Recombinant Acinetobacter sp. Deoxycytidine triphosphate deaminase (dcd)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference in order notes for customized preparation.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs unless dry ice is specifically requested. Advance notification and additional charges apply for dry ice shipping.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to settle the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50%, which can be used as a guideline.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquot to prevent repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing.
The tag type is determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us; we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
dcd; ACIAD0776dCTP deaminase; EC 3.5.4.13; Deoxycytidine triphosphate deaminase
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-189
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Acinetobacter baylyi (strain ATCC 33305 / BD413 / ADP1)
Target Names
dcd
Target Protein Sequence
MAIKSDRWIR EMSEKHGMIE PYAENQVRFN AQGEKLISYG VSSYGYDVRC APEFKVFTNV HSAIVDPKNF DEKSFIDIHS DVCIIPPNSF ALARTVEYFR IPRNVLTVCL GKSTYARCGI IVNVTPLEPE WEGHVTLEFS NTTNLPARIY AGEGVAQMLF FESDEVCETS YKDRGGKYQG QTGVTLPKA
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Catalyzes the deamination of dCTP to dUTP.
Database Links
Protein Families
DCTP deaminase family

Q&A

What is deoxycytidine triphosphate deaminase (dcd) and what is its function in Acinetobacter sp.?

Deoxycytidine triphosphate deaminase (dcd) is an enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of deoxycytidine triphosphate (dCTP) to deoxyuridine triphosphate (dUTP). In Acinetobacter species, as in other gram-negative bacteria, dcd plays a crucial role in the de novo synthesis of thymidylate, which is essential for DNA replication and cellular growth. The enzyme represents a significant route for thymidine synthesis in gram-negative bacteria, contributing approximately 70% of the deoxyuridine monophosphate (dUMP) synthesis in vivo, which is subsequently converted to deoxythymidine monophosphate (dTMP) .

For establishing dcd function in Acinetobacter sp., complementation studies provide a robust methodological approach. This involves expressing the Acinetobacter dcd gene in E. coli dcd mutants, which can restore normal growth without thymidine supplementation if the gene is functional. Growth curves should be measured using a "warm start" protocol (inoculation into prewarmed, preaerated media at 37°C) to detect subtle growth differences between wild-type and mutant strains . Expression can be confirmed via immunoblotting using antibodies against affinity tags such as His6-tags that are commonly fused to recombinant proteins for purification purposes.

How does the dcd pathway in Acinetobacter sp. differ from nucleotide metabolism in other organisms?

The nucleotide metabolism pathway involving dcd in Acinetobacter sp. represents a distinctive feature of gram-negative bacteria that differentiates them from eukaryotes and gram-positive bacteria:

Organism TypePrimary Deamination PathwayEnzymeSubstrateProduct
Gram-negative bacteria (Acinetobacter sp.)Triphosphate deaminationdCTP deaminasedCTPdUTP
Gram-positive bacteria and eukaryotesMonophosphate deaminationdCMP deaminasedCMPdUMP

This fundamental pathway difference can be methodologically investigated through comparative genomics and enzyme activity assays . When studying this pathway, researchers should:

  • Express recombinant dcd genes from Acinetobacter with C-terminal His6 tags in E. coli expression systems

  • Purify the enzyme using affinity chromatography

  • Conduct substrate specificity assays testing activity against dCTP, dCMP, and other cytosine nucleotides

  • Measure deamination activity using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) to quantify substrate depletion and product formation

Experimental evidence indicates that dcd-deficient E. coli cells expressing recombinant Acinetobacter dcd genes can restore normal growth patterns, confirming functional conservation of the enzyme across gram-negative bacterial species .

What methodologies are used to express and purify recombinant Acinetobacter sp. dcd?

