At1g76050 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
At1g76050 antibody; T4O12.210 antibody; RNA pseudouridine synthase 2 antibody; chloroplastic antibody; EC 5.4.99.- antibody; RNA pseudouridylate synthase 2 antibody; RNA-uridine isomerase 2 antibody
Target Names
At1g76050
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT1G76050

STRING: 3702.AT1G76050.2

UniGene: At.34707

Protein Families
Pseudouridine synthase RluA family
Subcellular Location
Plastid, chloroplast.

Q&A

Basic Research Questions

  • How is the specificity of At1g76050 antibody validated in plant biology studies?

    • Methodology:

      • Perform Western blotting using Arabidopsis thaliana wild-type and knockout mutants to confirm target band presence/absence .

      • Use immunocytochemistry with chloroplast localization controls (e.g., anti-RbcL antibodies) to validate subcellular targeting .

      • Cross-validate with recombinant At1g76050 protein produced in yeast or E. coli expression systems as a positive control .

  • What experimental models are appropriate for studying At1g76050 function?

    • Approach:

      • Knockout mutants (e.g., T-DNA insertion lines) to assess phenotypic changes in RNA pseudouridylation.

      • Complementation assays using transgenic lines expressing tagged At1g76050 under native promoters .

      • Co-immunoprecipitation coupled with mass spectrometry to identify interacting proteins in chloroplast RNA modification complexes .

Advanced Research Questions

  • How to resolve discrepancies in reported subcellular localization of At1g76050 across studies?

    • Analytical framework:

      • Compare subcellular fractionation protocols (e.g., differential centrifugation vs. non-aqueous methods) .

      • Use confocal microscopy with organelle-specific markers (e.g., chloroplast-targeted GFP).

      • Assess post-translational modifications (e.g., phosphorylation) that may alter localization .

  • What computational tools optimize epitope-antibody affinity for At1g76050?

    • Workflow:

      • Employ RosettaAntibodyDesign (RAbD) to engineer CDR loops for enhanced binding .

      • Validate predictions using yeast surface display libraries to screen for high-affinity variants .

      • Perform molecular dynamics simulations to assess conformational stability of antibody-antigen complexes .

Data Analysis & Interpretation

  • How to distinguish nonspecific binding in immunohistochemistry?

    • Troubleshooting guide:

      IssueSolution
      Background in chloroplastsPre-absorb antibody with chloroplast lysate from knockout mutants
      Cross-reactivity with homologsUse alignment tools (e.g., Clustal Omega) to identify unique epitopes
  • What metrics assess antibody utility in high-throughput screens?

    • Evaluation criteria:

      • Limit of detection (LOD) in ELISA with serially diluted recombinant protein.

      • Inter-assay variability across technical replicates in plant tissue extracts.

      • Thermal stability of antibody-antigen complexes (e.g., differential scanning fluorimetry) .

Methodological Pitfalls

  • Why do PhIP-Seq results vary for autoantibody detection in plant studies?

    • Technical analysis:

      • Library bias: Plant-specific peptide libraries are underrepresented in phage display databases .

      • Affinity thresholds: Low-titer antibodies may fail to meet 10-fold enrichment criteria used in APS1 studies .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.