Recombinant Acorus americanus ATP synthase subunit a, chloroplastic (atpI)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, we are happy to accommodate specific format requests. Please indicate your preference when placing the order, and we will strive to fulfill your requirements.
Lead Time
Delivery time may vary depending on the purchase method and location. Please consult your local distributors for specific delivery estimates.
Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. If dry ice shipping is required, please communicate your request in advance. Additional fees may apply.
Notes
Repeated freezing and thawing is not recommended. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
We recommend centrifuging the vial briefly before opening to ensure the contents settle at the bottom. Reconstitute the protein in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting the solution at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard final concentration of glycerol is 50%, which can be used as a reference point.
Shelf Life
Shelf life is influenced by various factors, including storage conditions, buffer composition, storage temperature, and the intrinsic stability of the protein.
Generally, the shelf life of liquid form is 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. Lyophilized form has a shelf life of 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquoting is recommended for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during the manufacturing process.
The specific tag type will be decided during production. If you have a preferred tag type, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
atpI; ATP synthase subunit a, chloroplastic; ATP synthase F0 sector subunit a; F-ATPase subunit IV
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-247
Protein Length
full length protein
Species
Acorus americanus (Sweetflag) (Acorus calamus var. americanus)
Target Names
atpI
Target Protein Sequence
MNVILCSSNMLKGLYDISGVEVGQHLYWQIGGFQVHAQVLITSWVVIAILLGSVTVAVRN PQTIPTNGQNFFEYVLEFIRDLSKTQIGEEYGPWVPFIGTMFLFIFVSNWSGALLPWKLI ELPHGELAAPTNDINTTVALALPTSVAYFYAGLTKKGLGYFGKYIQPTPILLPINILEDF TKPLSLSFRLFGNILADELVVVVLVSLVPLVVPIPVMFLGLFTSGIQALIFATLAAAYIG ESMEGHH
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This protein is a key component of the proton channel, playing a direct role in the translocation of protons across the membrane.
Protein Families
ATPase A chain family
Subcellular Location
Plastid, chloroplast thylakoid membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is the structure and function of ATP synthase subunit a (atpI) in Acorus americanus?

Acorus americanus ATP synthase subunit a, chloroplastic (atpI) is a 247-amino acid protein that forms part of the membrane-embedded F₀ subcomplex of the chloroplast ATP synthase. The protein plays a critical role in proton translocation across the thylakoid membrane during photosynthesis. The complete amino acid sequence is:

MNVILCSSNMLKGLYDISGVEVGQHLYWQIGGFQVHAQVLITSWVVIAILLGSVTVAVRN PQTIPTNGQNFFEYVLEFIRDLSKTQIGEEYGPWVPFIGTMFLFIFVSNWSGALLPWKLI ELPHGELAAPTNDINTTVALALPTSVAYFYAGLTKKGLGYFGKYIQPTPILLPINILEDF TKPLSLSFRLFGNILADELVVVVLVSLVPLVVPIPVMFLGLFTSGIQALIFATLAAAYIG ESMEGHH

The atpI subunit works in conjunction with the c-subunit ring to facilitate proton movement, which drives the rotation of the c-ring. This mechanical energy is then transmitted to the F₁ subcomplex via the γ-stalk, ultimately powering ATP synthesis from ADP and inorganic phosphate. The proton translocation occurs through putative half-channels provided by the a-subunit, allowing protons to bind to the Glu residue on the c-subunits .

How is recombinant Acorus americanus atpI protein expressed and purified for research use?

The recombinant full-length Acorus americanus ATP synthase subunit a is typically expressed in E. coli expression systems with an N-terminal His-tag to facilitate purification. The methodological approach involves:

  • Gene cloning: The atpI gene (encoding amino acids 1-247) is cloned into an appropriate expression vector with a His-tag sequence.

  • Transformation: The construct is transformed into E. coli expression strains.

  • Induction: Protein expression is induced under optimized conditions.

  • Cell lysis: Bacterial cells are lysed to release the recombinant protein.

  • Affinity chromatography: His-tagged protein is purified using metal affinity chromatography.

  • Quality control: Purity assessment via SDS-PAGE (typically >90% purity is achieved).

  • Lyophilization: The purified protein is lyophilized for storage stability .

For reconstitution of the lyophilized protein, it is recommended to:

  • Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening

  • Reconstitute in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL

  • Add glycerol (final concentration 5-50%, with 50% being standard) for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C

  • Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles which can compromise protein integrity

What techniques are most effective for studying atpI interactions with other ATP synthase subunits?