Recombinant expression and purification of Acinetobacter sp. dcd requires optimized methodologies to ensure functional protein production:

Expression strategy:

  • Clone the dcd gene with its native promoter region or under an inducible promoter system

  • Add an affinity tag (typically C-terminal His6) for purification purposes

  • Transform the construct into an appropriate E. coli expression strain

  • For functional studies, E. coli strains with dcd deletion (Δdcd) provide an excellent platform to confirm activity

Expression conditions optimization:

  • Test multiple induction temperatures (18-37°C) with lower temperatures generally improving solubility

  • Vary inducer concentration to balance protein yield with solubility

  • Optimize expression duration (4-24 hours)

  • Consider specialized media formulations for improved protein folding

Purification protocol:

  • Harvest cells and lyse using sonication or pressure-based methods

  • Clarify lysate by centrifugation (15,000×g, 30 minutes, 4°C)

  • Perform nickel affinity chromatography for His-tagged proteins

  • Include imidazole gradient elution (20-250 mM) to minimize non-specific binding

  • Consider secondary purification steps (ion exchange, size exclusion) for higher purity

Expression can be confirmed through immunoblotting using anti-His antibodies, while activity can be verified through complementation assays in Δdcd E. coli strains, which should restore normal growth patterns when the functional enzyme is expressed .

How can dcd enzyme activity be measured in vitro and in vivo?

Multiple complementary methodologies are available for measuring deoxycytidine triphosphate deaminase activity, each with specific advantages:

In vitro enzymatic assays:

  • LC-MS analysis:

    • Most precise method for measuring nucleotide conversion

    • Requires purified enzyme incubated with dCTP substrate

    • Samples are collected at defined timepoints and analyzed by LC-MS

    • Quantification using synthesized standards for dCTP, dUTP, and dUMP

    • Can detect depletion of dCTP and formation of deoxyuridine nucleotides within 5 minutes of reaction initiation

  • Spectrophotometric assays:

    • Based on absorption differences between cytosine and uracil nucleotides

    • Continuous measurements possible for determination of initial rates

    • Less sensitive than LC-MS but suitable for higher enzyme concentrations

In vivo activity assessment:

  • Nucleotide pool analysis:

    • Extract nucleotides from cells expressing dcd

    • Analyze using LC-MS with appropriate standards

    • Compare dCTP/dUMP levels between wild-type and dcd-expressing cells

    • Time-course experiments (0, 5, 10, 15 minutes) can reveal dynamic changes

  • EdC conversion assay:

    • Utilize 5-ethynyl 2′-deoxycytidine (EdC) substrate analog

    • Measure conversion to 5-ethynyl 2′-deoxyuridine (EdU)

    • EdU can be fluorescently labeled via click chemistry

    • Quantify using fluorescence microscopy or plate reader

  • Growth complementation:

    • Express Acinetobacter dcd in E. coli Δdcd strains

    • Compare growth curves with and without thymidine supplementation

    • Functional dcd should restore normal growth without thymidine

For accurate activity measurements, researchers should implement appropriate controls including heat-inactivated enzyme, reaction mixtures lacking substrate, and catalytically inactive point mutants in both the kinase and deaminase domains .

What is the role of dcd in bacterial defense against bacteriophages?

Recent research has revealed that deoxycytidine triphosphate deaminase functions as part of a bacterial defense mechanism against bacteriophage infection by depleting essential nucleotide pools required for phage DNA replication . This represents a distinct defense strategy from conventional restriction-modification or CRISPR-Cas systems.

Methodological framework for studying dcd-mediated phage defense:

  • Phage challenge assays:

    • Transform bacteria with vectors expressing dcd or control plasmids

    • Perform serial dilution plaque assays with various bacteriophages

    • Quantify "fold defense" as the ratio of phage plaques on control versus dcd-expressing cells

    • Note both complete resistance and plaque size reduction as defensive outcomes

  • Mechanistic investigation:

    • Infect control and dcd-expressing cells with phage at defined multiplicity of infection (MOI)

    • Collect samples at specific timepoints post-infection (0, 5, 10, 15 minutes)

    • Extract nucleotides using cold extraction protocols

    • Analyze nucleotide pools using LC-MS with appropriate standards

  • Structure-function analysis:

    • Generate point mutations in predicted kinase and deaminase domains

    • Test mutant constructs in phage challenge assays

    • Compare defensive activity between wild-type and mutant enzymes

Experimental data has shown that expression of dcd genes from various bacterial species provides significant protection against bacteriophages. The mechanism involves rapid depletion of dCTP pools within 5 minutes of infection, while control cells show elevated dCTP levels at later timepoints (10-15 minutes) . This nucleotide depletion disrupts phage DNA replication, resulting in accumulation of other dNTPs (dATP, dGTP, dTTP) that would otherwise be incorporated into phage genomes .

The functional importance of enzymatic activity has been confirmed through point mutation studies, where mutations in either the kinase or deaminase domains abolished defensive capabilities, indicating that catalytic conversion of dCTP is essential for the defensive function .

