KEGG: aci:ACIAD0562
STRING: 62977.ACIAD0562
Histidine--tRNA ligase (HisS) is an aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase that catalyzes the attachment of histidine to its cognate tRNA molecules, a critical step in protein translation. In Acinetobacter species, including the clinically significant A. baumannii, HisS ensures accurate incorporation of histidine during protein synthesis. It belongs to the class II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, which are characterized by their structural features and catalytic mechanisms . The enzyme serves as a critical component in maintaining translational fidelity in these bacteria, which is particularly important given their role in healthcare-associated infections and antibiotic resistance .
Acinetobacter HisS belongs to a class of smaller bacterial aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, compared to some other bacterial species. While the exact sequence characteristics of Acinetobacter HisS have not been extensively studied in comparison to all bacterial species, research on aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases demonstrates significant structural differences between bacterial species. For instance, the histidine sequence of E. coli HisS shows no strong alignment with several other bacterial tRNA synthetases, suggesting it may derive from a different progenitor . Unlike human histidyl-tRNA synthetase, which contains a coiled-coil domain within the first 60 amino acids that is important for both enzymatic activity and antigenicity, bacterial HisS proteins often lack this domain . The structural differences influence substrate interactions and may play roles in species-specific antibiotic resistance mechanisms .
The hisS gene in Acinetobacter species encodes the Histidine--tRNA ligase enzyme. While specific details about the genetic organization of hisS in Acinetobacter are not extensively described in the provided search results, comparative studies on aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases suggest that the gene structure includes a coding region and regulatory elements. In E. coli, for example, the hisS locus contains a coding region of 424 codons, with important regulatory elements located in the 5'-noncoding sequence that serve as promoter sites for RNA polymerase . The expression of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase genes, including hisS, can be affected by various regulatory mechanisms, as observed in studies of bacteria exposed to antimicrobial compounds, where genes controlling protein synthesis accuracy (including hisS) showed activation patterns . Research on A. baumannii genomes has also revealed that metabolic and antibiotic resistance genes can be regulated through complex genetic mechanisms involving secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters and antibiotic resistant genes, which may influence hisS expression .
The optimal expression of recombinant Acinetobacter sp. HisS protein typically involves bacterial expression systems, particularly E. coli. Based on research methods for similar proteins, the following conditions are recommended:
Expression System Design:
E. coli BL21(DE3) strain is commonly used as a host for recombinant HisS expression
Expression vectors containing T7 promoter systems provide controlled induction
Fusion tags like His6, GST, or MBP can improve solubility and facilitate purification
Culture and Induction Conditions:
Growth temperature: 30°C pre-induction, reduced to 18-25°C post-induction to maximize soluble protein
Induction: 0.1-0.5 mM IPTG when culture reaches OD600 of 0.6-0.8
Post-induction expression time: 4-16 hours (overnight expression at lower temperatures often yields higher amounts of soluble protein)
Media and Supplements:
Rich media (like LB) with appropriate antibiotics for plasmid maintenance
Supplementation with glucose (0.5-1%) can reduce basal expression
Addition of 1-5 mM histidine may improve folding and stability of the synthetase
The expression conditions should be optimized through small-scale tests before proceeding to large-scale production. Protein expression should be monitored by SDS-PAGE and enzymatic activity assays to ensure functional protein production .
Effective purification of recombinant Acinetobacter HisS requires a multi-step approach to achieve high purity while maintaining enzymatic activity. Based on successful protocols for similar recombinant proteins, the following methodology is recommended:
Initial Extraction:
Cell lysis under denaturing conditions can be efficient for HisS, similar to the "rapid histone purification" (RHP) approach that directly solubilizes inclusion bodies without their isolation
Alternative native extraction using sonication or high-pressure homogenization in buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5-8.0), 300 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, and 1 mM DTT
Chromatographic Purification Sequence:
Affinity Chromatography: If His-tagged, use Ni-NTA resin with imidazole gradient elution (20-250 mM)
Ion Exchange Chromatography: HisS can be purified effectively using ion exchange chromatography similar to methods used for other recombinant proteins
Size Exclusion Chromatography: Final polishing step using Superdex 200 or similar resin in buffer containing 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, and 1 mM DTT
Quality Control:
SDS-PAGE analysis for purity assessment (>95% purity should be achievable)
Activity assays measuring aminoacylation of tRNA^His
Mass spectrometry to confirm protein identity and detect potential modifications
The purification protocol should yield protein suitable for enzymatic, structural, and functional studies with minimal batch-to-batch variation .
