REC104 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Definition and Development of REC104 Antibody

REC104 antibodies are polyclonal or monoclonal tools raised against epitope-tagged versions of the Rec104 protein (e.g., myc, FLAG, or HA tags). These antibodies enable:

  • Immunoprecipitation to study protein-protein interactions .

  • Immunofluorescence to localize Rec104 during meiotic prophase .

  • Western blotting to monitor Rec104 expression dynamics .

Key challenges in antibody development include Rec104’s meiosis-specific expression and sensitivity to proteolysis . For instance, C-terminal tagging of Rec104 abolished functionality, necessitating N-terminal epitope insertion (e.g., mycRec104) .

2.1. Protein Interaction Mapping

Rec104 physically interacts with Rec102 and Spo11, as demonstrated by:

  • Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP): Anti-myc or anti-FLAG antibodies confirmed Rec102-Rec104 interaction in meiotic extracts .

  • Yeast two-hybrid assays: Weak but reproducible Rec102-Rec104 interaction .

Interaction PartnerMethodCitation
Rec102Co-IP, two-hybrid
Spo11Genetic suppression assays

2.2. Subcellular Localization Studies

REC104 antibodies revealed:

  • Nuclear enrichment during leptotene/zygotene, with dissociation by pachytene .

  • Dependency on Rec102: Rec104 mislocalizes cytoplasmically in rec102 mutants .

  • Partial Spo11/Ski8 dependence: Mixed nuclear/cytoplasmic staining in spo11 or ski8 mutants .

2.3. Chromatin Association Dynamics

  • DNase I sensitivity: ~50% of Rec104 pelletable fraction was chromatin-bound in wild-type cells, reduced in spo11, ski8, or rec102 mutants .

  • Cohesin axis complementarity: Rec104 (like Rec102) localizes to chromatin loops, avoiding cohesin-rich axes .

3.1. Role in DSB Formation

Rec104 and Rec102 are interdependent for:

  • Nuclear localization: Reciprocal mislocalization in deletion mutants .

  • DSB catalysis: Both proteins are required for Spo11 activity .

3.2. Genetic Interactions

MutantPhenotype in rec104Key Observation
rec102Cytoplasmic Rec104Loss of nuclear localization
spo11Partial nuclear Rec104 retentionIncomplete DSB complex assembly
ski8Mixed localizationAltered DSB processing dynamics

3.3. Regulation by Phosphorylation

While Rec104 itself is not phosphorylated, studies on related DSB proteins (e.g., Rec114) show ATM/ATR kinases (Tel1/Mec1) modulate DSB formation via phosphorylation . REC104 antibodies could aid future studies exploring post-translational regulation.

Experimental Validation and Limitations

  • Antibody specificity: Anti-myc/FLAG antibodies show minimal cross-reactivity in wild-type controls .

  • Proteolysis issues: Rec104 degradation during extraction complicates Western blotting .

  • Epitope accessibility: N-terminal tagging preserves function but may alter antibody binding efficiency .

Future Directions

REC104 antibodies will remain vital for:

  • Elucidating Rec104’s structural role in the Spo11-Rec102-Rec104 complex.

  • Mapping chromatin loop-axis crosstalk during meiosis.

  • Investigating evolutionary conservation in other eukaryotes.

Product Specs

Buffer
**Preservative:** 0.03% Proclin 300
**Constituents:** 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
REC104 antibody; Meiotic recombination protein REC104 antibody
Target Names
REC104
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
REC104 Antibody is a potential transcriptional regulator essential for activating the expression of several early meiotic genes, including HOP1.

Q&A

What is REC104 and what role does it play in meiotic recombination?

REC104 is one of at least nine proteins that work in conjunction with Spo11 to form meiotic double-strand breaks (DSBs), which are essential for initiating recombination during meiosis. REC104 forms a functional unit with REC102, and mutations in REC104 eliminate meiotic recombination completely, resulting in the production of inviable spores . Research indicates that REC104 localizes to chromatin during prophase I and interacts with chromosomes in a dynamic manner throughout meiosis, suggesting it plays a direct role in DSB formation .

How does REC104 interact with REC102 and other meiotic proteins?

