The recombinant rnc protein is heterologously expressed in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) systems to ensure proper folding and post-translational modifications. Key parameters include:
| Parameter | Detail |
|---|---|
| Expression Host | Saccharomyces cerevisiae |
| Purity | >85% (verified by SDS-PAGE) |
| Storage | -20°C (short-term); -80°C for long-term conservation |
| Product Code | CSB-YP019809AWN |
The production process involves codon optimization for yeast expression, affinity chromatography purification, and quality validation via enzymatic activity assays .
Catalytic Activity: RNase III cleaves dsRNA substrates, producing RNA fragments with 5'-phosphate and 3'-hydroxyl termini. This activity is Mg²⁺-dependent .
Substrate Specificity: Preferential cleavage at specific dsRNA regions, though detailed kinetics for A. baumannii rnc remain uncharacterized.
Thermostability: Preliminary data suggest stability at 4–25°C, but denaturation occurs above 37°C .
Structural Studies: No high-resolution structures of A. baumannii RNase III are available. Comparative modeling using E. coli RNase III (PDB: 1JBR) could provide mechanistic insights.
In Vivo Roles: The enzyme’s contribution to virulence, biofilm formation, or antibiotic resistance remains unverified experimentally.
Biotechnological Applications: Engineered RNase III variants could optimize RNA-based tools like EGS (External Guide Sequence) technology for gene silencing .
- Identification of the Acinetobacter baumannii Ribonuclease P RNA subunit .
- Role of sRNAs in virulence switching and antibiotic resistance .
- RNA-binding proteins in A. baumannii .
- Recombinant rnc production and specifications .
KEGG: abm:ABSDF0952
Ribonuclease 3 (RNase III), encoded by the rnc gene, functions as a global regulator of gene expression in bacteria. It plays an instrumental role in the maturation of ribosomal and other structural RNAs . In Escherichia coli, where RNase III has been extensively studied, the enzyme cleaves double-stranded RNA structures, including those found in rRNA precursors, contributing to their proper processing and maturation .
RNase III exhibits remarkable autoregulatory capabilities by cleaving a stem-loop structure in its own 5′ untranslated region (UTR), making the mRNA vulnerable to degradation by other ribonucleases . This autoregulation reduces RNase III mRNA levels approximately fivefold, effectively controlling the expression of both RNase III and other genes in the rnc operon .
Microarray studies have demonstrated that RNase III affects the expression of approximately 12% of bacterial mRNAs, with 9% showing increased abundance and 3% showing decreased abundance in rnc mutants . More refined approaches using strains with altered RNase III levels have identified 87 genes upregulated and 100 genes downregulated by RNase III, highlighting its extensive role in global gene expression regulation .
Multiple expression systems can be employed for producing recombinant Ribonuclease 3, each with distinct advantages depending on research requirements. E. coli and yeast expression systems generally offer the best yields and shorter turnaround times for Ribonuclease 3 production . These prokaryotic and lower eukaryotic systems provide cost-effective and rapid production platforms suitable for preliminary structural and functional studies.
For applications requiring proper protein folding and retention of enzymatic activity, insect cell systems using baculovirus vectors or mammalian cell expression systems are preferable . These eukaryotic expression systems can provide many of the posttranslational modifications necessary for correct protein folding and functional activity of Ribonuclease 3 .
The selection of an appropriate expression system should consider the following factors:
| Expression System | Advantages | Limitations | Best Applications |
|---|---|---|---|
| E. coli | High yields, rapid production, cost-effective | Limited posttranslational modifications | Initial characterization, structural studies |
| Yeast | Good yields, some posttranslational modifications | More complex than E. coli | Functional studies requiring basic modifications |
| Insect cells/Baculovirus | More complex posttranslational modifications | Lower yields, longer production time | Studies requiring properly folded, active enzyme |
| Mammalian cells | Full range of posttranslational modifications | Lowest yields, most time-consuming, expensive | Studies requiring native-like activity and modifications |
Acinetobacter baumannii demonstrates remarkable genomic plasticity that likely influences RNase III function and expression. A. baumannii is well-suited for genetic exchange and is among a unique class of gram-negative bacteria described as "naturally transformable" . This characteristic facilitates the acquisition and integration of foreign genetic material, potentially affecting RNase III expression patterns and function.
