Ribosome-recycling factor (RRF), encoded by the frr gene, is a conserved bacterial protein critical for disassembling post-termination ribosomal complexes after translation. This recycling process ensures ribosomes are available for subsequent rounds of protein synthesis. In Agrobacterium vitis, a plant pathogenic bacterium, RRF’s role remains understudied compared to model organisms like Escherichia coli . Recombinant RRF refers to the protein produced via heterologous expression systems, enabling functional and structural studies.
Gene locus: The frr gene in A. vitis is presumed homologous to E. coli frr (essential for ribosome recycling) and shares conserved domains .
Protein features:
| Feature | E. coli RRF | A. vitis RRF (Predicted) |
|---|---|---|
| Molecular weight | 20.8 kDa | ~21 kDa |
| Essentiality | Essential | Likely essential |
| Structural homologs | 46% identity with plant chloroplast RRF |
Recombinant RRF is typically produced in E. coli using plasmid vectors (e.g., pET system). Key steps include:
Gene amplification: frr coding sequence cloned from A. vitis genomic DNA.
Expression: Induced with IPTG, yielding soluble protein.
Purification: Affinity chromatography (e.g., His-tag) and gel filtration .
| Parameter | Detail |
|---|---|
| Host strain | E. coli BL21(DE3) |
| Induction temperature | 18°C (to enhance solubility) |
| Yield | ~15 mg/L culture |
In vitro ribosome recycling assays: Confirmed using fluorescently labeled mRNA and purified ribosomes .
Complementation studies: Rescue of E. coli frr temperature-sensitive mutants .
In Streptomyces coelicolor, RRF overexpression enhances antibiotic synthesis (e.g., actinorhodin) by boosting translational efficiency during stationary phase .
A. vitis RRF likely supports survival under nutrient limitation, analogous to its role in other bacteria .
RRF depletion in E. coli disrupts tmRNA- and ArfA-mediated ribosome rescue, suggesting crosstalk between recycling and quality-control pathways .
A. vitis RRF may similarly interact with stress-responsive factors, though direct evidence is lacking.
Structural studies: No crystal structure exists for A. vitis RRF; homology modeling could clarify mechanistic differences.
Pathogenicity link: Investigating RRF’s role in A. vitis virulence (e.g., crown gall disease) using knockout mutants .
Biotechnological potential: Engineered RRF variants might optimize recombinant protein production in Agrobacterium-based systems .
KEGG: avi:Avi_2521
STRING: 311402.Avi_2521
Agrobacterium vitis is a distinct bacterial species previously characterized as biovar 3 strains isolated from grapevines. It has been distinguished from other Agrobacterium species (A. tumefaciens, A. radiobacter, A. rhizogenes, and A. rubi) through biochemical tests and DNA binding studies, which showed 78-92% DNA binding between grapevine isolates but only 7-47% with other Agrobacterium type strains . This genetic distinctiveness suggests that A. vitis may possess unique molecular machinery, including potentially specialized translation components like RRF.
The ribosome recycling factor from A. vitis would be particularly interesting because of this organism's specialized ecological niche and its importance in plant pathology, potentially offering insights into adaptation of translation machinery in plant-associated bacteria.
Ribosome recycling factor (RRF) is an essential protein that disassembles post-termination complexes after protein synthesis is complete. The RRF mechanism involves:
Binding to ribosomes after termination and peptide release
Working with elongation factor G (EF-G) and GTP to promote ribosomal subunit splitting
Releasing the large subunit, while the small subunit may remain on the mRNA
Enabling IF3 to release deacylated tRNA from the small subunit and prevent reassembly
Studies in E. coli have shown that RRF is structurally similar to tRNA and stimulates in vitro protein synthesis 4- to 7-fold . When RRF is depleted, ribosomes fail to be recycled at stop codons, causing elongating ribosomes to be blocked and accumulation of ribosome density in 3'-UTRs .
Methodologically, researchers should take the following approach:
Genomic analysis: Use bioinformatic tools to identify the frr gene in the A. vitis genome through homology with known bacterial frr sequences.
Comparative genomics: Align the putative A. vitis frr sequence with those from related species, particularly other Agrobacterium species, to identify conserved domains.
Expression analysis: Use RT-PCR and Northern blotting to determine expression patterns of the frr gene under different growth conditions.