Verification of enzymatic activity for purified recombinant Acinetobacter HisS requires specific assays that measure its ability to aminoacylate tRNA with histidine. The following methodological approaches can be implemented:
Standard Aminoacylation Assay:
Prepare reaction mixture containing purified HisS (1-10 µg), tRNA^His (2-5 µM), ATP (2-5 mM), histidine (50-100 µM, including radioactive [³H] or [¹⁴C]-labeled histidine for detection), MgCl₂ (5-10 mM), and buffer (typically 50 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 30 mM KCl)
Incubate at 37°C for 10-30 minutes
Precipitate aminoacylated tRNA with trichloroacetic acid (TCA)
Filter through nitrocellulose membranes and wash
Measure radioactivity by scintillation counting
ATP-PPi Exchange Assay:
This alternative assay measures the reverse reaction of aminoacyl-adenylate formation
Includes [³²P]-PPi in the reaction mixture
Monitors the incorporation of radioactive phosphate into ATP
Useful when purified tRNA^His is not available
Enzyme Kinetics Analysis:
Determine kinetic parameters (Km, kcat) for histidine, tRNA^His, and ATP
Compare with published values for other bacterial HisS enzymes
Typical Km values for histidine range from 20-100 µM
Thermal Stability Testing:
Differential scanning fluorimetry (DSF) can assess protein stability
Properly folded HisS should show a clear thermal transition
DSF can also identify ligands that stabilize the enzyme
These assays provide comprehensive verification of enzymatic function and can be complemented with analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC) to confirm proper oligomeric state, typically dimeric for functional HisS .
The catalytic activity of Acinetobacter HisS depends on several critical domains and motifs that facilitate its aminoacylation function. Based on research on HisS proteins and related aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, the following structural elements are essential:
Catalytic Domain:
Contains the active site for histidine and ATP binding
Features conserved motifs characteristic of class II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases
The first 100 amino acids typically contain important catalytic elements, as observed in other bacterial tRNA synthetases
Mutations in this region, comparable to the p.Tyr330Cys, p.Ser356Asn, and p.Val155Gly mutations in human HARS, can significantly impair enzyme function
tRNA Binding Domain:
Responsible for recognizing and binding the appropriate tRNA^His
Often contains positively charged residues that interact with the negatively charged tRNA backbone
May involve recognition of specific identity elements in tRNA^His, particularly the anticodon and acceptor stem
Dimerization Interface:
HisS typically functions as a dimer
The dimerization interface is critical for maintaining proper enzyme conformation
Analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC) studies on similar enzymes confirm the importance of the dimeric structure for function
Conserved Motifs:
Class II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases contain three conserved motifs:
Motif 1: Involved in dimer formation
Motif 2: Forms part of the ATP binding site
Motif 3: Contributes to the active site and helps position the amino acid substrate
Bacterial HisS proteins notably lack the coiled-coil domain found in human histidyl-tRNA synthetase (within the first 60 amino acids), which affects their structural organization and potentially their interaction with tRNA . Understanding these structural elements is crucial for interpreting the effects of mutations and designing experiments to probe enzyme function .
Recombinant HisS serves as a valuable tool for unraveling antibiotic resistance mechanisms in Acinetobacter species through several research approaches:
Protein Synthesis Machinery as Resistance Target:
Studies show that genes controlling protein synthesis accuracy, including aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases like hisS, are activated in response to antimicrobial treatment
Recombinant HisS enables investigation of how aminoacylation processes may be altered in resistant strains
Changes in HisS expression or activity may contribute to translational fidelity shifts that enhance survival under antibiotic pressure
Structural Basis for Resistance:
Recombinant HisS production permits structural studies to identify potential interaction sites with antibiotics
Crystallography or cryo-EM analyses using the recombinant protein can reveal how mutations might affect antibiotic binding
Comparative structural analysis between sensitive and resistant strains may highlight adaptive changes
Functional Genomics Applications:
Metabolic Alterations and Resistance:
Research indicates that antibiotic resistance in A. baumannii involves metabolic alterations
Recombinant HisS studies can determine whether changes in histidine incorporation rates affect metabolic pathways linked to resistance
In vitro translation systems supplemented with recombinant HisS can model these metabolic impacts
Experimental Resistance Development Studies:
Recombinant HisS can be used in directed evolution experiments to identify mutations conferring resistance
AFM-based methods similar to those used for detecting A. baumannii antibiotic resistance could incorporate recombinant HisS to study its role in resistance mechanisms
This research is particularly important given that A. baumannii can develop resistance to multiple antibiotics through various mechanisms, including changes in membrane proteins, stress responses, and altered gene expression .
