RBR3 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Structure and Function of RBR3

RBR3 is a pocket protein with conserved A/B domains critical for binding viral oncoproteins via LxCxE motifs . Key features include:

  • Domain organization: Contains A (residues 436–615) and B (residues 729–864) pockets linked by a spacer region .

  • Phosphorylation: Harbors 10 CDK phosphorylation sites, enabling regulation by cyclin-dependent kinases (CycA/CDK) .

  • Expression dynamics: Highly expressed during mitotic phases of maize endosperm development but sharply declines during endoreduplication .

Functional Comparison of RBR Proteins

FeatureRBR3 (Maize)RBR1 (Maize)Mammalian p107
Expression TimingMitotic phaseConstitutiveCell-cycle phases
Binding MotifLxCxE-dependentLxCxE-dependentLxCxE-dependent
RoleCell-cycle exitCell-cycle arrestCell-cycle control
Data from

Development and Validation of RBR3 Antibodies

Polyclonal antibodies against RBR3 were generated using N-terminal epitopes and validated through:

  • Immunoblotting: Detected RBR3 in maize endosperm extracts, showing a ~111.5 kDa band .

  • Specificity controls: No cross-reactivity with RBR1 or other RBR family members .

  • Functional assays: Confirmed RBR3’s interaction with viral proteins (e.g., WDV RepA) via pull-down assays .

Key Applications of RBR3 Antibodies

ApplicationExperimental UseOutcome
Western BlotDetected RBR3 in mitotic endosperm lysatesSharp decline post-11 DAP
ImmunoprecipitationIdentified CycA/CDK complexes bound to RBR3Phosphorylation confirmed
RT-PCR CorrelationValidated RBR3 mRNA vs. protein levelsMatched transcriptional dynamics

3.1. Cell-Cycle Regulation

  • RBR3 expression is inversely correlated with endoreduplication onset in maize endosperm .

  • RepA viral protein expression upregulates RBR3 RNA 4-fold, suggesting feedback regulation via E2F/DP transcription factors .

3.2. Interaction with Viral Pathogens

  • RBR3 binds viral oncoproteins (e.g., HPV E7, Ad E1A) via LxCxE motifs, akin to mammalian pocket proteins .

  • Mutation of Cys-788 in the B-pocket disrupts these interactions, highlighting structural conservation .

3.3. Evolutionary Insights

  • RBR3’s N-terminal domain shares homology with mammalian p107/p130, implicating convergent functional motifs .

Technical Considerations

  • Antibody limitations: No commercial antibodies are available for plant RBR3; existing tools are research-grade polyclonals .

  • Cross-reactivity: Validated specificity for maize RBR3, but not tested in other plant species .

Future Directions

  • Agricultural biotechnology: Engineering RBR3 mutants to study grain development and yield .

  • Disease resistance: Targeting RBR3-viral protein interactions to combat plant pathogens .

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
RBR3 antibody; Retinoblastoma-related protein 3 antibody; ZmRBR3 antibody
Target Names
RBR3
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function

RBR3 is a regulator of biological processes that recruits a histone deacetylase to control gene transcription. It may play a role in the initiation of mitosis, negatively regulating cell proliferation. The formation of stable complexes with geminiviridae replication-associated proteins could potentially create a cellular environment conducive to viral DNA replication.

Gene References Into Functions
  1. RBR3 plays a critical and positive role in the expression of E2F targets, which are essential for the initiation of DNA synthesis and replication. This role is also crucial for the efficiency of obtaining transformed plants. PMID: 19234120
Database Links

KEGG: zma:732723

STRING: 4577.GRMZM2G033828_P02

UniGene: Zm.29028

Protein Families
Retinoblastoma protein (RB) family
Subcellular Location
Nucleus.

Q&A

What is ErbB3/HER3 and why is it an important antibody target?

ErbB3/HER3 is a member of the epidermal growth factor receptor family that plays a critical role in cancer cell signaling. Sensitivity analysis has identified ErbB3 as the most crucial activator of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) and Akt signaling, which is a key pro-survival pathway in cancer cells . Unlike other family members, ErbB3 has reduced kinase activity but forms heterodimers with other ErbB receptors to trigger downstream signaling cascades. This unique positioning in oncogenic signaling networks makes it an attractive therapeutic target, especially in cancers that develop resistance to other ErbB-targeting therapies.

