KEGG: aga:AgaP_AGAP013168
STRING: 7165.AGAP013168-PA
The Recombinant Anopheles gambiae Molybdopterin synthase catalytic subunit (AGAP004290) is a protein with UniProt accession number Q7QAD7. It represents the large subunit (MoaE) of the molybdopterin synthase enzyme complex derived from Anopheles gambiae (African malaria mosquito). The protein is also known as Molybdenum cofactor synthesis protein 2 large subunit or MOCS2B. The full-length protein consists of 154 amino acids with a sequence beginning with MNYLKLTFDK and ending with NHIL .
Molybdopterin synthase is a heterotetrameric enzyme composed of two types of subunits: a large subunit (MoaE) and a small subunit (MoaD). Crystal structure analysis has revealed that the C-terminus of each MoaD subunit inserts deeply into a MoaE subunit to form the active site. In the activated form of the enzyme, the MoaD C-terminus is present as a thiocarboxylate, which is critical for its catalytic function . The structure also includes a binding pocket for the terminal phosphate of molybdopterin and a proposed binding site for the pterin moiety present in the substrate (precursor Z) and the product (molybdopterin) .
The shelf life of recombinant AGAP004290 is influenced by multiple factors including storage state, buffer ingredients, storage temperature, and the inherent stability of the protein. For optimal preservation:
Liquid form has a shelf life of approximately 6 months at -20°C/-80°C
Lyophilized form demonstrates extended stability with a shelf life of 12 months at -20°C/-80°C
Repeated freezing and thawing cycles should be avoided
For proper reconstitution:
Briefly centrifuge the vial prior to opening to bring contents to the bottom
Reconstitute the protein in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL
Add glycerol to a final concentration of 5-50% (with 50% being the standard recommendation)
Molybdopterin synthase catalyzes a critical step in the molybdenum cofactor biosynthesis pathway. Specifically, it generates the dithiolene group of molybdopterin, which is responsible for molybdenum ligation in the final cofactor. The enzyme converts precursor Z to molybdopterin by introducing sulfur atoms to form the dithiolene group . This reaction is essential for producing functional molybdenum cofactors that serve as active sites in various enzymes including those involved in nitrogen, sulfur, and carbon metabolism in A. gambiae and other organisms .
A methodological approach to measuring AGAP004290 activity involves:
In vitro reconstitution assay: Combine purified recombinant AGAP004290 (MoaE) with its partner subunit MoaD (which should be present as a thiocarboxylate at its C-terminus)
Substrate preparation: Generate precursor Z either through chemical synthesis or isolation from bacteria lacking the molybdopterin synthase
Reaction conditions: Incubate the enzyme complex with precursor Z under anaerobic conditions with appropriate buffer systems (typically at pH 7.0-7.5)
Activity detection: Monitor the conversion of precursor Z to molybdopterin using:
Molybdopterin synthase catalyzes the second major step in the four-step molybdenum cofactor biosynthesis pathway in organisms like E. coli, which serves as a model for understanding this process. The complete pathway includes:
Formation of precursor Z
Conversion of precursor Z to molybdopterin (MPT) by molybdopterin synthase
Insertion of molybdenum to form Moco via an MPT-AMP intermediate
Potential additional modifications, such as the covalent addition of GMP or CMP to form MGD or MCD cofactors
In A. gambiae, the AGAP004290 protein (MoaE) is specifically involved in the second step of this pathway, working in conjunction with its partner subunit to generate the dithiolene group essential for molybdenum coordination .