Several sophisticated experimental approaches can detect and characterize interactions between antibiotics and Acinetobacter HisS, providing valuable insights into potential inhibition mechanisms:
Biophysical Interaction Assays:
Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR):
Immobilize recombinant HisS on sensor chip
Flow antibiotics at various concentrations over the surface
Measure binding kinetics (kon, koff) and affinity (KD)
Typical expected KD values range from nanomolar to micromolar for specific interactions
Microscale Thermophoresis (MST):
Label recombinant HisS with fluorescent dye
Mix with varying concentrations of antibiotics
Measure changes in thermophoretic mobility upon binding
Provides binding constants in native solution conditions
Differential Scanning Fluorimetry (DSF):
Monitor thermal stability of HisS in presence/absence of antibiotics
Binding typically increases melting temperature (Tm)
High-throughput method allows screening of multiple compounds
Functional Impact Assays:
Aminoacylation Inhibition Assays:
Measure HisS activity with standard aminoacylation assay
Add antibiotics at various concentrations
Calculate IC50 values for inhibition
Determine inhibition mechanism (competitive, non-competitive, uncompetitive)
ATP-PPi Exchange Inhibition:
Examine effect of antibiotics on adenylate formation step
Helps distinguish which reaction step is affected
Atomic Force Microscopy:
Structural Approaches:
X-ray Crystallography:
Co-crystallize HisS with antibiotics
Determine atomic-level interaction details
Identify specific binding sites and conformational changes
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR):
Map chemical shift perturbations upon antibiotic binding
Identify interaction interfaces
Study dynamics of binding-induced conformational changes
Cellular Approaches:
Gene Expression Analysis:
These complementary approaches provide comprehensive data on antibiotic-HisS interactions, informing both resistance mechanisms and potential new therapeutic strategies .
Recombinant HisS provides an excellent platform for screening novel antimicrobial compounds targeting Acinetobacter species through a multi-tiered approach:
Primary High-Throughput Screening:
Enzymatic Activity Inhibition Assays:
Develop a miniaturized aminoacylation assay using recombinant HisS
Screen compound libraries (10,000-100,000 compounds)
Identify hit compounds that inhibit >50% activity at 10-20 µM
Calculate Z' factor to ensure assay robustness (aim for Z' > 0.5)
Thermal Shift Assays:
Use differential scanning fluorimetry (DSF) as an orthogonal screening method
Identify compounds that significantly alter HisS thermal stability
Crosscheck with enzymatic assay hits to prioritize candidates
Secondary Screening and Characterization:
Dose-Response Analysis:
Determine IC50 values for hit compounds
Establish structure-activity relationships (SAR)
Typical minimum criteria: IC50 < 1 µM for further development
Mechanism of Action Studies:
Determine inhibition type (competitive, non-competitive)
Identify which substrate interaction is affected (ATP, histidine, tRNA)
Use kinetic analysis to calculate Ki values
Selectivity Profiling:
Test activity against human histidyl-tRNA synthetase
Aim for >100-fold selectivity for bacterial enzyme
Screen against panel of other aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases
Tertiary Cellular Validation:
Antimicrobial Activity Testing:
Determine minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) against Acinetobacter strains
Include clinical isolates with various resistance profiles
Compare with standard antibiotics
Rapid Resistance Detection Methods:
Target Validation in Cells:
Overexpress HisS in Acinetobacter and test for resistance
Use metabolomics to confirm histidine incorporation disruption
Monitor changes in protein synthesis rates
Lead Optimization Pipeline:
Structural Studies with Lead Compounds:
Co-crystallize recombinant HisS with promising inhibitors
Identify binding modes and key interaction residues
Guide medicinal chemistry for improved binding and pharmacokinetics
Resistance Development Monitoring:
Perform serial passage experiments with sub-MIC compound concentrations
Sequence hisS gene from resistant mutants
Test mutant recombinant proteins to confirm resistance mechanism
This comprehensive screening approach leverages recombinant HisS to identify inhibitors that specifically target Acinetobacter species, potentially addressing the critical need for new antibiotics against multidrug-resistant strains .
