KEGG: aca:ACP_1031
STRING: 240015.ACP_1031
While the specific organization of ATP synthase genes in Acidobacterium capsulatum has not been fully characterized in the provided search results, we can draw comparisons to related organisms. In Rhodobacter capsulatus, the atpHAGDC operon contains five genes coding for the F1 sector of ATP synthase, while the F0 sector genes are located elsewhere in the genome . This separation of F0 and F1 operons appears to be a feature shared among several photosynthetic bacteria, including Rhodospirillum rubrum and Rhodopseudomonas blastica .
For optimal cultivation of Acidobacterium capsulatum:
pH range: Maintain medium pH between 3.0 and 6.0, with optimal growth typically around pH 4.0-5.0. Growth ceases at pH 6.5 and above .
Carbon sources: Provide glucose, starch, cellobiose, or maltose as primary carbon sources. A. capsulatum cannot utilize elemental sulfur or ferrous iron as energy sources .
Temperature: As a mesophilic organism, maintain cultures at 25-30°C.
Oxygen conditions: While A. capsulatum is facultatively anaerobic, varying oxygen conditions may influence ATP synthase expression levels .
Media composition: Consider the presence of exopolysaccharides coating the cells, which may affect nutrient uptake and cell harvesting processes .
| Parameter | Optimal Condition | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| pH | 4.0-5.0 | No growth at pH ≥ 6.5 |
| Temperature | 25-30°C | Mesophilic range |
| Carbon source | Glucose, starch, cellobiose, maltose | Cannot use elemental sulfur or ferrous iron |
| Oxygen | Aerobic or anaerobic | Facultative anaerobe |
| Culture duration | Strain-dependent (typically 2-4 days) | Monitor growth curves to determine optimal harvest time |
When selecting an expression system for recombinant A. capsulatum atpH, consider the following approaches:
Escherichia coli-based systems:
BL21(DE3) derivatives with pET vectors containing T7 promoters offer high expression levels.
Consider codon optimization, as A. capsulatum may have different codon usage patterns compared to E. coli.
Expression as a fusion protein with solubility tags (MBP, SUMO, or TrxA) may improve folding and solubility.
Alternative hosts:
Based on experiences with other ATP synthase subunits, expression often requires optimization of:
Induction conditions (temperature, inducer concentration, duration)
Cell lysis methods to preserve protein integrity
Inclusion of stabilizing agents (glycerol, specific ions) in purification buffers
Drawing from principles established in the optimization of recombinant protein production in other systems, a systematic approach testing multiple expression constructs is recommended .
For site-directed mutagenesis studies of A. capsulatum atpH:
Plasmid-based approach:
Clone the atpH gene into a suitable vector
Use PCR-based mutagenesis (e.g., QuikChange method or overlap extension PCR)
Transform into an expression host for protein production
Purify and characterize mutant proteins
Chromosomal modification approach:
Drawing from methods developed for Rhodobacter capsulatus :
Combine gene transfer agent (GTA) transduction with conjugation for introducing mutations
Create a complementation plasmid carrying the wild-type atpH to maintain viability
Replace the wild-type gene with the mutated version
A key insight from Rhodobacter research is the essential nature of ATP synthase genes, which necessitates specialized approaches for generating viable mutants . When the ATP synthase is essential, a two-step process might be required:
a) Introduce a complementing wild-type copy
b) Replace the chromosomal copy with the mutant version
Key residues to target for mutagenesis should be identified through sequence alignment with well-characterized ATP synthase delta subunits from other organisms.
