Recombinant Acidovorax citrulli UPF0060 membrane protein Aave_2845 (Aave_2845)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Supplied as a lyophilized powder.
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your preferred format in order notes for fulfillment.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchase method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs unless dry ice shipping is specifically requested and pre-arranged. Additional charges apply for dry ice shipping.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to collect the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting to -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50% and serves as a guideline.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized formulations have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquot to prevent repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
The tag type is determined during the manufacturing process.
Note: While the tag type is determined during production, please specify your required tag type in advance to prioritize its inclusion in the manufacturing process.
Synonyms
Aave_2845; UPF0060 membrane protein Aave_2845
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-111
Protein Length
full length protein
Species
Acidovorax citrulli (strain AAC00-1) (Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli)
Target Names
Aave_2845
Target Protein Sequence
MVELKTFLLYAVTALAEIAGCYLPWLWLRQDRSAWLLVPGAACLALFAWLLTLHPAAAGR VYAAYGGVYVAVALGWLWAVDGIRPDRWDLAGAAVTLAGMAIIAFAPRGAA
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Database Links
Protein Families
UPF0060 family
Subcellular Location
Cell inner membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is the amino acid sequence and basic properties of the Aave_2845 protein?

The Aave_2845 protein is a 111-amino acid membrane protein with the following sequence:
MVELKTFLLYAVTALAEIAGCYLPWLWLRQDRSAWLLVPGAACLALFAWLLTLHPAAAGRVYAAYGGVYVAVALGWLWAVDGIRPDRWDLAGAAVTLAGMAIIAFAPRGAA

Analysis of this sequence reveals characteristic features of a membrane protein with hydrophobic regions. The protein has a molecular weight of approximately 12 kDa and contains transmembrane domains typical of membrane-associated proteins. Biochemical characterization indicates it belongs to the UPF0060 family of proteins, which are conserved across various bacterial species but remain functionally uncharacterized in many organisms .

What are the most effective expression systems for producing recombinant Aave_2845?

For membrane proteins like Aave_2845, E. coli expression systems have proven effective, as demonstrated by commercial preparations . The methodological approach involves:

  • Cloning the full-length gene sequence (positions 1-111) into an appropriate expression vector

  • Adding an N-terminal His-tag for purification purposes

  • Transforming into an E. coli expression strain optimized for membrane proteins

  • Inducing expression under controlled conditions to prevent aggregation

While E. coli is the most commonly used system, researchers should consider alternative expression systems for specific experimental needs:

Expression SystemAdvantagesLimitationsRecommended for Aave_2845
E. coliHigh yield, cost-effective, rapidMay have improper folding of complex membrane proteinsBasic structural studies, antibody production
YeastBetter for eukaryotic membrane proteins, glycosylation capabilityLower yield than E. coliNot typically necessary for bacterial proteins
Insect cellsSuperior folding for complex proteinsHigher cost, longer production timeAdvanced functional studies if E. coli system fails
Mammalian cellsBest for complex eukaryotic proteinsHighest cost, lowest yieldNot recommended for bacterial proteins

What purification challenges are specific to Aave_2845 and how can they be overcome?

As a membrane protein, Aave_2845 presents several purification challenges:

  • Solubility issues: Standard approaches include:

    • Using specialized detergents to solubilize the protein from membranes

    • Optimizing buffer conditions to maintain protein stability

    • Employing mild solubilization techniques to preserve native structure

  • Purification strategy: The recommended approach utilizes:

    • IMAC (Immobilized Metal Affinity Chromatography) leveraging the His-tag

    • Size exclusion chromatography to remove aggregates

    • Ion exchange chromatography for final polishing

  • Quality assessment metrics:

    • Purity >90% as assessed by SDS-PAGE

    • Western blot confirmation of target protein

    • Mass spectrometry to verify protein integrity

What techniques are most suitable for determining the membrane topology of Aave_2845?

Understanding membrane topology is crucial for functional characterization. Recommended methodologies include:

These approaches should be used complementarily, as each has strengths and limitations when applied to membrane proteins.