Recombinant HisS provides a powerful tool for investigating translation fidelity mechanisms in Acinetobacter species through several sophisticated experimental approaches:
In Vitro Translation System Development:
Reconstituted Translation Assays:
Establish a cell-free translation system using Acinetobacter components
Include purified recombinant HisS alongside other translation factors
Measure translation rates and accuracy using reporter constructs
Compare wild-type HisS with site-directed mutants affecting catalytic efficiency
Misacylation Analysis:
Assess HisS fidelity by measuring mischarging rates
Quantify incorporation of non-cognate amino acids (e.g., glutamine, arginine)
Determine error rates using mass spectrometry of translation products
Typical experimental setup: incubate HisS with tRNA^His and non-cognate amino acids, detect misacylated products
Molecular Mechanisms of Fidelity Control:
Structure-Function Analysis:
Create recombinant HisS variants with mutations in substrate binding sites
Measure changes in aminoacylation kinetics (kcat/Km)
Correlate structural changes with fidelity alterations
Key targets: conserved motifs in the catalytic domain that influence substrate recognition
tRNA Recognition Studies:
Investigate HisS interactions with tRNA^His identity elements
Use modified tRNAs to probe recognition mechanisms
Apply methods like SHAPE (Selective 2'-hydroxyl acylation analyzed by primer extension) to map interaction sites
Stress Response and Adaptability:
Environmental Stress Effects:
Examine how stress conditions affect HisS fidelity
Test recombinant HisS under various pH, ionic strength, and temperature conditions
Measure changes in misacylation rates and correlate with growth conditions
Relate to studies showing activation of genes controlling protein synthesis accuracy (including hisS) in response to antimicrobial treatments
Mistranslation as Adaptive Mechanism:
Investigate whether controlled mistranslation via HisS contributes to stress adaptation
Compare HisS properties from antibiotic-resistant versus sensitive strains
Analyze whether changes in translation fidelity correlate with resistance phenotypes
Systems Biology Integration:
Proteome-Wide Impact Assessment:
Combine recombinant HisS studies with proteomics approaches
Analyze how HisS activity levels affect the global Acinetobacter proteome
Identify proteins particularly sensitive to histidine incorporation accuracy
Connect with proteomic analyses that identified differential protein expression between multidrug-resistant and drug-susceptible A. baumannii isolates
These approaches can reveal how translation fidelity contributes to Acinetobacter's remarkable adaptability and antibiotic resistance capabilities, potentially identifying new therapeutic targets .
Site-directed mutagenesis of Acinetobacter HisS presents several significant challenges that researchers must address to obtain reliable insights into enzyme function:
Technical Challenges:
Expression and Solubility Issues:
Mutations may disrupt protein folding, leading to inclusion body formation
Critical residue mutations often reduce expression yields by 50-90%
Solutions: Optimize expression conditions (lower temperature, specific media), use solubility tags (MBP, SUMO), explore refolding protocols
Stability Considerations:
Mutations in conserved domains frequently destabilize the protein
Mutant proteins may show accelerated degradation during purification
Approach: Use differential scanning fluorimetry (DSF) to assess thermal stability of mutants compared to wild-type; implement stabilizing buffers
Oligomerization Disruption:
Experimental Design Challenges:
Selection of Target Residues:
Limited structural information specifically for Acinetobacter HisS
Need for homology modeling based on related structures
Recommendation: Focus on conserved motifs in the catalytic domain first, then expand to species-specific residues
Distinguishing Direct vs. Indirect Effects:
Mutations may impact function through catalytic or structural perturbations
Multiple assays needed: aminoacylation kinetics, binding studies, structural analyses
Complementary mutations can help distinguish mechanisms
Quantifying Subtle Effects:
Some mutations produce partial rather than complete loss of function
Requires precise kinetic analysis (kcat, Km) with multiple substrate concentrations
Statistical rigor: minimum triplicate experiments with appropriate controls
Interpretation Challenges:
Correlation with Physiological Relevance:
Context-Dependent Function:
HisS activity may depend on interactions with other cellular components
Mutations might affect these interactions without changing core enzymatic function
Recommendation: Include protein-protein interaction studies
Evolutionary Conservation Analysis:
Solutions Table:
| Challenge | Experimental Approach | Expected Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Expression difficulties | Test multiple expression vectors/conditions | Identify optimized protocol for each mutant |
| Stability issues | DSF analysis, buffer optimization | Stable preparations for functional assays |
| Structure disruption | CD spectroscopy, limited proteolysis | Confirmation of proper folding |
| Functional assessment | Multiple substrate concentrations, reaction conditions | Accurate kinetic parameters |
| Physiological relevance | Complementation of E. coli or A. baumannii hisS mutants | Validation of in vivo significance |
Addressing these challenges requires an integrated approach combining structural, biochemical, and genetic methods to obtain meaningful insights into HisS function .
