Recombinant Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae serotype 7 Probable oxaloacetate decarboxylase gamma chain (oadG)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: We prioritize shipping the format currently in stock. However, if you have specific format requirements, please specify them when placing your order, and we will prepare the product accordingly.
Lead Time
Delivery time may vary depending on the purchase method and location. Please consult your local distributor for specific delivery time information.
Note: All our proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. If you require dry ice shipping, please inform us in advance as additional fees will apply.
Notes
Repeated freezing and thawing is not recommended. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
We recommend centrifuging the vial briefly before opening to ensure the contents settle at the bottom. Reconstitute the protein in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default final glycerol concentration is 50%. Customers can use this as a reference.
Shelf Life
The shelf life is influenced by various factors, including storage conditions, buffer ingredients, temperature, and the inherent stability of the protein.
Generally, the shelf life of liquid form is 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. The shelf life of lyophilized form is 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquoting is necessary for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type will be determined during the manufacturing process.
The tag type is determined during production. If you have a specific tag type in mind, please inform us, and we will prioritize developing the specified tag.
Synonyms
oadG; APP7_1426; Probable oxaloacetate decarboxylase gamma chain
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-85
Protein Length
full length protein
Species
Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae serotype 7 (strain AP76)
Target Names
oadG
Target Protein Sequence
MTNAELFGEGINLMISGMGFVLLFLIVLIYAISFISTLINKYFPEPIPAPVAKPVPSAVP TDNLDHLRPVIAAAIAHHRRQQGLK
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Catalyzes the decarboxylation of oxaloacetate coupled to Na(+) translocation.
Database Links
Protein Families
OadG family
Subcellular Location
Cell membrane; Single-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is the function of the oxaloacetate decarboxylase gamma chain in Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae?

The oxaloacetate decarboxylase gamma chain (oadG) in Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae serves primarily as a stabilizing component of the oxaloacetate decarboxylase sodium pump (OAD) complex. This protein complex is composed of three subunits: alpha (α), beta (β), and gamma (γ). The gamma subunit specifically strengthens the OAD complex through direct interactions with both the alpha and beta subunits, maintaining structural integrity during the energy transduction process . The OAD complex itself plays a crucial role in bacterial energy metabolism by utilizing the free energy derived from oxaloacetate decarboxylation to drive sodium transport across the cell membrane, creating and maintaining essential ion gradients .

This sodium pump mechanism has been shown to be important for the pathogenicity of various bacterial pathogens, including members of the Pasteurellaceae family to which A. pleuropneumoniae belongs . In the complete functional complex, while the alpha subunit catalyzes the carboxyl transfer from oxaloacetate to biotin and the beta subunit handles subsequent carboxyl-biotin decarboxylation coupled with sodium transport, the gamma chain provides the structural support necessary for these energy-coupling reactions to proceed efficiently in the membrane environment .

How can researchers isolate and purify recombinant oadG protein for laboratory studies?

Isolation and purification of recombinant oadG protein requires a systematic approach incorporating molecular cloning, expression optimization, and protein purification techniques. The methodology can be outlined as follows:

  • Gene Amplification: The oadG gene should be amplified from A. pleuropneumoniae serotype 7 genomic DNA using PCR with specific primers containing appropriate restriction enzyme sites. Similar to the approach used for other A. pleuropneumoniae proteins, researchers could design primers with restriction sites such as EcoRI and SalI .

  • Cloning Strategy: The amplified fragment should be cloned into an expression vector such as pGEX-6P-1, creating a recombinant plasmid expressing oadG. This approach has been successfully used for other A. pleuropneumoniae proteins .

  • Expression System Selection: Transform the recombinant plasmid into an appropriate E. coli strain for protein expression. For membrane-associated proteins like oadG, specialized E. coli strains that enhance membrane protein expression may be preferable.

  • Expression Conditions: Optimize expression conditions including temperature (typically 25-30°C for membrane proteins rather than 37°C), IPTG concentration, and induction time. Since oadG is part of a membrane complex, expression at lower temperatures may improve proper folding.

