Recombinant Aeromonas hydrophila subsp. hydrophila Large-conductance mechanosensitive channel (mscL)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Understanding MscL in General

MscL is a mechanosensitive channel that responds to mechanical stress in the bacterial cell membrane, opening to allow the passage of ions, water, and small proteins, thereby preventing cell lysis during osmotic downshock . It is typically pentameric, composed of five identical subunits, each with two transmembrane helices (M1 and M2) . The channel's structure allows it to gate at high pressure thresholds, making it a model system for studying mechanosensation .

Role of MscL in Bacteria

In bacteria, MscL plays a vital role in maintaining cellular integrity by responding to changes in osmotic pressure. It acts as a safety valve, opening to release excess ions and water when the cell membrane is stretched, thus preventing cell lysis . This function is critical for bacterial survival in environments with fluctuating osmotic conditions.

Aeromonas hydrophila and Its Pathogenicity

Aeromonas hydrophila is a Gram-negative bacterium known for causing diseases in fish and humans. In aquaculture, it is a significant pathogen responsible for motile Aeromonas septicemia (MAS), which affects catfish and other aquatic species . The bacterium possesses various virulence factors, including toxins and enzymes that contribute to its pathogenicity .

Potential Applications of MscL in Aeromonas hydrophila

While there is no direct research on a recombinant Aeromonas hydrophila MscL, understanding its potential applications requires considering how MscL functions in other bacteria. MscL could serve as a target for antibacterial compounds, as seen with SCH-79797, which activates MscL to permeabilize bacterial membranes . If a recombinant MscL from Aeromonas hydrophila were developed, it could potentially be used to study or manipulate bacterial membrane integrity in this pathogen.

Data Tables

Given the lack of specific data on recombinant Aeromonas hydrophila MscL, we can only provide general information about MscL and Aeromonas hydrophila:

FeatureDescription
MscL FunctionActs as a pressure-relief valve in bacterial membranes .
MscL StructureTypically pentameric with two transmembrane helices per subunit .
Aeromonas hydrophila PathogenicityCauses motile Aeromonas septicemia in fish .
Virulence FactorsIncludes toxins and enzymes like elastase and lipase .

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference in order notes for customized fulfillment.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs unless dry ice shipping is specifically requested and agreed upon in advance. Additional fees apply for dry ice shipping.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to collect the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50% and can serve as a guideline.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on several factors including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing.
The tag type is determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its inclusion.
Synonyms
mscL; AHA_3272; Large-conductance mechanosensitive channel
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-135
Protein Length
full length protein
Species
Aeromonas hydrophila subsp. hydrophila (strain ATCC 7966 / DSM 30187 / JCM 1027 / KCTC 2358 / NCIMB 9240)
Target Names
mscL
Target Protein Sequence
MSLIQEFKAFASRGNVIDMAVGIIIGAAFGKIVSSFVGDVIMPPIGLILGGVDFSDLAVT LKAAEGSTPAVVIAYGKFIQTIIDFLIISFAIFMGLKAINTLKRKQEEEATPAGPTKDQE LLTEIRDLLKSQQGK
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
A membrane channel activated by stretch forces in the lipid bilayer. It may play a role in regulating cellular osmotic pressure.
Database Links
Protein Families
MscL family
Subcellular Location
Cell inner membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is the mscL channel and how does it function in Aeromonas hydrophila?

The large-conductance mechanosensitive channel (mscL) in Aeromonas hydrophila is a membrane protein that responds to mechanical tension in the bacterial cell membrane. Similar to the well-characterized MscL from Escherichia coli (the first MS channel to be cloned in 1994), the A. hydrophila mscL serves as a biological pressure valve that opens in response to hypoosmotic shock . When A. hydrophila encounters environments with lower osmolarity than its cytoplasm, water influx creates tension in the cell membrane, triggering the opening of mscL channels. This allows for the rapid efflux of cytoplasmic solutes, thereby preventing cell lysis.