Functional complementation: Test whether the identified A. vitis frr gene can rescue growth defects in E. coli strains with temperature-sensitive RRF mutations.
| Species | Genomic location | Gene length (bp) | Protein length (aa) | Sequence identity to E. coli RRF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E. coli | 3,462,650-3,463,153 | 504 | 185 | 100% |
| A. tumefaciens | Varies by strain | ~540 | ~185 | ~70-75% (estimated) |
| A. vitis | To be determined | To be determined | ~185 (predicted) | To be determined |
A methodological approach to cloning the A. vitis frr gene would involve:
PCR amplification: Design primers based on conserved regions of frr genes from related Agrobacterium species. Include appropriate restriction sites for downstream cloning.
Vector selection: Choose an expression vector with:
A strong, inducible promoter (T7, tac)
Appropriate fusion tags (His6, GST) for purification
Compatible with the intended expression host
Transformation optimization: For A. vitis-related work, consider using modified Agrobacterium-mediated transformation protocols, which have shown increased efficiency through the use of auxiliary proteins like AtVIP1 .
Verification: Confirm the cloned sequence through restriction analysis and DNA sequencing before expression studies.
Based on principles of recombinant protein expression for bacterial proteins:
E. coli expression systems:
BL21(DE3) strain is recommended for high-level expression
Arctic Express or Rosetta strains may improve folding or codon usage
Consider lower temperatures (16-20°C) during induction to improve solubility
Expression optimization parameters:
Inducer concentration: Test IPTG at 0.1-1.0 mM
Induction time: 3-18 hours depending on temperature
Media composition: Consider auto-induction media for higher yields
Alternative systems:
A systematic purification strategy would include:
Initial capture:
Immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) for His-tagged RRF
Glutathione affinity chromatography for GST-tagged RRF
Intermediate purification:
Ion exchange chromatography (typically cation exchange as RRFs tend to be basic)
Tag removal using specific proteases (TEV, thrombin) if necessary
Polishing:
Size exclusion chromatography to obtain homogeneous protein
Removal of bacterial endotoxins if the protein will be used in sensitive assays
Quality control:
SDS-PAGE and Western blotting to confirm purity and identity
Mass spectrometry to verify protein integrity
Circular dichroism to assess proper folding
| Purification Step | Method | Expected Yield | Purity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crude extract | Cell lysis | 100% | 1-5% |
| IMAC | Ni-NTA column | 50-70% | 70-80% |
| Tag removal | TEV protease | 80-90% | 80-90% |
| Size exclusion | Superdex 75 | 70-80% | >95% |
Based on established methods for studying RRF function:
In vitro translation assays:
Post-termination complex disassembly assays:
Formation of post-termination complexes using purified components
Addition of recombinant A. vitis RRF and EF-G
Monitoring disassembly through techniques like light scattering or sedimentation analysis
Ribosome profiling:
A comprehensive approach to study cross-species compatibility would include:
Functional complementation:
Expression of A. vitis RRF in E. coli strains with temperature-sensitive RRF mutations
Assessment of growth rescue at non-permissive temperatures
Quantification of translation efficiency in the complemented strains
Direct interaction studies:
Pull-down assays using tagged A. vitis RRF and EF-G from different species
Surface plasmon resonance to measure binding kinetics
Cross-linking followed by mass spectrometry to identify interaction interfaces
In vitro activity assays:
Reconstitution of ribosome recycling with A. vitis RRF and EF-G from various bacteria
Measurement of GTP hydrolysis rates in these mixed systems
Assessment of recycling efficiency with heterologous components
Recent research challenges previous assumptions about RRF's role in translational coupling:
Experimental evidence from E. coli suggests that RRF depletion does not significantly affect coupling efficiency in reporter assays or ribosome density across operons, indicating that re-initiation may not be a major mechanism of translational coupling in bacteria .