A systematic purification strategy for recombinant A. capsulatum atpH would include:
Initial capture:
If expressed with an affinity tag: Ni-NTA chromatography (His-tag), amylose resin (MBP-tag), or glutathione sepharose (GST-tag)
Without tag: Ion exchange chromatography based on the predicted pI of atpH
Intermediate purification:
Size exclusion chromatography to separate monomeric atpH from aggregates and contaminants
Consider hydrophobic interaction chromatography if appropriate
Polishing step:
Second ion exchange step under different pH conditions
Hydroxyapatite chromatography
| Purification Step | Technique | Typical Buffer Conditions | Critical Parameters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cell lysis | Sonication or pressure-based | 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol, protease inhibitors | Temperature control (4°C), minimizing proteolysis |
| Affinity chromatography | IMAC (for His-tagged protein) | Binding: 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 10 mM imidazole; Elution: gradual increase to 250 mM imidazole | Flow rate, imidazole gradient profile |
| Size exclusion | Superdex 75/200 | 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl | Column resolution, sample volume |
Specific considerations for A. capsulatum atpH:
Buffer pH may need adjustment considering the acidophilic nature of the source organism
Include stabilizing agents (glycerol 5-10%) to prevent aggregation
Test stability in NADH-containing buffers based on potential regulatory mechanisms
To investigate subunit interactions within the ATP synthase complex:
In vitro reconstitution studies:
Express and purify individual subunits (α, β, γ, δ, ε) of the F1 complex
Perform stepwise reconstitution experiments
Use analytical techniques (native PAGE, analytical ultracentrifugation, light scattering) to verify complex formation
Measure ATP hydrolysis/synthesis activities of reconstituted complexes
Protein-protein interaction analysis:
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) to determine binding kinetics between atpH and other subunits
Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) for thermodynamic parameters of binding
Crosslinking studies followed by mass spectrometry to identify interaction interfaces
Structural studies:
X-ray crystallography of the recombinant atpH alone or in complex with interacting partners
Cryo-electron microscopy of the assembled F1 or F0F1 complex
NMR studies for dynamics information if the protein size permits
FRET-based approaches:
Create fluorescently labeled versions of atpH and potential interaction partners
Monitor energy transfer as evidence of proximity and interaction
Drawing from insights on ATP synthase regulation by NADH , consider examining:
The role of metabolic state (NADH levels) in modulating subunit interactions
Potential conformational changes in atpH under different redox conditions
Given A. capsulatum's adaptation to acidic environments , examining pH effects on atpH is particularly relevant:
Structural stability across pH range:
Circular dichroism spectroscopy to monitor secondary structure changes at pH 3.0-7.0
Intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence to detect tertiary structure alterations
Differential scanning calorimetry to determine thermal stability at different pH values
Functional assays at varying pH:
ATPase activity measurements using phosphate release assays
Binding assays with other subunits at different pH values
If possible, proton pumping assays in reconstituted liposomes
Molecular dynamics simulations:
In silico prediction of pH-dependent structural changes
Identification of key residues with altered protonation states
Experimental design should include:
Fine pH gradients (0.5 unit increments) within the range 3.0-7.0
Extended incubation times to ensure equilibration
Multiple buffer systems with overlapping pH ranges to control for buffer-specific effects
| pH | Buffer System | Concentration | Ionic Strength Adjustment |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3.0-3.5 | Citrate | 50 mM | NaCl to 150 mM |
| 3.5-5.5 | Acetate | 50 mM | NaCl to 150 mM |
| 5.5-6.5 | MES | 50 mM | NaCl to 150 mM |
| 6.5-7.5 | MOPS | 50 mM | NaCl to 150 mM |
When facing discrepancies between recombinant atpH and native complex data:
Systematic comparison approach:
Create a comprehensive table of kinetic parameters (Km, Vmax, kcat) from both systems
Identify patterns in the discrepancies (e.g., consistently higher/lower values)
Test hypotheses about the causes of differences through targeted experiments
Context interpretation framework:
Recombinant atpH alone may lack regulatory influences present in the holoenzyme
Native complexes maintain quaternary structure constraints potentially absent in isolated subunits
Consider the impact of post-translational modifications potentially missing in recombinant systems
Data reconciliation strategies:
Statistical analysis approach:
Apply appropriate statistical tests to determine if differences are significant
Use regression analysis to identify factors influencing variability
Consider Bayesian approaches to incorporate prior knowledge about ATP synthase behavior
Based on the discovery of NADH-controlled gatekeeper mechanisms for ATP synthase , critical controls include:
Specificity controls:
Test other nucleotides (NAD+, NADPH, NADP+) to confirm NADH specificity
Employ varying NADH concentrations to establish dose-dependency
Use NADH analogs to identify structural requirements for the regulatory effect
Mechanistic controls:
Mutate potential NADH-binding residues in atpH to confirm direct interaction
Examine the effect of NADH in the presence/absence of other subunits
Test whether the effect persists under different pH conditions relevant to A. capsulatum
System validation controls:
Compare results from multiple expression and purification batches
Verify protein integrity before and after NADH exposure
Include positive and negative controls for activity assays
Physiological relevance controls:
Correlate in vitro findings with whole-cell measurements under varying metabolic conditions
Develop A. capsulatum mutants with altered NADH metabolism to test effects in vivo
Compare findings with data from other acidophilic bacteria
| Experiment | Control Type | Implementation | Expected Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| NADH binding assay | Specificity | Test NAD+, NADPH, ATP | Selective binding to NADH |
| Activity measurements | Negative | Heat-denatured atpH | No NADH-dependent changes |
| Structural studies | System validation | Circular dichroism before/after NADH | Consistent protein folding |
| Cellular energy status | Physiological relevance | Measure ATP/ADP ratios with/without NADH supplementation | Correlation with in vitro NADH effects |
To conduct comparative analyses across Acidobacteria:
Sequence analysis approach:
Perform multiple sequence alignment of atpH from diverse Acidobacteria
Calculate conservation scores for each residue
Identify domains with higher/lower conservation
Map conservation onto structural models (if available)
Structure-function correlation:
Use homology modeling to predict structural features of atpH from different species
Identify species-specific insertions/deletions
Correlate structural differences with habitat-specific adaptations (e.g., pH optima)
Experimental validation:
Express recombinant atpH from multiple Acidobacteria species
Compare biochemical properties under standardized conditions
Perform complementation studies in model organisms
Phylogenetic analysis:
Construct phylogenetic trees based on atpH sequences
Compare with species trees based on 16S rRNA or whole genomes
Identify instances of possible horizontal gene transfer or convergent evolution
These comparative approaches can reveal how the atpH gene has evolved in response to different environmental pressures, particularly in acidophilic niches where Acidobacterium capsulatum is found .
