Recombinant Acanthamoeba polyphaga mimivirus Uncharacterized protein L153 (MIMI_L153)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference during order placement for customized preparation.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires advance notice and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to consolidate the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50%, which can serve as a guideline.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on several factors: storage conditions, buffer components, temperature, and the protein's inherent stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquoting is essential for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during the manufacturing process.
The specific tag type is finalized during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
MIMI_L153; Uncharacterized protein L153
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-152
Protein Length
full length protein
Species
Acanthamoeba polyphaga mimivirus (APMV)
Target Names
MIMI_L153
Target Protein Sequence
MNNSMILLMVIASFVAGYLSTMNLWANSIGDIRLHLNDFYMVLLMVGWMIVMCYILMKSH MGITKTQLIITITIIIIIVYAIRTQAFIDDKQYLNGMIPHHSMAITMSKWIVNRTKDPRI KQLATDIIISQQNEINEMNSILDERKLQNKVF
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Database Links

KEGG: vg:9924753

Subcellular Location
Membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is Acanthamoeba polyphaga mimivirus Uncharacterized protein L153?

MIMI_L153 is a protein encoded by the Acanthamoeba polyphaga mimivirus genome, currently classified as uncharacterized due to limited functional data. The protein consists of 152 amino acids and is identified in the UniProt database with accession number Q5UPL7 . As a viral protein, it may play roles in viral replication, host interaction, or structural assembly, though its precise function remains to be elucidated through experimental analysis. The protein's relatively small size suggests it may function as an accessory protein rather than a major structural component of the virus.

What storage conditions are optimal for maintaining MIMI_L153 stability?

To maintain optimal stability of recombinant MIMI_L153, the protein should be stored in Tris-based buffer containing 50% glycerol, which has been optimized specifically for this protein . For short-term storage (up to one week), working aliquots can be kept at 4°C. For longer-term storage, the protein should be maintained at -20°C, while extended storage periods require conservation at -80°C . It is important to note that repeated freeze-thaw cycles are not recommended as they can lead to protein degradation and loss of activity. Instead, researchers should prepare single-use aliquots when dividing the stock solution.

How should I design experiments to investigate the function of MIMI_L153?

When designing experiments to investigate MIMI_L153 function, follow these methodological steps:

  • Formulate a clear hypothesis based on sequence analysis predictions, such as "MIMI_L153 localizes to host cell membranes due to its predicted transmembrane domains."

  • Identify your variables carefully:

    • Independent variable (IV): The experimental condition you're manipulating (e.g., expression systems, tagged vs. untagged protein)

    • Dependent variable (DV): The outcome you're measuring (e.g., localization pattern, binding affinity)

    • Controlled variables: Factors kept constant across all experimental conditions (e.g., cell type, temperature, incubation times)

  • Design a robust experimental procedure with multiple trials:

    • Include at least three biological replicates for each experimental condition

    • Incorporate appropriate positive and negative controls

    • Document the procedure with detailed diagrams as recommended in experimental design protocols

  • Plan appropriate analysis methods based on the type of data collected:

    • Statistical tests appropriate for your experimental design

    • Methods to identify and account for experimental errors

Experimental ApproachIndependent VariableDependent VariableKey ControlsAnalysis Method
Subcellular localizationTagged MIMI_L153 constructs (N-tag vs. C-tag vs. untagged)Localization pattern in host cellsKnown markers for cellular compartmentsFluorescence quantification across compartments
Pull-down assaysMIMI_L153 bait protein vs. control proteinIdentified binding partnersInput controls, Non-specific binding controlsMass spectrometry and enrichment analysis
Functional knockoutExpression vs. CRISPR knockout of MIMI_L153Viral replication efficiencyWild-type virus, Knockout of non-essential geneViral titer comparison, growth curve analysis

What methodological approaches should I use to study MIMI_L153 interaction with host proteins?

To study interactions between MIMI_L153 and host proteins, consider these methodological approaches:

  • Yeast Two-Hybrid Screening:

    • Clone MIMI_L153 as a bait protein fused to a DNA-binding domain

    • Screen against a human or amoeba host cDNA library

    • Design the experiment with appropriate controls, including:

      • Positive control (known interacting protein pairs)

      • Negative control (empty vectors)

      • Autoactivation control (bait with empty prey vector)

  • Co-Immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):

    • Express tagged MIMI_L153 in host cells

    • Design experiments with three technical replicates per condition

    • Include controls for non-specific binding and antibody specificity

    • Identify binding partners through mass spectrometry analysis

  • Proximity Labeling (BioID or APEX):

    • Design fusion constructs of MIMI_L153 with biotin ligase

    • Establish expression systems in relevant host cells

    • Consider spatial and temporal variables in your experimental design

    • Include appropriate controls to distinguish true interactors from background

For each approach, apply rigorous experimental design principles including clear hypotheses, well-defined variables, multi-trial procedures, and appropriate controls to ensure reproducibility and validity of results .

