According to manufacturer specifications, the stability of recombinant L35 protein depends on several factors:
| Storage Form | Recommended Temperature | Shelf Life |
|---|---|---|
| Lyophilized | -20°C/-80°C | 12 months |
| Liquid | -20°C/-80°C | 6 months |
| Working aliquots | 4°C | Up to 1 week |
For reconstitution of lyophilized protein:
Briefly centrifuge the vial prior to opening to bring contents to the bottom
Reconstitute in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL
Add glycerol to a final concentration of 5-50% (default recommendation is 50%)
Prepare small aliquots to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles, which should be avoided
Escherichia coli is the predominant expression system for recombinant L35 protein production . Standard protocols involve:
Transforming an E. coli expression strain with a plasmid containing the rpmI gene
Culturing cells in appropriate media (e.g., Luria-Bertani medium with 10 g/L tryptone, 5 g/L yeast extract, and 10 g/L NaCl)
Adding selection antibiotics (e.g., 50 μg/ml kanamycin) to maintain the expression plasmid
Inducing protein expression with isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) at concentrations around 0.8 mM
Optimizing expression conditions by testing different:
Determining whether L35 is essential for bacterial viability requires a systematic approach:
Create a conditional mutant strain where:
The chromosomal rpmI gene is deleted/replaced with a selectable marker
A complementing plasmid carries a functional copy of rpmI under an inducible promoter
The plasmid also carries a counter-selectable marker (e.g., sacB)
Test essentiality through:
Test temperature sensitivity by repeating tests at different temperatures (e.g., 30°C and 37°C)
In a systematic study of ribosomal protein gene essentiality, 5 ribosomal proteins (L15, L21, L29, L30, and S9) were found to be non-essential, while others were essential for bacterial survival . While L35 wasn't specifically mentioned among the non-essential proteins, using this methodology would conclusively determine its essentiality.
As noted in research, "peptides from the shorter ribosomal proteins L31-L36 are more difficult to resolve by [mass spectrometry]" . To improve L35 detection, researchers can employ these strategies:
Isotope labeling for quantitative comparison:
Technical improvements:
Optimize digestion protocols to generate more detectable L35 peptides
Use multiple proteases (beyond standard trypsin) to increase peptide coverage
Employ targeted mass spectrometry approaches such as Multiple Reaction Monitoring (MRM)
Implement sample fractionation to reduce complexity
Consider chemical crosslinking mass spectrometry (XL-MS) to detect L35 through its interaction partners
Complementary techniques:
Western blotting with L35-specific antibodies
Ribosome profiling to detect associated mRNAs
Fluorescent labeling of L35 for microscopy-based detection
While the specific function of L35 in ribosome assembly isn't explicitly detailed in the available research, principles of ribosomal protein involvement in assembly can be applied:
Assembly hierarchy: Ribosomal proteins incorporate into ribosomes in a defined order, with early binders facilitating the attachment of later proteins through conformational changes in rRNA
Assembly checkpoints: Some ribosomal proteins function as quality control checkpoints, with their successful incorporation signaling the readiness for subsequent assembly steps
Interaction networks: Research indicates that ribosomal proteins form critical interactions "with functional sites of the ribosome," and "the importance of these interactions is poorly understood, in part due to the lack of a facile experimental system to create and analyze mutations in ribosomal proteins"
Late-stage assembly: Some ribosomal proteins participate in late steps of 50S ribosomal subunit assembly, with specific modifications triggering conformational changes that facilitate maturation, as demonstrated with other ribosomal components: "Um2552 formation by RlmE facilitates interdomain interactions between H92 and H71, in concert with the incorporation of L36 and other ribosomal proteins"
To specifically study L35's role in assembly, researchers could:
Monitor assembly intermediates that accumulate in L35 depletion conditions
Analyze the timing of L35 incorporation using pulse-chase experiments
Perform in vitro reconstitution experiments with and without L35
Based on successful approaches with other ribosomal proteins, researchers can use truncation studies to identify functional domains within L35:
Design truncation strategy:
Create a series of N-terminal and C-terminal truncations of L35
Express truncated variants from a plasmid in a strain with chromosomal L35 deletion
Ensure proper expression using an inducible promoter system (e.g., trc promoter)
Functional assessment:
Test growth complementation by each truncation variant
Evaluate ribosome assembly by sedimentation analysis
Assess translation efficiency using reporter systems
Incorporation analysis:
This approach successfully identified functional domains in other ribosomal proteins: "In the 50S P site, removal of the L5 loop interacting with tRNA (L5Δ70-83) caused a severe growth defect" while "truncation of 9 amino acids from the N-terminal tail of L27 (L27NΔ9)... minimally affected cell growth" .