Studying subunit interactions within the ATP synthase complex requires a multi-faceted approach:

  • Affinity measurements: Quantitative binding assays between isolated components of the stator stalk can reveal interaction strengths. This is particularly important as the stator stalk must withstand significant elastic strain (estimated at approximately 50 kJ/mol) during rotational catalysis .

  • Structural biology approaches:

    • X-ray crystallography for high-resolution structures of individual domains

    • NMR spectroscopy for solution-state structural analysis (as demonstrated with the δ subunit, which revealed a six-helix bundle structure)

    • Cryo-electron microscopy for visualizing larger assemblies

  • Chemical cross-linking followed by mass spectrometry to identify interaction interfaces.

  • Mutagenesis studies combined with functional assays to determine critical residues for subunit interactions.

  • Computational modeling to predict interaction sites based on structural data.

When specifically studying atpI, researchers should consider that it functions within the membrane-embedded F₀ complex, necessitating appropriate detergent or lipid reconstitution systems to maintain native-like environments for interaction studies .

How does the proton translocation mechanism through atpI differ between species, and what methods can be used to investigate these differences?

The proton translocation mechanism through ATP synthase subunit a shows variations across species that affect the ATP synthesis efficiency. These variations can be investigated through:

  • Comparative sequence analysis:

    • Multiple sequence alignment of atpI sequences from different species

    • Identification of conserved and variable regions that may affect proton channeling

  • Site-directed mutagenesis:

    • Systematic mutation of key residues in the putative proton half-channels

    • Functional assessment of mutants through ATP synthesis assays

    • Proton translocation measurements using pH-sensitive probes

  • Electrophysiological techniques:

    • Patch-clamp recordings of reconstituted ATP synthase in liposomes

    • Measurement of proton currents through the F₀ complex under different conditions

  • Proton-to-ATP ratios determination:

    • The efficiency of ATP synthesis varies according to the number of c-subunits in the ring, which determines how many protons must be translocated to generate one ATP molecule

    • The proton:ATP ratio significantly impacts the bioenergetic efficiency of the organism

  • Molecular dynamics simulations:

    • Computational modeling of proton movement through the a-subunit channels

    • Prediction of species-specific differences in proton translocation kinetics

Research indicates that the chloroplast ATP synthase mechanically couples the translocation of protons to ATP synthesis, with the ratio of protons translocated to ATP synthesized varying according to the number of c-subunits present in the ring. For every complete 360° rotation of the c-ring, three ATP molecules are produced, with the number of protons required for this rotation equal to the number of c-subunits .

What experimental approaches can be used to study the role of atpI in stress responses in photosynthetic organisms?

ATP synthase function is critical during environmental stresses that affect photosynthesis. Several experimental approaches can be employed to study atpI's role in stress responses:

  • Time-structured gene expression analysis:

    • RNA-seq to measure expression changes under varying environmental conditions

    • Temporal analysis of expression patterns across diurnal cycles and stress conditions

    • Differential expression analysis using tools like edgeR with TMM normalization and CPM calculations

  • Proteomics approaches:

    • Quantitative proteomics to measure protein abundance changes

    • Post-translational modification analysis (phosphorylation, acetylation)

    • Protein-protein interaction changes under stress conditions

  • Physiological measurements:

    • Gas exchange measurements using systems like LiCOR-6400XT

    • Chlorophyll fluorescence to assess photosystem II activity

    • Measurement of ATP synthesis rates under varying conditions

  • Network analysis:

    • Regulatory network reconstruction using tools like ARACNe-AP

    • Identification of transcription factors regulating atpI expression

    • Assessment of co-regulated genes under stress conditions

  • Experimental design considerations:

    • Control environmental parameters (temperature, humidity, light intensity)

    • Time course sampling to capture temporal dynamics

    • Use of multiple species or genotypes for comparative analysis

For drought stress experiments specifically, a methodical approach involving controlled soil moisture conditions, periodic monitoring, and systematic sampling at defined time points (e.g., Zeitgeber times ZT1, ZT5, ZT9, ZT13, ZT17, ZT21) can reveal how atpI expression and function respond to water limitation .

What are the challenges in purifying functional atpI protein, and how can researchers overcome them?