Recombinant HisS provides a valuable molecular tool for investigating evolutionary relationships among Acinetobacter species through several sophisticated approaches:
Comparative Sequence-Structure-Function Analysis:
Evolutionary Rate Analysis:
Express and characterize recombinant HisS from multiple Acinetobacter species
Compare sequence conservation patterns in catalytic vs. non-catalytic regions
Calculate evolutionary rates (dN/dS ratios) to identify regions under selection
Correlate with functional differences in aminoacylation kinetics
Functional Conservation Testing:
Perform cross-species complementation studies
Express recombinant HisS from various Acinetobacter species in model organisms
Determine which residues are critical for species-specific functions
Assess whether HisS from different Acinetobacter species can cross-complement
Phylogenetic Approaches:
Multi-Gene Phylogeny Integration:
Include hisS sequences in phylogenomic analyses of Acinetobacter species
Compare HisS-based phylogenies with those derived from whole-genome analyses
Identify instances of potential horizontal gene transfer
Apply methods similar to the dynamic stochastic block model (DSBM) used for HIV-1 phylogenetic analysis
Ancestral Sequence Reconstruction:
Infer ancestral HisS sequences at key nodes in Acinetobacter phylogeny
Express recombinant ancestral HisS proteins
Characterize biochemical properties and compare to extant enzymes
Track the evolution of substrate specificity and catalytic efficiency
Structural Evolution Studies:
Comparative Structural Analysis:
Determine crystal structures of HisS from diverse Acinetobacter species
Identify structural adaptations in different lineages
Map sequence variations onto structural models
Unlike studies indicating that HisS may derive from a different progenitor than other aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, focus specifically on intra-genus variations
Domain Architecture Comparison:
Analyze domain organization across the Acinetobacter genus
Identify insertions, deletions, or domain shuffling events
Express chimeric HisS with domains from different species to test functional implications
Coevolution Analysis:
HisS-tRNA Coevolution:
Compare HisS and tRNA^His sequences from the same species
Identify coevolutionary patterns in interacting residues
Express recombinant HisS with cognate and non-cognate tRNAs to test specificity
Measure aminoacylation efficiency with homologous vs. heterologous components
Genome Context Analysis:
Examine genomic neighborhood of hisS across Acinetobacter species
Identify conserved gene clusters and potential operon structures
Test whether genomic context correlates with functional properties
Similar to approaches used in identifying secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters in Acinetobacter
These approaches can reveal how HisS has evolved within the Acinetobacter genus, potentially shedding light on adaptation mechanisms, speciation events, and the development of species-specific traits including antibiotic resistance .