How do researchers validate the specificity of anti-HER3 antibodies?

Validation of anti-HER3 antibodies typically involves a multi-step approach:

  • Western blot analysis: Testing against cell lines known to express HER3 (e.g., LNCap prostate cells or MDA-453 breast cancer cells) alongside negative controls

  • Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry: To confirm the identity of the precipitated protein

  • Testing in HER3 knockout models: To confirm absence of signal in genetic knockout systems

  • Cross-reactivity testing: Evaluating potential binding to related ErbB family members (EGFR, HER2, HER4)

  • Epitope mapping: Determining the specific region of HER3 that the antibody recognizes

Additionally, researchers should test the antibody in the specific experimental context it will be used in, as antibody performance can vary between applications such as Western blotting, immunohistochemistry, and flow cytometry .

What are the common applications of HER3 antibodies in cancer research?

HER3 antibodies are employed in multiple cancer research applications:

ApplicationPurposeTypical Methods
Receptor DetectionQuantifying expression levelsWestern blot, ELISA, immunohistochemistry
Signaling StudiesMonitoring pathway activationPhosphorylation-specific antibodies
Therapeutic DevelopmentBlocking ligand bindingNeutralization assays
Mechanistic InvestigationUnderstanding receptor dynamicsCo-immunoprecipitation, proximity ligation
Biomarker DevelopmentPatient stratificationImmunohistochemistry, ELISA

For detection applications, researchers typically use antibodies that recognize HER3 regardless of its phosphorylation status , while signaling studies may require phospho-specific antibodies targeting particular activation sites.

How do therapeutic anti-ErbB3 antibodies like seribantumab (MM-121) differ from research-grade antibodies?

Therapeutic antibodies like seribantumab (MM-121) are engineered with specific mechanisms of action and pharmacokinetic properties in mind, whereas research antibodies prioritize specificity and sensitivity for detection purposes.

Seribantumab was designed with several precise criteria:

  • Sub-nanomolar monovalent binding affinity for ErbB3

  • Ability to block heregulin (HRG) from binding to ErbB3

  • Capacity to inhibit betacellulin (BTC)-induced ErbB3 phosphorylation via EGFR

  • Ability to trigger downregulation of ErbB3

These therapeutic antibodies undergo extensive preclinical modeling and optimization before clinical testing. By contrast, research antibodies may not be optimized for all these parameters but instead focus on reliable target recognition across various experimental platforms. Additionally, therapeutic antibodies must undergo humanization or be fully human to reduce immunogenicity, while research antibodies can be from various species including rabbit, mouse, or rat .

What are the challenges in developing antibodies that can distinguish between the activated and non-activated states of HER3?

Developing antibodies that distinguish between activated and non-activated HER3 presents several technical challenges:

  • Conformational complexity: HER3 undergoes significant conformational changes upon ligand binding and dimerization with other ErbB receptors

  • Transient phosphorylation states: The activated state may be short-lived in cellular contexts

  • Multiple phosphorylation sites: HER3 contains numerous tyrosine phosphorylation sites that are differentially phosphorylated depending on stimulus and dimerization partner

  • Epitope accessibility: Some critical phosphorylation sites may be sterically hindered in certain protein conformations

To address these challenges, researchers employ strategies such as:

  • Immunizing with synthetic phosphopeptides corresponding to specific phosphorylation sites

  • Using structural biology data to identify accessible epitopes in different conformational states

  • Employing negative selection strategies to eliminate antibodies that recognize non-phosphorylated forms

  • Validation in cell systems where HER3 activation can be precisely controlled

How do computational models inform the design criteria for anti-ErbB3 antibodies?

Computational modeling has become an essential tool in antibody design, particularly for target selection and optimization. For seribantumab, modeling approaches identified:

  • The critical role of ErbB3 in PI3K/Akt signaling compared to other network components

  • Optimal binding affinities needed to compete with natural ligands

  • Key epitopes that would block both ligand-dependent and ligand-independent activation

  • Structural requirements for inducing receptor downregulation

These models incorporated:

  • Network analysis of signaling pathways

  • Protein-protein interaction simulations

  • Receptor trafficking dynamics

  • Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships

The computational insights directly translated into specific design criteria for the antibody and helped identify potential biomarkers for clinical trials. This systems biology approach represents a shift from traditional antibody development methods toward rational design based on mechanistic understanding of target biology .

