Recombinant Anopheles gambiae Integrator complex subunit 3 homolog (AGAP002539), partial

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference during order placement for customized preparation.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchase method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires prior arrangement and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to sediment the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default glycerol concentration is 50% and serves as a guideline for your reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors, including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and the protein's inherent stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquoting is essential for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during the manufacturing process.
The tag type is determined during production. Please inform us of your specific tag requirements for preferential development.
Synonyms
AGAP002539; Integrator complex subunit 3 homolog; SOSS complex subunit A homolog
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Protein Length
Partial
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Anopheles gambiae (African malaria mosquito)
Target Names
AGAP002539
Uniprot No.

Q&A

What genetic engineering approaches can be applied to study Anopheles gambiae recombinant proteins?

Anopheles gambiae is amenable to various genetic engineering approaches that can be applied to study recombinant proteins like AGAP002539. Researchers have successfully used transposon-mediated integration to insert transgenes into the A. gambiae genome. This can be accomplished through microinjection of embryos with plasmids containing piggyBac inverted repeats along with a transposase helper RNA . For site-specific modifications, meganuclease-induced homologous repair has proven effective, allowing for targeted knock-in procedures without disrupting surrounding genomic regions .

When working with AGAP002539, consider that genomic integration can be achieved with relatively modest success rates (approximately 0.18% when using helper plasmid), so plan for large-scale embryo injections to obtain successful transformants . For protein expression studies, fluorescent markers such as 3xP3-GFP and Actin5C-RFP can be included in your construct to facilitate identification of successful transformants.

How should I design control experiments when studying recombinant A. gambiae proteins?

Effective experimental design for studying recombinant proteins requires carefully structured controls addressing multiple aspects of the experiment. Using the Tool for Interrelated Experimental Design (TIED) principles, your control strategy should encompass five interrelated components :

  • Hypothesis and prediction formulation

  • Variable identification and management

  • Experimental setup and control design

  • Data collection methodology

  • Analysis approach for interpretation

Control experiments should specifically address:

  • Expression level comparisons between wild-type and recombinant strains

  • Tissue-specific expression patterns

  • Functional activity in different genetic backgrounds

  • Specificity of antibodies or detection reagents

  • Potential off-target effects of genetic modification

When designing these controls, ensure alignment between your hypothesis, experimental variables, and data collection methods to maintain experimental rigor and validity .

What are the fundamental considerations for protein purification from A. gambiae samples?

Purification of recombinant proteins from A. gambiae requires careful consideration of tissue sources, developmental stages, and expression systems. Based on standard approaches adapted for mosquito research:

  • For tissue selection, consider that different proteins show tissue-specific expression patterns, with some proteins predominantly expressed in specific tissues like ovaries, testes, or midgut.

  • When using transgenic expression systems, select appropriate promoters based on your research goals:

    • The vasa promoter is effective for germline expression

    • Actin5C promoter provides broad somatic expression

  • For extraction protocols, remember that mosquito tissues often contain proteases and other interfering compounds that can degrade proteins or inhibit purification.

  • Tag selection should be optimized based on protein size and structure:

    • His-tags are useful for metal affinity chromatography

    • Larger tags (GST, MBP) may improve solubility but impact function

  • Validate purification success using both activity assays and structural confirmation techniques to ensure the recombinant protein maintains its native properties.

How can I apply interrelated experimental design principles to A. gambiae protein research?

Applying interrelated experimental design principles to A. gambiae protein research requires systematic attention to multiple components of experimental design and their relationships. Based on the Tool for Interrelated Experimental Design (TIED) approach , researchers should:

  • Formulate clear hypotheses about protein function that make testable predictions

  • Identify and manage variables that might influence protein expression or activity

  • Design experimental and control setups that systematically test your hypotheses

  • Plan data collection methods appropriate for your experimental questions

  • Select analytical approaches that will properly interpret your results

TIED ComponentApplication to AGAP002539 ResearchCriteria for Quality Assessment
Hypothesis & PredictionState expected function of AGAP002539 based on homologyClear statement of predicted outcomes
Variable IdentificationSpecify independent variables (genetic background, developmental stage) and dependent variables (expression, activity)Comprehensive identification of variables
Experimental SetupDetail transgenic and control strains, tissue collection, protein extraction methodsAppropriate controls for each experimental condition
Data CollectionSpecify quantitative and qualitative measurements for protein characterizationMultiple methods that align with research question
Analysis ApproachOutline statistical tests and frameworks for interpreting protein functionAppropriate statistical methods for data type

What approaches are most effective for site-specific genetic engineering in A. gambiae?