Researchers frequently encounter several challenges when expressing recombinant Acinetobacter HisS. Here are the most common issues and their methodological solutions:
Low Expression Yields:
Problem: Poor protein production despite confirmed gene presence
Solutions:
Optimize codon usage for expression host (typically 30-40% increase in yield)
Test multiple promoter systems (T7, tac, ara) to identify optimal expression control
Adjust induction parameters: IPTG concentration (0.1-1.0 mM), temperature (18-37°C), and duration (4-24 hours)
Screen multiple E. coli strains (BL21, Rosetta, Arctic Express) for improved expression
Problem: Toxicity to host cells
Solutions:
Use tight expression control systems with minimal leakage
Lower culture temperature to 18-25°C during expression phase
Employ specialized strains with enhanced tolerance (C41/C43)
Consider cell-free protein synthesis as an alternative
Solubility and Folding Issues:
Problem: Formation of inclusion bodies
Solutions:
Apply "rapid histone purification" (RHP)-like approach that directly solubilizes inclusion bodies
Express with solubility-enhancing fusion tags (MBP, SUMO, TRX)
Co-express with chaperones (GroEL/ES, DnaK/J)
Develop refolding protocol using step-wise dialysis with declining urea/guanidine concentrations
Problem: Aggregation during purification
Solutions:
Include stabilizing additives: 10% glycerol, 0.1-0.5M arginine, or 0.1% Triton X-100
Add catalytic substrates (ATP, histidine) to stabilize native conformation
Optimize buffer conditions (pH 7.0-8.0, 150-300 mM NaCl)
Use size exclusion chromatography as final purification step
Enzymatic Activity Issues:
Problem: Low or absent enzymatic activity
Solutions:
Ensure proper folding using circular dichroism spectroscopy
Verify structural integrity with limited proteolysis
Screen buffer components systematically (pH, salt, metal ions)
Add reducing agents (1-5 mM DTT or 2-10 mM β-mercaptoethanol) to maintain cysteine residues
Problem: Batch-to-batch variability
Solutions:
Standardize expression and purification protocols rigorously
Implement quality control checkpoints: SDS-PAGE, activity assays, and mass spectrometry
Prepare large master batches and store as aliquots at -80°C
Include internal standards in activity assays
Stability and Storage Issues:
Problem: Rapid loss of activity during storage
Solutions:
Identify optimal storage conditions through stability testing
Add stabilizers: 10-50% glycerol, 0.1 mg/ml BSA, or 1-5 mM TCEP
Flash-freeze aliquots in liquid nitrogen and store at -80°C
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles (limit to 1-2 maximum)
By systematically addressing these challenges using the proposed methodological solutions, researchers can significantly improve the yield, quality, and consistency of recombinant Acinetobacter HisS preparations for subsequent functional and structural studies .
Inconsistent enzyme activity in recombinant HisS preparations presents a significant challenge for researchers. A methodical troubleshooting approach is essential to identify and resolve the underlying causes:
Systematic Activity Variation Analysis:
Problem: Variable activity between purification batches
Diagnostic Tests:
Perform side-by-side activity assays with multiple batches
Analyze protein purity by SDS-PAGE and mass spectrometry
Measure protein concentration using multiple methods (Bradford, BCA, A280)
Solutions:
Standardize every step of the purification protocol
Implement specific activity calculations (activity/mg protein)
Prepare internal standard (reference batch) for normalization
Establish acceptance criteria for batch release
Problem: Activity decay during storage
Diagnostic Tests:
Monitor activity over time under different storage conditions
Analyze for degradation products by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting
Assess aggregation by dynamic light scattering
Solutions:
Optimize buffer conditions (pH 7.0-8.0, 150-300 mM NaCl)
Add stabilizing agents: 20-50% glycerol, 0.1% BSA, 1 mM DTT
Store as single-use aliquots at -80°C to avoid freeze-thaw cycles
Consider lyophilization with appropriate cryoprotectants
Enzyme Quality and Integrity Issues:
Problem: Post-translational modifications affecting activity
Diagnostic Tests:
Mass spectrometry analysis to identify modifications
Phosphorylation detection using Pro-Q Diamond staining
Western blot with anti-phospho/acetyl antibodies
Solutions:
Express in systems with reduced modification capacity
Co-express with phosphatases if phosphorylation is detected
Purify under reducing conditions if oxidation is observed
Problem: Improper folding or oligomerization
Diagnostic Tests:
Circular dichroism spectroscopy to assess secondary structure
Analytical ultracentrifugation to determine oligomerization state
Differential scanning fluorimetry to evaluate thermal stability
Solutions:
Assay and Reaction Condition Optimization:
Problem: Substrate quality and consistency issues
Diagnostic Tests:
Analyze commercial ATP and amino acid purity
Verify tRNA^His integrity by gel electrophoresis
Test multiple substrate lots
Solutions:
Source high-quality reagents from reliable suppliers
Prepare master mixes for critical components
Include internal controls in every assay
Vary substrate concentrations to ensure saturation
Problem: Suboptimal reaction conditions
Diagnostic Tests:
Perform pH optimization (range 6.5-8.5)
Titrate divalent cations (Mg²⁺, Mn²⁺) at 1-20 mM
Test temperature dependence (25-42°C)
Evaluate buffer composition effects
Solutions:
Establish comprehensive condition optimization matrix
Determine enzyme kinetic parameters under optimal conditions
Standardize reaction time and temperature control
Include reaction monitoring time points to ensure linearity
Systematic Troubleshooting Data Table:
| Factor | Test Method | Typical Optimal Range | Solution for Deviation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein purity | SDS-PAGE, SEC-MALS | >95% purity | Additional purification steps |
| Structural integrity | CD, DSF | α-helical content ~40-50% | Adjust purification/storage |
| Oligomeric state | AUC, native PAGE | Primarily dimeric | Buffer optimization |
| pH optimum | Activity vs. pH curve | Usually 7.2-8.0 | Adjust assay buffer |
| Mg²⁺ requirement | Activity vs. [Mg²⁺] | Typically 5-10 mM | Optimize divalent cations |
| Temperature optimum | Activity vs. temp | Generally 30-37°C | Temperature control |
| Substrate Km values | Michaelis-Menten kinetics | ATP: 0.1-1 mM, His: 10-100 µM | Ensure saturating conditions |
By systematically addressing these potential issues, researchers can significantly improve the consistency and reliability of recombinant HisS activity measurements, enabling more reproducible results in functional and inhibitor studies .
