rde-11 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Functional Role of RDE-11 in RNAi

RDE-11 forms a complex with RDE-10 that is essential for RNAi efficacy. Key findings include:

  • Target mRNA Degradation: The RDE-10/RDE-11 complex binds to target mRNAs in an RDE-1-dependent manner (primary siRNA pathway) but does not require RRF-1 (secondary siRNA pathway) .

  • Secondary siRNA Amplification: Mutants lacking rde-11 show a fivefold reduction in secondary siRNA levels, while primary siRNA and miRNA biogenesis remain unaffected .

  • Gene-Specific RNAi Resistance: rde-11 mutants exhibit variable resistance to RNAi depending on the target gene (e.g., strong resistance to pos-1 RNAi but partial resistance to unc-22 RNAi) .

Table 1: mRNA Silencing Efficiency in rde-11 Mutants

Target GeneWT Silencing (%)rde-11 Mutant Silencing (%)Fold Change (Mutant vs. WT)
unc-15>90%~5%~19x higher residual mRNA
pos-1100% (embryonic lethality)0% (viable progeny)Complete resistance

Table 2: Secondary siRNA Abundance in rde-11 Mutants

ConditionSecondary siRNA Level (vs. WT)Primary siRNA Level (vs. WT)
Wild-type100%100%
rde-11 mutant20%98%

Mechanistic Insights

  • Target mRNA Recruitment: RDE-11 associates with mRNAs targeted by RNAi, as shown by coimmunoprecipitation assays using elt-2 and dpy-28 mRNAs .

  • Parallel Pathways: The partial RNAi resistance in rde-11 mutants suggests the existence of auxiliary effector pathways that compensate for RDE-11 loss in a gene-specific manner .

  • Dosage Sensitivity: rde-11 mutants display concentration-dependent RNAi resistance, with stronger resistance at low dsRNA concentrations (e.g., 0.5 ng/μl pos-1 dsRNA) .

Implications for RNAi Research

The RDE-10/RDE-11 complex represents a critical node for enhancing RNAi efficacy in C. elegans. Its absence disrupts the amplification loop necessary for robust gene silencing, making it a focus for understanding RNAi dynamics in metazoans. While antibodies targeting RDE-11 were not explicitly detailed in the provided sources, their development would enable deeper mechanistic studies, such as:

  • Subcellular localization of RDE-11 during RNAi.

  • Protein-protein interaction mapping within the RNAi machinery.

Research Gaps and Future Directions

  • Antibody Development: No standardized anti-RDE-11 antibodies are described in the literature surveyed. Custom monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies would require peptide antigens derived from RDE-11’s conserved domains.

  • Cross-Species Conservation: Investigating whether homologous complexes exist in other organisms could broaden applications in RNAi-based therapeutics.

Product Specs

Buffer
**Preservative:** 0.03% Proclin 300
**Constituents:** 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
rde-11 antibody; B0564.11 antibody; RNA interference defective protein 11 antibody
Target Names
rde-11
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
The RDE-10/RDE-11 complex plays a crucial role in the endogenous and exogenous siRNA pathway in C. elegans. It is essential for the biogenesis and accumulation of secondary small interfering RNA (siRNA) intermediates, such as 22G-siRNAs derived from ergo-1 targets.
Gene References Into Functions
  1. The RDE-10/RDE-11 complex is essential for the amplification of RNAi in C. elegans by promoting secondary siRNA accumulation. PMID: 22542102
Database Links

KEGG: cel:CELE_B0564.11

STRING: 6239.B0564.11.2

UniGene: Cel.6881

Q&A

What is the relationship between antibodies targeting IL-11 and the STAT3 signaling pathway?