The channel functions by directly responding to membrane tension without requiring additional signaling molecules. Upon activation, mscL undergoes a conformational change from a closed state to an open state that creates a large-diameter pore, allowing passage of small cytoplasmic molecules and ions. This emergency release mechanism is critical for A. hydrophila's survival in changing osmotic environments, particularly in the freshwater and brackish water habitats where this bacterium naturally resides .

How does A. hydrophila mscL structure compare with homologous channels in other bacterial species?

While the search results don't provide specific structural details of A. hydrophila mscL, we can infer similarities with other bacterial MscL proteins based on evolutionary conservation. In general, bacterial mscL channels are highly conserved in their transmembrane domains but show greater variation in their cytoplasmic regions.

The E. coli MscL, which serves as the prototype for this channel family, consists of five identical subunits forming a homopentameric structure with two transmembrane domains per subunit and a cytoplasmic C-terminal helical bundle . Given the similar ecological niches and physiological challenges faced by E. coli and A. hydrophila, we would expect conservation of critical structural elements that enable mechanosensing functionality.

What experimental approaches are most effective for initial characterization of recombinant A. hydrophila mscL protein?

Initial characterization of recombinant A. hydrophila mscL should employ a multi-faceted approach:

A typical workflow might proceed as follows:

StageMethodExpected OutcomeKey Considerations
ExpressionRecombinant expression in E. coliMembrane-integrated proteinOptimization of induction conditions and membrane fraction isolation
PurificationDetergent solubilization followed by affinity chromatography>90% pure proteinSelection of appropriate detergent to maintain native structure
Functional assessmentPatch-clamp of reconstituted proteoliposomesChannel activity in response to membrane tensionControl of membrane tension parameters
Biophysical characterizationCD spectroscopy, thermal stability assaysSecondary structure information, stability profileSample homogeneity and buffer optimization

How can patch-clamp techniques be optimized for studying A. hydrophila mscL gating kinetics?

Patch-clamp electrophysiology represents the gold standard for studying mechanosensitive channel gating kinetics. For A. hydrophila mscL, several optimizations can enhance experimental outcomes:

  • Reconstitution system selection: As illustrated in search result , multiple patch-clamp configurations are possible. For single-channel analysis of recombinant A. hydrophila mscL, the inside-out or outside-out patch configurations provide excellent control over both membrane tension and solution composition . For preliminary characterization, reconstitution in artificial liposomes offers precise control over membrane composition.

  • Pressure protocol design: To accurately characterize gating kinetics, implement pressure protocols that allow distinction between adaptation and inactivation processes. As demonstrated with E. coli MscS, combining prolonged conditioning steps with short saturating pulses enables separation of these interrelated processes .

  • Data acquisition parameters: Use high sampling rates (>10 kHz) with appropriate filtering (1-2 kHz) to capture fast gating events that characterize mscL channels. This is particularly important for analyzing subconductance states that may occur during channel opening and closing transitions.

  • Analysis of Boltzmann distribution: Plot the open probability (Popen) versus membrane tension to generate a Boltzmann function. From this, extract key parameters including activation threshold, half-maximum pressure (P₁/₂), and slope factor (representing sensitivity to membrane tension) .

  • Temperature control: Given A. hydrophila's mesophilic nature and ability to grow at temperatures as low as 4°C , performing patch-clamp experiments across a temperature range of 4-37°C may reveal important thermodynamic parameters of channel gating.

The relationship between open probability and applied pressure typically follows a sigmoid curve described by the Boltzmann equation:

P(open) = 1 / (1 + exp[(P₁/₂ - P) / slope])

Where P₁/₂ represents the pressure at which open probability equals 0.5, and the slope indicates sensitivity to membrane tension.

What molecular biology techniques are most effective for structure-function studies of A. hydrophila mscL?

Structure-function studies of A. hydrophila mscL benefit from a combination of site-directed mutagenesis and functional analysis:

  • Systematic mutagenesis: Create a library of single-point mutations targeting:

    • Transmembrane domains (likely to affect gating sensitivity)

    • Pore-lining residues (likely to affect conductance and ion selectivity)

    • Cytoplasmic domains (potential regulatory regions)

  • Cysteine scanning mutagenesis: Strategic introduction of cysteine residues enables subsequent labeling with fluorescent probes or crosslinking agents. This approach is particularly valuable for tracking conformational changes during gating, as demonstrated in the single-molecule FRET studies of MscL described in search result .