Designing robust kinetic assays for recombinant Acinetobacter HisS requires careful consideration of multiple factors to ensure accurate, reproducible results. The following methodological guidelines address key aspects of assay design:
Assay Format Selection and Optimization:
Detection Method Considerations:
Radioactive Assays: High sensitivity but requires special handling
Use [³H]-histidine (specific activity >20 Ci/mmol) or [¹⁴C]-histidine (50-60 mCi/mmol)
TCA precipitation followed by filter binding gives lowest background
Typical signal-to-noise ratio should exceed 10:1
Colorimetric/Fluorometric Alternatives:
Pyrophosphate release detection using coupled enzyme assays
BIOMOL Green for phosphate detection (sensitivity ~0.1-2 nmol)
Malachite green assay (linear range 0.1-10 nmol phosphate)
Coupled Assays:
Link aminoacylation to pyrophosphatase and phosphate detection
Ensure coupling enzymes are not rate-limiting (use 5-10× excess)
Reaction Components Optimization:
Buffer Selection:
HEPES or Tris buffers (50-100 mM, pH 7.0-8.0) minimize interference
Include 50-150 mM KCl or NaCl for ionic strength
Add 5-10% glycerol to enhance enzyme stability
Essential Cofactors:
Mg²⁺ (optimally 5-10 mM) as primary metal cofactor
Test alternative divalent cations (Mn²⁺, Zn²⁺) at 0.1-5 mM
Include reducing agent (1-5 mM DTT or β-mercaptoethanol)
Kinetic Parameter Determination:
Initial Velocity Measurements:
Establish linear range for time course (typically 1-10 minutes)
Use enzyme concentrations giving <15% substrate conversion
Include multiple time points to confirm linearity
Perform reactions at 30-37°C with temperature control (±0.5°C)
Substrate Concentration Ranges:
ATP: 0.01-5 mM (typical Km ~0.1-0.5 mM)
Histidine: 1-500 µM (typical Km ~10-50 µM)
tRNA^His: 0.1-10 µM (typical Km ~0.5-2 µM)
Use minimum 7-8 concentrations spanning 0.2-5× Km values
Data Analysis Approaches:
Apply appropriate kinetic models (Michaelis-Menten, Hill, etc.)
Use non-linear regression rather than linearization methods
Calculate standard errors for all parameters
Validate with Eadie-Hofstee or Hanes-Woolf plots for linearity
Controls and Validation:
Critical Control Reactions:
No-enzyme controls to establish background
Heat-inactivated enzyme controls (95°C, 10 min)
Substrate omission controls for each component
Positive control with commercial aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase
Assay Validation Parameters:
Reproducibility: CV <15% between replicates
Robustness: Evaluate influence of minor parameter changes
Z'-factor: Calculate for high-throughput applications (aim for >0.5)
Stability: Test reagent stability over typical assay duration
Special Considerations for Inhibitor Studies:
Inhibition Kinetics Design:
Pre-incubate enzyme with inhibitor (5-15 min)
Use multiple substrate and inhibitor concentrations
Include appropriate solvent controls (DMSO typically <2%)
Determine inhibition mechanism (competitive, non-competitive, etc.)
Artifact Recognition and Elimination:
Test for inhibitor aggregation via dynamic light scattering
Evaluate inhibitor specificity against related enzymes
Include detergent controls (0.01% Triton X-100) to identify promiscuous inhibitors
Consider time-dependent inhibition effects