  • Purification Protocol:

    • Harvest cells and disrupt by sonication or French press

    • Separate membrane fractions through ultracentrifugation

    • Solubilize the protein using appropriate detergents (e.g., n-dodecyl-β-D-maltoside)

    • Purify using affinity chromatography (via the GST-tag if using pGEX vectors)

    • Consider size exclusion chromatography as a secondary purification step

The quality of purified protein should be assessed using SDS-PAGE, Western blotting, and mass spectrometry to confirm identity and purity before proceeding with functional or structural studies.

What growth conditions are optimal for Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae cultures when studying oadG expression?

Optimal growth conditions for Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae cultures, particularly when studying oadG expression, must account for the microbiological characteristics of this organism. A. pleuropneumoniae belongs to the Pasteurellaceae family and requires specific cultivation parameters:

  • Media Requirements: A. pleuropneumoniae requires enriched media for growth. Blood agar plates supplemented with 5% defibrinated sheep blood or chocolate agar plates provide necessary growth factors .

  • Atmospheric Conditions: Growth is significantly improved in an atmosphere containing 5-10% CO₂. Cultivation should be performed in a CO₂ incubator or using anaerobic jars with CO₂-generating systems .

  • Temperature and pH: Optimal growth occurs at 37°C with pH maintained between 7.2-7.4.

  • Expression Induction: To study natural oadG expression patterns, researchers should consider manipulating sodium concentrations in the growth medium, as the OAD complex is involved in sodium transport .

  • Growth Monitoring: Colony morphology on blood agar typically appears as translucent colonies approximately 1-2 mm in diameter after 24-48 hours of incubation .

  • Verification Methods: Confirmation of A. pleuropneumoniae serotype 7 can be performed through PCR targeting serotype-specific genes, followed by immunological methods such as slide agglutination tests with specific antisera.

When specifically studying oadG expression, researchers should consider implementing a time-course experimental design to monitor gene expression under various growth conditions, potentially using quantitative RT-PCR to measure oadG transcript levels at different growth phases and under different environmental stresses.

How does the sodium binding site in the OAD complex influence oadG function and what methodologies can detect these interactions?

The sodium binding site in the OAD complex significantly influences the structural stability and functional capacity of the oadG (gamma) subunit through complex protein-ion-protein interactions. Experimental evidence from related OAD complexes demonstrates that the beta subunit contains critical sodium-binding residues, particularly Asp203 and Ser382, which when mutated (D203A and S382A) completely abolish sodium binding with measurable dissociation constants . The gamma subunit (oadG) interacts with both alpha and beta subunits, and its stabilizing function is directly affected by sodium binding events.

To effectively detect and characterize these interactions, researchers should employ multiple complementary methodologies:

  • Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC):

    • Can determine binding affinity (Kd) for sodium ions

    • Has previously revealed a Kd of approximately 3.7 mM for sodium binding to wild-type OAD complexes

    • Requires purified oadG-containing complexes in detergent solutions

  • Site-Directed Mutagenesis:

    • Create mutations in potential sodium-coordinating residues

    • Assess changes in complex stability and activity

    • Compare wild-type and mutant binding properties

  • Fluorescence Spectroscopy:

    • Using intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence or extrinsic fluorescent probes

    • Can detect conformational changes upon sodium binding

    • Allows real-time monitoring of binding events

  • Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry (HDX-MS):

    • Maps regions of conformational change upon sodium binding

    • Identifies protected regions involved in subunit interactions

    • Provides spatial resolution of binding effects

A comprehensive analysis would include comparative studies between wild-type oadG and engineered variants, examining how sodium concentration affects the stability of protein-protein interactions within the OAD complex. Activity assays measuring oxaloacetate decarboxylation rates should be correlated with binding data to establish structure-function relationships.

What are the most effective experimental designs for studying oadG interactions with other OAD subunits?