  • Chimeric channel construction: Creating chimeric channels by swapping domains between A. hydrophila mscL and well-characterized homologs (e.g., from E. coli) can identify regions responsible for specific functional properties.

  • Fluorescence-based approaches: Following the methodology described for MscL by Wang et al. (mentioned in search result ), single-molecule FRET can reveal conformational changes during channel gating. This requires strategic placement of fluorophores at positions that undergo significant movement during the gating transition.

  • Computational modeling: Homology modeling based on solved structures of homologous MscL channels can guide experimental design by predicting critical residues and conformational changes.

A methodical approach might involve:

TechniqueApplicationExpected Outcome
Site-directed mutagenesisSystematic replacement of conserved residuesIdentification of residues critical for gating, conductance, or regulation
Cysteine scanningIntroduction of cysteine residues followed by fluorophore labelingMapping of protein movements during gating transitions
Chimeric constructsDomain swapping with E. coli MscLLocalization of regions responsible for specific functional properties
Single-molecule FRETDetection of distance changes between labeled residuesReal-time observation of conformational changes during gating
Molecular dynamics simulationsIn silico analysis of channel behavior in lipid bilayerPrediction of lipid-protein interactions and gating mechanisms

How does membrane composition affect A. hydrophila mscL gating properties?

The lipid environment significantly influences mechanosensitive channel function through several mechanisms:

  • Hydrophobic mismatch: Differences between the hydrophobic thickness of the membrane and the channel's transmembrane domains affect gating energetics. For A. hydrophila, which can thrive in diverse aquatic environments, the mscL channel may have evolved to function across a range of membrane thicknesses.

  • Membrane curvature effects: Local curvature of the membrane can alter lateral pressure profiles and thus affect channel gating. The reconstitution of A. hydrophila mscL in proteoliposomes of defined size and composition allows for systematic investigation of curvature effects .

  • Lipid composition: The presence of specific lipids may directly influence channel function through:

    • Specific binding interactions with the channel protein

    • Alterations in membrane physical properties

    • Effects on lateral pressure profile

To investigate these effects experimentally:

  • Reconstitute recombinant A. hydrophila mscL into liposomes of defined composition:

    • Vary phospholipid headgroups (PC, PE, PG, PS)

    • Alter acyl chain length and saturation

    • Incorporate bacterial-specific lipids (e.g., cardiolipin)

  • Perform patch-clamp analysis to determine gating parameters for each membrane composition:

    • Activation threshold pressure

    • Pressure for half-maximal activation (P₁/₂)

    • Channel conductance

    • Adaptation and inactivation kinetics

  • Correlate gating parameters with membrane physical properties:

    • Membrane thickness (measured by small-angle X-ray scattering)

    • Bending rigidity (determined by micropipette aspiration)

    • Lateral pressure profile (estimated from lipid composition)

This systematic approach would yield a quantitative understanding of how membrane composition affects A. hydrophila mscL function, potentially revealing adaptations that contribute to this organism's ability to survive in diverse aquatic environments.

What role might mscL channels play in A. hydrophila pathogenicity and virulence?

A. hydrophila is recognized as an opportunistic pathogen causing gastroenteritis, wound infections, and in severe cases, necrotizing fasciitis . The potential role of mscL channels in pathogenicity remains largely unexplored, but several hypotheses warrant investigation:

  • Osmotic adaptation during infection: As A. hydrophila transitions from aquatic environments to host tissues, it encounters significant osmotic shifts. The mscL channel likely plays a crucial role in maintaining cellular integrity during this transition, potentially contributing to the bacterium's ability to establish infection.

  • Response to host defense mechanisms: Host immune responses often involve the creation of osmotically challenging microenvironments. mscL channels may contribute to bacterial survival against osmotic stress components of innate immunity.