To investigate this in A. vitis:
Design bicistronic reporter constructs with A. vitis intergenic regions
Measure expression of the second gene relative to the first with varying levels of RRF
Use ribosome profiling to examine ribosome distribution across operons
Compare results with those from E. coli and other bacterial species
Investigation of post-termination events:
Study the fate of ribosomes after termination using techniques like ribosome profiling
Analyze the effects of RRF depletion on ribosome distribution in 3'-UTRs
Determine whether A. vitis exhibits unique patterns of ribosome behavior at stop codons
RRF depletion studies in E. coli have revealed connections to ribosome rescue pathways:
RRF depletion leads to dramatic effects on ribosome rescue factors like tmRNA and ArfA . Similar studies with A. vitis RRF could:
Investigate whether A. vitis possesses the same rescue mechanisms
Identify any plant pathogen-specific adaptations in these systems
Reveal potential targets for antimicrobial development
Methodological approach:
Create conditional RRF depletion systems in A. vitis or heterologous hosts
Use ribosome profiling to identify ribosome stalling sites
Analyze expression changes in rescue factors upon RRF depletion
Compare results with those from E. coli and other bacterial species
Potential applications:
Development of new antimicrobial strategies targeting RRF-dependent processes
Identification of plant pathogen-specific rescue mechanisms
Engineering of bacterial strains with enhanced translational quality control
While specific structural data for A. vitis RRF is not currently available, we can infer from studies of other bacterial RRFs:
RRF is structurally described as "a near perfect mimic of tRNA" , suggesting conserved structural features across bacterial species.
A methodological approach would include:
Homology modeling based on existing RRF structures
X-ray crystallography or cryo-EM studies of purified A. vitis RRF
Mutagenesis of predicted functional residues
Comparison of A. vitis RRF with RRFs from free-living vs. plant-associated bacteria
Key questions to address:
Does A. vitis RRF contain unique structural features related to its plant-associated lifestyle?
How do any structural differences affect interactions with ribosomes and EF-G?
Are there specific adaptations in the A. vitis translational machinery?
RRF has been shown to stimulate in vitro protein synthesis 4- to 7-fold , suggesting applications in biotechnology:
Enhancement of cell-free protein synthesis:
Supplementation of commercial or lab-made cell-free systems with purified A. vitis RRF
Optimization of RRF concentration for maximum stimulation
Testing synergistic effects with other translation factors
Development of specialized translation systems:
Creation of hybrid systems containing components from multiple species
Engineering of RRF variants with enhanced recycling capabilities
Design of systems optimized for specific applications (e.g., membrane protein expression)
Comparative analysis:
Systematic testing of RRFs from different bacterial species in the same cell-free system
Identification of the most effective RRF variants for in vitro applications
Engineering of improved RRF proteins based on structure-function insights
| RRF Source | Stimulation of Protein Synthesis | Optimal Concentration | Compatibility with E. coli Components |
|---|---|---|---|
| E. coli | 4-7 fold | 0.5-1 μM | High |
| A. vitis | To be determined | To be determined | To be determined |
| Other species | Varies | Varies | Varies |
Common challenges and solutions include:
Insoluble protein expression:
Lower induction temperature (16-20°C)
Use solubility-enhancing fusion tags (MBP, SUMO)
Co-express with molecular chaperones
Screen multiple expression hosts and conditions
Low expression levels:
Protein degradation:
Include protease inhibitors during purification
Use protease-deficient expression strains
Optimize buffer conditions to enhance stability
Consider fusion partners that can protect from proteolysis
Research on E. coli RRF has revealed potential discrepancies:
While in vitro studies suggest ribosome recycling is essential for translational coupling, ribosome profiling in vivo showed that "RRF depletion did not significantly affect coupling efficiency in reporter assays or in ribosome density genome-wide" .
Methodological approaches to address discrepancies:
Control for differences in experimental conditions
Develop systems that more closely mimic the in vivo environment
Use complementary techniques to validate results
Consider the effects of other cellular factors not present in simplified in vitro systems
Specific investigations for A. vitis RRF:
Compare in vitro and in vivo results using identical genetic constructs
Develop more sophisticated in vitro systems that include additional factors
Use ribosome profiling to obtain a genome-wide view of translation in A. vitis
Rigorous experimental design requires:
Protein quality controls:
Circular dichroism to verify proper folding
Size exclusion chromatography to confirm homogeneity
Activity assays with known RRF substrates as positive controls
Genetic controls:
Complementation with wild-type A. vitis RRF as positive control
Inactive RRF mutants as negative controls
Heterologous RRFs from well-characterized species for comparison
System-specific controls:
For ribosome profiling: control for changes in mRNA levels using RNA-seq
For in vitro translation: reactions without added mRNA to measure background
For binding studies: non-specific proteins to control for non-specific interactions
Validation across methods:
Confirm key findings using multiple independent techniques
Test hypotheses in both homologous and heterologous systems
Validate in vitro findings with in vivo experiments when possible