How can I design experiments to determine the structure-function relationship of MIMI_L153?

Structure-function analysis requires methodical experimental design focused on protein domains and mutations:

  • Domain Mapping Analysis:

    • Design a series of truncated constructs of MIMI_L153

    • Express each construct as a recombinant protein

    • Test each construct for specific functions (localization, binding, activity)

    • Include at least three trials for each construct as recommended in experimental design best practices

  • Site-Directed Mutagenesis:

    • Identify conserved residues through sequence alignment with related proteins

    • Design experiments with systematic mutations of key residues

    • Independent variable: Specific amino acid mutations

    • Dependent variable: Effect on function (binding, localization, etc.)

    • Controls: Wild-type protein, irrelevant mutations in non-conserved regions

  • Structural Analysis Integration:

    • Correlate functional effects with structural predictions

    • Design experiments to test structure-based hypotheses

    • Record both quantitative measurements and qualitative observations

Mutation TypeDesign RationaleExpected OutcomeControl Condition
Conserved hydrophobic residues in N-terminal regionTest membrane association hypothesisAltered localization, reduced membrane associationWild-type protein, mutations in non-conserved regions
Charged residues in potential interaction interfaceDisrupt potential protein-protein interactionsReduced binding to partner proteinsWild-type protein, surface mutations away from predicted interface
Glycosylation site mutationsTest importance of post-translational modificationsAltered stability or localizationWild-type protein expression under identical conditions

What statistical approaches should I use when analyzing MIMI_L153 experimental data?

Statistical analysis of MIMI_L153 data requires careful consideration of experimental design principles:

  • Preliminary Data Processing:

    • Normalize data to account for experimental variations

    • Test for normal distribution (Shapiro-Wilk test)

    • Identify and address outliers using standardized methods

  • Appropriate Statistical Tests:

    • For comparing two conditions: t-tests (parametric) or Mann-Whitney U test (non-parametric)

    • For multiple conditions: ANOVA with appropriate post-hoc tests

    • For binding assays: Regression analysis for binding curves and calculation of affinity constants

  • Replication and Error Analysis:

    • Conduct minimum three independent replicates as recommended in experimental design guidelines

    • Calculate standard error and confidence intervals

    • Report p-values and effect sizes to indicate statistical significance and biological relevance

  • Visualization Approaches:

    • Create clear and informative graphs with error bars

    • Use consistent formatting for all data representations

    • Include appropriate legends and statistical significance indicators

When analyzing data, remember to account for experimental errors that may have occurred during the procedure, and consider how these might affect your interpretation of results . Document all analytical methods thoroughly to ensure reproducibility.

How should I interpret unexpected or contradictory results in MIMI_L153 functional studies?

When encountering unexpected or contradictory results:

  • Systematic Error Analysis:

    • Review experimental procedures for potential sources of error

    • Consider variables that may have been insufficiently controlled

    • Evaluate whether equipment calibration could have affected measurements

  • Biological Interpretation:

    • Consider whether contradictory results might reflect actual biological complexity

    • Analyze whether MIMI_L153 might have multiple functions depending on context

    • Examine whether post-translational modifications might explain differential behavior

  • Validation Through Alternative Approaches:

    • Design follow-up experiments using complementary methods

    • Apply different experimental designs that test the same hypothesis

    • Ensure proper experimental controls for each validation approach

  • Literature Comparison:

    • Compare your findings with studies of related viral proteins

    • Analyze whether your contradictory results align with observations in other systems

    • Consider whether your findings reveal novel aspects of mimivirus biology

Remember that unexpected results often lead to the most significant discoveries. Document all observations thoroughly, including qualitative observations that might provide context for quantitative data .

What approaches can I use to validate potential MIMI_L153 interaction partners?