  • Potential connection to virulence factor secretion: While not directly implicated, mechanosensitive channels in other bacteria have been linked to secretion systems. Given that A. hydrophila pathogenicity involves extracellular proteins such as aerolysin and other toxins , investigating potential connections between mscL function and virulence factor secretion could reveal novel aspects of pathogenicity.

  • Antibiotic resistance: A. hydrophila exhibits resistance to many common antibiotics . Some antibiotics act by disrupting membrane integrity, which could trigger mscL opening. The relationship between mscL function and antibiotic susceptibility represents an important area for investigation.

Experimental approaches to investigate these hypotheses could include:

ApproachMethodologyExpected Outcomes
Gene knockout studiesCRISPR-Cas9 deletion of mscL in A. hydrophilaDetermination of mscL contribution to osmotic stress survival and virulence
Virulence model testingComparison of wild-type vs. mscL-deficient strains in infection modelsQuantification of mscL contribution to pathogenicity
Secretome analysisProteomic comparison of secreted proteins under osmotic stressIdentification of virulence factors potentially regulated by osmotic stress responses
Antibiotic susceptibilityMIC determination for wild-type vs. mscL-deficient strainsAssessment of mscL role in antibiotic resistance mechanisms

How does temperature affect A. hydrophila mscL function and expression?

A. hydrophila thrives in warm climates but can survive at temperatures as low as 4°C . Temperature likely influences both mscL expression and function through several mechanisms:

  • Expression regulation: Temperature-responsive promoter elements may regulate mscL transcription, potentially coordinating expression with environmentally relevant temperature shifts. In particular, transition from environmental temperatures to host body temperature (37°C for human hosts) may trigger expression changes relevant to pathogenicity.

  • Channel gating thermodynamics: Temperature directly affects the energetics of channel gating by altering:

    • Membrane fluidity and thickness

    • Protein conformational dynamics

    • Hydration of the channel pore

  • Protein stability and turnover: Temperature extremes may affect protein folding, membrane insertion, and degradation rates of the mscL channel, with consequences for functional channel abundance.

Methodological approaches to investigate temperature effects include:

  • qRT-PCR analysis of mscL expression across a temperature range (4-42°C) relevant to A. hydrophila's ecological niche and pathogenic lifestyle.

  • Patch-clamp electrophysiology at controlled temperatures to determine how temperature affects:

    • Activation threshold

    • Channel conductance

    • Gating kinetics

    • Adaptation and inactivation processes

  • Proteoliposome stability assays to assess temperature effects on membrane-embedded mscL protein stability and functional persistence.

  • Western blot analysis with anti-mscL antibodies to quantify channel protein levels at different temperatures and growth phases.

The temperature-dependence of mechanosensitive channel function may provide insights into A. hydrophila's ability to adapt to diverse environmental conditions and transition between environmental reservoirs and host organisms.

How can single-molecule techniques advance our understanding of A. hydrophila mscL function?

Single-molecule approaches offer unprecedented insights into mechanosensitive channel dynamics that are obscured in ensemble measurements:

  • Single-molecule FRET (smFRET): As highlighted in search result , Wang et al. demonstrated the utility of smFRET for tracking MscL conformational changes. Adapting this approach to A. hydrophila mscL would require:

    • Strategic placement of fluorophore pairs at key positions in the channel structure

    • Observation of FRET efficiency changes during gating transitions

    • Correlation of FRET changes with electrophysiological measurements

  • High-speed atomic force microscopy (HS-AFM): This technique enables direct visualization of protein conformational changes in near-native conditions:

    • Monitor topographical changes in reconstituted mscL channels during gating

    • Correlate structural changes with applied membrane tension

    • Observe potential interactions with other membrane components

  • Magnetic tweezers combined with patch-clamp: This hybrid approach allows simultaneous application of defined forces and measurement of channel currents:

    • Attach magnetic beads to specific domains of the channel protein

    • Apply calibrated forces using magnetic fields

    • Correlate applied forces with channel gating events

  • Single-particle cryo-electron microscopy: This structural technique can potentially capture different conformational states of the channel:

    • Stabilize channels in different gating states using appropriate membrane tension or mutations

    • Determine structures of multiple functional states

    • Map the conformational transition pathway between closed and open states

Implementation of these techniques would reveal dynamic aspects of channel function including:

  • Potential subconductance states during gating transitions

  • Heterogeneity in gating behavior among individual channels

  • Direct correlation between structural changes and functional outcomes

What computational approaches can predict A. hydrophila mscL behavior in complex membrane environments?

