RAD51D is a RAD51 paralog that plays a crucial role in the homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway of double-stranded DNA breaks. It forms part of the RAD51 paralog protein complex BCDX2 which acts in the BRCA1-BRCA2-dependent HR pathway. Upon DNA damage, the BCDX2 complex acts downstream of BRCA2 recruitment and upstream of RAD51 recruitment . RAD51D binds to single-stranded DNA and possesses DNA-dependent ATPase activity. Its importance in research stems from its involvement in cancer development, particularly in breast and ovarian cancer, and its role in determining sensitivity to PARP inhibitor therapies .
When selecting a RAD51D antibody, researchers should consider:
Antibody type: Monoclonal antibodies like Rad51D 5B3/6 and Rad51D 5A8/4 offer high specificity, while polyclonal antibodies may provide higher sensitivity but potentially more background .
Host species: Available in mouse (monoclonal) and rabbit (polyclonal) variants .
Target species reactivity: Confirm reactivity with your sample species (human, mouse, hamster) .
Applications: Ensure the antibody is validated for your intended application (WB, IP, ICC/IF, IHC-P) .
Molecular weight detection: RAD51D has a calculated molecular weight of 35 kDa, but is typically observed at 30-40 kDa in Western blots .
Storage conditions: Most RAD51D antibodies require storage at -15° C to -25° C in PBS buffer with preservatives .
For optimal Western blot detection of RAD51D:
Sample preparation: Use appropriate lysis buffers that preserve protein integrity while efficiently extracting nuclear proteins.
Protein loading: Load 15-20 μg of total protein per lane, as demonstrated in validation studies .
Antibody dilution: Use recommended dilutions (for example, 1:1000-1:6000 for antibody 30068-1-AP) .
Controls: Include both positive controls (RAD51D-expressing cells like HEK-293, HeLa, or A2780) and negative controls (RAD51D knockdown cells) .
Expected band size: Look for bands in the 30-40 kDa range, as the calculated molecular weight is 35 kDa .
Validation strategy: Consider using RAD51D transfected cell lysates alongside non-transfected controls to confirm specificity, as shown in validation studies where both transfected and non-transfected 293T cell lysates were compared .
To study RAD51D foci formation in response to DNA damage:
Experimental setup:
Immunofluorescence protocol:
Fix cells appropriately (commonly with 4% paraformaldehyde).
Permeabilize cells to allow antibody access to nuclear proteins.
Block with appropriate buffer to reduce non-specific binding.
Incubate with RAD51D antibody (ab168463 has been validated for ICC/IF) .
Use appropriate fluorescently-labeled secondary antibody.
Co-stain with DAPI to visualize nuclei.
Analysis methods:
Quantify foci formation using fluorescence microscopy.
Count the number of foci per nucleus (typically >5 foci per nucleus is considered positive).
Analyze at least 100 cells per condition for statistical significance.
Perform statistical analysis using appropriate tests like ANOVA followed by the Tukey test .
Research has demonstrated that RAD51 and γ-H2AX foci formation assays can effectively illustrate deficient HR repair in tumor samples with primary RAD51D mutations compared to those with secondary mutations .
RAD51D antibodies are valuable tools for investigating PARP inhibitor resistance mechanisms through:
Expression analysis:
Functional assays:
Mutation analysis workflow:
Generate cell lines expressing wildtype RAD51D, primary mutations, or secondary mutations.
Validate expression status by Western blotting.
Assess PARP inhibitor sensitivity across these cell lines.
Correlate with RAD51D expression and function.
In a clinical case study, immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated that a germline RAD51D frameshift mutation resulted in low RAD51D expression in initial tumor samples (PARP inhibitor sensitive), while a secondary deletion mutation restored RAD51D expression in resistant tumors, as confirmed by increased IHC staining .
Based on published research, the following cell lines are recommended for RAD51D antibody validation:
When validating antibodies, it's recommended to:
Include both high and low expressing cell lines
Test RAD51D knockdown controls using shRNA constructs for specificity confirmation
Compare antibody performance in multiple applications (WB, IF, IP) when possible
Based on published methodologies, researchers can generate RAD51D expression constructs following these steps:
Obtain cDNA source:
Cloning strategy:
Mutation generation:
Viral packaging and transduction:
Package lentiviral constructs with appropriate packaging plasmids (psPAX2 and pMD2.G)
Harvest viral particles after 48 hours
Filter through 0.45-μm filters before transduction
Add polybrene (8 mg/mL) during infection
Select stable cells using appropriate antibiotics (puromycin at 2 mg/mL or G418 at 5 mg/mL) for 1-2 weeks
Validation:
Confirm expression by Western blot using validated RAD51D antibodies
Verify function using appropriate assays (e.g., HR repair assays, PARP inhibitor sensitivity)
RAD51D antibodies can be valuable tools for evaluating patient samples in cancer research:
Immunohistochemical analysis:
RAD51D antibodies can be used to assess expression levels in tumor samples from cancer patients .