Studying the intricate interactions between oadG and other OAD subunits requires sophisticated experimental design approaches that balance throughput with mechanistic insight. A systematic Design of Experiments (DOE) methodology is particularly valuable for this complex biological system:

  • Factorial Design Approach:

    • Implement full or fractional factorial designs to simultaneously evaluate multiple factors affecting oadG-subunit interactions

    • Key factors to include: pH (6.0-8.0), sodium concentration (0-50 mM), temperature (25-37°C), and detergent type/concentration

    • This approach enables identification of both main effects and interaction effects between factors

  • Pull-Down Assay Optimization:

    • Tag different subunits with distinct affinity tags (His, GST, MBP)

    • Use DOE to optimize buffer conditions, incubation times, and wash stringency

    • Quantify interaction strength through densitometry analysis

  • Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) Analysis:

    • Immobilize one subunit (alpha or beta) on sensor chips

    • Apply response surface methodology to optimize binding buffer components

    • Create interaction models with calculated kon and koff rates

  • Crosslinking Studies with MS Analysis:

    • Apply central composite design to optimize crosslinking conditions

    • Variables include crosslinker concentration, reaction time, and protein concentration

    • Identify interaction interfaces through MS/MS analysis of crosslinked peptides

A robust experimental design should include the following elements:

Experimental ParameterLow LevelCenter PointHigh Level
pH6.57.27.8
NaCl Concentration (mM)02550
Temperature (°C)253037
Protein Ratio (α:β:γ)1:1:0.51:1:11:1:2

The DOE approach avoids the limitations of conventional one-factor-at-a-time methods, which cannot detect interaction effects between variables . Statistical analysis of results should employ ANOVA to determine significant factors and interactions, followed by response surface methodology to identify optimal conditions for oadG-subunit complex formation.

How can researchers compare the structural and functional differences between oadG variants across different Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae serotypes?

Comparing structural and functional differences between oadG variants across different A. pleuropneumoniae serotypes requires a multi-faceted approach combining bioinformatics, structural biology, and functional assays. This integrated strategy allows researchers to correlate sequence variations with functional consequences:

  • Comparative Sequence Analysis:

    • Obtain oadG sequences from all 15 recognized A. pleuropneumoniae serotypes

    • Perform multiple sequence alignment to identify conserved domains and variable regions

    • Apply phylogenetic analysis to establish evolutionary relationships between variants

    • Calculate selection pressures (dN/dS ratios) to identify regions under positive selection

  • Structural Characterization:

    • Express and purify oadG variants from representative serotypes

    • Employ X-ray crystallography or cryo-electron microscopy for high-resolution structures

    • When full structures are unavailable, use homology modeling based on the available OAD structures

    • Validate structural models through limited proteolysis and circular dichroism spectroscopy

  • Functional Comparison Methodology:

    • Develop a standardized sodium transport assay using purified OAD complexes

    • Measure oxaloacetate decarboxylation activity coupled to sodium transport

    • Compare kinetic parameters (Km, Vmax) between serotype variants

    • Assess complex stability through thermal shift assays and size exclusion chromatography

  • Complementation Studies:

    • Generate oadG knockout mutants in representative serotypes

    • Perform cross-complementation with oadG variants from other serotypes

    • Measure restoration of OAD activity and virulence characteristics

    • Correlate functional differences with specific sequence/structural variations

To systematically document differences between variants, researchers should compile data in comparative tables:

SerotypeKey Amino Acid SubstitutionsSodium Binding Affinity (Kd)Decarboxylation Activity (U/mg)Complex Stability (Tm)
1ReferenceX.X mMX.XX.X°C
7Position A, B, CX.X mMX.XX.X°C
12Position D, E, FX.X mMX.XX.X°C

This systematic approach enables correlation of specific sequence features with functional differences, potentially identifying critical residues that might influence virulence or serve as serotype-specific therapeutic targets.

What Design of Experiments (DOE) approaches are most suitable for optimizing oadG expression in recombinant systems?

Optimizing oadG expression in recombinant systems presents multiple interacting variables that influence protein yield, solubility, and functionality. Design of Experiments (DOE) provides a systematic framework to efficiently navigate this multidimensional parameter space:

  • Initial Screening: Fractional Factorial Design:

    • Begin with a fractional factorial design to screen 6-8 factors simultaneously

    • Key factors to include: expression vector, host strain, induction temperature, inducer concentration, induction timing, media composition, and culture aeration

    • This approach identifies significant main effects without requiring exhaustive experiments

    • Example design: 2^(7-3) resolution IV design requiring only 16 experimental runs

  • Optimization: Response Surface Methodology (RSM):

