KEGG: ajs:Ajs_0303
STRING: 232721.Ajs_0303
ATP synthase subunit c, encoded by the atpE gene, forms the critical oligomeric ring structure (C-ring) within the membrane-embedded F₀ sector of ATP synthase. In Acidovorax species, as in other bacteria, this subunit functions as an essential component of the proton-conducting pathway. The C-ring contains the ion-binding site necessary for proton translocation across the membrane, which drives the rotational catalysis that generates ATP . Each subunit c has a hairpin structure comprising two membrane-spanning α-helices connected by a hydrophilic loop at the cytoplasmic side of the membrane, with the essential ion carrier (glutamate or aspartate residue) located in the middle of the C-terminal α-helix . This structure enables the C-ring to rotate during proton translocation, coupling the electrochemical gradient to ATP synthesis in the F₁ sector of the complex.
For PCR amplification of the Acidovorax sp. atpE gene, researchers should consider a protocol similar to those used for mycobacterial ATP synthase genes but with primers specifically designed for Acidovorax sequences. DNA can be amplified using degenerate primers targeting conserved regions across bacterial atpE sequences, followed by more specific amplification with Acidovorax-specific primers . A typical approach includes:
Initial DNA extraction using a standard bacterial genomic DNA extraction kit
PCR amplification with degenerate primers (e.g., atpE-F: 5'-GARTTYATHGCNTGYTTYGG-3' and atpE-R: 5'-CCNARYCCRAANARRTCNCC-3')
Verification of PCR products by agarose gel electrophoresis (1.5%)
Purification of PCR products
Cloning into a suitable vector such as pMOSBlue or other blunt-ended cloning systems
Confirmation by sequencing
The PCR reaction can be optimized using a gradient of annealing temperatures (50-60°C) to find the optimal conditions for Acidovorax species. DNA polymerases with proofreading capability are recommended for high-fidelity amplification .
The structure of Acidovorax sp. ATP synthase subunit c likely shares common features with other bacterial c subunits while maintaining species-specific variations. While no crystal structure is available specifically for Acidovorax sp. C-ring, comparative analysis can be performed by homology modeling using known bacterial structures.
Based on comparative studies of other bacterial ATP synthases, we can infer that Acidovorax sp. subunit c likely forms a ring structure with 10-15 subunits, similar to other bacterial species which range from 8-15 subunits depending on the organism . Key structural features include:
Two membrane-spanning α-helices connected by a hydrophilic loop
A conserved ion-binding glutamate or aspartate residue at the middle of the C-terminal helix
A proton-binding site located between adjacent c subunits in the assembled C-ring
The amino acid composition of subunit c varies significantly across species, but the residues involved in ion binding and ring formation are generally conserved. The Acidovorax sp. subunit c would likely maintain these critical functional residues while potentially showing differences in other regions that might affect drug binding or interactions with other ATP synthase components .
For efficient expression and purification of functional recombinant Acidovorax sp. ATP synthase subunit c, researchers should consider a multi-step strategy that accounts for the hydrophobic nature of this membrane protein. The following methodology is recommended:
Expression System Selection:
E. coli C41(DE3) or C43(DE3) strains - These strains are engineered for membrane protein expression and show reduced toxicity effects
pET vector system with a C-terminal His6-tag - Provides controlled expression and facilitates purification
Low-temperature induction (16-18°C) - Slows expression rate, improving proper folding
Optimized Expression Protocol:
Transform expression plasmid into selected E. coli strain
Grow culture to OD600 of 0.6-0.8 at 37°C
Reduce temperature to 18°C and induce with 0.1-0.5 mM IPTG
Continue expression for 16-20 hours
Purification Strategy:
Cell lysis by sonication or French press in buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol
Membrane fraction isolation by differential centrifugation
Membrane solubilization using 1% n-dodecyl-β-D-maltoside (DDM) or 1% digitonin
Immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) using Ni-NTA resin
Size exclusion chromatography for final purification and oligomeric state assessment
For functional studies, the purified subunit c can be reconstituted into liposomes using a 4:1 mixture of phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidic acid, which has been successfully used for other bacterial ATP synthase components .
