ABCB1 is a plasma membrane-associated ATP-dependent transporter with broad substrate specificity. Its structure comprises:
Two transmembrane domains (TMDs): Each with six helices, forming a drug-binding pocket.
Two nucleotide-binding domains (NBDs): Mediate ATP hydrolysis to power substrate efflux .
Cryo-EM studies reveal ABCB1 operates via an alternating access mechanism, cycling between inward-facing (substrate-binding) and outward-facing (substrate-release) conformations . This dynamic process enables efflux of chemotherapeutic agents (e.g., vincristine, taxanes) and contributes to multidrug resistance (MDR) in cancers .
ABCB1 antibodies are widely used for:
ABCB1 limits drug absorption at barriers (e.g., blood-brain barrier) and enhances drug excretion, affecting therapies for HIV (bictegravir) and neurology .
Structural Asymmetry: Recent cryo-EM data highlight conformational heterogeneity in ABCB1’s substrate-binding pockets, influencing inhibitor design .
Lipid Interactions: Membrane lipids modulate ABCB1 activity, complicating in vitro assays .
Genetic Polymorphisms: Variants like c.1199G>A alter drug accumulation (e.g., bictegravir) .
Applications : Western Blot
Sample type: Muscle Myo-lineage cells
Review: In order to verify the reliability of proteomics data, 7 DEPs were randomly selected for Western blot analysis. As shownin FigureS1, there lativea bundance sof selected proteins between Myo-L and Myo-Y determined by Western blot were highly consistent with the data of TMT analysis.
ABCB1 is a broad-spectrum efflux pump central to cellular drug handling and multidrug resistance in humans. It plays a crucial role in chemotherapy resistance across multiple cancer types. According to recent studies, ABCB1 overexpression is associated with chemotherapy resistance, particularly following taxane-based treatments. In prostate cancer, ABCB1 expression is typically low in chemotherapy-naïve patients but becomes elevated after treatment, suggesting acquired rather than intrinsic resistance . The protein is particularly important because it mediates resistance to multiple therapeutic agents, including docetaxel (DTX) and cabazitaxel (CBZ) in castration-resistant prostate cancer cells .
Several validated ABCB1 antibodies are available for research use, including:
ABCB1 antibodies generally require specific storage conditions to maintain their functionality. For example, the Anti-P-GlycoProtein(MDR) ABCB1 Antibody (Monoclonal, F4) should be stored at -20°C for one year from the receipt date. After reconstitution, it can be stored at 4°C for one month or aliquoted and stored at -20°C for up to six months. Repeated freeze-thaw cycles should be avoided as they may compromise antibody quality and performance .
For optimal ABCB1 detection via Western blotting:
Sample preparation: Use appropriate lysis buffers that effectively solubilize membrane proteins.
Blocking: Use either PBS or TBS-based blocking solutions depending on the primary antibody requirements.
Primary antibody incubation: Dilute in corresponding blocking solution and incubate overnight at 4°C.
Secondary antibody: Use appropriate IRDye secondary antibodies for 1 hour at ambient temperature.
Visualization: Use an imaging system such as the Odyssey CLx Imaging System for detection .
For meaningful quantification, normalize ABCB1 expression to loading controls such as actin. The relative levels of ABCB1 should be calculated as a ratio to actin, as demonstrated in research evaluating ABCB1 expression in resistant cancer cell lines .
For effective immunofluorescence analysis of ABCB1:
Fixation: Follow standard cell fixation protocols.
Primary antibody: Apply diluted antibody and incubate overnight at 4°C.
Counterstaining: Use DAPI for nuclear visualization.
Expected pattern: ABCB1 should primarily localize to the plasma membrane in expressing cells.
Research has shown that ABCB1 displays a characteristic membrane localization pattern in resistant cells. For example, in RC4-2B resistant cells, ABCB1 shows high expression with the expected localization at the plasma membrane, while parental C4-2B cells demonstrate only background levels of expression .
To validate ABCB1 antibody specificity:
Use positive controls: Include cell lines with known ABCB1 overexpression, such as resistant cancer cells.
Include negative controls: Use parental cell lines with low ABCB1 expression for comparison.
Perform time-course experiments: Analyze expression over different time points (e.g., 0, 24, 48, 72 hours) of treatment.
Assess subcellular localization: Confirm the expected membrane localization pattern through immunofluorescence.
Research has demonstrated that ABCB1 protein expression and localization remain stable in resistant cell lines like KB-C2 cells even after 72 hours of treatment with compounds such as ARS-1620, providing a validation approach for antibody specificity .
ABCB1 antibodies provide crucial tools for investigating drug resistance mechanisms:
Comparative expression analysis: Compare ABCB1 levels between parental and resistant cell lines.