How do mutations in dcd affect metabolism and what alternative pathways exist?

Mutations in dcd can significantly impact bacterial metabolism, particularly nucleotide homeostasis and thymidylate synthesis. The effects of such mutations and the existence of alternative pathways can be studied through rigorous methodological approaches:

Phenotypic characterization of dcd mutants:

  • Generate clean dcd knockout mutations in Acinetobacter sp. using:

    • CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing

    • Homologous recombination-based gene replacement

    • Transposon mutagenesis

  • Assess growth phenotypes:

    • Growth curves in defined media with and without thymidine supplementation

    • Aerobic versus anaerobic growth conditions (oxygen availability affects thymidine requirements)

    • Determine minimum inhibitory concentrations of various antibiotics

  • Analyze nucleotide pools:

    • Extract nucleotides from wild-type and mutant strains

    • Quantify using LC-MS with appropriate standards

    • Compare dCTP, dUMP, and other deoxynucleotide levels

Alternative pathway investigation:

Research in E. coli has revealed that dcd mutants utilize an alternative pathway for thymidylate synthesis involving deoxycytidine and deoxyuridine as intermediates . This pathway can be mapped through construction of double and triple mutants:

GenotypeGrowth PhenotypeInterpretation
ΔdcdThymidine requirement for optimal aerobic growthPrimary pathway blocked
Δdcd ΔdeoAImproved growth without thymidineEnhanced alternative pathway (deoA mutation spares deoxyuridine from catabolism)
Δdcd ΔdeoA ΔcddRestored thymidine dependenceAlternative pathway blocked (cdd mutation prevents deoxycytidine to deoxyuridine conversion)

These genetic interaction studies indicate that the alternative pathway involves:

  • Generation of deoxycytidine from dCTP/dCDP via unknown steps

  • Conversion of deoxycytidine to deoxyuridine by deoxycytidine deaminase (cdd)

  • Conversion of deoxyuridine to dUMP for thymidylate synthesis

Interestingly, dcd mutants readily revert to prototrophy through secondary mutations, particularly in genes like deoA (deoxyuridine phosphorylase) . This genetic plasticity necessitates careful strain maintenance and periodic verification of genotypes to ensure experimental reproducibility.

What is the role of Acinetobacter sp. dcd in pathogenicity and antimicrobial resistance?

The relationship between dcd function and Acinetobacter pathogenicity/antimicrobial resistance represents an emerging area of research. While direct evidence from the provided materials is limited, several methodological approaches can investigate these connections:

Investigating dcd in Acinetobacter pathogenicity:

  • Genetic manipulation studies:

    • Create dcd deletion or overexpression strains in clinical Acinetobacter isolates

    • Compare virulence in infection models (Galleria mellonella, mouse pneumonia)

    • Assess biofilm formation capacity and host cell adherence

    • Measure survival in human serum and whole blood challenge assays

  • Host-pathogen interaction analysis:

    • Examine dcd expression during host cell infection or serum exposure

    • Investigate nucleotide pool changes during host immune stress

    • Determine if dcd activity affects resistance to complement-mediated killing

  • Immune evasion mechanisms:

    • Test dcd-deficient strains for altered susceptibility to phagocytosis

    • Measure complement deposition and MAC formation on bacterial surface

    • Correlate nucleotide metabolism with capsule production

Connection to antimicrobial resistance:

  • Comparative genomics:

    • Analyze dcd gene presence/variation across antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) and sensitive isolates

    • Identify potential mutations or expression differences in resistant strains

    • Examine genomic context for linkage with known resistance determinants

  • Antibiotic stress response:

    • Profile nucleotide pool changes during antibiotic exposure

    • Compare dcd expression between resistant and sensitive strains under antibiotic pressure

    • Assess DNA damage and repair efficiency in relation to dcd function

The known high serum resistance of Acinetobacter species is a significant virulence factor, with the majority of clinical isolates showing resistance to direct complement killing . This resistance involves multiple mechanisms, including prevention of membrane attack complex (MAC) deposition, which could potentially be linked to proper DNA replication and repair supported by dcd-mediated nucleotide metabolism.