Site-directed mutagenesis of Acidovorax sp. ATP synthase subunit c provides a powerful approach to elucidate the functional importance of specific residues in proton binding and translocation. A comprehensive mutagenesis strategy should focus on:
Key Residues for Mutation:
The conserved glutamate/aspartate in the C-terminal helix (equivalent to Glu61 in M. tuberculosis)
Residues surrounding the ion-binding site that may contribute to proton affinity
Residues at the interface between adjacent c subunits that form the complete binding pocket
Recommended Methodological Approach:
Create mutations using overlap extension PCR or QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis
Clone mutated genes into an expression vector with the wild-type atpE gene as control
Express and purify both wild-type and mutant proteins
Reconstitute proteins into liposomes for functional assays
Assess proton translocation efficiency using pH-sensitive fluorescent dyes
Measure ATP synthesis activity in a reconstituted system
Mutations that have proven informative in other bacterial species include Glu→Gln at the proton-binding site (eliminates proton binding), Asp→Ala at positions interacting with the proton-binding site (alters binding kinetics), and mutations at the interface between subunits (affects c-ring stability) . For Acidovorax sp., mutations equivalent to the Asp28→Gly/Ala, Glu61→Asp, and Ala63→Pro found in Mycobacterium species would be particularly valuable to investigate species-specific differences in function .
The oligomeric state of the Acidovorax sp. ATP synthase C-ring is crucial for understanding its function and can be characterized using several complementary techniques:
Blue Native Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis (BN-PAGE):
Solubilize purified protein in mild detergent (0.5-1% digitonin)
Separate complexes on 4-16% gradient native gels with Coomassie G-250
Use known molecular weight standards for size estimation
Western blot with anti-His antibodies to confirm identity
Analytical Ultracentrifugation:
Perform sedimentation velocity experiments at multiple protein concentrations
Analyze data using SEDFIT software to determine sedimentation coefficients
Calculate molecular weight to determine oligomeric state
Compare results with known bacterial C-rings (8-15 subunits)
Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) with Negative Staining:
Apply purified C-rings to glow-discharged carbon-coated grids
Stain with uranyl acetate or phosphotungstic acid
Image at magnification of 40,000-60,000×
Perform particle analysis to determine ring diameter and subunit number
Cross-linking Mass Spectrometry:
Treat purified protein with membrane-permeable cross-linkers (DSS or BS3)
Digest cross-linked complexes with trypsin
Analyze peptides by LC-MS/MS
Identify cross-linked residues to map subunit interfaces
These techniques should be used in combination, as each provides different but complementary information about the C-ring structure. For accurate assessment, researchers should compare results with known bacterial C-ring structures from species such as Ilyobacter tartaricus, Bacillus pseudofirmus, or Spirulina platensis, which have 11, 13, and 15 subunits respectively .
Investigating proton translocation through the Acidovorax sp. ATP synthase c-subunit ring requires specialized techniques that maintain the protein's native environment while allowing measurement of proton movement. The following methodological approaches are recommended:
Liposome Reconstitution System:
Purify recombinant Acidovorax sp. c-subunit or complete ATP synthase complex
Prepare liposomes using E. coli polar lipids or synthetic lipids (POPC:POPG at 3:1 ratio)
Incorporate purified protein using detergent-mediated reconstitution
Remove detergent using Bio-Beads or dialysis
Verify reconstitution by freeze-fracture electron microscopy
pH-Sensitive Fluorescence Measurements:
Entrap pH-sensitive fluorescent dyes (ACMA or pyranine) in proteoliposomes
Establish a pH gradient across the membrane using buffer exchange
Monitor fluorescence changes upon addition of ionophores or ATP
Calculate proton translocation rates under different conditions
Compare wild-type with mutant versions to identify critical residues
Patch-Clamp Electrophysiology:
For direct measurement of proton currents, researchers can form "artificial membranes" containing the reconstituted c-subunit ring:
Form planar lipid bilayers across a small aperture
Incorporate purified c-subunit rings
Apply voltage and measure currents using high-sensitivity amplifiers
Determine conductance and ion selectivity
Test effects of specific inhibitors
Electrochemical Detection:
Use solid-supported membrane (SSM) electrophysiology
Adsorb proteoliposomes onto the SSM
Apply rapid substrate concentration jumps
Measure capacitive currents resulting from charge translocation
These techniques should be performed under varying conditions (pH, temperature, membrane potential) to fully characterize the proton translocation properties of the Acidovorax sp. c-subunit ring and how they might differ from other bacterial species .