Purifying functional membrane proteins like atpI presents several challenges. Here are methodological solutions for each challenge:

ChallengeSolution ApproachesTechnical Considerations
Protein solubilityUse of appropriate detergents (DDM, LDAO, etc.)Detergent concentration must be optimized to prevent protein aggregation while maintaining structural integrity
Maintaining native conformationLipid reconstitution after purificationIncorporate protein into liposomes or nanodiscs with lipid compositions mimicking thylakoid membranes
Low expression yieldsOptimization of expression conditionsTest multiple E. coli strains, induction temperatures, and inducer concentrations
Protein stabilityAddition of stabilizing agentsInclude glycerol (5-50%) in storage buffer and avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles
Functional assessmentDevelopment of activity assaysMeasure proton translocation or ATP synthesis in reconstituted systems
Protein aggregationAddition of solubilizing agentsUse low concentrations of urea or arginine to prevent aggregation without denaturation
Proteolytic degradationInclusion of protease inhibitorsAdd a cocktail of inhibitors during purification process

When working with atpI specifically, researchers should consider:

  • Expressing the protein with a His-tag for efficient purification via affinity chromatography

  • Using Tris/PBS-based buffer with 6% trehalose at pH 8.0 for storage

  • Reconstituting the protein to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL in deionized sterile water

  • Storing working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week to avoid degradation

  • For long-term storage, keeping the protein at -20°C/-80°C in the presence of glycerol

How can researchers investigate the structural basis of atpI function in the proton translocation mechanism?

Investigating the structural basis of atpI function requires a comprehensive approach that combines various structural and functional techniques:

  • High-resolution structural determination:

    • X-ray crystallography of the complete F₀ complex or atpI in isolation

    • Cryo-electron microscopy for visualization of the entire ATP synthase complex

    • Solid-state NMR for membrane-embedded structural details

  • Structure-function analysis through mutagenesis:

    • Systematic mutation of conserved residues in putative proton channels

    • Analysis of effects on proton translocation and ATP synthesis

    • Correlation of mutational effects with structural information

  • Computational approaches:

    • Molecular dynamics simulations of proton movement through channels

    • Quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) calculations for proton transfer energetics

    • In silico docking studies to model interactions with other subunits

  • Biophysical characterization:

    • Hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry to identify exposed regions

    • Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) to measure distances between subunits

    • Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy with spin labeling

  • Functional reconstitution experiments:

    • Reconstitution of purified atpI with c-subunit rings in liposomes

    • Measurement of proton pumping using pH-sensitive dyes

    • Assessment of ATP synthesis coupling to proton gradients

The structural understanding of atpI must be integrated with its functional role in the ATP synthase complex, where it provides critical half-channels for proton entry from the lumen and exit to the stroma. The rotation of the c-ring coupled to proton translocation drives the mechanical rotation of the γ-stalk in the F₁ region, which catalyzes ATP synthesis at the three catalytic sites formed by α-β subunit interfaces .

What are the most effective approaches for analyzing the evolutionary conservation of atpI across plant species?

Analyzing evolutionary conservation of atpI requires integrating multiple computational and experimental approaches:

  • Comprehensive sequence analysis:

    • Retrieval of atpI sequences from diverse plant species, focusing on representatives from major plant lineages

    • Multiple sequence alignment using algorithms like MUSCLE, MAFFT, or T-Coffee

    • Calculation of conservation scores for each amino acid position

    • Visualization of conservation patterns using tools like WebLogo

  • Phylogenetic analysis:

    • Construction of phylogenetic trees using maximum likelihood or Bayesian methods

    • Mapping of structural and functional features onto the phylogeny

    • Analysis of branch lengths and topology to identify selection pressures

  • Selective pressure analysis:

    • Calculation of dN/dS ratios to identify sites under positive, neutral, or purifying selection

    • Codon-based models to detect episodic selection

    • Branch-site models to identify lineage-specific selection patterns

  • Structural conservation mapping:

    • Homology modeling of atpI proteins from different species

    • Mapping of conserved residues onto structural models

    • Identification of conserved functional domains, particularly those involved in proton translocation

  • Experimental validation:

    • Heterologous expression of atpI from different species

    • Functional complementation assays in model organisms

    • Chimeric protein construction to identify functionally important domains

When analyzing conservation patterns, researchers should consider that ATP synthase components have undergone lineage-specific duplications in some plant groups. For example, genome duplications have been documented in Arabidopsis thaliana and Yucca species , which may complicate orthology assignments and necessitate careful consideration when comparing atpI across species.

What quality control measures should be implemented when working with recombinant atpI protein?

