KEGG: ath:AT3G19400
UniGene: At.38409
What experimental approaches validate the specificity of RBD-targeting antibodies in SARS-CoV-2 research?
Use eukaryotic-expressed RBD fragments (223 amino acids) for ELISA assays, as they better mimic native conformational epitopes compared to bacterial fragments .
Incorporate knockout/knockdown cell lines as negative controls to confirm antibody specificity .
Validate results across multiple platforms (e.g., Western blot, immunofluorescence) to assess cross-reactivity and assay suitability .
How do RBD antibody levels correlate with viral neutralization?
What are the minimal validation criteria for anti-RBD antibodies in preclinical studies?
Key parameters:
How to resolve contradictory data on RBD antibody functions (neutralization vs enhancement)?
Methodological approach:
Perform pseudotyped virus neutralization assays with titrated antibody concentrations .
Use epitope binning (e.g., hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry) to map binding regions associated with enhancement .
Analyze Fcγ receptor interactions via surface plasmon resonance to identify pro-inflammatory profiles linked to antibody-dependent enhancement .
What experimental design principles optimize high-throughput RBD antibody screening?
Best practices:
Cohort stratification: Group samples by prior infection/vaccination status to account for pre-existing immunity .
Multiplexed assays: Combine RBD ELISA with surrogate neutralization (e.g., ACE2 inhibition assays) for functional profiling .
Power analysis: For 80% power to detect a 2-fold titer difference, include ≥45 samples/group (α=0.05, σ=0.8) .
How to address cross-reactivity between SARS-CoV-2 RBD and seasonal coronaviruses?
A systematic analysis of 8,000+ anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies revealed: