Recombinant Acanthamoeba polyphaga mimivirus Probable capsid protein 2 (MIMI_R439), partial

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference in order remarks for customized preparation.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please consult your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires prior arrangement and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to collect the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50% and may serve as a reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors, including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing.
The tag type is determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
MIMI_R439Probable capsid protein 2
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Protein Length
Partial
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Acanthamoeba polyphaga mimivirus (APMV)
Target Names
MIMI_R439
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Protein Families
NCLDV major capsid protein family
Subcellular Location
Virion.

Q&A

What is the structural significance of the MIMI_R439 capsid protein in Acanthamoeba polyphaga mimivirus?

The MIMI_R439 protein is a critical structural component of the Acanthamoeba polyphaga mimivirus (APMV) capsid. Research indicates that mimivirus capsid proteins function as building blocks for the viral icosahedral structure. The capsid assembly in mimivirus appears to occur through a process involving growing lamellar structures that progressively form the complete viral particle . Unlike many other capsid proteins that simply form a protective shell, mimivirus capsid proteins participate in a complex morphogenesis process that includes the coordination of genome packaging and the acquisition of surface fibrils . The MIMI_R439 probable capsid protein likely contributes to maintaining the structural integrity necessary for viral function and protection.

How does the MIMI_R439 capsid protein relate to viral entry and infection processes?

The mimivirus MIMI_R439 capsid protein is involved in the complex entry mechanism of the virus into host cells. Studies using cytochalasin (a phagocytosis inhibitor) demonstrated that mimivirus entry depends on phagocytosis by Acanthamoeba castellanii . Following entry, the uncoating process—which includes the opening of a unique structure called the "stargate"—appears to be dependent on phagosome acidification, as shown by experiments with bafilomycin treatment . The capsid proteins, including MIMI_R439, participate in this precisely choreographed entry process, indicating their importance beyond mere structural components. Additionally, research has demonstrated that the mimivirus capsid protein can trigger specific antibody responses in patients, suggesting immunological significance during infection processes .

What experimental approaches are recommended for basic characterization of recombinant MIMI_R439?

For fundamental characterization of recombinant MIMI_R439, researchers should implement a multi-faceted experimental approach:

  • Protein expression verification: Use Western blotting with anti-His tag or protein-specific antibodies

  • Structural analysis: Apply circular dichroism spectroscopy to assess secondary structure elements

  • Purity assessment: Employ SDS-PAGE combined with mass spectrometry

  • Functional validation: Conduct binding assays to verify interactions with other viral components

Advanced characterization may include X-ray crystallography or cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) for detailed structural determination. When designing experiments, researchers should note that mimivirus proteins have shown cross-reactivity with antibodies from patients infected with Francisella tularensis . This cross-reactivity should be considered when developing immunological detection methods. To ensure reproducibility, proper experimental design with adequate sample size calculation should be implemented following statistical principles outlined in experimental design literature .

How can researchers address the challenges in distinguishing between MIMI_R439 and other capsid proteins in immunological studies?

The cross-reactivity observed between mimivirus capsid proteins and antibodies from patients infected with Francisella tularensis presents significant challenges for immunological studies . To address these challenges, researchers should implement a comprehensive strategy:

  • Epitope mapping: Identify specific regions of MIMI_R439 that may cross-react with antibodies against other pathogens

  • Recombinant protein engineering: Create truncated or mutated versions of MIMI_R439 that retain function but eliminate cross-reactive epitopes

  • Absorption techniques: Pre-absorb patient sera with F. tularensis antigens to reduce cross-reactivity

  • Multi-parameter validation: Combine serological tests with PCR or other molecular detection methods

Research has shown that sera from patients infected with F. tularensis recognize specifically two proteins of APMV: the capsid protein and another protein of unknown function . Incorporating appropriate controls is essential, as this cross-reactivity emphasizes potential pitfalls in serological diagnosis of infections . When designing experiments to address cross-reactivity, researchers should consider randomized multifactorial designs rather than one-factor-at-a-time approaches to efficiently examine multiple variables simultaneously .

What statistical approaches are recommended for analyzing experimental data involving recombinant MIMI_R439?

When designing experiments and analyzing data related to recombinant MIMI_R439, researchers should employ robust statistical methodologies:

  • Power analysis: Calculate appropriate sample sizes based on anticipated effect sizes

  • Experimental design optimization: Implement principles of replication, randomization, and blocking

  • Multifactorial analysis: Use factorial designs to understand interaction effects between variables

  • Standardized effect size calculation: Utilize the ratio R = |δ|/σ to express meaningful changes

For experiments examining protein-protein interactions or functional effects, sample size requirements can be estimated using the relationship between power, standardized effect size, and significance level. As shown in the literature, detecting a change of half a standard deviation with 80% power requires approximately 25 observations . The standardized effect size (R) relating to the ratio of detectable difference (δ) to standard deviation (σ) is crucial in determining required sample sizes .