Antibodies targeting IL-11 are crucial tools for studying the interleukin-11 signaling cascade. IL-11 is a pleiotropic cytokine produced by stromal cells that binds to a dimeric receptor complex consisting of the IL-11 Ra chain and the gp130 chain shared by receptors for the IL-6 cytokine family . Research demonstrates that IL-11 signaling activates STAT3 phosphorylation, as evidenced by western blot analyses showing that recombinant IL-11 (10 ng/mL) increases phosphorylated STAT3 (pSTAT3) levels, which can be effectively blocked by neutralizing IL-11 antibodies . This signaling pathway appears critically important in several pathological conditions, including fibrosis and cancer progression.

Proper handling of antibodies is essential for experimental reproducibility and reliability. According to established protocols:

  • Use a manual defrost freezer and avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles

  • Store unopened antibody at -20 to -70°C for up to 12 months from date of receipt

  • After reconstitution, the antibody can be stored for:

    • 1 month at 2 to 8°C under sterile conditions

    • 6 months at -20 to -70°C under sterile conditions

Optimal dilutions should be determined by each laboratory for each specific application, as performance can vary between experimental systems .

How should experimental controls be designed when using neutralizing antibodies in signaling studies?

When conducting neutralization assays with IL-11 antibodies, researchers should implement a comprehensive control system:

  • Positive control: Recombinant Human IL-11 (typically 1 ng/mL) to establish baseline cytokine activity

  • Isotype control antibodies: To account for non-specific antibody effects and distinguish them from specific neutralization

  • Dose-response analysis: Establishing concentration-dependent relationships between IL-11 and biological effects (e.g., cell proliferation in T11 mouse plasmacytoma cell line)

  • Negative control: Cells without IL-11 treatment to establish baseline cellular activity

  • Multiple antibody concentrations: To determine the Neutralization Dose (ND50)

How do researchers distinguish between neutralizing and non-neutralizing antibodies in experimental design?

The functional differences between neutralizing and non-neutralizing antibodies are critical considerations in experimental design:

PropertyNeutralizing AntibodiesNon-neutralizing Antibodies
Biological activityBlock IL-11 functionDo not inhibit functionality
Receptor bindingPrevent receptor engagementMay allow receptor binding
Signaling effectsInhibit STAT3 phosphorylationNo effect on downstream signaling
Primary applicationsFunctional studies, therapeutic researchDetection (Western blot, ELISA, IHC)
Experimental readoutFunctional inhibition measuredOnly detection capability

Research demonstrates that neutralizing anti-IL-11 antibodies effectively inhibit IL-11-induced cell proliferation and prevent STAT3 phosphorylation, making them valuable tools for studying IL-11 signaling mechanisms .

What methodologies are most effective for using IL-11 antibodies in fibrosis research?

Current literature supports several optimized approaches for studying fibrosis mechanisms:

  • In vivo neutralization models: Neutralizing anti-IL-11 antibodies have been successfully employed in animal models to improve organ function and reduce fibrotic tissue formation .

  • Fibrotic marker analysis: Western blot analysis of key fibrosis markers (pSTAT3, α-SMA) in tissues treated with anti-IL-11 antibodies provides quantifiable data on fibrosis progression .

  • Multiplexed cytokine intervention: Research indicates value in blocking multiple cytokine pathways (IL-6, IL-11, LIF) simultaneously or separately to dissect their relative contributions to fibrotic processes .

  • Tissue-specific models: Studies on cardiac fibroblasts and pulmonary fibroblasts demonstrate tissue-specific effects of IL-11 signaling that can be effectively targeted with antibodies .

  • Transcriptional profiling: Quantitative PCR analysis measuring fibrosis-related gene expression changes after anti-IL-11 treatment provides mechanistic insights into antifibrotic effects .

How can researchers optimize anti-IL-11 antibody interventions in renal disease models?

Research on renal function utilizing anti-IL-11 therapy has identified several critical optimization parameters:

ParameterMethodologySignificanceReference
Biochemical markersBUN, serum Cr measurementsQuantifies renal function
Proteinuria assessmentUrinary albumin-creatinine ratioMeasures glomerular damage
Histological analysisIHC and immunofluorescenceVisualizes tissue changes
Molecular markersqPCR and Western blotQuantifies molecular changes
Cell-specific effectsPodocin/NHPS2, WT1 stainingIdentifies affected cell populations

Timing considerations are crucial, as studies establish specific experimental timepoints (e.g., 8.5 weeks of age in rodent models) to evaluate intervention efficacy .