Research has shown that different Acinetobacter strains employ various mechanisms to evade complement-mediated killing, with some AMR strains inhibiting the complement cascade at different levels . These diverse evasion strategies highlight the complexity of Acinetobacter pathogenicity and suggest multiple factors, potentially including nucleotide metabolism, contribute to clinical success.

How can contradictory findings regarding dcd function be reconciled in the scientific literature?

Scientific literature contains several seemingly contradictory findings regarding dcd function, particularly concerning growth requirements of dcd mutants. These contradictions can be systematically addressed through methodological approaches that account for experimental variables:

Major contradiction: Thymidine requirements in dcd mutants

Methodological approach to reconciliation:

  • Genetic background control:

    • Generate clean, marker-less dcd deletions in well-characterized strains

    • Maintain multiple independent mutant isolates to detect phenotypic variations

    • Sequence verify mutations before and after experimental use

  • Growth condition standardization:

    • Compare aerobic versus anaerobic growth (oxygen availability significantly affects thymidine requirements)

    • Use chemically defined media with controlled nutrient composition

    • Implement "warm start" protocols (prewarmed, preaerated media) for growth assays

    • Monitor growth across multiple timepoints rather than endpoint measurements

  • Secondary mutation analysis:

    • Perform whole genome sequencing of apparent revertants

    • Monitor for mutations in genes involved in alternative pathways (deoA, cdd)

    • Construct defined double and triple mutants to control for compensatory pathways

Through these approaches, researchers discovered that dcd mutants rapidly acquire secondary mutations that restore prototrophy, particularly in deoA (deoxyuridine phosphorylase) . This genetic plasticity explains the variable phenotypes reported in different studies and highlights the importance of maintaining rigorous strain verification protocols.

The reconciliation model involves recognizing that dcd mutants utilize an alternative pathway for thymidylate synthesis involving deoxycytidine and deoxyuridine as intermediates . A deoA mutation enhances this pathway by preventing deoxyuridine catabolism, while a cdd mutation blocks it by preventing deoxycytidine deamination to deoxyuridine . This model successfully explains the seemingly contradictory growth phenotypes observed across different studies.

What computational approaches can be used to study Acinetobacter sp. dcd structure and function?

Computational methods provide powerful tools for investigating dcd structure and function when integrated with experimental validation:

Structural bioinformatics approaches:

  • Homology modeling:

    • Identify structurally characterized dcd proteins as templates

    • Generate multiple models using tools like AlphaFold, SWISS-MODEL, or Rosetta

    • Validate models through Ramachandran plot analysis and quality metrics

    • Refine models using energy minimization

    • Identify potential catalytic residues and substrate binding pockets

  • Molecular dynamics simulations:

    • Prepare protein structures in appropriate force fields (AMBER, CHARMERS)

    • Simulate protein behavior in explicit solvent systems

    • Analyze conformational changes, flexibility, and substrate interactions

    • Typical simulation timescales: 100-300 ns for conformational sampling

    • Employ enhanced sampling techniques for rare events

Sequence-based analyses:

  • Multiple sequence alignment:

    • Collect dcd sequences from diverse bacterial species

    • Align using MUSCLE, MAFFT, or similar tools

    • Identify conserved motifs and catalytically important residues

    • Generate sequence logos to visualize conservation patterns

  • Phylogenetic analysis:

    • Construct phylogenetic trees using maximum likelihood or Bayesian approaches

    • Compare evolutionary patterns with taxonomic relationships

    • Identify potential horizontal gene transfer events

    • Analyze selective pressure using dN/dS ratios

Functional prediction:

  • Substrate specificity modeling:

    • Dock various cytosine nucleotides (dCTP, dCDP, dCMP, CTP)

    • Calculate binding energies and identify key interaction residues

    • Compare docking scores with experimental substrate preferences

    • Protocol should include positive controls (known substrates) and negative controls

  • Enzyme catalytic mechanism prediction:

    • Model transition states for deamination reaction

    • Identify residues involved in acid-base catalysis

    • Calculate reaction energy profiles

    • Compare with experimental mutagenesis data

Experimental validation of computational predictions is essential and can be implemented through site-directed mutagenesis of predicted catalytic residues. Studies on related dCTP deaminases have demonstrated that mutations in the predicted kinase or deaminase domains abolished their activity , confirming the computational identification of functional domains.

What novel methodologies are being developed to study dcd function in Acinetobacter sp.?

