How is the specificity of At1g76050 antibody validated in plant biology studies?
Methodology:
Perform Western blotting using Arabidopsis thaliana wild-type and knockout mutants to confirm target band presence/absence .
Use immunocytochemistry with chloroplast localization controls (e.g., anti-RbcL antibodies) to validate subcellular targeting .
Cross-validate with recombinant At1g76050 protein produced in yeast or E. coli expression systems as a positive control .
What experimental models are appropriate for studying At1g76050 function?
Approach:
Knockout mutants (e.g., T-DNA insertion lines) to assess phenotypic changes in RNA pseudouridylation.
Complementation assays using transgenic lines expressing tagged At1g76050 under native promoters .
Co-immunoprecipitation coupled with mass spectrometry to identify interacting proteins in chloroplast RNA modification complexes .
How to resolve discrepancies in reported subcellular localization of At1g76050 across studies?
Analytical framework:
What computational tools optimize epitope-antibody affinity for At1g76050?
How to distinguish nonspecific binding in immunohistochemistry?
Troubleshooting guide:
| Issue | Solution |
|---|---|
| Background in chloroplasts | Pre-absorb antibody with chloroplast lysate from knockout mutants |
| Cross-reactivity with homologs | Use alignment tools (e.g., Clustal Omega) to identify unique epitopes |
What metrics assess antibody utility in high-throughput screens?
Why do PhIP-Seq results vary for autoantibody detection in plant studies?