Inhibitor binding studies with Acidovorax sp. ATP synthase subunit c can provide valuable information for structure-based drug design, particularly for developing species-selective antimicrobial compounds. A systematic approach should include:
Binding Site Identification:
Perform homology modeling of Acidovorax sp. c-subunit based on known bacterial structures
Use computational docking to predict binding pockets
Identify residues likely involved in inhibitor interactions
Compare with binding sites in other species to identify unique features
Experimental Binding Assays:
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) with immobilized c-subunit
Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) for thermodynamic parameters
Fluorescence-based binding assays using environment-sensitive probes
Competition binding assays with known inhibitors
Structure-Activity Relationship Studies:
Test a series of structural analogs of known ATP synthase inhibitors
Measure IC50 values against purified Acidovorax sp. ATP synthase
Correlate structural features with inhibitory potency
Develop a pharmacophore model specific to Acidovorax sp.
Inhibitor | Acidovorax sp. IC₅₀ (μM)* | M. tuberculosis IC₅₀ (μM) | E. coli IC₅₀ (μM) | Key Binding Residues |
---|---|---|---|---|
TMC207 (Bedaquiline) | 15-25* | 0.1-0.5 | >100 | Glu61, Asp28, Tyr64* |
DCCD | 5-10* | 2-5 | 1-3 | Conserved Glu in C-terminal helix |
Oligomycin | 40-60* | 20-30 | 10-20 | Multiple residues at subunit interfaces |
Venturicidin | 30-40* | 15-25 | 5-15 | Residues in the proton-binding region |
*Values for Acidovorax sp. are estimated based on related bacterial species and would need experimental verification
For structure-based drug design, researchers should focus on the key differences between Acidovorax sp. and other species. Based on studies with Mycobacterium, the cleft located between two adjacent c subunits that encompasses the proton-binding site would be a primary target. In Mycobacterium, this region includes residues Glu61, Tyr64, and Asp28, which anchor TMC207 through ionic, hydrogen, and halogen bonds respectively . Identifying the equivalent residues in Acidovorax sp. and how they differ structurally would enable the design of species-selective inhibitors.
Understanding the interactions between Acidovorax sp. ATP synthase subunit c and other components of the ATP synthase complex requires a combination of biochemical, biophysical, and structural approaches. The following methodological framework is recommended:
Co-purification and Pull-down Assays:
Express recombinant subunit c with an affinity tag
Express other ATP synthase components (a, b, δ, ε) with different tags
Perform pull-down experiments to identify stable interactions
Analyze complexes by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting
Quantify binding affinities using varying salt concentrations
Cross-linking Mass Spectrometry:
Treat purified ATP synthase or membrane fractions with chemical cross-linkers
Digest cross-linked proteins with trypsin
Enrich cross-linked peptides using SEC or SCX chromatography
Analyze by high-resolution LC-MS/MS
Identify cross-linked residues to map interaction interfaces
FRET-based Interaction Studies:
Generate fusion proteins with fluorescent proteins (e.g., CFP-subunit c and YFP-subunit a)
Express in a suitable system (E. coli or Acidovorax if possible)
Measure FRET efficiency to determine proximity and orientation
Use acceptor photobleaching to confirm specific interactions
Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry (HDX-MS):
Expose purified complexes to D₂O buffer for varying time periods
Quench the exchange reaction and digest proteins
Analyze deuterium incorporation by LC-MS
Identify regions with reduced exchange rates, indicating protein-protein interfaces
Interface | Interacting Subunits | Key Residues in Subunit c* | Functional Significance |
---|---|---|---|
c-a interface | c-ring and subunit a | N-terminal helix residues (10-30) | Proton translocation pathway |
c-c interface | Adjacent c subunits | C-terminal helix residues (50-70) | C-ring stability and rotation |
c-b interface | c-ring and subunit b | Loop region residues (35-45) | Stator connection |
c-γ interface | c-ring and γ subunit | C-terminus of subunit c | Rotor assembly and torque transmission |
c-ε interface | c-ring and ε subunit | C-terminus of subunit c | Regulation of ATP synthase activity |
*Residue numbers are approximate and would need to be determined specifically for Acidovorax sp.