How does Aave_2845 compare structurally and functionally to homologous proteins in other bacterial pathogens?

Comparative analysis provides insights into potential functions:

  • Homology assessment:

    • UPF0060 family proteins are found across multiple bacterial species

    • Sequence alignment reveals conserved regions that may indicate functional domains

    • Structural prediction indicates similar membrane topology across homologs

  • Functional inferences:

    • By analogy to other bacterial membrane proteins, Aave_2845 may contribute to membrane integrity, signaling, or transport functions

    • Its conservation suggests importance, though specific roles remain to be characterized

  • Evolutionary considerations:

    • Pathogens like A. citrulli have evolved specialized protein arsenals for host infection and colonization

    • Membrane proteins often play roles in adaptation to specific host environments

How might Aave_2845 contribute to the differential host specificity observed between group I and group II A. citrulli strains?

A. citrulli strains show distinct host preferences, with group I strains primarily affecting melon and group II strains being more aggressive on watermelon . While the specific contribution of Aave_2845 has not been directly established, several hypotheses can be considered:

  • Potential mechanisms:

    • Membrane proteins may affect bacterial adhesion to specific host tissues

    • They may be involved in sensing environmental cues specific to different host plants

    • They could contribute to resistance against host defense compounds

  • Experimental approaches to test these hypotheses:

    • Comparative genomic analysis of Aave_2845 sequences between group I and II strains

    • Knockout/complementation studies to assess virulence changes on different hosts

    • Heterologous expression to determine if the protein confers altered host specificity

What evidence exists for Aave_2845 interaction with the type III secretion system or other virulence mechanisms?

While direct evidence specifically for Aave_2845 is limited in the provided literature, broader research on A. citrulli provides a framework for investigation:

  • Type III secretion system context:

    • A. citrulli possesses a complex T3SS regulated by HrpX, an AraC-type transcriptional regulator

    • The pathogen contains at least 58 validated type III-secreted effectors

    • Membrane proteins may interact with or support T3SS function

  • Regulatory networks:

    • Genes like barA encode multi-sensor hybrid histidine kinases that regulate virulence

    • These regulatory systems may influence membrane protein expression

    • Transcriptomic studies could reveal co-regulation patterns with known virulence factors

What gene knockout strategies are most effective for studying Aave_2845 function in A. citrulli?

Designing gene knockout studies requires careful consideration:

  • Methodological approaches:

    • Homologous recombination with antibiotic resistance cassettes

    • CRISPR-Cas9 systems adapted for bacterial editing

    • Transposon mutagenesis for high-throughput screening

  • Validation strategies:

    • PCR confirmation of gene deletion

    • RT-PCR to verify absence of transcript

    • Western blotting to confirm protein absence

    • Complementation studies to confirm phenotype specificity

  • Phenotypic assays:

    • Growth curves in various media conditions

    • Biofilm formation assessment

    • Host infection studies on both melon and watermelon

    • Microscopy to evaluate morphological changes

How can researchers design experiments to elucidate potential protein-protein interactions involving Aave_2845?

Understanding protein interactions is crucial for functional characterization:

MethodApplication for Aave_2845AdvantagesLimitations
Bacterial two-hybridScreening for interacting partnersWorks in vivo, good for membrane proteinsMay have false positives
Co-immunoprecipitationValidating specific interactionsCaptures native complexesRequires good antibodies, may disrupt weak interactions
Crosslinking-MSMapping interaction interfacesHigh resolution of interacting regionsComplex data analysis, requires specialized equipment
Fluorescence microscopyLocalization and co-localizationVisual confirmation in bacterial cellsLower resolution than biochemical methods

For membrane proteins like Aave_2845, specialized approaches should be considered:

  • Detergent selection is critical for maintaining native interactions

  • In-membrane crosslinking prior to solubilization can capture transient interactions

  • Proper controls should account for non-specific membrane protein associations

How can researchers resolve contradictory data in Aave_2845 functional studies?

