Research highlights RAB14’s critical roles in:
RAB14 regulates apical membrane specification in epithelial cells by controlling phosphatidylinositol lipid domains and recruiting polarity complexes (e.g., Par3/aPKC/Cdc42) .
Localizes to tubular-vesicular structures between the trans-Golgi network (TGN) and endosomes, influencing vesicle transport to apical membranes .
Facilitates ceramide transport from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to the Golgi apparatus during Classical Swine Fever Virus (CSFV) infection, promoting sphingomyelin synthesis essential for viral assembly .
Colocalizes with ceramide-enriched vesicles, with trafficking regulated by the PI3K/AKT/AS160 pathway .
The antibody detects RAB14 in diverse cell lines:
| Cell Line | Lysate Source | Band Size | Citation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jurkat (Human) | Whole cell | ~24 kDa | |
| Raw264.7 (Mouse) | Whole cell | ~24 kDa | |
| PC12 (Rat) | Whole cell | ~24 kDa |
Polarity Studies: Rab14 knockdown disrupts apical membrane formation in MDCK cysts, rescued by Arf6/PtdIns(4)P5K overexpression .
Viral Assembly: Rab14-mediated ceramide trafficking enhances CSFV replication; inhibition reduces viral titers by 80% .
Trafficking Pathways: Rab14 interacts with Cdc42 and modulates its activity, linking vesicle transport to cytoskeletal dynamics .
The RAB14 antibody enables precise investigation of:
Membrane trafficking defects in polarized epithelia.
Lipid metabolism dysregulation in viral infections.
Mitotic errors linked to Rab14 mislocalization.
RAB14 is a member of the RAS oncogene family of small GTPases that regulates membrane trafficking between various cellular compartments. RAB14 cycles between GTP-bound (active) and GDP-bound (inactive) states and primarily localizes to endosomes, with a pool also found on trans-Golgi network (TGN) membranes . RAB14 functions in multiple cellular processes including:
Endocytic recycling pathway, involved in trafficking of the ADAM10 protease, GLUT4, and components of cell-cell junctions to the plasma membrane
Cytokinesis regulation through effects on Rab11/Fip3-endosomes targeting to the intercellular bridge (ICB) and actin clearance
Maintenance of pathogen-containing phagosomes in infections like Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Promotion of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in bladder cancer via Akt-associated autophagic pathway
RAB14 is most closely related to the RAB11 subfamily of GTPases . Like other RAB proteins, it contains a conserved GTPase domain but has unique C-terminal regions that determine its specific localization and function. While RAB4 and RAB11 primarily regulate endosomal recycling, RAB14 appears to function at the interface between the biosynthetic and endocytic pathways, with roles in both Golgi complex and endosomal compartments . RAB14 (24 kDa) can be distinguished from other RABs using specific antibodies, as demonstrated when affinity-purified antibodies recognized GST-RAB14 but not other RABs including RAB1, RAB2, RAB3, RAB4, RAB10, RAB15, and RAB17 .
Based on published data, RAB14 antibodies have demonstrated utility in multiple applications:
| Application | Common Dilutions | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Western Blot (WB) | 1:500-1:1000 | Detects band at approximately 24 kDa |
| Immunohistochemistry (IHC) | 1:50-1:500 | May require antigen retrieval with TE buffer pH 9.0 or citrate buffer pH 6.0 |
| Immunofluorescence (IF) | Application-dependent | Often used to visualize endosomal structures |
| ELISA | Application-dependent | Used in protein detection assays |
| KD/KO validation | N/A | Used to confirm specificity in knockout/knockdown experiments |
Most commercial RAB14 antibodies show reactivity with human, mouse, and rat samples .
Rigorous validation is critical, especially for antibodies targeting members of protein families like RABs. Recommended validation approaches include:
Specificity testing: Compare reactivity against recombinant RAB14 versus other RAB proteins. One study demonstrated that affinity-purified antibody specifically recognized GST-RAB14 protein but none of the other RABs tested .
Knockdown/knockout validation: Use siRNA or CRISPR to deplete RAB14 and confirm loss of signal. Multiple studies have used RAB14 KD/KO to validate antibody specificity .
