ATP synthase in A. pleuropneumoniae is a membrane-bound enzyme responsible for ATP synthesis via oxidative phosphorylation. The enzyme consists of multiple subunits, including the F sector (catalytic core with α, β, γ, δ, and ε subunits) and the F sector (proton channel with a, b, and c subunits) . Though the provided sources focus on subunit c (atpE) , subunit alpha (atpA) likely plays a structural and regulatory role in the F complex, similar to other bacterial ATP synthases.
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Host Organism | Escherichia coli (expression system) |
| Protein Tag | N-terminal His tag |
| Protein Length | Partial fragment (specific residues not specified in available data) |
| Formulation | Lyophilized powder |
| Source Strain | A. pleuropneumoniae serotype 3 |
ATP synthase is essential for A. pleuropneumoniae survival under host conditions, particularly during energy-intensive processes like adhesion, toxin production, and immune evasion . Key findings include:
Energy Metabolism: ATP synthase enables the bacterium to utilize proton gradients for ATP synthesis, critical for persistence in anaerobic host environments .
Virulence Link: Mutations in ATP synthase genes (e.g., atpE) impair bacterial growth in vivo, highlighting their role in pathogenesis .
Stress Response: Upregulation of energy metabolism genes, including ATP synthase components, occurs during infection to counteract host-derived stressors .
While recombinant ATP synthase subunits are primarily used for:
Antigen Production: For antibody generation and vaccine development .
Functional Studies: To investigate enzyme mechanics and drug targeting .
Existing literature lacks direct studies on subunit alpha (atpA). Most data derive from subunit c (atpE) or broader ATP synthase analyses . For example:
Subunit c (atpE): Expressed in E. coli as a full-length His-tagged protein (1–84 aa) .
Subunit Alpha (Inferred): Likely requires similar recombinant strategies but remains uncharacterized in A. pleuropneumoniae.
KEGG: apj:APJL_1681
Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae is a Gram-negative bacterium that causes porcine pleuropneumonia, a highly infectious fatal respiratory disease in pigs. It colonizes the epithelial cells of the lower respiratory tract, leading to symptoms such as chronic necrotizing pneumonia, acute fibrinous pneumonia, and pleuritis with high mortality rates . Currently, there are 15 recognized serotypes based on their capsular and lipopolysaccharide antigens, all of which can cause disease with varying degrees of virulence and regional prevalence . The economic impact of A. pleuropneumoniae infections on the pig farming industry worldwide has driven extensive research into its virulence factors and potential vaccine candidates.
The ATP synthase subunit alpha (atpA) is a component of the F1F0-ATP synthase complex, a crucial enzyme responsible for ATP production in bacteria. In A. pleuropneumoniae, like other bacteria, atpA plays an essential role in energy metabolism by participating in the final step of oxidative phosphorylation. While specific information about serotype 3 atpA is limited in the available research, ATP synthase components are generally highly conserved across bacterial species and serotypes, making them potential targets for broad-spectrum interventions. The conserved nature of atpA might parallel other highly conserved proteins in A. pleuropneumoniae, such as the type IV fimbrial subunit protein ApfA, which shows conservation across different serotypes .
Based on studies with other A. pleuropneumoniae proteins, Escherichia coli expression systems are commonly employed for recombinant protein production. For instance, recombinant ApxIA, ApxIIA, and ApxIIIA genes (encoding major virulence factor exotoxins) have been successfully expressed in E. coli M15 cells . Similarly, for methodological approaches with atpA, researchers might consider:
| Expression System | Advantages | Considerations for atpA Expression |
|---|---|---|
| E. coli BL21(DE3) | High yield, simple cultivation | May require optimization of induction conditions |
| E. coli M15 | Proven success with A. pleuropneumoniae proteins | Good for histidine-tagged proteins |
| E. coli Rosetta | Enhanced expression of proteins with rare codons | Beneficial if atpA contains rare codons |
| Yeast systems | Post-translational modifications | May be considered for functional studies |
While the search results don't provide specific information about atpA conservation, the approach used to analyze conservation of other A. pleuropneumoniae proteins can be instructive. Researchers investigating the conservation of proteins across serotypes typically perform detailed sequence analysis of genome sequences from different serotypes. For example, the type IV fimbrial subunit protein ApfA was found to be highly conserved among different serotypes of A. pleuropneumoniae .
For atpA research, a similar analytical approach would involve:
Collecting atpA sequences from all 15 serotypes of A. pleuropneumoniae
Performing multiple sequence alignment to identify conserved regions
Calculating percent identity and similarity between serotypes
Identifying conserved functional domains that could be targeted for interventions
This conservation analysis is particularly relevant for developing diagnostics or vaccines with cross-serotype effectiveness.
Developing effective vaccines against A. pleuropneumoniae is challenging due to the diverse genetic makeup of the pathogen and the lack of cross-serotype protection from current vaccines . Highly conserved proteins that play essential roles in bacterial physiology, such as atpA, represent potential targets for vaccine development.