Several innovative methodological approaches are being developed to advance our understanding of dcd function in Acinetobacter species and related bacteria:

Advanced nucleotide metabolism analysis:

  • EdC conversion assay:

    • Utilizes 5-ethynyl 2′-deoxycytidine (EdC) substrate analog

    • Measures conversion to 5-ethynyl 2′-deoxyuridine (EdU)

    • EdU can be fluorescently labeled via click chemistry with 5-FAM azide

    • Enables simultaneous assessment of cytotoxicity and DNA replication activity

    • Provides a high-throughput method for rapid screening

Protocol outline:

  • Incubate cells with EdC at defined concentrations

  • Process cells with click chemistry reagents (CuSO₄, sodium ascorbate, 5-FAM azide)

  • For low signal samples: image by fluorescence microscopy

  • For high signal samples: treat with proteinase K, transfer to 96-well plate with SDS, measure fluorescence with plate reader

Infection-based functional assays:

  • Phage challenge time-course:

    • Infect control and dcd-expressing cells with phage at controlled MOI

    • Collect samples at precise timepoints post-infection (0, 5, 10, 15 minutes)

    • Extract nucleotides using cold extraction protocols

    • Analyze complete nucleotide profiles using LC-MS with synthesized standards

    • Track dynamic changes in multiple nucleotide species simultaneously

This approach has revealed previously unknown dynamics in nucleotide metabolism during phage infection, showing that dcd activity causes depletion of dCTP within 5 minutes, while other deoxynucleotides (dATP, dGTP, dTTP) accumulate at later timepoints due to blocked phage DNA synthesis .

Genetic interaction mapping:

  • Synthetic genetic array analysis:

    • Generate dcd deletion in a query strain

    • Cross with ordered arrays of single-gene deletions

    • Identify synthetic lethal/sick interactions

    • Map genetic interaction networks

  • Targeted epistasis analysis:

    • Construct defined sets of single, double, and triple mutants in nucleotide metabolism genes

    • Compare phenotypes to establish pathway relationships

    • Determine conditionally essential genes in dcd-deficient backgrounds

This approach has successfully revealed alternative pathways for thymidylate synthesis in dcd mutants and identified key genes like deoA and cdd that influence these pathways .

How can recombinant Acinetobacter sp. dcd be targeted for antimicrobial development?

Given the essential role of dcd in nucleotide metabolism, it represents a potential target for antimicrobial development against multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter species. A comprehensive methodological framework includes:

Target validation strategies:

  • Essentiality assessment:

    • Create conditional dcd knockdown systems (e.g., inducible antisense RNA)

    • Evaluate growth under various environmental conditions

    • Determine metabolic bottlenecks in dcd-depleted cells

    • Identify synthetic lethal interactions that could be co-targeted

  • In vivo relevance:

    • Test dcd-deficient strains in infection models

    • Assess competitive fitness with wild-type strains during infection

    • Evaluate nucleotide metabolism during exposure to host defense mechanisms

Inhibitor discovery approaches:

  • Structure-based screening:

    • Generate homology models or solve crystal structure of Acinetobacter dcd

    • Perform virtual screening of compound libraries targeting the active site

    • Develop docking protocols with known substrates as positive controls

    • Select compounds with favorable binding energies and drug-like properties

  • Activity-based screening:

    • Develop high-throughput enzyme assays using fluorescent readouts

    • Screen compound libraries for inhibition of dcd catalytic activity

    • Implement counter-screens against human nucleotide metabolism enzymes

    • Validate hits with orthogonal activity assays (LC-MS)

Lead optimization considerations:

  • Spectrum of activity:

    • Test lead compounds against diverse Acinetobacter clinical isolates

    • Evaluate activity against other priority pathogens

    • Assess selectivity over human enzymes

  • Physicochemical optimization:

    • Address membrane permeability challenges in gram-negative bacteria

    • Optimize properties to avoid efflux using medicinal chemistry approaches

    • Develop structure-activity relationships through systematic modifications

  • Resistance potential:

    • Select for resistant mutants and perform whole-genome sequencing

    • Evaluate frequency of resistance emergence

    • Test combinations with existing antibiotics for synergistic effects

The development process should consider Acinetobacter's notable serum resistance and ability to evade immune clearance mechanisms, which present significant challenges for treatment. Targeting metabolic pathways essential for survival during infection offers promising alternatives to conventional antibiotics that face increasing resistance issues.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.