Different expression patterns have been observed between tumors with functional versus non-functional RAD51D due to mutations .
This can help identify patients who might benefit from PARP inhibitor therapy or explain resistance mechanisms.
Mutation-specific analysis:
Researchers have used IHC with RAD51D antibodies to demonstrate how different mutations affect protein expression .
In one study, low IHC staining of RAD51D was observed in tumor sections with germline frameshift mutations, while restored staining was seen in samples with secondary compensatory mutations .
Correlation with treatment response:
Sample preparation recommendations:
Use appropriate fixation methods compatible with the antibody
Include positive and negative control tissues
Consider dual staining with other HR pathway proteins for context
For comprehensive RAD51D mutation detection and correlation with antibody staining:
Genetic screening approaches:
Correlation methodology:
Functional validation:
Clinical correlation:
Research has shown that germline RAD51D mutations, particularly frameshift variants like K91fs, can lead to loss of protein expression detectable by antibody staining, while secondary mutations can restore expression and function, leading to treatment resistance .
Common issues with RAD51D antibodies and their solutions include:
Low or no signal in Western blot:
Increase antibody concentration (try 1:1000 before moving to higher concentrations)
Optimize protein extraction methods to ensure nuclear proteins are efficiently extracted
Use fresh samples and avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles
Verify sample integrity with loading controls
Check if your cell line expresses RAD51D (use positive control cell lines like HEK-293, HeLa, or A2780)
High background:
Increase blocking time or concentration
Use more stringent washing conditions
Reduce primary and secondary antibody concentrations
Use highly cross-adsorbed secondary antibodies
Consider alternative blocking agents (BSA vs. milk)
Non-specific bands:
Poor reproducibility:
Standardize protocols and reagents
Document lot numbers and storage conditions
Aliquot antibodies to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles
Consider using automated systems where possible
Weak immunofluorescence signal:
Optimize fixation and permeabilization methods
Increase antibody concentration or incubation time
Use signal amplification methods
Adjust image acquisition settings
Proper experimental controls are essential for reliable results with RAD51D antibodies:
Additionally, for mutation studies, include:
Wildtype RAD51D expressing cells
Recent advances in using RAD51D antibodies to study PARP inhibitor resistance include:
Reversion mutation detection:
Researchers have identified a novel reversion mutation involving a 12 bp deletion (LRG_516t1:c.271_282del) that can eliminate the frameshift effect of a germline 2 bp duplication in RAD51D .
RAD51D antibodies were crucial in demonstrating restored protein expression in resistant tumors through immunohistochemical analysis .
Functional validation approaches:
Temporal monitoring of resistance:
Liquid biopsy correlation:
Combination therapy studies:
RAD51D antibodies are being used to identify tumors that might benefit from combination therapies designed to overcome resistance mechanisms.
Expression patterns can help predict which patients might develop resistance and guide preemptive therapeutic strategies.
Emerging techniques enhancing RAD51D antibody utility include:
Multiplex immunofluorescence:
Allows simultaneous detection of RAD51D with other HR pathway proteins (BRCA1/2, RAD51, etc.)
Provides context for RAD51D expression within the complete DNA repair pathway
Enables better characterization of homologous recombination deficiency phenotypes
Single-cell analysis:
Application of RAD51D antibodies in single-cell protein analysis technologies
Reveals heterogeneity in expression and function within tumor populations
May explain why some cells survive PARP inhibitor therapy while others don't
Proximity ligation assays (PLA):
Detect protein-protein interactions involving RAD51D in situ
Provide spatial information about RAD51D interactions with other HR components
Enable visualization of complex formation in response to DNA damage
Live-cell imaging:
Development of antibody-based fluorescent reporters for RAD51D
Allows real-time monitoring of RAD51D recruitment to DNA damage sites
Provides temporal information about HR pathway activation
AI-assisted image analysis:
Machine learning algorithms for automated quantification of RAD51D foci
Improves consistency and throughput in foci counting experiments
Enables detection of subtle patterns that might escape manual analysis
CRISPR-engineered cellular models:
Creation of endogenously tagged RAD51D to avoid overexpression artifacts
Generation of allelic series of RAD51D mutations for systematic functional studies
Development of isogenic cell lines with specific RAD51D variants for drug screening