
| Application | Specific Troubleshooting Strategies |
|---|---|
| Western Blot | - Use PVDF instead of nitrocellulose membrane - Increase SDS concentration in transfer buffer - Apply gradient gels for better resolution |
| IHC | - Optimize antigen retrieval (pH, duration, temperature) - Use biotin-free detection systems - Apply Sudan Black B to reduce autofluorescence |
| IF | - Include 0.1-0.3% Triton X-100 for cell permeabilization - Use image-based quantification to subtract background - Apply signal enhancement systems (tyramide) |
| Flow Cytometry | - Include viability dye to exclude dead cells - Use Fc receptor blocking reagents - Optimize fixation and permeabilization buffers |
By systematically implementing these strategies, researchers can significantly reduce background issues in PTPRE immunodetection experiments.
Detecting low-abundance PTPRE requires optimizing multiple experimental parameters:
Sample enrichment strategies:
Immunoprecipitate PTPRE before detection to concentrate the target protein
Use subcellular fractionation to enrich for compartments where PTPRE is localized
Apply phosphatase inhibitors during sample preparation to preserve phosphorylated forms
Signal amplification methods:
For Western blots: Use high-sensitivity ECL substrates or fluorescent detection systems
For IHC/IF: Apply tyramide signal amplification (TSA) or polymer-based detection systems
For flow cytometry: Utilize multi-layer detection with biotin-streptavidin systems
Instrumentation optimization:
Use highly sensitive CCD cameras for Western blot imaging
Apply confocal or super-resolution microscopy for IF detection
Optimize PMT voltage settings for flow cytometry
Buffer and reagent considerations:
Add protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktails to lysis buffers
Use freshly prepared reducing agents in sample buffers
Apply antigen retrieval optimization for fixed tissue samples
Antibody selection for low-abundance detection:
| Antibody Type | Sensitivity Characteristics |
|---|---|
| High-affinity monoclonals | Lower detection threshold but epitope-restricted |
| Pooled polyclonals | Enhanced signal through multiple epitope recognition |
| Directly conjugated antibodies | Elimination of secondary antibody background |
| Recombinant antibodies | Consistent lot-to-lot performance for quantitative studies |
Loading controls and normalization:
Use appropriate housekeeping proteins based on experimental conditions
Apply total protein normalization (stain-free gels, Ponceau S) for more accurate quantification
Include positive controls with known PTPRE expression levels
These comprehensive approaches can significantly enhance the detection of low-abundance PTPRE in various experimental systems.
Co-localization studies provide valuable insights into PTPRE's spatial relationships with interacting proteins. Implement the following methodological approach:
Dual immunofluorescence labeling:
Select antibodies from different host species (e.g., rabbit anti-PTPRE and mouse anti-partner protein)
Use fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibodies with well-separated emission spectra
Include single-label controls to verify antibody specificity and channel bleed-through
Advanced microscopy techniques:
Confocal microscopy for improved spatial resolution
Super-resolution microscopy (STED, PALM, STORM) for nanoscale co-localization
Live-cell imaging with fluorescent protein fusions to track dynamic interactions
Quantitative co-localization analysis:
Calculate Pearson's correlation coefficient (PCC) or Mander's overlap coefficient
Apply intensity correlation analysis (ICA) for more robust assessment
Use specialized software (ImageJ with Coloc2, CellProfiler) for unbiased quantification
Proximity ligation assay (PLA):
Detect protein-protein interactions within 40 nm proximity
Generate amplified fluorescent signals only when proteins are closely associated
Quantify interaction events as discrete fluorescent spots
Controls and validation:
Positive controls using known interaction partners
Negative controls with proteins known not to interact with PTPRE
Functional validation through mutagenesis of interaction domains
This systematic approach provides both qualitative and quantitative assessment of PTPRE's spatial relationships with potential binding partners.
Studying PTPRE in primary cells and tissues presents unique challenges that require specialized techniques:
Tissue-specific expression profiling:
Immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays (TMAs) to compare expression across multiple samples
Single-cell RNA-seq to identify cell populations expressing PTPRE
Laser capture microdissection combined with Western blotting or qPCR for region-specific analysis
Primary cell isolation and culture:
Isolate primary cells expressing PTPRE (e.g., osteoclasts from giant cell tumors)
Optimize fixation protocols to preserve PTPRE epitopes
Adapt lysis procedures for limited sample amounts
Ex vivo functional studies:
Tissue slice cultures to maintain PTPRE in its native microenvironment
Organoid models to study PTPRE in 3D tissue-like structures
Patient-derived xenografts (PDX) for in vivo functional studies
Multiplex detection approaches:
Multiplex immunofluorescence to co-stain PTPRE with cell type markers
Imaging mass cytometry for simultaneous detection of dozens of proteins
Spatial transcriptomics to correlate PTPRE protein localization with gene expression
Tissue-specific considerations:
| Tissue/Cell Type | Special Considerations |
|---|---|
| Bone/Osteoclasts | - Decalcification affects epitope preservation - TRAP co-staining to identify osteoclasts |
| Frozen tissues | - Brief fixation in 4% PFA to preserve morphology - Optimization of permeabilization |
| FFPE tissues | - Extended antigen retrieval - Signal amplification systems |
| Primary immune cells | - Non-enzymatic isolation methods - Minimizing activation during processing |
These approaches enable comprehensive characterization of PTPRE expression and function in physiologically relevant primary cells and tissues.
Investigating PTPRE's role in disease contexts requires comprehensive experimental designs:
Expression correlation with disease progression:
Analyze PTPRE levels across disease stages using tissue microarrays
Correlate expression with clinical outcomes and prognostic indicators
Examine isoform-specific expression patterns in normal versus diseased tissues
Genetic manipulation in disease models:
CRISPR/Cas9 knockout or knockin of PTPRE in cell-based disease models
Conditional knockout mice to study tissue-specific PTPRE functions
Viral vector-mediated overexpression or silencing in animal models
Pharmacological modulation:
Small molecule inhibitors targeting PTPRE catalytic activity
Allosteric modulators affecting PTPRE conformation or interactions
Peptide-based approaches to disrupt specific protein-protein interactions
Disease-specific functional readouts:
| Disease Context | Functional Assays |
|---|---|
| Cancer | - Cell proliferation and apoptosis assays - Invasion and migration studies - Tumor formation in xenograft models |
| Inflammatory conditions | - Cytokine production profiles - Leukocyte adhesion and migration - NF-κB pathway activation |
| Metabolic disorders | - Insulin signaling cascade analysis - Glucose uptake measurements - Lipid metabolism assessment |
| Bone disorders | - Osteoclast differentiation and function - Bone resorption assays - Micro-CT analysis of bone structure |
Therapeutic targeting validation:
Antibody-drug conjugates targeting cell-surface PTPRE
RNA interference approaches for isoform-specific knockdown
Structure-based drug design targeting PTPRE catalytic pocket or allosteric sites
By implementing these comprehensive experimental approaches, researchers can establish causal relationships between PTPRE function and disease pathogenesis, potentially identifying novel therapeutic strategies.