The genomic architecture of A. baumannii can undergo significant changes even without antibiotic pressure. Experimental evolution studies have shown that culturing MDR A. baumannii under different nutritional conditions for 8000 generations leads to substantial genomic changes, primarily through insertion sequence (IS)-mediated insertions and deletions . These genomic alterations can potentially affect regulatory elements controlling RNase III expression.
A. baumannii possesses competence genes (comFECB and comQLONM) that enable the uptake of DNA from the environment . Additionally, transposons carrying integrons play important roles in disseminating genetic determinants of resistance in Acinetobacter species . These mobile genetic elements could potentially introduce mutations or regulatory changes affecting RNase III expression or function, particularly under selective pressures.
The dynamic nature of the A. baumannii genome suggests that RNase III function may vary between strains and environmental conditions, highlighting the importance of strain-specific characterization when studying recombinant A. baumannii RNase III.
Identifying RNase III-regulated genes in multidrug-resistant (MDR) A. baumannii requires a multifaceted approach combining transcriptomic, genetic, and biochemical techniques. Based on methodologies that have been successful with other bacterial RNase III studies, the following experimental design is recommended:
Comparative Transcriptomics: Generate isogenic A. baumannii strains with varying levels of RNase III expression (knockout, reduced expression, wild-type, and overexpression) . RNA sequencing of these strains can identify differentially expressed genes across RNase III expression levels. This approach has previously revealed that altering RNase III levels tenfold relative to wild type affects the expression of nearly 200 genes in other bacterial species .
CLIP-Seq (Cross-linking Immunoprecipitation followed by Sequencing): This technique involves cross-linking RNase III to its RNA substrates in vivo, immunoprecipitating the protein-RNA complexes, and sequencing the associated RNAs. This approach directly identifies RNase III binding sites across the transcriptome.
Integrative Analysis with Resistance Genomics: Cross-reference RNase III-regulated genes with those associated with antibiotic resistance. A. baumannii possesses numerous mechanisms of resistance that may be regulated post-transcriptionally . Integration of data from class 1 integrons, which have been detected in clinical isolates of A. baumannii (isolates AB34, AB36, and AB41), can provide insights into potential RNase III-mediated regulation of resistance genes .
Structure Prediction and Validation: Use computational tools to predict double-stranded RNA structures (potential RNase III substrates) in the 5' UTRs of candidate genes. Follow with in vitro cleavage assays using purified recombinant A. baumannii RNase III to validate these predictions.
Phenotypic Characterization: Assess how modulation of RNase III levels affects antibiotic susceptibility profiles, biofilm formation, and virulence in infection models. Experimental evolution studies have shown that A. baumannii strains cultured under different nutritional conditions exhibit higher virulence in mouse infection models , suggesting that gene regulation mechanisms including RNase III may contribute to virulence adaptation.
Carbapenem resistance in A. baumannii represents a significant clinical challenge, as carbapenems are considered the last line of defense against multidrug-resistant bacterial infections . The potential role of RNase III in modulating this resistance involves several mechanistic pathways:
Post-transcriptional Regulation of Resistance Genes: RNase III likely regulates the expression of genes involved in carbapenem resistance through mRNA processing. In other bacteria, RNase III affects approximately 12% of all mRNAs, with varied effects on abundance . For A. baumannii, this regulation might target transcripts encoding carbapenemases, efflux pumps, or outer membrane proteins associated with carbapenem resistance.
Regulation of Mobile Genetic Element Expression: Carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CP-CRAB) can transmit resistance genes to other bacteria . The transfer of these mobile genetic elements may be regulated by RNase III processing of transcripts. A. baumannii acquires resistance factors through plasmid conjugation and transposons carrying integrons (predominantly class 1) . Three clinical isolates (AB34, AB36, and AB41) were found to harbor class 1 integrons in genomic DNA, with different antibiotic gene cassettes within their integron structures .
Influence on Gene Expression Under Stress Conditions: Carbapenem exposure represents a significant stress for A. baumannii, potentially altering RNase III activity or expression patterns. Studies in E. coli have shown that RNase III levels change in response to growth conditions and environmental stressors . For instance, RNase III levels drop when cells enter stationary phase or switch to poorer growth media . Similar dynamic regulation might occur in A. baumannii under antibiotic stress.