Computational methods offer powerful tools for investigating mscL function across scales from atomic to cellular:

  • Homology modeling and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations:

    • Generate A. hydrophila mscL structural models based on homologous proteins

    • Embed models in lipid bilayers of varying composition

    • Apply membrane tension in silico to simulate gating transitions

    • Calculate energetics of channel-lipid interactions

  • Coarse-grained simulations:

    • Model longer timescale processes not accessible to all-atom MD

    • Investigate protein-lipid sorting and potential preferential interactions

    • Simulate membrane deformation during channel gating

  • Continuum mechanics modeling:

    • Predict membrane tension distribution around channel clusters

    • Model cell-scale effects of mechanosensitive channel activity

    • Simulate osmotic shock response at the whole-cell level

  • Machine learning approaches:

    • Train models on experimental patch-clamp data to predict gating behavior

    • Identify sequence-function relationships through analysis of homologous channels

    • Develop predictive models for drug interactions with the channel

Computational investigations could address crucial questions including:

Computational ApproachResearch QuestionExpected Outcome
All-atom MDHow do specific lipids interact with A. hydrophila mscL?Identification of potential lipid binding sites and their functional consequences
Coarse-grained MDHow does membrane curvature affect channel clustering?Prediction of channel distribution patterns in curved membrane regions
Continuum modelingHow does channel activity affect cell-scale mechanical properties?Quantitative model of how mscL activation alters cellular mechanics
Machine learningWhich sequence features predict functional differences between mscL homologs?Identification of critical residues for specific functional properties

How might A. hydrophila mscL be exploited for biotechnological applications?

The unique properties of mechanosensitive channels offer intriguing possibilities for biotechnological applications:

  • Biosensor development:

    • Engineer A. hydrophila mscL to respond to specific stimuli beyond membrane tension

    • Couple channel opening to reporter systems (fluorescent, electrical, or enzymatic)

    • Develop sensors for environmental monitoring or diagnostic applications

  • Controlled release systems:

    • Incorporate engineered mscL channels into liposomes for stimulus-responsive drug delivery

    • Design systems where specific mechanical stimuli trigger release of encapsulated compounds

    • Create mechanical stress-responsive materials for tissue engineering

  • Antimicrobial development:

    • Target A. hydrophila mscL with compounds that disrupt normal gating

    • Design molecules that lock channels in open conformation, disrupting ion homeostasis

    • Develop adjuvants that sensitize bacteria to osmotic stress during antibiotic treatment

  • Synthetic biology applications:

    • Incorporate mscL into synthetic cells as osmotic pressure regulators

    • Engineer mechanosensitive transcriptional control systems using mscL as the sensor component

    • Develop cellular actuators that respond to mechanical stimuli

Methodological considerations for these applications include:

ApplicationKey MethodologyTechnical Challenges
Biosensor developmentSite-directed mutagenesis to alter gating specificityMaintaining protein stability while modifying sensitivity
Controlled release systemsReconstitution of purified channels in liposomes of defined compositionAchieving uniform channel incorporation and orientation
Antimicrobial developmentHigh-throughput screening for compounds that affect channel gatingEnsuring specificity for bacterial versus host channels
Synthetic biologyIntegration with other cellular components in minimal systemsCalibrating response thresholds in artificial cellular contexts

How should contradictory results in mscL functional studies be reconciled?