    • After identifying significant factors, employ central composite or Box-Behnken designs

    • Focus on 3-4 key factors identified in the screening phase

    • These designs enable modeling of quadratic effects and identification of optimal conditions

    • Typical responses to measure: protein yield (mg/L culture), solubility (%), and functional activity

  • Process Robustness: Definitive Screening Design:

    • Once near-optimal conditions are identified, assess process robustness

    • Evaluate sensitivity to small changes in critical parameters

    • Identify acceptable operating ranges for consistent oadG expression

A typical optimization workflow might proceed as follows:

PhaseDesign TypeFactorsRunsPrimary Response Variables
ScreeningFractional Factorial6-816-32Expression level, solubility
OptimizationCentral Composite3-415-25Yield, activity, purity
RobustnessDefinitive Screening2-39-13Process consistency, stability

Throughout this process, it's critical to include appropriate controls and randomize experimental runs to minimize systematic errors. Statistical analysis should employ ANOVA to identify significant effects, followed by response surface modeling to identify optimal conditions .

For membrane-associated proteins like oadG, special attention should be paid to factors affecting membrane incorporation and proper folding. These might include specialized detergents, lipid compositions, and lower expression temperatures (20-25°C) that have been shown to improve membrane protein expression in recombinant systems.

How can researchers design experiments to investigate the role of oadG in Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae virulence?

Investigating the role of oadG in A. pleuropneumoniae virulence requires a comprehensive experimental design that connects molecular function to pathological outcomes. A systematic approach incorporating both in vitro and in vivo components is essential:

  • Gene Knockout and Complementation Studies:

    • Generate precise oadG deletion mutants using allelic exchange or CRISPR-Cas9 systems

    • Create complementation strains with wild-type oadG under native or inducible promoters

    • Develop point mutants targeting specific functional domains

    • Compare growth curves under various environmental conditions (pH, sodium concentrations, oxygen levels)

  • In Vitro Virulence Assays:

    • Adhesion assays using primary porcine respiratory epithelial cells

    • Biofilm formation quantification using crystal violet staining and confocal microscopy

    • Resistance to antimicrobial peptides and oxidative stress

    • Comparative proteomics and transcriptomics between wild-type and ΔoadG strains

  • Ex Vivo Models:

    • Precision-cut lung slices from porcine tissues

    • Survival in porcine alveolar macrophages

    • Sodium ion transport capacity measurement using fluorescent indicators

  • In Vivo Models with Factorial Design:

    • Implement a factorial design comparing:

      • Strain types (wild-type, ΔoadG, complemented)

      • Inoculation routes (intranasal, intratracheal)

      • Bacterial doses (10^6, 10^7, 10^8 CFU)

    • Measure multiple outcome variables including lung pathology scores, bacterial recovery, inflammatory markers, and survival rates

For vaccine development implications, the experimental design should also incorporate:

  • Immunogenicity Assessment:

    • ELISA-based antibody titer measurements against purified oadG

    • T-cell proliferation assays using recombinant oadG stimulation

    • Cytokine profiling following immunization

  • Challenge-Protection Studies:

    • Immunize with recombinant oadG alone or as part of multicomponent vaccines

    • Compare protection against homologous and heterologous serotypes

    • Evaluate parameters similar to those assessed for multicomponent recombinant subunit vaccines, including antibody titers, survival rates, and lung lesion scores

The experimental data should be analyzed using appropriate statistical methods, including ANOVA for factorial designs and survival analysis for challenge studies. This comprehensive approach will provide mechanistic insights into how oadG contributes to A. pleuropneumoniae pathogenesis and evaluate its potential as a vaccine component.

What are the appropriate controls and variables to consider when studying oadG protein-protein interactions with other bacterial components?