Site-specific genetic engineering in A. gambiae can be accomplished through a combination of techniques that allow precise modification of genomic targets. Based on recent advances:

  • Meganuclease-induced homologous repair has been successfully implemented by:

    • Creating recognition sites for the I-SceI endonuclease within target genes

    • Using circular repair templates containing the desired sequence modifications

    • Generating double-strand breaks that stimulate homology-directed repair

  • Docking systems for secondary integration:

    • Creating initial "docking lines" with attP recombination sites

    • Subsequently using φC31 integrase for site-specific integration

    • This two-step approach allows for repeated modifications at the same genomic location

  • Y-chromosome modification strategies:

    • Initial transposon-mediated integration onto the Y chromosome

    • Subsequent site-specific engineering at the initial integration site

    • This approach is valuable for sex-specific applications and studies of sex determination

The efficiency of site-specific engineering in A. gambiae can be relatively low (research indicates success rates of approximately 0.18% for some approaches), so scaling up injection numbers and including robust screening methods is essential for success .

How can I assess the function of recombinant proteins in different genetic backgrounds?

Assessing recombinant protein function across different genetic backgrounds requires systematic approaches to isolate genetic effects from technical variation. Based on established methodologies:

How can genomic islands of speciation impact studies of A. gambiae proteins?

Genomic islands of speciation in Anopheles gambiae significantly impact protein studies by creating regions of reduced recombination that maintain genetic divergence between closely related taxa. These genomic features should be considered when studying proteins like AGAP002539:

  • Location effects on protein evolution:

    • Proteins encoded within genomic islands may evolve differently than those in regions of normal recombination

    • Islands may contain clusters of functionally related genes under selection

    • The X chromosome island spans approximately 6Mb (positions ~18.1 to 24.2Mb) and contains genes with divergent protein sequences between sibling species

  • Functional implications:

    • Proteins within islands may show species-specific functions or expression patterns

    • These differences may reflect adaptation to different ecological niches

    • Islands often contain genes involved in development, immunity, and sensory perception

  • Experimental considerations:

    • When comparing protein function between species, determine if your protein is located within an island of divergence

    • Account for linkage with nearby genes that might affect phenotypic outcomes

    • Consider using recombinant strains that isolate island regions to study specific effects

  • Methodological approaches:

    • Use targeted genome comparisons to identify conserved differences in protein-coding regions

    • Perform functional assays that can detect subtle differences in protein activity

    • Consider how protein interactions might differ between closely related species

Understanding these genomic context effects is essential for correctly interpreting protein function studies in A. gambiae and related species .

What methodologies can be used to study protein interactions in the context of reproductive isolation?

Studying protein interactions in the context of reproductive isolation requires specialized approaches that connect molecular mechanisms to phenotypic outcomes. Based on research with A. gambiae:

  • Creation of recombinant strains with swapped genomic regions:

    • Generate strains that differ only in the genomic region of interest

    • Conduct backcrossing (5+ generations) followed by crosses within introgressed strains

    • Verify genomic content through sequencing to confirm successful genetic exchange

  • Behavioral assays to assess phenotypic outcomes:

    • Design standardized assays that measure specific behaviors

    • Include appropriate controls with matching genetic backgrounds

    • Quantify mating preferences or other isolation-related behaviors

  • Molecular verification of protein interactions:

    • Use genetic analyses to confirm phenotypic observations (e.g., sperm transfer analysis)

    • Perform reciprocal experiments to test direction-specific effects

    • Conduct full-genome sequencing to identify protein-coding differences

  • Comparative analysis across populations:

    • Compare protein sequence and function between sympatric populations

    • Identify conserved differences in natural populations

    • Use these comparisons to identify candidate genes for reproductive isolation

This multi-level approach connects protein function to reproductive isolation mechanisms, providing insights into the molecular basis of speciation. For proteins like AGAP002539, this can reveal whether they play roles in maintaining genetic barriers between closely related species .

How can I address data contradictions when studying protein function across different A. gambiae strains?