Researchers frequently encounter these challenges when working with recombinant ATP synthase subunits:
Poor solubility and inclusion body formation:
Solution: Lower induction temperature (16-20°C), reduce inducer concentration, use solubility-enhancing tags (SUMO, MBP)
Alternative: Develop refolding protocols from inclusion bodies using gradual dialysis
Proteolytic degradation:
Solution: Use protease-deficient host strains, include multiple protease inhibitors, optimize purification speed
Identification: N-terminal sequencing or mass spectrometry to identify cleavage sites
Low activity of purified protein:
Solution: Test multiple buffer conditions, include stabilizing agents (glycerol, reducing agents)
Validation: Compare with native ATP synthase activity, ensure proper folding using spectroscopic methods
Inconsistent yields between batches:
Solution: Standardize growth conditions, harvest at consistent cell density, monitor expression using reporter systems
Analysis: Implement statistical process control to identify sources of variability
Drawing from approaches used for other ATP synthase components , consider:
Co-expression of multiple subunits may enhance stability
Expression in specialized hosts adapted to membrane protein production
For successful crystallization:
Pre-crystallization optimization:
Verify protein homogeneity using dynamic light scattering
Perform thermal shift assays to identify stabilizing buffer conditions
Consider limited proteolysis to remove flexible regions that might impede crystallization
Initial screening strategy:
Employ sparse matrix screens at multiple protein concentrations (5-20 mg/ml)
Test both vapor diffusion and batch crystallization methods
Include additive screens with known ATP synthase ligands
Optimization approaches:
Fine-tune promising conditions through grid screens varying pH, precipitant concentration, and salt
Implement seeding techniques to improve crystal quality
Consider crystallization with binding partners or antibody fragments
Special considerations for atpH:
| Crystallization Variable | Suggested Range | Optimization Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| pH | 3.5-6.5 | 0.5 unit increments |
| Protein concentration | 5-20 mg/ml | 2-fold serial dilutions |
| Temperature | 4°C and 18°C | Compare results at both temperatures |
| Additives | Nucleotides (ATP, ADP, NADH) | 0.1-5 mM concentration range |
Several cutting-edge approaches show promise for ATP synthase research:
Cryo-electron tomography:
Visualize ATP synthase in its native membrane environment
Reveal supramolecular organization and potential interactions with other complexes
Capture different conformational states during the catalytic cycle
Single-molecule techniques:
FRET-based studies to monitor real-time conformational changes
Optical tweezers to measure force generation during ATP synthesis
High-speed atomic force microscopy to observe structural dynamics
Integrative structural biology:
Combine X-ray crystallography, NMR, and cryo-EM data
Integrate computational modeling with experimental restraints
Develop time-resolved structural methods to capture transient states
Systems biology approaches:
Multi-omics integration (transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics)
Flux balance analysis to understand ATP synthase contribution to cellular energetics
Network modeling of energy metabolism in acidophilic conditions
Building on the discovered NADH-dependent regulation mechanisms , future research could explore:
Redox-sensitive structural elements within atpH
Integration of ATP synthase function with cellular metabolic state
Adaptation mechanisms in extremophiles like A. capsulatum
Studying atpH from A. capsulatum can provide insights into:
Molecular basis of acid tolerance:
Identification of acid-resistant protein structural features
Understanding how energy conservation occurs efficiently at low pH
Revealing adaptations in proton-utilizing enzymes
Evolutionary perspectives:
Comparison with ATP synthases from neutrophilic bacteria
Identification of convergent adaptations across different acidophilic lineages
Understanding the evolutionary history of Acidobacteria
Ecological implications:
Biotechnological applications:
Development of acid-stable enzymes for industrial processes
Understanding energy metabolism in acidic conditions for bioremediation applications
Engineering acid-tolerant organisms for various biotechnological purposes