These techniques, used in combination, can provide a comprehensive understanding of how the c-subunit interacts with other components to form a functional ATP synthase complex in Acidovorax sp. Researchers should focus particularly on the c-a interface, which is critical for proton translocation, and the c-c interface, which determines the stability and functional properties of the c-ring .
Expressing and purifying membrane proteins like ATP synthase subunit c presents several challenges due to their hydrophobic nature. Here are systematic approaches to overcome common issues when working with Acidovorax sp. ATP synthase subunit c:
Challenge 1: Poor Expression Levels
Solution methods:
Optimize codon usage for the expression host (E. coli)
Test multiple promoter strengths (T7, trc, ara)
Use specialized strains designed for membrane proteins (C41/C43(DE3), Lemo21(DE3))
Lower expression temperature to 16-18°C
Reduce inducer concentration (0.1-0.2 mM IPTG)
Add stabilizing agents to culture medium (5-10% glycerol, 1% glucose)
Challenge 2: Protein Aggregation/Inclusion Bodies
Solution methods:
Fuse with solubility-enhancing tags (MBP, SUMO)
Co-express with chaperones (GroEL/GroES, DnaK/DnaJ)
Add mild detergents to lysis buffer (0.1% DDM or LDAO)
Use gentle cell disruption methods (enzymatic lysis or osmotic shock)
If inclusion bodies form, develop refolding protocols with gradual detergent introduction
Challenge 3: Low Purification Yield
Solution methods:
Optimize detergent type and concentration for extraction
Test DDM (0.5-1%), LDAO (0.5-1%), digitonin (0.5-1%)
Add lipids during purification (0.1-0.5 mg/ml E. coli lipids)
Include stabilizing additives in all buffers:
Glycerol (5-10%)
Cholesterol hemisuccinate (0.01-0.05%)
Specific phospholipids (0.1-0.5 mg/ml)
Use tandem affinity tags for higher purity
Perform purification at 4°C to minimize degradation
Challenge 4: Loss of Function During Purification
Solution methods:
Preserve native lipid environment:
Extract with styrene-maleic acid copolymer (SMA) to form native nanodiscs
Use amphipols for detergent-free handling after extraction
Add ATP synthase inhibitor during purification to stabilize conformation
Validate function at each purification step with proton translocation assays
Consider on-column refolding during purification
Immediately reconstitute into liposomes after purification
Detergent | Concentration Range | Extraction Efficiency* | Functional Recovery* | Best Applications |
---|---|---|---|---|
DDM | 0.5-1.0% | +++ | +++ | General extraction and purification |
LDAO | 0.5-1.0% | +++ | ++ | High-resolution structural studies |
Digitonin | 0.5-1.0% | ++ | ++++ | Preserving protein-protein interactions |
CHAPS | 0.5-2.0% | ++ | ++ | Mild extraction, good for sensitive complexes |
SMA copolymer | 2.5% | ++ | ++++ | Native nanodisc formation |
Amphipols (A8-35) | 1:4 (w/w) to protein | N/A | +++ | Detergent replacement after extraction |
*Rating scale: + (poor) to ++++ (excellent)
By systematically addressing these challenges, researchers can significantly improve the yield and quality of purified Acidovorax sp. ATP synthase subunit c for functional and structural studies .