The approach taken with the adhesion protein ApfA could serve as a model for atpA research. Studies with ApfA demonstrated that:
The recombinant protein elicited an elevated humoral immune response
It conferred robust protection against challenges with multiple serotypes (including serotype 1 and 7)
Anti-ApfA serum provided significant cross-serotype protection
For atpA, researchers should investigate:
Whether recombinant atpA is immunogenic in animal models
If antibodies against atpA can neutralize bacterial function
The protective efficacy against homologous and heterologous serotype challenges
The potential for combination with other antigenic targets for enhanced protection
Optimizing expression and purification of functional recombinant atpA requires addressing several experimental parameters:
| Parameter | Optimization Strategies | Considerations for atpA |
|---|---|---|
| Expression construct | Codon optimization, fusion tags | N-terminal vs. C-terminal tags based on protein structure |
| Expression conditions | Temperature, induction time, inducer concentration | Lower temperatures (16-25°C) may enhance solubility |
| Solubility | Co-expression with chaperones, solubility tags | SUMO or thioredoxin fusion may enhance solubility |
| Purification strategy | IMAC, ion exchange, size exclusion | Multi-step purification to ensure high purity |
| Functional assessment | ATP hydrolysis assay, binding studies | Confirmation that recombinant protein retains native function |
When optimizing these parameters, researchers should consider the specific challenges associated with membrane-associated proteins like ATP synthase components, which may require detergents or specialized buffers to maintain proper folding and function.
Recent research has identified multiple phase-variable DNA methyltransferases in A. pleuropneumoniae that can influence gene expression through epigenetic mechanisms . These systems, known as phasevarions (phase-variable regulons), result from variable expression of cytoplasmic DNA methyltransferases, leading to genome-wide methylation differences within a bacterial population .
For atpA research, it would be valuable to investigate:
Whether atpA expression is regulated by any of the identified phase-variable methyltransferases (ModP or ModQ)
If the identified cytosine-specific Type III DNA methyltransferase ModP influences atpA expression
How methylation patterns might differ across growth conditions relevant to infection
Whether epigenetic regulation affects atpA expression during host-pathogen interactions
This understanding could reveal how A. pleuropneumoniae regulates energy metabolism genes during infection and adaptation to different environments.
A comprehensive characterization of recombinant atpA should employ multiple complementary techniques:
| Analytical Technique | Application to atpA Research | Expected Outcomes |
|---|---|---|
| Circular Dichroism (CD) | Secondary structure analysis | α-helix, β-sheet content verification |
| Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) | 3D structure determination for smaller domains | Atomic-level structural details |
| X-ray Crystallography | High-resolution 3D structure | Complete structural model, active site details |
| Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC) | Binding kinetics with ligands/nucleotides | Binding constants, thermodynamic parameters |
| Enzyme Activity Assays | ATP synthesis/hydrolysis activity | Functional verification, kinetic parameters |
| Mass Spectrometry | Protein mass, post-translational modifications | Verification of correct translation, modifications |
| Surface Plasmon Resonance | Interaction with other ATP synthase subunits | Association/dissociation rates, complex formation |
Combining these techniques provides a comprehensive understanding of both structure and function, which is essential for designing interventions targeting atpA.
Based on approaches used with other A. pleuropneumoniae proteins, several immunological methods can be employed to evaluate atpA antigenicity:
Western blot analysis using sera from infected or vaccinated animals to detect antibody recognition of recombinant atpA, similar to the approach used with ApxI, ApxII, and ApxIII proteins .
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to quantify antibody titers against recombinant atpA in sera from vaccinated animals, following methods used for other A. pleuropneumoniae antigens .
Opsonophagocytosis assays to determine whether anti-atpA antibodies enhance phagocytosis of A. pleuropneumoniae by host immune cells.
Immunization and challenge studies in animal models to evaluate protective efficacy, similar to the approach used with the ApfA protein, which demonstrated protection against multiple serotypes .
Epitope mapping to identify immunodominant regions of atpA that could be targeted for peptide-based vaccine development.
These methods collectively provide insights into both the immunogenicity of atpA and its potential value as a vaccine component.
ATP synthase subunit alpha, though part of a membrane-associated complex, is primarily a peripheral membrane protein, which presents specific challenges for recombinant expression:
Expression construct design:
Consider expressing only the soluble domains if the full-length protein proves difficult
Test multiple fusion tags (MBP, GST, SUMO) to enhance solubility
Evaluate the impact of tag position (N- vs C-terminal) on folding and activity
Expression conditions optimization:
Reduce expression temperature to 16-25°C to slow protein synthesis and allow proper folding
Test different induction conditions (IPTG concentration, induction time)
Consider auto-induction media for gradual protein expression
Solubilization strategies:
If inclusion bodies form, develop a refolding protocol with gradually decreasing concentrations of denaturants
For membrane-associated portions, test mild detergents (DDM, CHAPS, Triton X-100) for solubilization
Evaluate co-expression with other ATP synthase subunits to promote proper complex assembly
Functional verification:
Develop activity assays specific to the ATP synthase alpha subunit
Compare activity of recombinant protein to native protein extracted from A. pleuropneumoniae
Assess structure-function relationships through site-directed mutagenesis of key residues
To investigate whether atpA contributes to A. pleuropneumoniae virulence, researchers could employ approaches similar to those used for other potential virulence factors like ApfA:
Gene expression analysis:
Genetic manipulation:
Create atpA deletion mutants and assess their virulence in cellular and animal models
Conduct complementation studies to confirm phenotype specificity
Use conditional knockdown approaches if complete deletion is lethal
Infection models:
Compare the ability of wild-type and atpA-mutant strains to colonize lung tissue in mouse models
Evaluate differences in bacterial survival, replication, and tissue damage
Assess the impact on inflammatory responses and immune cell recruitment
Protein-host interaction studies:
Investigate if atpA interacts with host proteins or immune components
Determine if atpA is exposed on the bacterial surface during infection
Assess if antibodies against atpA can neutralize bacterial functions relevant to pathogenesis