Ensuring the quality of recombinant atpI protein is crucial for reliable experimental results. A comprehensive quality control protocol should include:

  • Purity assessment:

    • SDS-PAGE analysis with Coomassie or silver staining (minimum 90% purity recommended)

    • Western blot using anti-His antibodies to confirm identity

    • Mass spectrometry for precise molecular weight determination

    • Size exclusion chromatography to assess aggregation state

  • Functional validation:

    • Binding assays with known interaction partners (e.g., c-subunit)

    • Proton translocation assays in reconstituted liposomes

    • ATP synthesis coupling efficiency in reconstituted systems

  • Structural integrity:

    • Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy to assess secondary structure

    • Thermal shift assays to determine stability

    • Limited proteolysis to confirm proper folding

    • Dynamic light scattering to measure homogeneity

  • Storage stability monitoring:

    • Periodic reassessment of purity and function during storage

    • Tracking of activity loss over time under different storage conditions

    • Implementation of recommended storage procedures:

      • Storage at -20°C/-80°C in aliquots

      • Addition of 6% trehalose in Tris/PBS buffer at pH 8.0

      • Inclusion of glycerol (typically 50%) for freeze protection

  • Documentation and reporting standards:

    • Detailed records of expression conditions, purification methods, and yields

    • Standardized quality metrics for batch-to-batch comparisons

    • Complete reporting of protein characteristics in publications

Maintaining protein quality through proper handling is essential: avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles, store working aliquots at 4°C for a maximum of one week, and ensure proper reconstitution procedures are followed when using lyophilized protein .

How can researchers optimize expression systems for producing high yields of functional atpI?

Optimizing recombinant expression of membrane proteins like atpI presents unique challenges. The following methodological approach can help maximize yields of functional protein:

  • Expression system selection:

    • E. coli is commonly used but may require specialized strains (C41(DE3), C43(DE3), or Lemo21(DE3)) designed for membrane protein expression

    • Consider alternative hosts such as yeast (Pichia pastoris) or insect cells for complex membrane proteins

    • Cell-free expression systems can be valuable for toxic membrane proteins

  • Vector design optimization:

    • Codon optimization for the expression host

    • Selection of appropriate promoters (T7, tac, araBAD)

    • Inclusion of solubility-enhancing fusion partners (MBP, SUMO, Trx)

    • Strategic placement of affinity tags (N-terminal His-tag has been successful for atpI)

  • Culture condition optimization:

    ParameterOptimization StrategyExpected Impact
    TemperatureTest range from 16-37°CLower temperatures often improve folding
    Induction timingInduction at different OD₆₀₀ valuesOptimizes cell density vs. metabolic capacity
    Inducer concentrationTitration of IPTG, arabinose, etc.Controls expression rate
    Media compositionRich vs. minimal, supplementationProvides necessary cofactors and nutrients
    AerationVarying shaking speeds, baffled flasksEnsures oxygen availability
    DurationTime course samplingDetermines optimal harvest time
  • Extraction and solubilization optimization:

    • Screening of detergents for efficient extraction

    • Optimization of detergent:protein ratios

    • Testing of mixed micelle systems (detergent combinations)

    • Addition of lipids during solubilization

  • Purification strategy refinement:

    • Multi-step purification (affinity, ion exchange, size exclusion)

    • Detergent exchange during purification

    • Gradient elution optimization

    • Buffer composition screening (pH, salt, additives)

For atpI specifically, expression in E. coli with an N-terminal His-tag has been demonstrated to be effective, followed by purification to greater than 90% purity as determined by SDS-PAGE .

How might advanced structural biology techniques enhance our understanding of atpI function?

Recent advances in structural biology offer unprecedented opportunities to elucidate the detailed mechanism of atpI function:

  • Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) advancements:

    • High-resolution structures of complete ATP synthase complexes

    • Visualization of different conformational states during the catalytic cycle

    • Identification of precise proton pathways through the a-subunit

    • Analysis of the interface between a- and c-subunits during rotation

  • Integrative structural biology approaches:

    • Combining data from multiple techniques (X-ray crystallography, NMR, cryo-EM)

    • Molecular dynamics simulations constrained by experimental data

    • Cross-linking mass spectrometry to validate protein-protein interactions

    • Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) for solution-state conformational analysis

  • Time-resolved structural methods:

    • Time-resolved cryo-EM to capture intermediate states during proton translocation

    • Time-resolved spectroscopy to monitor conformational changes

    • Single-molecule FRET to track dynamic movements during function

    • Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry to identify conformational changes

  • In situ structural analysis:

    • Cryo-electron tomography of ATP synthase in native membrane environments

    • Correlative light and electron microscopy to link structure to function

    • Native mass spectrometry to analyze intact complexes

    • Solid-state NMR of membrane-embedded complexes

These advanced techniques would help resolve key questions about atpI, including:

  • The precise mechanism of proton channeling through the half-channels

  • How the a-subunit interacts with the rotating c-ring without allowing proton leakage

  • The structural basis for the coupling between proton translocation and c-ring rotation

  • How the stator stalk maintains structural integrity while withstanding the elastic strain of approximately 50 kJ/mol during rotation

What experimental approaches can be used to investigate the role of atpI in different physiological conditions?