Studying oadG protein-protein interactions requires meticulous experimental design with appropriate controls and variables to ensure reliable and interpretable results. A comprehensive approach should address multiple aspects of interaction specificity, strength, and biological relevance:

  • Essential Controls for Interaction Studies:

    • Negative Controls:

      • Unrelated proteins of similar size/structure to rule out non-specific binding

      • oadG with known binding-site mutations

      • Heat-denatured oadG to distinguish folding-dependent interactions

    • Positive Controls:

      • Known interaction partners (alpha and beta OAD subunits)

      • Artificially linked fusion proteins as standards for quantification

    • Buffer Controls:

      • Variations in ionic strength (50-300 mM NaCl)

      • pH range reflective of physiological conditions (pH 6.5-7.5)

      • Detergent types and concentrations for membrane-associated complexes

  • Critical Variables to Manipulate:

    • Sodium Concentration: Given OAD's role in sodium transport, sodium levels (0-50 mM) directly impact complex formation and stability

    • Redox Conditions: Test interactions under reducing vs. oxidizing conditions

    • Protein Concentration Ratios: Vary molar ratios between oadG and potential partners

    • Temperature: Assess interaction stability across temperature range (4-37°C)

  • Methodological Considerations:

    • In vitro vs. in vivo detection methods

    • Label-free vs. tagged protein approaches

    • Static (equilibrium) vs. dynamic (kinetic) measurements

  • Statistical Design Considerations:

    • Minimum of 3-5 biological replicates

    • Technical replicates for each measurement

    • Randomization of sample processing order

    • Blinding of sample identity when possible during analysis

A typical experimental workflow might proceed through progressive levels of validation:

Interaction Detection MethodPurposeControls RequiredKey Variables
Bacterial Two-HybridInitial screeningEmpty vector, unrelated proteinExpression levels, reporter sensitivity
Co-immunoprecipitationIn vivo validationIgG control, irrelevant antibodyCrosslinking conditions, wash stringency
Surface Plasmon ResonanceKinetic parametersBlocked surface, flow cellBuffer composition, flow rate
Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange MSInteraction interfaceDeuterium controls, pepsin digestionExchange time, quenching conditions

By systematically controlling these variables and incorporating appropriate controls, researchers can distinguish specific oadG interactions from experimental artifacts and characterize their biological significance in the context of A. pleuropneumoniae physiology and pathogenesis.

How can researchers develop competitive grant proposals focusing on oadG research for funding opportunities like ERC Advanced Grants?

Developing competitive grant proposals for oadG research requires strategic alignment between the innovative aspects of the research and the specific requirements of funding mechanisms like the European Research Council (ERC) Advanced Grants. Researchers should consider the following methodological approach:

  • Demonstrate Principal Investigator Excellence:

    • ERC Advanced Grants target established, leading principal investigators with significant research achievements

    • Highlight track record emphasizing pioneering contributions to bacterial pathogenesis or membrane protein research

    • Present evidence of leadership in terms of originality and significance of research contributions

    • Showcase previous successful projects that demonstrate ability to manage ambitious research

  • Craft a Ground-Breaking Research Proposition:

    • Frame oadG research within larger context of bacterial pathogen energy metabolism

    • Position the proposal at intersection of structural biology, microbial physiology, and infectious disease

    • Propose specific hypotheses about how oadG contributes to A. pleuropneumoniae pathogenesis

    • Outline potential translational outcomes (vaccines, diagnostics, antimicrobials)

  • Design a Comprehensive Methodology:

    • Structure the research plan with clearly defined work packages and milestones

    • Include cutting-edge approaches like cryo-EM for structural studies of the OAD complex

    • Propose systems biology approaches to contextualize oadG function

    • Include risk assessment and alternative strategies for high-risk aspects

  • Address ERC-Specific Requirements:

    • Emphasize bottom-up, investigator-driven research without predetermined priorities

    • Identify appropriate host institution offering suitable facilities and support

    • Structure team composition appropriately, potentially including international collaborators

    • Budget for 5 years with appropriate resource allocation

  • Develop Compelling Impact Narratives:

    • Connect basic science questions to broader impacts on animal health

    • Highlight potential for discovering new antimicrobial targets

    • Discuss implications for understanding other bacterial pathogens with similar systems

The proposal should present a clear progression from previous knowledge (established OAD complex role in bacterial physiology) to novel investigations (specific role of oadG in virulence), with emphasis on how this research opens new horizons in understanding bacterial energy metabolism in pathogenesis. The innovative aspects should be balanced with methodological rigor, demonstrating feasibility alongside ambition.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.