RNF213 is a 591 kDa cytoplasmic protein with dual enzymatic activities:
E3 ubiquitin ligase (via its RING domain)
ATPase (via six AAA+ domains)
Mutations in RNF213 are linked to moyamoya disease (MMD), but recent studies highlight its broader role in antiviral, antibacterial, and antiparasitic immunity .
The antibody enables critical investigations into:
Protein localization: RNF213 translocates to pathogen-containing vesicles (e.g., Salmonella-BCVs, Toxoplasma-PVs) .
Mechanistic studies:
Immune regulation: Promotes Treg differentiation via FOXO1 K63-linked ubiquitination, attenuating autoimmune diseases like EAE .
Specificity: Validated in RNF213-KO mice and siRNA-mediated knockdown models .
Assays: Used in immunoblotting, immunofluorescence, and flow cytometry to quantify RNF213 expression in immune cells (e.g., CD4+ T cells) .
Functional correlation: Reduced RNF213 levels correlate with impaired pathogen clearance and dysregulated Treg/Th17 balance .
Unresolved mechanisms: How RNF213 recognizes viral/bacterial substrates remains unclear.
Therapeutic potential: Antibody-based modulation of RNF213 could enhance antimicrobial immunity or treat autoimmune disorders, but off-target effects require scrutiny.
Commercial availability: Current antibodies are research-grade; clinical-grade versions need development.
STRING: 7955.ENSDARP00000103579
RNF213 is a large E3 ubiquitin ligase with a molecular weight of 591 kDa, located in the cytosol and perinuclear space. Structurally, it contains a C3HC4-type RING finger domain with E3 ubiquitin ligase activity and six AAA+ adenosine triphosphatase (ATPase) domains. It is notable for being the only known protein with both AAA+ ATPase and ubiquitin ligase activities . This unique combination of enzymatic activities suggests complex regulatory functions that may be uniquely controlled through antibody-based research approaches.
RNF213 plays a critical role in immune regulation by specifically promoting regulatory T (Treg) cell differentiation in CD4+ T cells. Mechanistically, RNF213 interacts with Forkhead Box Protein O1 (FOXO1) and promotes nuclear translocation of FOXO1 by facilitating K63-linked ubiquitination . This process is crucial for proper Treg differentiation and function. Research demonstrates that RNF213 deficiency leads to decreased Foxp3+ CD4+ T cells and reduced IL-10 production under Treg skewing conditions, confirming its essential role in Treg development .
Recent studies have established RNF213 as an important antimicrobial protein. It plays significant roles in fighting against various microbial infections, including viruses, parasites, bacteria, and chlamydiae . In viral infection studies, RNF213-deficient mice showed increased susceptibility to Rift Valley Fever Virus (RVFV), while mice overexpressing RNF213 demonstrated enhanced resistance and reduced infection symptoms . Additionally, RNF213 expression is significantly upregulated in experimental animals upon injection with highly pathogenic strains of avian influenza .
When selecting an anti-RNF213 antibody, researchers should consider:
Antibody Type: Options include rabbit monoclonal (e.g., Anti-RNF213 Antibody, clone 1D10 ZooMAb ) or mouse monoclonal (e.g., Anti-RNF213 Antibody, clone 1C9 )
Epitope Specificity: Verify the antibody targets the region of interest (e.g., the 1D10 clone targets an epitope within 24 amino acids from the N-terminal half )
Validated Applications: Confirm the antibody is validated for your intended application (Western blotting, immunocytochemistry, immunohistochemistry, ELISA)
Species Reactivity: Ensure compatibility with your experimental model
Performance Documentation: Review quality control testing data from the manufacturer
The selection should be driven by your specific experimental questions and techniques rather than convenience or cost factors.
A comprehensive validation protocol for anti-RNF213 antibodies should include:
Positive and Negative Controls:
Dilution Optimization:
Specificity Testing:
Cross-validation:
Compare results from at least two different anti-RNF213 antibodies
Correlate protein detection with mRNA expression data
RNF213 deficiency significantly exacerbates experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), a mouse model of multiple sclerosis. Research demonstrates that RNF213-deficient mice develop more severe EAE with higher clinical scores and increased proinflammatory cytokines (IFN-γ, IL-17A, GM-CSF) alongside decreased IL-10 in serum compared to wild-type controls .
Analysis of the central nervous system (CNS) in these models reveals several key findings:
| Parameter | Wild-type | RNF213-deficient |
|---|---|---|
| CNS IFN-γ+ CD4+ T cells | Normal | Increased |
| CNS IL-17A+ CD4+ T cells | Normal | Increased |
| CNS Treg cells (CD25+Foxp3+) | Normal | Decreased |
| MOG-stimulated IFN-γ secretion | Normal | Increased |
| MOG-stimulated IL-17A secretion | Normal | Increased |
| MOG-stimulated IL-10 secretion | Normal | Decreased |
These findings highlight RNF213's critical role in regulating autoimmune responses through T cell differentiation and function .
RNF213 promotes Treg cell differentiation through a specific molecular mechanism involving FOXO1. The process involves:
Direct Interaction: RNF213 physically interacts with FOXO1, a critical transcription factor for Treg development
Post-translational Modification: RNF213 catalyzes K63-linked ubiquitination of FOXO1
Nuclear Translocation: This ubiquitination promotes FOXO1 nuclear translocation
Transcriptional Activation: Nuclear FOXO1 then activates Foxp3 expression
Treg Differentiation: Increased Foxp3 expression drives Treg cell differentiation
This mechanism is further supported by experiments showing that reintroduction of RNF213 into RNF213-deficient CD4+ T cells restores Treg differentiation capacity , providing a direct causative link between RNF213 activity and Treg development.