Addressing contradictory data when studying protein function across different A. gambiae strains requires systematic investigation of potential sources of variation:

  • Genetic background effects:

    • Create isogenic lines through backcrossing to isolate genetic effects

    • Use genome sequencing to identify unexpected genetic differences

    • Quantify the effect of genetic background through appropriate statistical models

  • Experimental design assessment:

    • Review all components of experimental design using the TIED approach:

      • Hypothesis formulation

      • Variable identification

      • Experimental setup

      • Data collection methods

      • Analysis approach

    • Ensure appropriate controls for each experimental component

    • Verify that experimental variables align with research questions

  • Technical validation approaches:

    • Use multiple independent methods to measure the same outcome

    • Verify antibody specificity or detection reagent performance

    • Confirm protein expression using both RNA and protein detection methods

  • Comprehensive data analysis:

    • Apply appropriate statistical tests that account for multiple sources of variation

    • Consider interactions between variables that might explain contradictions

    • Use meta-analysis approaches to integrate results across experiments

  • Systematic documentation of conditions:

    • Record detailed experimental conditions including mosquito rearing parameters

    • Document reagent sources and preparation methods

    • Maintain detailed protocols to identify potential sources of variation

This systematic approach can help identify the source of contradictions and determine whether they represent technical artifacts or biologically meaningful differences in protein function .

What are the most effective approaches for designing recombinant protein constructs for A. gambiae studies?

Designing effective recombinant protein constructs for A. gambiae studies requires careful consideration of multiple factors:

  • Promoter selection based on experimental goals:

    • For germline-specific expression, the A. gambiae vasa promoter has proven effective

    • For broad expression, Actin5C promoters provide consistent results

    • Consider temporal and tissue-specific expression patterns based on research questions

  • Marker integration for screening and validation:

    • Fluorescent markers like 3xP3-GFP and Actin5C-RFP facilitate identification of transformants

    • Selection markers appropriate for mosquito systems improve screening efficiency

    • Consider marker location to avoid interference with protein function

  • Integration site considerations:

    • For random integration, piggyBac transposase systems offer reliable results

    • For site-specific integration, include recognition sites (e.g., I-SceI) for targeted approaches

    • Consider genomic context effects when selecting integration locations

  • Protein tag selection and placement:

    • N-terminal vs. C-terminal tags based on protein structure

    • Tag size and type based on purification and detection needs

    • Include cleavage sites if tag removal is necessary

  • Codon optimization for expression:

    • Adapt codons to A. gambiae preferences for improved expression

    • Consider RNA secondary structure in design

    • Avoid rare codons that might limit expression

This comprehensive approach to construct design improves success rates in creating functional recombinant proteins for research applications .

How should I analyze protein sequence conservation across Anopheles species?

Analyzing protein sequence conservation across Anopheles species requires a multi-faceted approach that combines comparative genomics with functional analysis:

  • Sequence alignment strategies:

    • Perform multiple sequence alignments using algorithms optimized for protein sequences

    • Include diverse Anopheles species to capture evolutionary range

    • Focus on functional domains with predicted biological significance

  • Identification of conserved regions:

    • Compare sequences between closely related species (e.g., A. gambiae s.s. and A. coluzzii)

    • Identify regions with high conservation, suggesting functional importance

    • Pay special attention to protein-coding differences in genomic islands of divergence

  • Functional prediction methods:

    • Use structure prediction to identify functional domains

    • Apply evolutionary trace methods to identify functionally important residues

    • Predict the impact of amino acid substitutions on protein function

  • Statistical approaches for conservation analysis:

    • Calculate sequence identity and similarity percentages across species

    • Apply appropriate evolutionary models to understand selection pressures

    • Use statistical tests to identify regions under positive or purifying selection

  • Integration with experimental data:

    • Connect sequence conservation with functional domains

    • Test predictions through site-directed mutagenesis of conserved residues

    • Validate computational predictions with experimental functional assays

This integrated approach provides insights into protein evolution and functional conservation, helping identify regions of AGAP002539 that may be critical for its biological role .

What considerations are important when interpreting reproductive isolation mechanisms at the protein level?