Western blot analysis: Confirm detection of a single band at the expected molecular weight (~24 kDa) in tissue/cell lysates. Note that heart tissue may show a slightly larger protein (~28 kDa) compared to other tissues .
Cross-reactivity testing: Test reactivity in multiple species if cross-species experiments are planned. Commercial antibodies often react with human, mouse, and rat samples .
Application-specific validation: Validate specifically for your intended application (WB, IHC, IF) as performance can vary between applications.
To study RAB14's role in membrane trafficking:
Co-localization studies: Use immunofluorescence with RAB14 antibodies alongside markers for various compartments. RAB14 colocalizes well with RAB4 on peripheral endosomes .
Dominant-negative approaches: Express RAB14 dominant-negative mutants (e.g., S17N mutation that locks RAB14 in GDP-bound state) and examine effects on trafficking using RAB14 antibodies .
Knockdown experiments: Deplete RAB14 using siRNA and assess effects on endosomal morphology, cargo trafficking (e.g., transferrin), and localization of other endosomal proteins. Depletion of RAB14 causes dissociation of RUFY1 from endosomal membranes .
Live cell imaging: Use fluorescently-tagged RAB14 constructs validated with antibodies to track vesicle movement in real time.
Immunoelectron microscopy: Quantify the distribution of RAB14 by counting gold particles on sections labeled with anti-RAB14 (for endogenous RAB14) or anti-GFP (for overexpressed GFP-RAB14) .
For optimal detection of endogenous RAB14:
Fixation method: Fix cells with 3% paraformaldehyde and incubate with the antibody in 0.05% saponin .
Alternative approach: Treat cells with 0.05% saponin in microtubule-stabilizing buffer (80 mM PIPES, pH 6.8, 1 mM MgCl₂, 5 mM EGTA) for 5 minutes at room temperature before fixation to extract cytosolic proteins and improve signal-to-noise ratio .
Co-detection with other proteins: For simultaneous detection of endogenous RUFY1 and RAB14, treat cells with 0.05% saponin in microtubule-stabilizing buffer before fixation with 3% paraformaldehyde and incubate with antibodies in 0.05% saponin for 1 hour at room temperature .
Controls: Include RAB14 knockdown cells as negative controls to confirm specificity of staining.
Co-staining markers: Include markers for Golgi (GM130), early endosomes (EEA1), or recycling endosomes (RAB4, RAB11) to confirm proper localization.
To study RAB14's function in cytokinesis:
Multinucleation assays: Quantify multinucleated cells after RAB14 knockdown or dominant-negative expression. This assay indicates defects in cytokinesis, with RAB14 dominant-negative mutant (S17N) showing increased multinucleated cells .
Telophase accumulation analysis: Assess the percentage of cells in telophase after RAB14 manipulation, as RAB14-KD leads to an increase in telophase cells, similar to RAB11a/b co-KD .
Actin clearance analysis: Co-stain control or RAB14-KO cells with anti-tubulin antibodies and phalloidin-Alexa 594 (F-actin marker) to assess actin accumulation in the intercellular bridge. RAB14 depletion leads to increased F-actin in the ICB .
Rescue experiments: Perform rescue experiments using shRNA-resistant GFP-RAB14 to confirm specificity of the observed phenotypes .
Live cell imaging: Track dividing cells to measure the time required for abscission, as RAB14 depletion increases division time.
To investigate RAB14-effector interactions:
Co-immunoprecipitation/proteomic analysis: Use anti-RAB14 antibodies to pull down RAB14 and identify interacting partners by mass spectrometry. This approach identified MACF2 as a RAB14 effector .
GTP-dependent binding assays: Test binding of potential effectors to active (GTP-bound) versus inactive (GDP-bound) RAB14. For example, RAB14 binds RUFY1/Rabip4 in a GTP-dependent manner .
Co-localization studies: Examine co-localization of RAB14 with potential effectors using immunofluorescence, with and without RAB14 knockdown to assess recruitment dependencies.
Functional rescue experiments: Test whether effector knockdown phenocopies RAB14 depletion and whether overexpression of one can rescue loss of the other.
