Recombinant 60S ribosomal protein L4 (RPL4)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder. We will ship the available format, but you can specify a preferred format when ordering.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary by purchase method and location. Consult local distributors for specifics. Proteins are shipped with blue ice packs. Request dry ice in advance for an extra fee.
Notes
Avoid repeated freezing and thawing. Working aliquots are stable at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening. Reconstitute in sterile deionized water to 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. Add 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquot for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default glycerol concentration is 50%.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on storage conditions, buffer components, and protein stability. Liquid form is generally stable for 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. Lyophilized form is generally stable for 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon arrival. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
RPL4; RPL1; 60S ribosomal protein L4; L1
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-374
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Trypanosoma brucei brucei
Target Names
RPL4
Target Protein Sequence
MTARPSVSVY SASEDKVVGT CSLPAVFTAP IRHDVVQFVH TNMAKNSRQP YAVNRLSGMK HSTESWGTGR AVARIPRIHG GGTSMSGAGA FGNMCRGGRM FAPTKIFRRW HRKINLHQKR FAVVSALAAS SLPALVMSRG HKIENVAEVP LVVEDGVRAY EKTKEAMTFL KTVGAIDDVN RVNDSRQIRA GRGKMRNRRY VARRGPMLVM PDNKGTRAFR NIFGLDLANV NSLNLLHLAP GGHVGRFIIW TKSAFEKLDK IFGTFTEPST VKSGFMLPAP MLTSTDVTRI MQSEEVRRVL KPKKLQPKRP SRYRQPTNGI RNRRLRLRLN PFQKKEKAMA KGMQNKKNRE ARHAAKVVRL AKARKNVAKA LKKK
Uniprot No.

Q&A

What is the structural composition of RPL4 and how does it contribute to ribosomal function?

RPL4 is a component of the 60S ribosomal subunit in eukaryotes. In humans, it is encoded by the RPL4 gene located on chromosome 15 and belongs to the L4E family of ribosomal proteins . The protein primarily localizes to the cytoplasm where it participates in ribosome assembly and protein synthesis.

The functional domains of RPL4 include:

  • An N-terminal region critical for ribosome integration

  • Central domains that contribute to rRNA binding

  • A C-terminal region with potential regulatory functions

Structurally, RPL4 has acquired a notable 3' extension during evolutionary transfer to the nuclear genome in plants. This extension contains an intron and codes for glutamic and aspartic acid-rich amino acid sequences resembling the acidic C-terminal tails found in certain transcription factors . This suggests RPL4 may have evolved additional functions beyond its core ribosomal role.

How do the extraribosomal functions of RPL4 compare between species?

Research has identified significant extraribosomal functions for RPL4, particularly in transcriptional regulation. These functions show evolutionary conservation with some important distinctions:

In prokaryotes: RPL4 demonstrates established roles in transcriptional regulation .

In plants: Evidence from spinach and Arabidopsis thaliana shows that RPL4 co-purifies with plastid RNA polymerase and transcription factor CDF2, suggesting involvement in plastid transcriptional regulation . The plant RPL4 gene has acquired a remarkable 3' extension during evolutionary transfer to the nuclear genome that codes for an acidic amino acid sequence resembling C-terminal tails of some transcription factors .

In mammals: Human RPL4 directly interacts with MDM2 at its central acidic domain, enabling it to suppress MDM2-mediated p53 ubiquitination and degradation . This positions RPL4 as a regulator in the critical MDM2-p53 pathway that governs cell growth and proliferation.

These functional differences make RPL4 an interesting subject for comparative studies across species to better understand ribosomal protein evolution.

What experimental designs are most effective for studying RPL4's role in ribosome assembly?

When investigating RPL4's function in ribosome assembly, researchers should consider both pre-experimental and true experimental research designs:

Pre-experimental approaches:

  • One-shot case studies to observe RPL4 interactions with nascent ribosomes

  • One-group pretest-posttest designs to measure ribosome assembly rates with and without functional RPL4

  • Static-group comparisons between wild-type and mutant RPL4 variants

True experimental approaches:
For definitive cause-effect relationships, implement designs with these elements:

  • Control groups (cells without RPL4 manipulation) and experimental groups (with RPL4 variants)

  • Manipulable variables (e.g., expression levels, mutation sites)

  • Random distribution to minimize confounding factors

Quasi-experimental designs can be employed in field settings where random assignment is impractical. For instance, comparing naturally occurring RPL4 variants across different cell types or organisms .

A robust experimental workflow should include:

  • Expression of recombinant RPL4 (wild-type and mutants)

  • Purification using affinity chromatography

  • Ribosome assembly assays (in vitro and in vivo)

  • Structural analysis (cryo-EM, X-ray crystallography)

  • Functional analysis (translation efficiency measurement)

What methodological approaches can identify critical regions of RPL4 for its regulatory functions?