Investigating atpI function across different physiological conditions requires integrating multiple experimental approaches:

  • Gene expression analysis under varying conditions:

    • RNA-seq to measure transcriptional responses to environmental changes

    • Time-structured sampling to capture temporal dynamics (e.g., following Zeitgeber time points ZT1, ZT5, ZT9, ZT13, ZT17, ZT21)

    • Differential expression analysis using appropriate statistical methods

    • Network analysis to identify co-regulated genes and potential transcription factors

  • Physiological measurements:

    • Gas exchange measurements using portable photosynthesis systems

    • Chlorophyll fluorescence to assess photosystem efficiency

    • Measurement of ATP/ADP ratios and energy charge

    • Proton gradient assessment using fluorescent probes

  • Experimental design considerations:

    • Controlled growth chamber conditions with defined:

      • Light intensity (e.g., PAR ~270 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹)

      • Temperature cycles (e.g., 30°C day/17°C night)

      • Relative humidity (e.g., 40%)

      • Photoperiod (e.g., 12 hours light/12 hours dark)

    • Stress induction protocols:

      • Drought stress through controlled soil moisture monitoring

      • Salt stress with defined NaCl concentrations

      • Temperature stress with precise temperature control

      • Light stress with varying light intensities and durations

  • Proteomic and metabolomic analyses:

    • Quantitative proteomics to measure atpI abundance changes

    • Post-translational modification analysis

    • Metabolomics to assess energy metabolite profiles

    • Lipidomics to evaluate membrane composition changes

  • Genetic approaches:

    • CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing to modify atpI

    • RNA interference for transient knockdown

    • Overexpression studies to assess gain-of-function effects

    • Site-directed mutagenesis of key functional residues

By implementing these approaches, researchers can develop a comprehensive understanding of how atpI function is regulated and adapted across different physiological conditions, contributing to our knowledge of photosynthetic energy metabolism regulation in plants.

What are the most significant unanswered questions regarding atpI structure and function?

Despite considerable advances in our understanding of ATP synthase, several critical questions about atpI structure and function remain unanswered:

Addressing these questions will require integrated approaches combining structural biology, biophysics, biochemistry, and molecular biology. The continuing evolution of techniques such as cryo-EM, advanced spectroscopy, and computational modeling promises to provide new insights into these fundamental aspects of atpI function in the coming years.

How can understanding atpI contribute to broader research in photosynthesis efficiency and stress tolerance?

Research on atpI has significant implications for understanding and potentially improving photosynthetic efficiency and stress tolerance in plants:

  • Energetic efficiency optimization:

    • The c:a subunit ratio determines the H⁺/ATP ratio, which directly impacts photosynthetic efficiency

    • Understanding how this ratio is regulated could provide insights for optimizing energy conversion

    • The proton translocation mechanism involving atpI is a potential target for enhancing ATP production efficiency

  • Stress adaptation mechanisms:

    • ATP synthase function must be maintained under various stress conditions

    • Understanding how atpI structure and function adapt to stresses could reveal general principles of membrane protein stress tolerance

    • Time-structured gene expression studies reveal how atpI regulation changes during stress responses

  • CAM photosynthesis engineering:

    • Engineering CAM (Crassulacean Acid Metabolism) into C3 crop species has been proposed as a means of developing climate-resilient crops

    • ATP synthase function is critical for the energy requirements of both photosynthetic pathways

    • Understanding atpI's role in different photosynthetic contexts could inform engineering efforts

  • Evolutionary adaptations:

    • Studying atpI across species with different photosynthetic adaptations provides insights into evolutionary solutions to energy management

    • These insights could guide biomimetic approaches to improving crop photosynthesis

  • Systems biology integration:

    • ATP synthase functions within a complex network of photosynthetic processes

    • Network analysis approaches can reveal how atpI regulation is integrated with other components

    • This systems-level understanding is essential for predicting the effects of targeted modifications

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.