Experimental Approach to Investigate This Relationship:
Generate isogenic strains with varied RNase III expression in carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii backgrounds
Conduct comparative transcriptomics and proteomics under carbapenem exposure
Perform minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) testing for carbapenems across RNase III expression variants
Identify specific RNA processing events affecting carbapenem resistance genes using targeted RNA structure analysis
RNase III likely serves as a critical regulator of virulence and host adaptation in A. baumannii through its post-transcriptional control of gene expression. Experimental studies reveal several important mechanisms:
Regulation of Virulence-Associated Transcripts: In other bacterial pathogens, RNase III processes transcripts of virulence genes. For A. baumannii, virulence factors potentially regulated by RNase III include those involved in epithelial barrier crossing, immune evasion, and attachment to epithelial cells, all critical virulence mechanisms identified in evolved strains .
Contribution to Stress Adaptation: A. baumannii must adapt to various stress conditions within the host. Evolved A. baumannii strains cultivated under starvation conditions (EAB1) show enhanced ability to cross epithelial barriers, evade the immune system, and spread to tissues . Conversely, strains evolved under nutrient-rich conditions (EAB2) demonstrate increased attachment to epithelial cells, leading to heightened production of proinflammatory cytokines . RNase III likely contributes to the post-transcriptional regulation underlying these adaptations.
Role in Genomic Plasticity: A. baumannii's genomic architecture undergoes significant changes during adaptation, with IS-mediated insertions and deletions as the primary mechanism . Additionally, prophage-related deletions and translocations have been observed in strains evolved under starvation conditions . As a regulator of RNA processing, RNase III may influence the expression of mobile genetic elements and thus impact genomic rearrangements contributing to adaptation.
Methodological Approach to Study Virulence Regulation:
| Experimental Strategy | Methodology | Expected Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Comparative virulence profiling | Infection models with wild-type, RNase III knockout, and complemented strains | Identification of virulence phenotypes dependent on RNase III |
| Transcriptome analysis during infection | RNA-seq of bacteria recovered from infection models | Identification of infection-specific RNase III-regulated transcripts |
| RNA structurome analysis | SHAPE-MaP or similar techniques to identify RNA structures in vivo | Mapping of RNase III recognition sites in virulence-associated transcripts |
| Host response characterization | Cytokine profiling and immune cell response to variant strains | Understanding how RNase III regulation affects host-pathogen interactions |
The structural and functional comparison between A. baumannii RNase III and its homologs in other bacterial species requires comprehensive analysis at multiple levels:
Domain Organization and Conservation: RNase III typically contains an N-terminal nuclease domain and a C-terminal double-stranded RNA binding domain (dsRBD). While this general architecture is likely conserved in A. baumannii RNase III, species-specific variations in key residues may influence substrate specificity and catalytic efficiency. In E. coli, RNase III functions in close proximity to Era, a GTPase involved in 16S rRNA processing . Investigation of similar protein-protein interactions in A. baumannii would provide insights into its functional context.
Substrate Recognition Patterns: E. coli RNase III recognizes specific RNA structures, including those in rRNA and its own transcript for autoregulation . The substrate specificity of A. baumannii RNase III may differ due to variations in recognition determinants. This is particularly relevant given the high genomic plasticity of A. baumannii, which undergoes significant changes even during short-term evolution .
Autoregulatory Mechanisms: E. coli RNase III cleaves a stem-loop in its own 5′ UTR, causing autoregulation that reduces mRNA levels approximately fivefold . Whether A. baumannii RNase III employs a similar autoregulatory mechanism remains to be determined. This feature is particularly important given that RNase III protein typically represents less than 0.01% of total bacterial protein .
Response to Environmental Signals: E. coli RNase III levels change in response to growth conditions and environmental stressors . Given A. baumannii's remarkable adaptability to different environments, including its ability to survive in healthcare settings for months , its RNase III may exhibit unique regulatory responses to environmental signals.
Methodological Approach for Comparative Analysis:
Phylogenetic analysis of RNase III sequences across bacterial species
Homology modeling of A. baumannii RNase III based on available crystal structures
Recombinant expression of A. baumannii RNase III and homologs for comparative biochemical assays
Cross-species complementation experiments to assess functional conservation