REC104 and REC102 interact physically as demonstrated through co-immunoprecipitation experiments and yeast two-hybrid analyses. These proteins are mutually dependent for proper subcellular localization and share a requirement for Spo11 and Ski8 for their recruitment to meiotic chromosomes . Both proteins constitute a functional unit during meiosis, with REC102 being required for REC104 to accumulate to normal steady-state levels and to be properly phosphorylated. This relationship has been confirmed through various experimental approaches:

Experimental MethodFindings
Co-immunoprecipitationREC102flag was enriched in immunoprecipitates from mycREC104 strains
Yeast two-hybrid analysisDemonstrated direct interaction between REC102 and REC104
ImmunofluorescenceBoth proteins show similar patterns of chromatin association during leptotene and zygotene

In which organisms has REC104 been identified and studied?

REC104 has been primarily studied in Saccharomyces cerevisiae but has also been identified in other yeast species. REC104 analogs have been isolated from S. paradoxus and S. pastorianus through hybridization with a REC104 probe. These analogs can restore spore viability and meiotic recombination when transformed into a rec104 strain of S. cerevisiae . Comparison of these homologs reveals:

SpeciesAmino Acid IdentityNucleic Acid Identity (Promoter)Nucleic Acid Identity (Coding Region)
S. paradoxus79%86%84%
S. pastorianus63%59%71%

How should researchers validate the specificity of a REC104 antibody?

Validating REC104 antibody specificity requires multiple experimental approaches:

  • Western blot analysis with appropriate controls: Compare samples from wild-type and rec104Δ mutant strains. A specific antibody should detect a band of the expected molecular weight (~34 kDa) in wild-type samples but not in the rec104Δ mutant .

  • Immunoprecipitation-based validation: Perform immunoprecipitation from strains expressing tagged versions of REC104 (e.g., mycREC104) using anti-tag antibodies and detect with the REC104 antibody being validated.

  • Phosphatase treatment: Since REC104 is phosphorylated, treat immunoprecipitated samples with lambda phosphatase (with and without phosphatase inhibitors) to confirm antibody recognition of both phosphorylated and unphosphorylated forms .

  • Cross-reactivity testing: Verify antibody specificity against related proteins, especially when studying REC104 in other yeast species where sequence homology may lead to cross-reactivity.

What methods are recommended for optimizing REC104 antibody for Western blotting?

Optimizing Western blotting conditions for REC104 detection requires careful consideration of several parameters:

  • Extraction method: Use denaturing whole-cell extraction methods to ensure complete solubilization of REC104. This is particularly important as REC104 associates with chromatin during meiosis .

  • Dilution optimization: Start with a 1:1000 dilution (based on similar antibody protocols ) and adjust as needed for optimal signal-to-noise ratio.

  • Loading controls: Include appropriate loading controls such as Bdf1, which has been successfully used in REC104 studies .

  • Time course samples: When studying REC104 during meiosis, collect samples at multiple timepoints to track expression dynamics. Western blot analysis has shown that REC104 expression follows a specific pattern during meiotic progression .

  • Protein degradation considerations: Be aware that REC104 can be degraded during certain assays, which may affect detection .

How can researchers use REC104 antibodies for immunofluorescence studies of meiotic chromosomes?

For successful immunofluorescence detection of REC104 on meiotic chromosomes:

  • Sample preparation: Prepare nuclear spreads rather than whole-cell immunostaining for optimal visualization of chromosome association. This technique has been successfully used to study REC104 localization to spread meiotic chromosomes .

  • Co-staining approach: Use anti-Zip1 antibodies (red) alongside anti-REC104 antibodies (green) for co-localization studies and to determine the meiotic stage (leptotene, zygotene, pachytene) .

  • Stage-specific analysis: Analyze REC104 localization across different meiotic stages, as the protein shows dynamic binding patterns - from diffuse nuclear localization in leptotene/preleptotene to more defined patterns in zygotene and early pachytene before disappearing in late pachytene .

  • Image acquisition: Use high-resolution microscopy with a scale bar (3 μm has been used in published studies) for accurate representation of localization patterns .

  • Controls: Include rec102Δ, spo11Δ, and ski8Δ mutants as controls, as REC104 localization is affected in these backgrounds .

What are the key considerations for chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays using REC104 antibodies?

When designing ChIP experiments to study REC104 chromatin association:

  • Crosslinking optimization: Carefully optimize crosslinking conditions, as REC104 associates with chromatin loops during leptotene and zygotene .

  • Sonication parameters: Adjust sonication conditions to generate appropriately sized DNA fragments for detecting both DSB-hot and DSB-cold regions, as REC104 is associated with both .

  • Control regions: Include both DSB-hot and DSB-cold regions in your analysis, as REC104 distribution does not simply correlate with DSB formation sites .

  • Temporal analysis: Collect samples across multiple timepoints during meiosis, as REC104 persists on chromatin until pachytene before abruptly disappearing .