What technical considerations affect Western blot analysis with IL-11 antibodies?

Western blot analysis using IL-11 antibodies requires attention to several technical parameters:

  • Protein detection strategy:

    • Direct detection: Antibodies targeting IL-11 protein

    • Indirect assessment: Antibodies detecting downstream effectors like pSTAT3/STAT3

  • Loading control selection:

    • Actin is recommended for most cell types in IL-11 signaling studies

    • GAPDH provides an alternative normalization control for expression analysis

  • Sample processing protocols:

    • RNA extraction from tissues typically employs Trizol followed by column purification

    • Protein extraction requires appropriate lysis buffers compatible with phosphoprotein preservation

  • Signal visualization systems:

    • HRP-conjugated detection systems with DAB substrate for colorimetric analysis

    • Fluorescence-based detection using Alexa Fluor conjugates for multiplexed analysis

  • Cross-reactivity considerations:

    • When studying IL-11 in the presence of other IL-6 family cytokines, specific validation is essential

What strategies ensure antibody specificity validation in experimental systems?

Rigorous validation ensures experimental reliability when working with IL-11 antibodies:

  • Control system implementation:

    • Positive control: Recombinant IL-11 protein

    • Negative control: Samples without IL-11 expression

  • Functional validation approaches:

    • Neutralization assays demonstrating specific inhibition of IL-11-induced effects

    • Dose-dependent inhibition curves establishing quantitative relationships

  • Comparative antibody analysis:

    • Parallel testing with multiple antibodies targeting different IL-11 epitopes

    • Comparison with antibodies targeting related cytokines (IL-6, LIF)

  • Genetic validation methods:

    • Testing in IL-11 knockout or knockdown systems

    • Recombinant expression systems with controlled IL-11 levels

  • Cross-reactivity evaluation:

    • Testing against structurally similar cytokines in the IL-6 family

    • Validating in multiple cell types to ensure consistent detection

What challenges exist in using IL-11 antibodies for STAT3 signaling research?

Research on IL-11/STAT3 signaling faces several methodological challenges:

  • Signaling pathway redundancy:

    • Multiple cytokines (IL-6, IL-11, LIF) activate STAT3, complicating isolation of IL-11-specific effects

    • Complete pathway analysis requires blocking multiple cytokines simultaneously

  • Temporal signaling dynamics:

    • STAT3 phosphorylation exhibits complex kinetics requiring precisely timed experimental measurements

    • Research indicates the need for carefully designed time-course experiments

  • Cell type-specific responses:

    • Studies in various cell types (epidural ADSCs, lung cancer cells) demonstrate variable IL-11 responses

    • Cell-specific validation is necessary for each new experimental system

  • Microenvironmental influences:

    • The cellular context significantly affects IL-11 signaling outcomes

    • Conditioned media experiments reveal microenvironmental effects on signaling efficacy

  • Antibody distribution challenges:

    • In vivo studies must account for antibody biodistribution and tissue penetration

    • Optimal dosing regimens require pharmacokinetic characterization

How should researchers design antibody library screening for optimal IL-11 targeting?

Modern approaches to antibody library design combine computational and experimental techniques:

  • Deep learning integration: Current methodologies utilize deep learning approaches combined with multi-objective linear programming with diversity constraints to optimize antibody library design .

  • Multi-parameter optimization: Experimental designs should consider multiple optimization objectives simultaneously, as demonstrated in recent antibody library design approaches .

  • Position-specific mutation constraints: Effective library design implements constraints on the number of solutions containing specific positions and mutations to ensure diversity .

  • CDR targeting strategy: Research indicates focusing mutations on complementarity-determining regions (CDRs), particularly CDR3, produces the most effective antibody variants .