Table 1: Sample Size Requirements Based on Standardized Effect Size and Power

Standardized Effect Size (R)Sample Size for 70% PowerSample Size for 80% PowerSample Size for 90% Power
0.5192535
0.7101318
1.0579

Note: Values based on statistical principles for experimental design with α = 0.05 .

How can researchers effectively investigate the role of MIMI_R439 in mimivirus capsid assembly and morphogenesis?

Investigating MIMI_R439's role in mimivirus capsid assembly requires sophisticated experimental approaches:

  • Time-course microscopy: Implement electron tomography and cryo-scanning electron microscopy to visualize assembly stages

  • Protein interaction mapping: Use pull-down assays and mass spectrometry to identify binding partners

  • Mutagenesis studies: Create targeted mutations to identify critical functional domains

  • In situ labeling: Apply fluorescent or gold-particle labeling of MIMI_R439 to track its incorporation during assembly

Research indicates that mimivirus capsids assemble from growing lamellar structures, with simultaneous acquisition of genome and surface fibrils . A specialized area surrounding the viral factory core appears to be involved in fiber acquisition . To properly investigate these complex processes, researchers should employ a sequential experimental approach combined with high-resolution imaging techniques that have previously revealed critical insights into mimivirus morphogenesis .

What approaches are most effective for optimizing recombinant MIMI_R439 expression and purification?

Optimizing expression and purification of recombinant MIMI_R439 requires systematic methodology:

  • Expression system selection: Compare prokaryotic (E. coli) and eukaryotic (insect cells) systems

  • Codon optimization: Adjust codon usage to match expression host preferences

  • Fusion tag strategy: Test multiple affinity and solubility tags (His, GST, MBP) to identify optimal configuration

  • Purification optimization: Implement a multistep purification strategy including affinity chromatography, ion exchange, and size exclusion

How should researchers design functional assays to investigate MIMI_R439 interactions with viral and host proteins?

Designing functional assays for MIMI_R439 interactions requires careful consideration of biological relevance and methodological sensitivity:

  • Binding assays: Implement surface plasmon resonance (SPR) or biolayer interferometry (BLI) to quantify binding kinetics

  • Co-immunoprecipitation: Use with both viral and host protein extracts to identify physiologically relevant interactions

  • Yeast two-hybrid screening: Employ to discover novel interaction partners

  • Protein-protein docking simulations: Conduct in silico analysis to predict interaction interfaces before experimental validation

When designing these assays, researchers should account for mimivirus's unique properties, including its giant size and complex entry mechanism through phagocytosis . The interaction studies should consider the specificity observed in previous research, where patient sera recognized specifically the capsid protein and another protein of unknown function . For robust experimental design, researchers should implement principles of replication and randomization while considering potential interfering variables .

What imaging techniques provide the most valuable insights into MIMI_R439 localization and function?

Advanced imaging approaches offer critical insights into MIMI_R439 localization and function:

  • Electron tomography: Provides three-dimensional visualization of capsid architecture

  • Cryo-electron microscopy: Offers high-resolution structural data without fixation artifacts

  • Super-resolution fluorescence microscopy: Enables tracking of labeled proteins during infection

  • Correlative light and electron microscopy (CLEM): Combines functional and structural information

Research has demonstrated the value of electron tomography and cryo-scanning electron microscopy in revealing mimivirus structural features, including the unique "stargate" vertex for DNA delivery . These techniques have provided crucial insights into mimivirus morphogenesis, showing that capsids assemble from growing lamellar structures and that genome and fibrils can be acquired simultaneously . For optimal experimental design when conducting imaging studies, researchers should ensure adequate biological and technical replication, with systematic randomization to minimize bias .

How should researchers interpret contradictory findings regarding MIMI_R439 function or interactions?

Contradictory findings regarding MIMI_R439 require systematic analysis and reconciliation:

  • Methodological evaluation: Assess differences in experimental approaches that might explain discrepancies

  • Context dependency: Consider whether environmental conditions or cell types influence results

  • Protein isoform analysis: Investigate whether different protein isoforms or post-translational modifications exist

  • Replication with standardized protocols: Implement consistent protocols across laboratories for validation

When interpreting contradictory results, researchers should consider that mimivirus proteins have shown unexpected cross-reactivity with antibodies from patients infected with unrelated pathogens despite no detectable common protein motifs in silico . This suggests that protein function and interaction may be more complex than predicted by sequence analysis alone. Statistical approaches should include evaluation of standardized effect sizes and careful consideration of experimental power, as insufficient sample sizes can lead to contradictory findings .

What are the most promising research directions for understanding MIMI_R439's role in mimivirus pathogenesis?