Sequential action analysis: Investigate whether RAB14 and its partners act sequentially. For example, RAB14 is required for recruitment of RUFY1 onto endosomes, and subsequent RUFY1 interaction with RAB4 may allow endosomal tethering and fusion .
RAB14 plays critical roles in host-pathogen interactions, particularly with intracellular bacteria:
Phagosome maturation assays: Use RAB14 antibodies alongside markers of phagosome maturation (e.g., CD63, V-ATPase, LysoTracker) to assess how pathogens manipulate RAB14 function. Knockdown of RAB14 promotes mycobacterial phagosome maturation, with increased colocalization between CD63 and live mycobacteria (from 22.7±0.3% to 48.1±4.1%) .
Pathogen compartment analysis: Examine colocalization of intracellular bacteria with RAB14 in infected cells. Certain bacteria like Legionella pneumophila, Chlamydia trachomatis, and Salmonella enterica utilize RAB14 to promote their maturation and replication .
Live cell imaging: Track the recruitment of fluorescently tagged RAB14 to pathogen-containing compartments during infection.
siRNA approaches: Use siRNA to knockdown RAB14 and assess effects on pathogen survival and replication. For example, reduced RAB14 levels resulted in increased acidification of M. tuberculosis H37Rv phagosomes (from 37.4±1.2% to 72.9±3.3%) .
Dominant-negative inhibition: Express dominant-negative RAB14 to disrupt pathogen survival strategies, particularly for bacteria that depend on RAB14 function.
RAB14 has emerging roles in cancer biology, particularly in processes like epithelial-mesenchymal transition:
Expression analysis: Examine RAB14 expression levels in cancer tissues versus normal tissues using IHC or western blotting. RAB14 is highly upregulated in bladder cancer and correlates with clinical outcomes based on TCGA datasets .
EMT marker correlation: Investigate correlation between RAB14 levels and EMT markers. Knocking down RAB14 inhibits EMT in T24 bladder cancer cells .
Autophagy pathway analysis: Examine relationship between RAB14 and autophagy markers (LC3B, Beclin1) in cancer tissues. RAB14 levels positively correlate with these markers in clinical specimens .
Signaling pathway investigation: Study the relationship between RAB14 and AKT signaling, as RAB14's effects on autophagy are associated with p-AKT levels .
Functional assays: Test effects of RAB14 knockdown on cancer cell migration, invasion, and EMT using transwell assays and western blotting for EMT markers.
Several factors can contribute to variable results between different RAB14 antibodies:
Epitope differences: Antibodies raised against different regions of RAB14 may have different accessibility depending on protein conformation or interactions.
Cross-reactivity: Some antibodies may cross-react with closely related RAB family members, particularly RAB11 subfamily members.
Application-specific performance: Antibodies optimized for one application (e.g., WB) may not perform well in others (e.g., IF or IHC).
Fixation sensitivity: Different antibodies may require specific fixation methods. For example, some protocols specify methanol fixation for 5 minutes at -20°C for certain antibodies, while others recommend 3% paraformaldehyde .
Validation status: Not all commercially available antibodies are equally well-validated. It is important to rigorously characterize antibodies prior to their use in cell biology or biochemistry experiments, particularly for proteins belonging to a protein family .
RAB14 shows tissue-specific expression patterns and variations that may affect antibody performance:
Expression levels: RAB14 is expressed at relatively higher levels in brain, heart, kidney, placenta, lung, pancreas, spleen, and testis compared to muscle, thymus, intestine, colon, and leukocytes .
Isoform variations: Heart tissue shows a slightly larger RAB14 protein (~28 kDa) compared to the typical 24 kDa observed in other tissues .
Protein modifications: Post-translational modifications may vary between tissues, potentially affecting antibody recognition.
Background staining: Some tissues may show higher background or non-specific staining, requiring optimization of blocking conditions or antibody dilutions.
Antigen retrieval requirements: For IHC applications, different tissues may require different antigen retrieval methods. For RAB14 in ovary tumor tissue, suggested antigen retrieval with TE buffer pH 9.0 or alternatively with citrate buffer pH 6.0 is recommended .