  • Mutation frequency control: Enforcing maximum and minimum mutation thresholds from wild-type sequences ensures appropriate variation within the library .

Researchers should consider the comparative advantages of different methodological approaches:

How are IL-11 neutralizing antibodies being utilized in fibrosis and inflammation research?

Recent studies demonstrate several promising applications:

  • Cardiac fibrosis models: Research shows that neutralizing IL-11 antibodies improve cardiac function and reduce fibrosis in multiple models .

  • Renal disease applications: Anti-IL-11 therapy improves renal function markers (BUN, serum Cr) and reduces albuminuria in kidney disease models .

  • Cancer-associated fibrosis: Studies indicate that neutralizing IL-11 can modulate the tumor microenvironment by affecting cancer-associated fibroblasts .

  • Anti-inflammatory effects: IL-11 neutralization reduces inflammatory marker expression, suggesting dual anti-fibrotic and anti-inflammatory mechanisms .

  • Combination therapy approaches: Research explores combining IL-11 antibodies with other anti-fibrotic or anti-inflammatory agents for enhanced efficacy.

What considerations affect transitioning IL-11 antibody applications from in vitro to in vivo systems?

Successful translation requires addressing several key factors:

  • Pharmacokinetic properties: Antibody half-life, tissue distribution, and clearance mechanisms significantly impact in vivo efficacy.

  • Dosing regimen optimization: Studies must establish appropriate dosing schedules based on disease models and progression timelines .

  • Route of administration: Different administration routes (intravenous, intraperitoneal, subcutaneous) affect antibody bioavailability and tissue penetration.

  • Species cross-reactivity: Antibodies developed against human IL-11 may have variable affinity for murine IL-11, necessitating species-specific validation .

  • Model selection considerations: Disease models must appropriately recapitulate the IL-11 signaling mechanisms relevant to the pathology being studied .

How should researchers quantify IL-11 antibody efficacy in cell proliferation studies?

Cell proliferation represents a key functional readout for IL-11 activity:

  • Established cellular models: The T11 mouse plasmacytoma cell line provides a validated system for measuring IL-11-induced proliferation and antibody neutralization .

  • Quantification approaches:

    • CCK-8 assay measures optical density at 450 nm to assess proliferation

    • Direct cell counting provides complementary validation

    • BrdU incorporation quantifies DNA synthesis rates

  • Concentration-response relationships: Establishing full dose-response curves with multiple antibody concentrations enables precise determination of the ND50 .

  • Statistical analysis requirements: Experiments should include at least three independent replicates with appropriate statistical testing .

  • Kinetic considerations: Time-course measurements provide insights into both immediate and sustained antibody effects.

What strategies can resolve inconsistent results in IL-11 antibody experiments?

When facing experimental variability, researchers should consider:

  • Antibody quality assessment:

    • Verify antibody concentration using spectrophotometric methods

    • Confirm binding activity with ELISA against recombinant IL-11

  • Cell culture standardization:

    • Control cell density and passage number

    • Standardize serum lots and culture conditions

  • Recombinant protein validation:

    • Verify IL-11 activity with established bioassays

    • Confirm protein concentration independence of effects

  • Detection system optimization:

    • Validate secondary antibody specificity and sensitivity

    • Optimize signal development timing and conditions

  • Protocol standardization:

    • Implement detailed standard operating procedures

    • Control incubation times, temperatures, and buffer compositions

How can researchers optimize antibody dilutions for various experimental applications?

Dilution optimization depends on the specific application:

ApplicationStarting Dilution RangeOptimization ApproachCritical Controls
Western blot1:500 - 1:2000Titration seriesLoading controls
IHC/IF1:100 - 1:500Tissue-specific titrationNo primary controls
Neutralization1-10 μg/mLDose-response analysisIsotype controls
ELISA1:1000 - 1:5000Checker-board titrationStandard curves

As noted in the literature, "Optimal dilutions should be determined by each laboratory for each application" , emphasizing the importance of empirical optimization in each experimental system.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.