Future research on MIMI_R439 should focus on several promising directions:

  • Host immune response analysis: Investigate how MIMI_R439 interacts with host immune system components

  • Structure-function relationship mapping: Determine how specific domains contribute to capsid assembly and stability

  • Evolutionary conservation studies: Compare MIMI_R439 with capsid proteins from related giant viruses

  • Development of inhibitory compounds: Screen for molecules that disrupt MIMI_R439 function as potential antivirals

Research has demonstrated that mimivirus capsid proteins can elicit specific antibody responses, suggesting potential immunological significance . The entry mechanism involving phagocytosis and the dependence of uncoating on phagosome acidification indicate potential targets for intervention . When designing studies to explore these directions, researchers should implement multifactorial experimental designs rather than one-factor-at-a-time approaches to efficiently examine multiple variables simultaneously .

How can researchers leverage structural information about MIMI_R439 to inform drug discovery or diagnostic development?

Structural insights into MIMI_R439 can drive translational applications:

  • Structure-based drug design: Use high-resolution structural data to identify potential binding pockets

  • Epitope mapping: Identify unique regions for specific antibody development

  • Diagnostic marker development: Exploit specific regions that avoid cross-reactivity with other pathogens

  • Rational vaccine design: Target structurally conserved epitopes for broad protection

Research has highlighted the challenges of cross-reactivity in serological diagnosis, emphasizing the need for carefully designed diagnostics . When developing structure-based applications, researchers should be aware that despite no common protein motifs detectable through in silico analysis, unexpected cross-reactivity can occur . This suggests that structural analysis should combine computational approaches with experimental validation. Experimental design for validation studies should incorporate principles of replication, randomization, and blocking to ensure reliable results .

What are the key considerations for designing controlled experiments to study MIMI_R439 function in vitro?

Designing controlled experiments for MIMI_R439 function requires rigorous methodology:

  • Appropriate controls: Include both positive controls (known functional domains) and negative controls (mutated non-functional versions)

  • Variable isolation: Systematically control environmental conditions affecting protein function

  • Replication strategy: Implement both biological and technical replication to ensure reliability

  • Quantification methods: Establish sensitive and specific readouts for functional assessment

For robust experimental design, researchers should follow established statistical guidelines that outline principles including replication, randomization, blocking or grouping of subjects, and multifactorial design . Sample size calculations should consider the standardized effect size, which relates to the ratio of detectable difference to standard deviation . When designing experiments to study MIMI_R439, researchers should be particularly attentive to potential cross-reactivity with antibodies against other pathogens, which could confound immunological assays .

How can researchers effectively design experiments to study MIMI_R439 interactions with host cell components during infection?

Studying MIMI_R439 interactions during infection requires specialized experimental approaches:

  • Time-course analysis: Sample at multiple time points to capture dynamic interactions

  • Proximity labeling: Employ BioID or APEX2 techniques to identify proteins in close proximity during infection

  • Live-cell imaging: Use fluorescently tagged proteins to track localization during infection stages

  • Targeted knockdown/knockout: Employ siRNA or CRISPR to assess functional importance of specific interactions

Research has established that mimivirus entry depends on phagocytosis, with uncoating and stargate opening dependent on phagosome acidification . These findings suggest that experiments should be designed to account for the specific cellular conditions at different stages of infection. When designing these studies, researchers should implement multifactorial approaches rather than changing one factor at a time, as this allows for more efficient understanding of interaction effects .

What are the most common technical pitfalls when working with recombinant MIMI_R439, and how can they be addressed?

Researchers working with recombinant MIMI_R439 should anticipate and address several technical challenges:

  • Protein solubility issues: Optimize expression conditions and consider solubility-enhancing fusion tags

  • Expression toxicity: Use tightly regulated inducible expression systems and optimize induction conditions

  • Structural integrity verification: Implement circular dichroism or limited proteolysis to confirm proper folding

  • Functional validation challenges: Develop robust activity assays with appropriate controls

One significant challenge highlighted in the literature is cross-reactivity in immunological assays. Research has shown that sera from patients infected with F. tularensis recognize specifically two proteins of APMV, including the capsid protein . This cross-reactivity underscores the importance of careful antibody validation and the use of multiple detection methods. When addressing these challenges, researchers should implement experimental designs with proper randomization to ensure that unanticipated factors equally impact all treatment groups .

How can collaborative approaches advance our understanding of MIMI_R439 function in viral biology?

Advancing knowledge about MIMI_R439 will benefit from multidisciplinary collaboration:

  • Structural biologists and virologists: Combine expertise to link structure with function

  • Immunologists and cell biologists: Integrate perspectives on host-pathogen interactions

  • Bioinformaticians and wet-lab researchers: Merge computational predictions with experimental validation

  • Clinical and basic researchers: Connect bench findings with potential diagnostic applications

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.