Scientific research often generates seemingly contradictory results. For Aave_2845 studies, consider:

  • Sources of experimental variability:

    • Differences in protein expression constructs (tag position, linker sequences)

    • Variation in purification protocols affecting protein conformation

    • Host strain differences in knockout studies

  • Resolution strategies:

    • Standardize experimental conditions across laboratories

    • Employ multiple complementary approaches to test the same hypothesis

    • Consider contextual factors like bacterial growth phase and environmental conditions

  • Data integration approaches:

    • Meta-analysis of multiple studies

    • Systematic review of methodological differences

    • Bayesian analysis to weight evidence based on methodological strength

What considerations are important when designing site-directed mutagenesis studies of Aave_2845?

Site-directed mutagenesis provides powerful insights into protein function:

  • Target selection rationale:

    • Conserved residues identified through multiple sequence alignment

    • Predicted functional domains based on structural modeling

    • Residues in membrane-spanning regions versus loops

  • Mutation strategy:

    • Conservative substitutions to test chemical properties

    • Alanine scanning to identify essential residues

    • Cysteine substitutions for accessibility studies

    • Domain swapping with homologs for functional region mapping

  • Functional assessment:

    • Expression level and stability of mutant proteins

    • Subcellular localization analysis

    • Interaction partner binding studies

    • Phenotypic assays in the native bacterial context

What are the optimal storage conditions for maintaining recombinant Aave_2845 stability and activity?

Based on available information about the recombinant protein:

  • Short-term storage:

    • Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week

    • Use buffer systems optimized for membrane proteins

  • Long-term storage:

    • Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt

    • Aliquoting is necessary for multiple use to avoid freeze-thaw cycles

    • Tris/PBS-based buffer with 6% trehalose, pH 8.0 is recommended

    • Consider adding 5-50% glycerol (optimally 50%) for freeze protection

  • Reconstitution protocol:

    • Briefly centrifuge before opening to bring contents to the bottom

    • Reconstitute in deionized sterile water to 0.1-1.0 mg/mL

    • Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles which damage membrane proteins

How can researchers assess and maintain the structural integrity of purified Aave_2845?

Quality control for membrane proteins presents unique challenges:

  • Integrity assessment methods:

    • Circular dichroism spectroscopy to monitor secondary structure

    • Size exclusion chromatography to detect aggregation

    • Differential scanning fluorimetry to measure thermal stability

    • Activity assays specific to predicted function

  • Stability enhancement strategies:

    • Optimize buffer composition (pH, salt concentration, additives)

    • Add stabilizing agents such as glycerol or specific lipids

    • Consider nanodiscs or liposome reconstitution for native-like environment

How does research on Aave_2845 complement other studies on A. citrulli virulence factors?

Understanding Aave_2845 in the broader context of A. citrulli research:

  • Integration with known virulence mechanisms:

    • A. citrulli pathogenicity depends on swimming motility, twitching motility, biofilm formation, and the T3SS

    • Regulatory systems like BarA inhibit virulence and early proliferation

    • Membrane proteins may function within these networks

  • Research gap analysis:

    • While T3SS effectors are relatively well-studied , membrane protein contributions to virulence are less characterized

    • Systematic studies of membrane proteome could reveal new virulence determinants

    • Host-specific adaptation mechanisms remain partially understood

What techniques from other bacterial pathogen studies could be applied to Aave_2845 research?

Translating methodologies from related fields:

  • Advanced imaging techniques:

    • Super-resolution microscopy to visualize membrane localization

    • Correlative light and electron microscopy for structural context

    • Live-cell imaging to track dynamics during infection

  • Systems biology approaches:

    • Proteomics to identify temporal changes in protein expression and modification

    • Interactomics to map protein-protein interaction networks

    • Transcriptomics to understand regulatory patterns

  • Host-pathogen models:

    • Simplified plant infection models for high-throughput studies

    • In vitro reconstitution of host membrane interactions

    • Computational modeling of membrane protein dynamics

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.