  • Data interpretation: Remember that ChIP yields population-average measurements, making it difficult to assess whether REC104 binds every loop or only a subset of loops in any given cell .

How can researchers study REC104 phosphorylation using antibodies?

To investigate REC104 phosphorylation:

  • Phospho-specific antibodies: Consider developing antibodies specifically targeting phosphorylated forms of REC104, particularly at RxxS/T sites which have been studied in REC104 mutants .

  • Phosphatase treatment experiments: Treat immunoprecipitated REC104 with lambda phosphatase alone or in the presence of inhibitors to distinguish phosphorylated from non-phosphorylated forms on Western blots .

  • Mobility shift analysis: Monitor electrophoretic mobility shifts in REC104 under different conditions to track phosphorylation states.

  • Comparative analysis with mutants: Compare wild-type REC104 with REC104 RxxS/T site mutants to identify specific phosphorylation-dependent functions .

  • Time course studies: Track phosphorylation changes throughout meiotic progression to correlate with specific meiotic events.

What approaches are recommended for co-immunoprecipitation of REC104 with its interaction partners?

For successful co-immunoprecipitation experiments:

  • Extract preparation: Use non-denaturing whole-cell extracts to preserve protein-protein interactions. This approach has successfully demonstrated REC104-REC102 interactions .

  • Epitope tagging strategy: Consider using mycREC104 and REC102flag tag combinations, which have been validated for co-immunoprecipitation studies .

  • Antibody selection: Use high-affinity antibodies against the tags (anti-myc, anti-flag) rather than directly against the proteins to ensure efficient pull-down .

  • Control strains: Include appropriate controls such as untagged REC104 strains to verify specific enrichment of interaction partners in immunoprecipitates .

  • Western blot detection: Analyze both input extracts and antibody matrix eluates by Western blotting with antibodies against both proteins to confirm co-immunoprecipitation .

How do researchers reconcile conflicting results from different experimental approaches when studying REC104?

When facing contradictory results:

  • Technique limitations: Consider inherent limitations of different techniques. For example, ChIP provides population-average measurements while immunofluorescence offers single-cell resolution but lower spatial precision .

  • Temporal dynamics: Account for the dynamic nature of REC104 association with chromosomes across meiotic stages. Different results may reflect different timepoints rather than contradictions .

  • Protein complex context: Consider that REC104 functions within a complex with REC102 and other proteins. Results may vary depending on which protein within the complex is being analyzed .

  • Strain background effects: Validate findings across multiple strain backgrounds, as genetic differences can affect REC104 behavior.

  • Integration approach: Rather than discarding conflicting results, develop integrated models that explain apparent contradictions. For example, the finding that REC104 associates with both DSB-hot and DSB-cold regions ruled out a simple model in which sites of DSB formation are dictated solely by where REC102/104 complexes load .

How can REC104 antibodies be utilized in comparative studies across yeast species?

When conducting cross-species analysis:

  • Antibody cross-reactivity assessment: Test whether antibodies raised against S. cerevisiae REC104 recognize orthologous proteins in S. paradoxus (79% amino acid identity) and S. pastorianus (63% amino acid identity) .

  • Epitope mapping: Identify conserved regions that could serve as universal epitopes for antibody generation by aligning REC104 sequences from different species .

  • Functional complementation correlation: Correlate antibody recognition patterns with functional complementation data, as REC104 analogs from S. paradoxus and S. pastorianus can restore spore viability in S. cerevisiae rec104 mutants .

  • Evolutionary studies: Use antibodies to examine REC104 expression and localization across species to understand evolutionary conservation of meiotic recombination mechanisms.

What are the methodological considerations for studying REC104 in relation to chromosome axis proteins?

To investigate REC104 relationships with chromosome axis components:

  • Co-localization analysis: Perform dual immunofluorescence with REC104 antibodies and antibodies against axis proteins (e.g., Rec114, Mer2, Mei4) .

  • Sequential ChIP: Consider sequential ChIP (ChIP-reChIP) to determine whether REC104 and axis proteins occupy the same chromatin regions simultaneously.

  • Genetic interaction studies: Combine REC104 antibody studies with mutations in axis protein genes (red1, hop1, mek1) to investigate functional relationships .

  • Temporal dynamics: Track the relative timing of REC104 and axis protein association with chromosomes throughout meiotic progression.

  • Quantitative analysis: Perform quantitative analysis of co-localization to determine the degree of association between REC104 and chromosome axis proteins at different stages of meiosis and in different chromosomal regions.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.