IFN-β treatment significantly impacts RNF213 expression and function in multiple sclerosis contexts. Research demonstrates that:
Induction Relationship: RNF213 expression in CD4+ T cells is directly induced by IFN-β treatment
Therapeutic Connection: RNF213 exerts a crucial role in the therapeutic efficacy of IFN-β for multiple sclerosis
Mechanistic Pathway: IFN-β → RNF213 upregulation → Enhanced Treg differentiation → Reduced autoimmune inflammation
Clinical Relevance: This pathway provides a molecular explanation for one mechanism by which IFN-β therapy benefits MS patients
This relationship suggests that monitoring RNF213 expression levels could potentially serve as a biomarker for predicting IFN-β treatment efficacy in MS patients, though this application requires further clinical validation.
Based on validated protocols, the following methodology is recommended for optimal Western blotting with anti-RNF213 antibodies:
Sample Preparation:
Extract proteins from relevant cells (A549, HUVEC, or A431 are validated positive controls )
Determine protein concentration using a reliable assay (BCA or Bradford)
Load 20-40 μg of total protein per lane
Western Blotting Protocol:
Separate proteins using 6% SDS-PAGE (RNF213 is large at 591 kDa)
Transfer to PVDF membrane at low current (30V) overnight at 4°C
Block with 5% non-fat milk in TBST for 1 hour at room temperature
Incubate with anti-RNF213 antibody at 1:1,000 dilution overnight at 4°C
Wash 3x with TBST, 10 minutes each
Incubate with appropriate secondary antibody (HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit or anti-mouse depending on primary)
Develop using enhanced chemiluminescence with extended exposure time
Troubleshooting Tips:
For poor signal: Decrease the dilution to 1:500 or use a more sensitive detection system
For high background: Increase blocking time and add additional washing steps
For non-specific bands: Validate with peptide competition assay or RNF213 knockout controls
For optimal immunocytochemistry using anti-RNF213 antibodies, follow this validated protocol:
Cell Preparation:
Grow cells on sterile coverslips to 70-80% confluence
Fix cells with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 minutes at room temperature
Permeabilize with 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS for 10 minutes
Immunostaining Protocol:
Block with 3% BSA in PBS for 1 hour at room temperature
Incubate with anti-RNF213 antibody at 1:100 dilution overnight at 4°C
Wash 3x with PBS, 5 minutes each
Incubate with fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibody for 1 hour at room temperature
Counterstain nuclei with DAPI
Mount with anti-fade mounting medium
Visualization Controls:
Include a no-primary antibody control
Use RNF213 knockout or knockdown cells as negative controls
Co-stain with markers for cytosolic and perinuclear regions to confirm expected localization
To assess RNF213's E3 ubiquitin ligase activity, researchers should employ the following comprehensive approach:
In Vitro Ubiquitination Assay:
Express and purify recombinant RNF213 or its RING domain
Set up reaction with E1, E2 enzymes, ubiquitin, ATP, and target substrate (e.g., FOXO1)
Incubate at 37°C for 1-2 hours
Analyze by SDS-PAGE and immunoblot for ubiquitin and target protein
Cell-Based Ubiquitination Analysis:
Co-transfect cells with HA-tagged ubiquitin, RNF213, and potential substrate
Treat with proteasome inhibitor (MG132) for 4-6 hours
Lyse cells under denaturing conditions
Immunoprecipitate substrate of interest
Immunoblot for HA to detect ubiquitination
K63-Linkage Specific Analysis for FOXO1:
Since RNF213 specifically promotes K63-linked ubiquitination of FOXO1 , use:
K63-linkage specific ubiquitin antibodies
K63R ubiquitin mutant as a negative control
Mass spectrometry to identify ubiquitination sites
This multi-faceted approach will provide definitive evidence of RNF213's E3 ligase activity and specificity for K63-linked ubiquitination.
Contradictory findings regarding RNF213's immune roles can be methodically addressed through:
Context-Specific Analysis:
Compare RNF213 function in different immune cell types simultaneously
Analyze timing of RNF213 activity during immune response phases
Assess tissue-specific effects using conditional knockout models
Stimulation-Dependent Effects:
Systematically compare RNF213 function under different stimulation conditions
Test multiple concentrations and time courses of cytokine treatments
Examine combined effects of multiple stimuli
Resolution Approach:
Design experiments with direct head-to-head comparisons
Standardize experimental conditions across laboratories
Account for genetic background variations in mouse models
Collaborate across research groups to validate findings
Mechanism Dissection:
Differentiate E3 ligase versus ATPase functions using domain-specific mutants
Identify context-specific binding partners through unbiased proteomics
Map differential post-translational modifications under varying conditions
Several cutting-edge techniques are emerging for RNF213 research that extend beyond traditional antibody applications:
CRISPR-Based Approaches:
CRISPR activation (CRISPRa) to enhance endogenous RNF213 expression
CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) for targeted repression
CRISPR-based tagging for live-cell visualization of endogenous RNF213
Domain-specific mutagenesis to dissect functional regions
Proximity Labeling Technologies:
BioID or TurboID fusion with RNF213 to identify proximal interacting proteins
APEX2-based proximity labeling for temporal interaction dynamics
Split-BioID for identifying condition-specific interactions
Advanced Imaging Techniques:
Super-resolution microscopy to visualize RNF213 subcellular localization
Live-cell imaging with fluorescent protein fusions to track dynamics
Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) to detect direct protein interactions
Single-Cell Technologies:
Single-cell RNA-seq to identify cell populations with differential RNF213 expression
Single-cell proteomics to correlate RNF213 with cellular phenotypes
Single-cell ubiquitinome analysis to identify cell-specific substrates
These emerging techniques offer powerful complementary approaches to traditional antibody-based methods, enabling more comprehensive understanding of RNF213 biology.