What are the best practices for validating newly developed HER3 antibodies?

Comprehensive validation of newly developed HER3 antibodies should follow a systematic approach:

  • Initial characterization:

    • Determine binding affinity using surface plasmon resonance or bio-layer interferometry

    • Confirm epitope specificity through peptide mapping or competitive binding assays

    • Assess cross-reactivity with other ErbB family members

  • Functional validation:

    • Test ability to block ligand binding in cell-free assays

    • Evaluate inhibition of downstream signaling in cellular contexts

    • Assess effects on receptor dimerization and internalization

  • Application-specific validation:

    • For Western blotting: Test multiple positive and negative control cell lines, with and without stimulus

    • For immunoprecipitation: Confirm pull-down efficiency and specificity

    • For flow cytometry/immunofluorescence: Evaluate membrane versus cytoplasmic staining patterns

    • For immunohistochemistry: Test on tissue microarrays with known HER3 expression profiles

  • Controls to include:

    • Genetic knockouts or knockdowns of HER3

    • Competing with unconjugated antibody

    • Isotype controls

    • Pre-absorption with recombinant antigen

Antibody characterization should be documented comprehensively, including all conditions tested and negative results, to enhance reproducibility across laboratories.

How can researchers convert hybridoma-derived anti-HER3 antibodies to recombinant formats?

Converting hybridoma-derived antibodies to recombinant formats involves several key steps:

  • Sequence determination:

    • RNA extraction from hybridoma cells

    • RT-PCR using primers targeting conserved regions of antibody genes

    • Next-generation sequencing to identify paired heavy and light chain sequences

  • Cloning into expression vectors:

    • Design of expression constructs with appropriate leader sequences

    • Cloning of variable regions into vectors containing constant regions

    • Verification of sequence integrity

  • Expression optimization:

    • Transient transfection in mammalian cells (e.g., Expi-HEK-293)

    • Evaluation of expression levels and antibody functionality

    • Scale-up production and purification

  • Functional comparison:

    • Side-by-side testing with original hybridoma antibody

    • Affinity measurements to ensure binding properties are maintained

    • Application-specific validation (Western blot, ELISA, etc.)

This conversion provides several advantages including:

  • Elimination of hybridoma drift and contamination risks

  • Opportunity for antibody engineering (humanization, affinity maturation)

  • Reproducible manufacturing without batch-to-batch variation

  • Potential for site-specific modifications and conjugations

What approaches can detect HER3 activation in complex tissue samples?

Detecting HER3 activation in complex tissue samples presents unique challenges due to heterogeneity and preservation issues. Several complementary approaches can be employed:

  • Phospho-specific immunohistochemistry:

    • Use of antibodies specific for phosphorylated tyrosine residues on HER3

    • Careful optimization of antigen retrieval methods to preserve phospho-epitopes

    • Implementation of automated staining platforms for consistency

    • Quantitative image analysis for objective scoring

  • Proximity ligation assays (PLAs):

    • Detection of HER3 interaction with binding partners (e.g., HER2, PI3K p85)

    • Visualization of dimerization events as discrete spots within cells

    • Quantification of activation events at single-cell resolution within tissue context

  • Multiplex immunofluorescence:

    • Simultaneous detection of HER3, its binding partners, and downstream effectors

    • Assessment of co-localization as indicator of pathway activation

    • Single-cell analysis of heterogeneous activation patterns

  • Mass cytometry or imaging mass cytometry:

    • Metal-labeled antibodies against HER3 and phosphorylated forms

    • Highly multiplexed detection without spectral overlap issues

    • Preservation of spatial information in tissue context

Each method has specific technical considerations including fixation protocols, antibody concentration optimization, and appropriate controls to distinguish specific from non-specific signals .

What are the key considerations when designing antigens for HER3 antibody generation?