Validation of protein interactions requires multi-method confirmation:

  • Reciprocal Co-Immunoprecipitation:

    • Perform pull-downs from both directions (MIMI_L153 as bait and prey)

    • Design experiments with appropriate negative controls

    • Include at least three biological replicates for statistical analysis

  • Functional Validation:

    • Design experiments to test whether the interaction affects function

    • Independent variable: Disruption of interaction (mutations, blocking peptides)

    • Dependent variable: Functional outcome (viral replication, localization)

    • Controls: Wild-type protein, irrelevant mutations

  • In Vitro Binding Assays:

    • Use purified recombinant proteins to test direct interactions

    • Employ quantitative methods (SPR, ITC, MST) to measure binding parameters

    • Include properly designed controls for non-specific binding

  • Cellular Colocalization Studies:

    • Design fluorescence microscopy experiments to visualize potential colocalization

    • Apply proper statistical analysis to quantify colocalization

    • Include controls for random colocalization patterns

Validation MethodStrengthsLimitationsControls Required
Reciprocal Co-IPDemonstrates interaction in cellular contextPotential for indirect interactionsNon-specific antibody, unrelated protein pull-down
FRET/BRET AnalysisShows proximity in living cellsTechnical complexityDonor-only, acceptor-only, non-interacting protein pairs
In vitro binding assaysDemonstrates direct interactionMay not reflect in vivo conditionsBinding to unrelated proteins, buffer-only controls
Functional assaysDemonstrates biological relevanceIndirect measure of interactionWild-type conditions, mutations not affecting interaction

How can MIMI_L153 research contribute to our understanding of mimivirus-host interactions?

MIMI_L153 research offers several avenues for advancing mimivirus-host interaction knowledge:

  • Receptor Recognition Studies:

    • Design experiments to test whether MIMI_L153 participates in host cell recognition

    • Apply experimental design principles with clear independent (host cell types) and dependent variables (binding efficiency)

    • Include controls with other mimivirus surface proteins

  • Immune Evasion Mechanisms:

    • Investigate whether MIMI_L153 interferes with host immune responses

    • Design experiments measuring host immune factors with and without MIMI_L153 expression

    • Include appropriate time-course measurements with multiple trials

  • Evolutionary Analysis:

    • Compare MIMI_L153 with homologs in other large DNA viruses

    • Design phylogenetic analyses to trace the protein's evolutionary history

    • Correlate sequence conservation with functional domains

  • Systems Biology Integration:

    • Design interactome mapping experiments to place MIMI_L153 in the context of viral-host protein networks

    • Apply network analysis to identify key interaction hubs

    • Validate predictions with targeted experimental approaches

By systematically applying these research approaches with proper experimental design, researchers can uncover the role of MIMI_L153 in the broader context of mimivirus biology and host interactions.

What structural biology approaches are most appropriate for studying MIMI_L153?

For structural characterization of MIMI_L153, consider these methodological approaches:

  • X-ray Crystallography:

    • Optimize expression and purification conditions for crystallization

    • Design construct screening (full-length vs. domains)

    • Plan for phase determination methods (molecular replacement vs. experimental phasing)

    • Include controls for protein quality and homogeneity before crystallization trials

  • Cryo-Electron Microscopy:

    • Design sample preparation protocols optimized for membrane proteins

    • Plan for both single-particle analysis and tomography approaches

    • Include controls for sample vitrification quality and particle distribution

  • NMR Spectroscopy:

    • Design isotope labeling strategies (15N, 13C, 2H)

    • Optimize sample conditions for solution NMR

    • Include controls for protein folding and stability during data collection

  • Integrative Structural Biology:

    • Design complementary experiments using multiple methods

    • Plan for computational integration of diverse structural data

    • Include validation experiments for structural models

How might comparative studies with other mimivirus proteins enhance our understanding of MIMI_L153?

Comparative studies offer powerful insights into MIMI_L153 function:

  • Functional Genomics Approaches:

    • Design comparative knockout studies of MIMI_L153 and related genes

    • Apply experimental design principles with clearly defined variables

    • Include appropriate controls for each gene manipulation

  • Evolutionary Pattern Analysis:

    • Design sequence conservation studies across mimiviruses and related viruses

    • Correlate conserved motifs with functional domains

    • Apply phylogenetic methods to trace evolutionary relationships

  • Expression Pattern Comparisons:

    • Design time-course experiments measuring expression of MIMI_L153 alongside other viral proteins

    • Independent variable: Time post-infection

    • Dependent variable: Expression levels of multiple proteins

    • Controls: Host genes, viral structural genes

  • Structural Homology Modeling:

    • Design comparative modeling based on known structures of related proteins

    • Validate models through targeted mutagenesis experiments

    • Include experimental controls to test model predictions

By designing these comparative studies with rigorous experimental protocols and multiple trials , researchers can place MIMI_L153 in the broader context of mimivirus biology and potentially identify its functional role based on similarities with better-characterized viral proteins.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.