Essential Controls for Mutagenesis Studies:
Wild-type Controls:
Express and purify wild-type protein in parallel with mutants
Process all samples identically to eliminate method-based artifacts
Include wild-type in every functional assay as reference point
Expression Level Verification:
Quantify protein expression by Western blot analysis
Use C-terminal tags that don't interfere with function
Normalize functional data to expression levels
Protein Folding and Stability Controls:
Perform circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy to compare secondary structure
Conduct thermal shift assays to assess protein stability
Use limited proteolysis to verify similar folding patterns
Multiple Mutation Types:
Create conservative mutations (e.g., Glu→Asp) and more severe mutations (e.g., Glu→Ala)
Analyze charge-preserving vs. charge-altering mutations
Generate complementary mutations that restore function in double mutants
Validation Experimental Approaches:
Structure Validation:
Perform size-exclusion chromatography to verify oligomeric state
Use negative-stain electron microscopy to confirm C-ring formation
Validate membrane insertion using protease protection assays
Functional Validation:
Measure proton translocation using multiple methodologies:
pH-sensitive fluorescent dyes
Membrane potential-sensitive dyes
Direct electrophysiological recordings
Assess ATP synthesis/hydrolysis coupling with reconstituted systems
Measure growth complementation in ATP synthase-deficient strains
Binding Site Validation:
Conduct inhibitor binding studies with known ATP synthase inhibitors
Perform cross-linking experiments to validate interaction interfaces
Use molecular dynamics simulations to assess conformational effects
Mutation Type | Primary Validation | Secondary Validation | Tertiary Validation |
---|---|---|---|
Proton-binding site mutations (e.g., Glu61→Asp/Gln) | Proton translocation assays | ATP synthesis measurement | pH-dependent inhibitor binding |
C-ring stability mutations (interface residues) | C-ring assembly verification | Thermal stability assays | Crosslinking efficiency |
a-subunit interface mutations | Pull-down with subunit a | Proton leakage measurement | Inhibitor sensitivity |
Allosteric site mutations | ATP synthesis kinetics | Response to PMF changes | Subunit interaction mapping |
Inhibitor resistance mutations | IC50 determination | Binding affinity measurement | Molecular docking validation |
These controls and validation experiments establish a robust framework for interpreting the effects of mutations in Acidovorax sp. ATP synthase subunit c, ensuring that observed phenotypes are directly attributable to the introduced mutations rather than experimental artifacts .
Recent research indicates that ATP synthase subunit c may have broader implications for understanding membrane-embedded ion channels and leak mechanisms. For Acidovorax sp. ATP synthase subunit c, this presents several promising research directions:
Investigation of Potential Leak Mechanisms:
The ATP synthase c-subunit ring has been implicated in forming or contributing to the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP) . Similar leak mechanisms may exist in bacterial systems including Acidovorax sp. Researchers should:
Examine c-subunit ring stability under different conditions (pH, membrane potential)
Investigate whether isolated Acidovorax sp. c-rings can form ion-conducting pores in artificial membranes
Measure ion selectivity and conductance properties of these potential pores
Compare leak properties with those observed in other bacterial and mitochondrial systems
Identify residues that influence leak probability through systematic mutagenesis
Structure-Function Relationships:
Understanding how the c-ring structure relates to ion channel-like properties could provide insights into fundamental principles of ion channel design:
Determine whether the central pore of the c-ring can conduct ions under certain conditions
Map the electrostatic potential throughout the c-ring structure
Identify residues that contribute to ion selectivity
Examine how lipid composition affects channel-like properties
Investigate whether post-translational modifications alter leak tendency
Comparative Analyses:
Acidovorax sp. ATP synthase subunit c could serve as a model system for comparative studies:
Compare properties with c-subunits from organisms that thrive in extreme environments
Analyze differences between species that show varied energy coupling efficiencies
Examine evolutionary conservation of residues associated with leak functions
Study how environmental adaptations affect c-ring stability and leak propensity
These investigations could reveal how fundamental ion channel properties evolved in membrane-embedded protein complexes and provide insights into the dual role of ATP synthase components in both energy production and membrane permeability regulation . Understanding these mechanisms in Acidovorax sp. might reveal species-specific adaptations that could inform biomimetic applications in synthetic biology.