Based on recent research, several powerful methodological approaches can be used to identify functionally important regions of RPL4:

Progressive mapping through deletion analysis:
Research has successfully used this approach to identify critical regulatory regions of RPL4. By systematically creating N-terminal and C-terminal deletion variants (e.g., constructs lacking the first 42, 77, 87, 95, 100, or 110 amino acids), researchers identified that:

  • The region encompassing amino acids 101-110 (particularly W109) is crucial for regulation

  • C-terminal extension to amino acid 139 is necessary for complete regulatory function

Site-directed mutagenesis:
Specific mutations like W109C can significantly affect RPL4 function and stability. This approach allows precise determination of key residues .

Heterologous expression systems:
Testing minimal regulation-conferring regions (e.g., amino acids 78-139) in heterologous contexts helps confirm their sufficiency for regulatory function .

Co-purification assays:
These have successfully identified interactions between RPL4 and proteins like plastid RNA polymerase and transcription factor CDF2, revealing potential regulatory mechanisms .

qRT-PCR analysis:
This method effectively measures how RPL4 variants affect mRNA stability and levels, providing insights into regulatory mechanisms .

How is RPL4 expression co-translationally regulated and what factors are involved?

RPL4 expression is subject to sophisticated co-translational regulation through a network of protein interactions. Key findings reveal:

Regulatory proteins identified:

  • Caf130: A sub-stoichiometric subunit of the Ccr4-Not complex that influences RPL4 mRNA levels

  • Cal4 (Yjr011c): A Caf130-associated regulator specifically required for RPL4 mRNA regulation

  • Acl4: A dedicated chaperone that co-translationally captures nascent RPL4

Regulatory mechanisms:
RPL4 mRNA is subject to co-translational downregulation. When this regulation is disrupted (through deletion of regulatory proteins like Caf130 or Cal4), RPL4 mRNA levels increase approximately twofold . This mechanism appears to be specific, as it does not similarly affect all ribosomal protein mRNAs.

Critical interactions:
Co-translational capturing of nascent RPL4 by its dedicated chaperone Acl4 has a positive impact on RPL4 mRNA abundance. When Acl4 is deleted, RPL4 mRNA levels decrease, suggesting a stabilizing effect .

Key regulatory regions:
The segment encompassing amino acids 101-110 of RPL4 (particularly W109) is critical for regulation. This region likely serves as an interaction site for regulatory factors .

Mutations that disrupt these regulatory interactions can have significant effects on cellular growth, highlighting the importance of proper RPL4 regulation for normal cellular function.

What approaches have been effective in resolving contradictory data about RPL4 regulation?

When facing contradictory data about RPL4 regulation, researchers have successfully employed these approaches:

Suppressor mutation analysis:

  • When deletion of the Acl4 chaperone (Δacl4) caused severe growth defects, researchers observed spontaneous suppressors arising at high frequency

  • Whole-genome sequencing identified 47 different causative mutations across just four genes: CAF130 (35 mutations), CAL4 (7), NOT1 (4), and RPL4A (1)

  • This approach revealed the critical regulatory network controlling RPL4 expression

Comparative qRT-PCR analysis:

  • Comparing RPL4 mRNA levels between wild-type and various mutant cells (Δcaf130, Δcal4, Δegd2, etc.)

  • Examining effects on other ribosomal protein mRNAs (RPL3, RPL5, RPS3) to determine specificity

  • This resolved contradictory data by showing that Cal4 specifically regulates RPL4 mRNA but not RPL3 mRNA

Promoter swap experiments:

  • Placing RPL4 under control of different promoters (e.g., ADH1) while maintaining the coding sequence

  • This confirmed that regulation occurs at the translational/co-translational level rather than transcriptionally

Heterologous fusion constructs:

  • Creating fusion proteins between RPL4 fragments and reporter proteins like yEGFP

  • Testing minimal regulation-conferring regions in heterologous contexts

  • This approach resolved questions about which specific protein regions are necessary and sufficient for regulation

These methodologies collectively provide a robust framework for resolving contradictory data about complex regulatory mechanisms controlling RPL4 expression.

How does RPL4 interact with MDM2 to regulate the p53 pathway?

RPL4 serves as a novel regulator of the MDM2-p53 loop through direct protein interactions:

Interaction mechanism:
RPL4 directly binds to MDM2 at its central acidic domain . This interaction is specific and functionally significant, as it suppresses MDM2-mediated p53 ubiquitination and degradation .

Functional consequences:

  • By inhibiting MDM2's ubiquitin ligase activity toward p53, RPL4 stabilizes p53 protein levels

  • This stabilization allows p53 to exert its functions as a tumor suppressor and regulator of cell cycle arrest, DNA repair, and apoptosis

  • RPL4 joins several other ribosomal proteins that coordinate ribosome biogenesis with cell growth and proliferation by regulating the MDM2-p53 pathway

Research implications:
This interaction places RPL4 in an important regulatory network that connects ribosome biogenesis with cell cycle control and stress responses. Disruption of this interaction could potentially contribute to diseases including cancer, where p53 function is frequently compromised.