Interpreting reproductive isolation mechanisms at the protein level requires connecting molecular differences to mating behaviors and speciation processes:

  • Association between genomic islands and mating genes:

    • Proteins encoded within islands of speciation may directly influence mating behavior

    • Genetic recombination is suppressed in these regions, protecting associations between genes

    • In A. gambiae, the X-island contains genes with roles in development, immunity, and sensory functions that may influence mating

  • Sex-specific considerations:

    • Assess whether proteins function differently in males versus females

    • Consider sex-specific gene expression patterns

    • In A. gambiae, females show stronger assortative mating preferences than males

  • Protein functional categories relevant to reproductive isolation:

    • Sensory proteins involved in mate recognition

    • Receptors and signaling molecules that influence behavior

    • Developmental proteins that shape sexual characteristics

    • Immune-related proteins that may influence mating success

  • Experimental approaches to test protein function:

    • Create recombinant strains that isolate specific genomic regions

    • Test mating preferences in controlled behavioral assays

    • Use genetic analyses to confirm phenotypic observations

  • Comparative analysis across populations:

    • Compare protein function between sympatric populations

    • Identify consistent differences maintained by selection

    • Connect protein differences to ecological adaptation and mating behaviors

This multilevel approach connects protein function to reproductive isolation mechanisms, providing insights into the molecular basis of speciation in Anopheles mosquitoes .

How can I improve transformation efficiency when working with A. gambiae embryos?

Improving transformation efficiency in A. gambiae embryos requires optimization of multiple technical aspects:

  • Embryo collection and preparation:

    • Collect embryos within 60-90 minutes post-oviposition

    • Optimize dechorionation conditions to maintain viability

    • Align embryos properly for microinjection at the posterior end

  • Injection technique optimization:

    • Use glass needles with appropriate diameter and taper

    • Maintain consistent injection volume

    • Inject at the posterior pole where pole cells (germline precursors) form

  • Construct design considerations:

    • Optimize plasmid concentration (typical range: 0.2-0.5 μg/μL)

    • Include strong promoters for marker gene expression

    • Use helper plasmids rather than RNA when possible (0.18% success with helper plasmid)

  • Post-injection care:

    • Maintain optimal humidity to prevent desiccation

    • Transfer to recovery medium promptly

    • Minimize mechanical disturbance during recovery

  • Screening protocol enhancement:

    • Use bright fluorescent markers (3xP3-GFP, Actin5C-RFP) for easier detection

    • Screen multiple generations to identify stable transformants

    • Implement molecular verification of integration

By optimizing these parameters, researchers can improve the typically low transformation efficiency (reported at approximately 0.18% for some approaches) when working with A. gambiae embryos .

What strategies can address the challenges of protein expression variability in mosquito systems?

Addressing protein expression variability in mosquito systems requires systematic approaches to identify and control sources of variation:

  • Position effect management:

    • Use site-specific integration to minimize position effects

    • Create multiple independent lines to assess position effects

    • Consider using insulator elements to buffer against position effects

  • Genetic background standardization:

    • Backcross into a standard genetic background for 5+ generations

    • Use isogenic lines for comparative studies

    • Verify genetic background through genome sequencing

  • Environmental condition control:

    • Standardize rearing conditions (temperature, humidity, diet)

    • Control larval density to minimize developmental variation

    • Maintain consistent adult feeding regimes

  • Temporal expression considerations:

    • Standardize collection times based on developmental stage

    • Consider circadian effects on gene expression

    • Use inducible expression systems for temporal control

  • Quantification method validation:

    • Use multiple independent methods to quantify expression

    • Include internal controls for normalization

    • Develop standard curves for absolute quantification

This systematic approach helps identify sources of variability and implement appropriate controls, improving the reliability and reproducibility of protein expression studies in mosquito systems .

How can I validate the specificity of antibodies for A. gambiae protein detection?

Validating antibody specificity for A. gambiae protein detection requires a comprehensive approach:

  • Initial validation experiments:

    • Test antibodies against recombinant protein expressed in heterologous systems

    • Compare wild-type versus knockout/knockdown samples

    • Perform peptide competition assays to confirm epitope specificity

  • Cross-reactivity assessment:

    • Test against closely related proteins within A. gambiae

    • Assess reactivity across different Anopheles species

    • Verify specificity in complex tissue lysates

  • Technical validation approaches:

    • Use multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes

    • Combine immunological detection with genetic approaches

    • Confirm subcellular localization matches predicted patterns

  • Quantitative validation methods:

    • Establish detection limits and dynamic range

    • Verify linearity of signal with protein concentration

    • Assess batch-to-batch consistency of antibody performance

  • Documentation and reporting:

    • Record detailed validation protocols

    • Document all antibody information (source, lot, dilution)

    • Include comprehensive validation data in publications

This rigorous validation approach ensures that antibodies used for A. gambiae protein detection provide specific and reliable results, which is essential for accurate functional characterization of proteins like AGAP002539 .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.