Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference in order notes for customized preparation.
Note: Standard shipping includes blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires advance notice and incurs additional charges.
The tag type will be determined during production. Please specify your preferred tag type for prioritized development.
KEGG: aci:ACIAD0701
STRING: 62977.ACIAD0701
What are the optimal conditions for expressing and purifying active recombinant Acinetobacter sp. RsmC?
Based on experimental approaches used with E. coli RsmC and other methyltransferases, optimal conditions include:
Expression parameters:
E. coli BL21(DE3) or Rosetta(DE3) strains to accommodate potential rare codons
Growth in LB or 2xYT medium to OD600 0.6-0.8 at 37°C
Induction with 0.2-0.5 mM IPTG
Post-induction growth at 18-20°C for 16-18 hours to maximize soluble protein yield
Purification buffer optimization:
Base buffer: 50 mM Tris-HCl or HEPES (pH 7.5-8.0), 300-500 mM NaCl
Addition of 5-10% glycerol for stability
1-5 mM β-mercaptoethanol or DTT to maintain reduced cysteines
Consider adding 0.1 mM SAM to stabilize the protein structure
Activity validation:
In vitro methylation assay using [methyl-³H]-SAM and isolated ribosomes or 16S rRNA
Monitor SAM binding by ITC or fluorescence-based thermal shift assays
Circular dichroism spectroscopy to confirm proper folding
Maintaining RsmC activity throughout purification is critical for subsequent functional studies, with particular attention to buffer composition and storage conditions .
How can mutational analysis be used to map functional regions of Acinetobacter sp. RsmC?
Systematic mutational analysis can elucidate the structure-function relationships in RsmC:
Strategic mutation targets:
Conserved residues in predicted SAM-binding motifs (analogs of D202, D227 in E. coli RsmC)
Putative catalytic residues (analog of N268 in the NPPF motif)
Positively charged surface residues likely involved in rRNA binding
Interdomain linker residues to probe domain communication
Experimental approach:
Site-directed mutagenesis to generate single and double mutants
Circular dichroism to verify proper folding of mutant proteins
ITC to measure SAM binding affinity
Methylation assays with isolated ribosomes from an rsmC-deficient strain
RNA binding assays using synthetic oligonucleotides corresponding to the 16S rRNA target region
Data analysis:
Quantify the effect of each mutation on SAM binding (Kd values)
Determine kinetic parameters (Km, kcat) for methylation activity
Map the results onto a structural model to identify functional regions
What are the most reliable assays for measuring RsmC methyltransferase activity?
Several complementary assays can be used to measure RsmC methyltransferase activity:
Radiometric methylation assay:
Use [methyl-³H]-SAM or [methyl-¹⁴C]-SAM as methyl donor
Incubate with purified ribosomes or in vitro transcribed 16S rRNA
Collect methylated RNA by filtration or precipitation
Quantify incorporated radioactivity by scintillation counting
Mass spectrometry-based approaches:
Use stable isotope-labeled SAM (¹³C or deuterium-labeled)
Digest RNA after methylation reaction
Identify and quantify methylated nucleosides by LC-MS/MS
Compare with synthetic standards of methylated nucleosides
Antibody-based detection:
Generate specific antibodies against m²G1207
Use dot blot or Northern blot analysis to detect methylation
Quantify signal intensity relative to standards
Restriction enzyme protection assay:
Design the system where methylation protects from or creates a restriction site
Digest RNA after methylation reaction
Analyze fragment patterns by gel electrophoresis
The radiometric assay provides the most quantitative results for kinetic studies, while mass spectrometry offers the highest specificity for confirming the exact position and type of methylation .
How might targeting RsmC lead to novel antimicrobial strategies against multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter?
With Acinetobacter species showing alarming rates of antimicrobial resistance and mortality rates up to 70% for infections caused by extensively drug-resistant strains , targeting RsmC offers several promising therapeutic strategies:
Direct inhibition approaches:
Small molecule inhibitors targeting the SAM-binding pocket
Allosteric inhibitors disrupting interdomain communication
Competitive inhibitors that mimic the rRNA substrate
Gene expression targeting:
Antisense oligonucleotides directed against rsmC mRNA
CRISPR interference to repress rsmC transcription
Combination strategies:
RsmC inhibitors to potentiate existing antibiotics
Dual targeting of multiple rRNA modification enzymes
Potential advantages of targeting RsmC:
Essential bacterial function not targeted by current antibiotics
Highly conserved across Acinetobacter species
Structural differences from human methyltransferases enable selectivity
Development challenges include achieving sufficient cellular penetration, especially given Acinetobacter's inherent membrane permeability barriers, and demonstrating efficacy in animal infection models.
What is the relationship between RsmC function and biofilm formation in Acinetobacter sp.?
Biofilm formation is a key virulence factor in Acinetobacter species, contributing to environmental persistence and antibiotic resistance . The potential relationship between RsmC and biofilm formation warrants investigation:
Translation regulation through ribosomal modifications may affect expression of biofilm-associated proteins
Stress responses that induce biofilm formation might also modulate RsmC expression or activity
Changes in metabolic rate during biofilm development could alter requirements for ribosome function
Research approaches should include:
Comparing rsmC expression between planktonic and biofilm growth conditions
Creating conditional rsmC knockdown strains to assess biofilm formation
Analyzing biofilm architecture and composition in strains with altered RsmC activity
Evaluating antibiotic tolerance in biofilms with modified RsmC function
Understanding this relationship could potentially lead to strategies that simultaneously target biofilm formation and essential cellular functions, addressing two major contributors to Acinetobacter's clinical challenges.