Antigen design is crucial for generating high-quality HER3 antibodies with desired specificity and functionality:

  • Domain selection:

    • Extracellular domain (ECD): For antibodies targeting the native receptor on cell surfaces

    • Intracellular domain: For detecting denatured protein in Western blots or fixed samples

    • Specific segments: For blocking particular functions (e.g., ligand binding region)

  • Species considerations:

    • Human sequence for clinical applications

    • Conserved regions for cross-species reactivity

    • Species-specific regions for discriminating orthologs

  • Production methods:

    • Recombinant protein expression in mammalian cells for native conformation

    • Bacterial expression for linear epitopes or fusion proteins

    • Synthetic peptides for targeting specific regions

For example, the commercial rabbit polyclonal HER3 antibody described in the search results was prepared using a fusion protein corresponding to amino acids 1283-1323 at the carboxy-terminus of human HER3 . This region was strategically chosen to generate antibodies that can recognize HER3 regardless of its phosphorylation status, making the antibody versatile for various detection applications.

How do different immunization strategies affect the quality of resulting HER3 antibodies?

Immunization strategies significantly impact antibody quality and characteristics:

Immunization ApproachAdvantagesLimitationsBest For
Conventional protein immunizationBroad epitope coverageLimited control over epitope specificityDetection applications
DNA immunizationNative conformation, in vivo expressionLower titerAntibodies against conformational epitopes
Prime-boost strategiesHigher affinity, better specificityTime-consumingTherapeutic antibodies
Single B-cell approachesRapid generation from human sourcesTechnical complexityFully human antibodies

For HER3 antibodies specifically, considerations include:

  • Using appropriate adjuvants that preserve conformational epitopes

  • Alternating between different forms of the antigen to boost specificity

  • Including negative selection steps against related ErbB family members

  • Screening strategies that identify functionally relevant clones early in the process

The development of seribantumab, for instance, employed phage display technology to select fully human antibodies against the extracellular domain of ErbB3, followed by rigorous screening for clones that met all predefined design criteria .

How can HER3 antibodies be used to study receptor heterodimerization dynamics?

HER3 antibodies are valuable tools for investigating the complex heterodimerization dynamics of ErbB receptors:

  • Live-cell imaging approaches:

    • Fluorescently labeled non-blocking antibodies to track receptor movement

    • FRET-based assays using differentially labeled antibodies against HER3 and potential partners

    • Single-molecule tracking to determine diffusion rates before and after stimulation

  • Biochemical approaches:

    • Co-immunoprecipitation using anti-HER3 antibodies followed by detection of binding partners

    • Chemical crosslinking prior to immunoprecipitation to capture transient interactions

    • Sequential immunoprecipitation to isolate specific receptor complexes

  • Functional applications:

    • Using blocking antibodies to disrupt specific heterodimer pairs

    • Comparing signaling outputs with different combinations of blocking antibodies

    • Proximity ligation assays to visualize and quantify specific dimerization events

These techniques have revealed that HER3 forms heterodimers primarily with HER2 and EGFR, with each dimer pair activating distinct downstream signaling pathways. The formation of these heterodimers can be influenced by ligand concentration, receptor expression levels, and the presence of therapeutic antibodies targeting other ErbB family members .

What are the considerations when using anti-HER3 antibodies in combination with other therapeutic antibodies?

Using anti-HER3 antibodies in combination with other therapeutic antibodies requires careful consideration of several factors:

  • Mechanistic synergy:

    • Blocking compensatory signaling pathways

    • Targeting different epitopes on the same receptor

    • Inducing complementary cellular responses (e.g., signaling inhibition plus immune activation)

  • Technical considerations:

    • Potential competition for binding if epitopes are proximal

    • Effect of one antibody on receptor conformation and epitope accessibility

    • Changes in receptor trafficking and membrane organization

  • Experimental design:

    • Sequence of administration (simultaneous vs. sequential)

    • Dose ratios that maximize synergy and minimize antagonism

    • Appropriate controls for each antibody alone and in combination

  • Readout selection:

    • Pathway-specific markers that reflect the intended mechanism

    • Cell fate outcomes (proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation)

    • Long-term adaptive responses and resistance mechanisms

Preclinical studies with seribantumab demonstrated enhanced efficacy when combined with other ErbB-targeting agents, suggesting that comprehensive blockade of the ErbB signaling network can overcome resistance mechanisms and lead to more durable responses .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.