Research into mechanosensitive channels frequently produces apparently contradictory results due to experimental variables. Methodological approaches to reconcile such discrepancies include:

  • Standardization of expression and purification protocols:

    • Use consistent expression systems and purification methods

    • Quantitatively assess protein purity, homogeneity, and functional state

    • Develop standard quality control metrics for recombinant channel preparations

  • Careful control of reconstitution parameters:

    • Document and standardize lipid composition of proteoliposomes

    • Control protein-to-lipid ratios and vesicle size distributions

    • Verify channel orientation in reconstituted systems

  • Precise control of membrane tension application:

    • Calibrate pressure application systems

    • Measure patch geometry to calculate applied tension

    • Standardize tension protocols across laboratories

  • Meta-analysis approaches:

    • Compile data across multiple studies

    • Identify systematic variables that correlate with functional differences

    • Develop mathematical models that incorporate multiple experimental variables

  • Cross-validation using multiple techniques:

    • Combine electrophysiology with structural and spectroscopic approaches

    • Verify key findings using in vivo and in vitro systems

    • Employ genetic approaches to complement biophysical studies

When confronted with contradictory literature results, researchers should systematically analyze potential sources of variation:

VariablePotential ImpactStandardization Approach
Lipid compositionAlters gating threshold and kineticsUse defined synthetic lipid mixtures with published compositions
TemperatureAffects membrane properties and protein dynamicsPerform experiments at controlled temperatures with precise reporting
Patch geometryChanges relationship between applied pressure and membrane tensionMeasure patch curvature and calculate tension using Laplace's law
Protein modificationsTags and mutations may alter functionCompare tagged and untagged versions; use consistent constructs
Solution compositionIonic strength affects electrostatics and screeningStandardize buffer composition and report precise formulations

What are the most significant technical barriers to studying A. hydrophila mscL and how can they be overcome?

Several technical challenges complicate research on A. hydrophila mscL:

  • Expression and purification challenges:

    • Membrane proteins often express poorly and may be toxic to host cells

    • Purification requires detergents that can affect protein stability and function

    • Maintaining native conformation throughout purification is difficult

    Solutions:

    • Optimize expression using specialized strains (e.g., C41/C43 for toxic membrane proteins)

    • Screen multiple detergents for extraction and purification

    • Employ nanodisc technology to maintain a native-like membrane environment

  • Functional reconstitution issues:

    • Achieving consistent channel orientation in liposomes is challenging

    • Variability in reconstitution efficiency complicates quantitative analysis

    • Background leak conductances can interfere with channel measurements

    Solutions:

    • Develop asymmetric reconstitution protocols that favor unidirectional insertion

    • Implement rigorous quality control for liposome preparations

    • Use channel-specific pharmacological tools to distinguish channel currents from leaks

  • Patch-clamp technical difficulties:

    • Achieving gigaohm seals with reconstituted systems is technically demanding

    • Maintaining stable patches under pressure is challenging

    • Pressure application systems may have limited precision

    Solutions:

    • Optimize patch formation protocols for specific membrane compositions

    • Develop improved pressure control systems with high-precision feedback

    • Implement automated patch-clamp approaches for higher throughput

  • Structural analysis limitations:

    • Membrane proteins present challenges for crystallization

    • Different functional states may be difficult to trap for structural studies

    • Lipid-protein interactions may be lost during structural determination

    Solutions:

    • Utilize native mass spectrometry to analyze channel-lipid complexes

    • Apply single-particle cryo-EM approaches that accommodate membrane proteins

    • Develop conformation-specific antibodies to stabilize discrete functional states

Methodological innovations that could advance A. hydrophila mscL research include:

ChallengeInnovative ApproachExpected Improvement
Expression difficultiesCell-free expression systems with direct reconstitution into nanodiscsBypass toxicity issues and maintain native environment
Reconstitution variabilityMicrofluidic-based standardized proteoliposome formationIncreased consistency and reduced sample requirements
Electrophysiological limitationsAutomated high-throughput patch-clamp platformsLarger datasets and improved statistical power
Structural determination challengesIntegration of complementary techniques (FRET, crosslinking, modeling)More complete view of dynamic structural transitions

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.