Resistance profiling: Correlate ABCB1 expression with IC50 values for different therapeutic agents.
Resistance reversal studies: Combine with ABCB1 inhibitors to confirm ABCB1-dependent resistance.
Research has demonstrated that ABCB1 overexpression correlates with resistance to taxanes in prostate cancer cell lines. For example, RC4-2B cells with high ABCB1 expression show significant resistance to both cabazitaxel and docetaxel, which can be reversed using the ABCB1-specific inhibitor elacridar .
Several methodological approaches can determine ABCB1 interactions:
Cytotoxicity assays: Compare a compound's effect on parental versus ABCB1-overexpressing cells.
Reversal experiments: Test if a compound re-sensitizes resistant cells to known ABCB1 substrates.
Protein expression analysis: Assess whether the compound affects ABCB1 expression levels through Western blotting.
Localization studies: Determine if the compound alters ABCB1 cellular localization via immunofluorescence.
Molecular docking: Perform computational analysis to predict binding interactions.
For example, researchers have used these approaches to determine that ARS-1620 is likely a substrate of ABCB1 but not an inhibitor. Treatment with non-toxic concentrations (0.3, 1, 3 μM) of ARS-1620 did not significantly re-sensitize ABCB1-overexpressing cells to known ABCB1 substrates like doxorubicin and paclitaxel, unlike verapamil which served as a positive control .
To investigate ABCB1 structure-function relationships:
Utilize antibodies targeting specific domains/epitopes of ABCB1.
Compare binding profiles in different conformational states.
Correlate findings with cryo-EM structural data.
Analyze interactions with substrates versus inhibitors.
Recent cryo-EM studies have revealed that ABCB1 adopts distinct conformations in apo-, substrate-bound, inhibitor-bound, and nucleotide-trapped states. The substrate-binding site is located within one half of the molecule and is obstructed by transmembrane helix 4 (TM4) in the apo state. Different binding modes can be observed between substrates (like Taxol) and inhibitors (like zosuquidar), providing insight into the structural basis of substrate versus inhibitor discrimination .
Common issues and solutions for ABCB1 Western blotting:
When facing discrepancies between ABCB1 expression and functional outcomes:
Consider post-translational modifications that may affect function but not detection.
Evaluate if the antibody epitope is in a region critical for function.
Assess potential effects of membrane lipid composition on ABCB1 function.
Examine whether other ABC transporters may be compensating.
For example, researchers have observed that some compounds may interact with ABCB1 without altering its expression or localization, as demonstrated in studies with ARS-1620, which didn't change ABCB1 expression or membrane localization in KB-C2 cells over 72 hours of treatment .
Essential controls for clinical sample analysis:
Positive tissue controls: Include tissues known to express ABCB1 (e.g., adrenal gland, kidney).
Negative controls: Include tissues with minimal ABCB1 expression.
Treatment controls: Compare pre- and post-treatment samples when available.
Scoring system validation: Implement consistent scoring systems for expression assessment.
Validation with multiple methods: Confirm findings using orthogonal approaches (e.g., qPCR, proteomics).
Clinical research has demonstrated that ABCB1 levels are typically low in prostate cancer tissue samples from chemotherapy-naïve patients but become elevated following taxane therapy. This pattern suggests an acquired rather than intrinsic resistance mechanism, highlighting the importance of comparing pre- and post-treatment samples .
ABCB1 antibodies play a critical role in developing resistance-overcoming strategies:
Identification of ABCB1-independent pathways: Use antibodies to identify tumors where ABCB1 is not the primary resistance mechanism.
Development of combination therapies: Test compounds that bypass ABCB1-mediated resistance.
Monitoring resistance development: Track ABCB1 induction during treatment.
Recent research has identified promising approaches, such as using DNA-damaging agents like camptothecin (CPT) and cytarabine (Ara-C) alone or in combination with CDK4/6 inhibitors as potential treatment regimens for CRPC patients with ABCB1-mediated resistance .
ABCB1 plays a crucial role in the blood-brain barrier (BBB), limiting brain penetration of many drugs:
Expression analysis: Use ABCB1 antibodies to characterize expression in brain blood vessels.
Functional studies: Combine with transport assays to correlate expression with function.
Imaging approaches: Implement immunofluorescence to visualize ABCB1 distribution along brain vasculature.
Interventional strategies: Test ABCB1 inhibitors for enhancing CNS drug delivery.
Researchers have investigated ABCB1 expression in brain blood vessels using anti-P-Glycoprotein(MDR) antibodies, highlighting both the technical challenges and importance of proper validation for this specific application .