Advanced computational approaches offer powerful tools for investigating the dynamics and function of Acidovorax sp. ATP synthase subunit c at atomic and molecular levels. The following methodological framework is recommended:
Homology Modeling and Structural Prediction:
Generate multiple homology models using templates from different bacterial species
Refine models through energy minimization and molecular dynamics
Validate models using ProSA, PROCHECK, and Verify3D
Submit models to AlphaFold Multimer for potential refinement
Predict the complete C-ring structure with accurate subunit interfaces
Molecular Dynamics Simulations:
Embed modeled C-ring in explicit lipid bilayers resembling Acidovorax sp. membrane composition
Perform long-timescale (>1 μs) simulations to capture conformational changes
Apply enhanced sampling techniques (metadynamics, umbrella sampling) to observe rare events
Simulate proton transfer events using QM/MM approaches
Analyze water wire formation and proton pathways through the complex
Ion/Proton Permeation Calculations:
Calculate potential of mean force (PMF) profiles for proton movement
Apply computational electrophysiology to determine conductance properties
Estimate pKa values of key residues under different conditions
Model the effect of membrane potential on proton translocation
Simulate interactions with known inhibitors to identify binding modes
Coarse-Grained Simulations:
Develop Martini-based coarse-grained models of the entire ATP synthase complex
Simulate c-ring rotation coupled to proton translocation
Investigate protein-lipid interactions with specific membrane compositions
Model ATP synthase assembly dynamics and subunit interactions
Simulate long-timescale events (>100 μs) inaccessible to all-atom approaches
Computational Approach | Timescale | Primary Applications | Key Output Parameters |
---|---|---|---|
Homology modeling | N/A | Initial structure prediction | 3D coordinates, quality scores |
All-atom MD | ns-μs | Conformational dynamics, water networks | RMSD, RMSF, hydrogen bonds |
QM/MM | ps-ns | Proton transfer energetics | Transition state energies, pKa values |
Coarse-grained MD | μs-ms | Large-scale motions, protein-lipid interactions | Diffusion coefficients, lipid enrichment |
Continuum electrostatics | N/A | Ion/proton permeation barriers | PMF profiles, energy barriers |
Free energy calculations | N/A | Binding energetics, mutation effects | ΔG values, binding constants |
These computational approaches, used in combination with experimental techniques, can provide unprecedented insights into the dynamic behavior of Acidovorax sp. ATP synthase subunit c, revealing functional mechanisms that may be difficult to capture experimentally .
Despite advances in our understanding of ATP synthase, several significant questions about Acidovorax sp. ATP synthase subunit c remain unresolved and merit focused research efforts. These questions span structural, functional, and evolutionary domains:
Structural Questions:
What is the exact stoichiometry of the Acidovorax sp. c-ring, and how does it compare to other bacterial species?
Are there species-specific structural adaptations that optimize ATP synthase function for Acidovorax's ecological niche?
How does the structure of the c-ring respond to changes in membrane potential and pH?
What is the precise architecture of the interface between the c-ring and other ATP synthase components in Acidovorax sp.?
Functional Questions:
Does the Acidovorax sp. c-subunit ring exhibit ion-leak properties similar to those observed in mitochondrial systems ?
How do the proton translocation kinetics of Acidovorax sp. ATP synthase compare to other bacterial species, and what structural features account for any differences?
Are there regulatory mechanisms that modulate c-ring function in response to environmental conditions?
Does the Acidovorax sp. c-ring display unique inhibitor binding properties that could be exploited for antimicrobial development?
Evolutionary Questions:
How have the functional properties of ATP synthase subunit c evolved in Acidovorax sp. compared to related species?
Are there horizontal gene transfer events in the evolutionary history of Acidovorax sp. atpE that have influenced its function?
How has co-evolution with other ATP synthase subunits shaped the structure and function of subunit c?
What selective pressures have driven the conservation or divergence of key residues in Acidovorax sp. ATP synthase subunit c?