To study this interaction experimentally, researchers should consider:

  • Co-immunoprecipitation assays to confirm direct binding

  • Ubiquitination assays to measure MDM2 activity toward p53 in the presence/absence of RPL4

  • Cellular localization studies to track interaction dynamics under different conditions

  • Structural studies to map the precise interaction interface

What role do dedicated chaperones play in RPL4 function and how can they be studied?

Dedicated chaperones, particularly Acl4, play crucial roles in RPL4 function through co-translational interactions:

Key functions of the RPL4-chaperone relationship:

  • Acl4 co-translationally captures nascent RPL4 protein

  • This interaction stabilizes RPL4 mRNA levels

  • When Acl4 is deleted, cells exhibit severe growth defects

  • Chaperones help coordinate the biogenesis and assembly of RPL4 into the ribosome

Experimental approaches to study these interactions:

  • Genetic deletion studies: Deletion of Acl4 (Δacl4) produces clear phenotypes that can be measured (growth defects)

  • Suppressor screens: Identifying mutations that suppress Δacl4 growth defects reveals proteins in the same pathway

  • mRNA stability assays: Measuring RPL4 mRNA levels in chaperone mutants vs. wild-type cells

  • Domain mapping: Creating RPL4 variants with mutations in potential chaperone-binding regions

  • Co-translational capturing assays: Studying nascent chain interactions during active translation

Key findings from suppressor screens:
Mutations in several genes can suppress the growth defects caused by Acl4 deletion:

  • CAF130 (35 different mutations identified)

  • CAL4/YJR011C (7 mutations)

  • NOT1 (4 mutations)

  • RPL4A (1 mutation)

The involvement of these proteins suggests a complex regulatory network coordinating RPL4 biogenesis, with chaperones playing a central organizational role.

How might RPL4 contribute to cancer biology through its extraribosomal functions?

RPL4's involvement in cancer biology stems primarily from its regulatory role in the MDM2-p53 pathway:

Mechanism of action:
RPL4 directly interacts with MDM2 at the central acidic domain and suppresses MDM2-mediated p53 ubiquitination and degradation . This places RPL4 in a critical position to regulate p53 activity, which is essential for tumor suppression.

Research implications:

  • Potential tumor suppressor role: By stabilizing p53, RPL4 may function as a tumor suppressor protein. Disruptions to RPL4 function could potentially contribute to p53 inactivation and cancer development.

  • Ribosomal stress response: Like other ribosomal proteins, RPL4 may serve as a sensor of ribosomal stress, triggering p53 activation when ribosome biogenesis is disrupted. This connects RPL4 to cellular stress responses relevant to cancer.

  • Potential therapeutic target: Understanding RPL4's role in regulating p53 could potentially identify new therapeutic approaches for cancers with wild-type p53.

Experimental approaches for cancer research:

  • Analyzing RPL4 expression levels and mutations in cancer databases

  • Studying effects of RPL4 knockdown/overexpression on cancer cell proliferation and apoptosis

  • Investigating correlations between RPL4 status and p53 pathway activity in tumors

  • Examining potential RPL4 mutations in cancer genomes that might affect MDM2 binding

RPL4 joins several other ribosomal proteins that have been shown to play critical roles in coordinating ribosome biogenesis with cell growth and proliferation by regulating the MDM2-p53 pathway .

What experimental approaches can resolve the dual functions of RPL4 in protein synthesis versus gene regulation?

To distinguish between RPL4's canonical role in ribosome function and its extraribosomal regulatory activities, researchers can implement several sophisticated experimental approaches:

Separation of function mutations:

  • Create RPL4 variants with mutations that specifically disrupt one function while preserving the other

  • For example, the W109C mutation affects regulatory functions while potentially preserving ribosomal incorporation

  • These mutants allow researchers to attribute specific cellular effects to distinct RPL4 functions

Domain-specific isolation:

  • Identify minimal functional domains for either ribosomal incorporation or regulatory activity

  • Express these domains independently to study their specific functions

  • The region encompassing amino acids 78-139 appears particularly important for regulatory functions

Temporal separation techniques:

  • Use inducible expression systems to control RPL4 variant expression at specific time points

  • Monitor immediate effects (likely regulatory) versus delayed effects (potentially related to ribosome assembly)

Spatial localization studies:

  • Track subcellular localization of RPL4 under different conditions

  • Identify non-ribosomal pools of RPL4 that may be involved in regulatory functions

  • Co-localization with partners like MDM2 or transcription machinery would suggest regulatory roles

Interactome analysis:

  • Compare RPL4 protein interaction networks under different cellular conditions

  • Distinguish between ribosome-associated interactions and extraribosomal partners

  • Co-purification experiments have successfully identified RPL4's association with transcription factors and RNA polymerase in plants

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.