Researchers can establish an in vitro system to study L35's role in ribosome assembly:
Ribosome reconstitution approach:
"Each subunit can be reconstituted in vitro from its individual component ribosomal RNAs and proteins, indicating that these components contain all of the information necessary to automatically assemble into functional subunits"
Compare assembly kinetics and efficiency with and without L35
Monitor assembly intermediates using sedimentation analysis
Assembly conversion assays:
Isolate assembly intermediates from L35-depleted cells
Attempt to convert these to mature 50S subunits by adding purified L35
Similar approaches have been successful for other assembly factors: "We partially recapitulate the formation of 50S from 45S in the presence of recombinant RlmE and AdoMet in vitro"
Tracking assembly using density gradients:
Pulse-chase analysis:
To ensure the integrity and functionality of recombinant L35 preparations:
Purity assessment:
Functional testing:
RNA binding assays to confirm interaction with rRNA
In vitro reconstitution to verify incorporation into ribosomal subunits
Circular dichroism spectroscopy to assess secondary structure
Stability monitoring:
Thermal shift assays to determine melting temperature
Time-course analysis of protein under various storage conditions
Aggregation assessment using dynamic light scattering
These quality control measures ensure that experimental outcomes truly reflect L35 biology rather than artifacts from compromised protein preparations.
Based on methods used for recombinant protein production in bacterial systems:
Strain selection and culture optimization:
Test multiple E. coli strains designed for protein expression
Optimize media composition (defined vs. complex media)
Implement fed-batch or high-density culture techniques
Expression conditions:
Construct engineering:
Add solubility-enhancing tags (e.g., SUMO, MBP, or GST)
Codon-optimize the rpmI sequence for the expression host
Co-express molecular chaperones to facilitate folding
Special culture systems:
A systematic optimization approach, testing these variables individually and in combination, will likely yield significant improvements in recombinant L35 production.
Purified recombinant L35 can be a valuable tool for studying ribosome assembly:
Complementation studies:
Add purified L35 to assembly-defective ribosomes from L35-depleted cells
Monitor conversion of precursor particles to mature subunits through sedimentation analysis
Similar approaches have demonstrated: "The 50S peak slightly increased, concomitant with a decrease in the 45S peak, only in the presence of both RlmE and AdoMet"
Interaction partner identification:
Use purified L35 as bait in pull-down assays to identify binding partners
Perform cross-linking studies to capture transient interactions
Map the L35 interaction network within the ribosome
In vitro assembly systems:
Establish defined reconstitution systems with purified components
Systematically test the order of addition to determine L35's position in the assembly hierarchy
Modify L35 (mutations, truncations) to identify critical functional regions
Assembly kinetics:
Use fluorescently labeled L35 to monitor incorporation rates
Perform stopped-flow kinetics to measure binding rates to assembly intermediates
Compare wild-type versus modified L35 to identify rate-limiting steps
Although not explicitly covered in the search results, L35's evolutionary significance can be inferred:
Comparative genomics:
Analyze L35 sequences across bacterial phyla to identify conserved and variable regions
Map conservation patterns onto structural models to identify functionally important domains
Compare with archaeal and eukaryotic homologs (if present) to understand ribosome evolution
Structure-function relationships:
Determine whether L35 occupies similar positions within ribosomes from diverse bacterial species
Analyze co-evolution patterns between L35 and its rRNA binding regions
Identify adaptive changes in L35 that correlate with environmental niches of different bacteria
Essentiality patterns:
Compare the essentiality of L35 across different bacterial species
Correlate with genome size, growth rate, and ecological niche
Research has shown varying essentiality patterns for other ribosomal proteins: "5 mutants (with chromosomal deletion of the gene encoding L15, L21, L29, L30, or S9) showed obvious growth in the absence of an inducer"
This evolutionary perspective can guide rational antibiotic design targeting bacterial-specific features of the ribosome, including potential L35 interactions.
Several cutting-edge approaches could significantly enhance our understanding of L35:
Cryo-electron microscopy:
Capture high-resolution structures of ribosomes with and without L35
Visualize different conformational states during assembly
Map L35's position relative to functional centers of the ribosome
Time-resolved structural methods:
Time-resolved cryo-EM to capture assembly intermediates
Single-molecule FRET to monitor L35 incorporation dynamics
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry to detect conformational changes
Genomic approaches:
CRISPR interference for titratable control of L35 expression
Ribosome profiling to assess translation effects of L35 depletion
Synthetic genetic arrays to identify genetic interactions with L35
Computational methods:
Molecular dynamics simulations of L35-rRNA interactions
Quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics studies of L35's role in catalytic centers
Systems biology models integrating L35 into ribosome assembly pathways
These approaches, used in combination, would provide multidimensional insights into L35 function beyond what's possible with current methodologies.