Based on the available data, yeast has been used successfully as an expression system for recombinant AGAP004290 . When designing an expression strategy:
Yeast expression system:
Offers eukaryotic protein processing capabilities
Provides post-translational modifications
Typically yields properly folded protein
Optimization considerations:
Codon optimization for the host organism
Selection of appropriate promoters (constitutive vs. inducible)
Fusion tags for purification and detection
Growth conditions (temperature, media, induction time)
Purification strategy:
Multiple complementary techniques can be employed to verify structural integrity:
SDS-PAGE and Western blotting:
Circular Dichroism (CD) spectroscopy:
Assess secondary structure elements
Monitor thermal stability and folding
Size Exclusion Chromatography with Multi-Angle Light Scattering (SEC-MALS):
Determine oligomeric state in solution
Verify heterotetramer formation when combined with MoaD
Limited proteolysis:
Probe domain organization and folding
Identify stable domains for structural studies
Differential Scanning Fluorimetry (DSF):
Measure thermal stability under various buffer conditions
Optimize storage conditions based on stability data
When investigating protein-protein interactions involving AGAP004290:
Partner identification:
The MoaD subunit (small subunit) is the primary interaction partner
Ensure the MoaD C-terminus is properly processed for thiocarboxylate formation
Interaction analysis methods:
Pull-down assays using tagged AGAP004290
Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) for binding kinetics
Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC) for thermodynamic parameters
Native mass spectrometry to confirm heterotetramer formation
Yeast two-hybrid or bacterial two-hybrid screens for novel partners
Functional validation:
The crystal structure analysis of molybdopterin synthase provides crucial insights for rational inhibitor design:
Target site identification:
The deep insertion of the MoaD C-terminus into MoaE creates a unique interface
The binding pocket for the terminal phosphate of molybdopterin
The proposed binding site for the pterin moiety
Structure-based design strategy:
Develop compounds that mimic the thiocarboxylate group but resist catalysis
Target species-specific differences in the active site between human and insect enzymes
Design allosteric inhibitors that prevent MoaE-MoaD complex formation
Validation approaches:
In vitro enzyme inhibition assays
Structural studies of enzyme-inhibitor complexes
Cellular assays in insect cell lines
Specificity testing against human molybdopterin synthase
Potential applications:
Several complementary approaches can elucidate the physiological significance:
Gene silencing techniques:
RNA interference (RNAi) to knockdown AGAP004290 expression
CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing to create defined mutations
Analysis of resulting phenotypes in development, survival, and reproduction
Tissue-specific expression analysis:
RT-qPCR to quantify transcripts across tissues and developmental stages
Immunohistochemistry to localize protein expression
Single-cell transcriptomics to identify cell types expressing AGAP004290
Functional assays:
Measure activities of molybdoenzymes in normal and AGAP004290-depleted mosquitoes
Metabolomic profiling to identify altered biochemical pathways
Supplementation studies with molybdenum compounds
Ecological and behavioral studies:
Assess impact on blood-feeding behavior
Evaluate effects on susceptibility to insecticides
Investigate potential role in malaria parasite interactions
A systematic approach to mutation analysis would include:
Mutation identification and characterization:
Natural variants in wild mosquito populations
Engineered mutations based on structural information
Classification of mutations (active site, dimerization interface, etc.)
Functional analysis of mutant proteins:
Expression and purification of recombinant mutant proteins
Enzymatic activity assays compared to wild-type
Structural studies to determine molecular effects of mutations
Protein stability and partner binding studies
Physiological impact assessment:
Generation of transgenic mosquitoes expressing mutant variants
Phenotypic characterization across developmental stages
Stress response analysis (oxidative, nutritional, etc.)
Fitness measurements in laboratory and simulated field conditions
Comparative analysis with human disease mutations:
Evolutionary analysis provides multiple insights:
Sequence conservation patterns:
Highly conserved catalytic residues across all domains of life
Variable regions that may confer species-specific properties
Correlation between sequence conservation and functional importance
Phylogenetic relationships:
Construction of evolutionary trees based on MoaE sequences
Identification of insect-specific sequence features
Correlation with species divergence patterns
Selective pressures:
Analysis of positive and negative selection on different protein regions
Identification of rapidly evolving sites that may indicate functional adaptation
Correlation with environmental factors (e.g., molybdenum availability)
Applications:
While not directly related to the core function of AGAP004290, understanding the downstream processing of molybdopterin provides context:
Dinucleotide formation process:
After molybdopterin formation by molybdopterin synthase (including AGAP004290)
Further modification can occur with the addition of nucleotides
In bacteria, GTP:molybdopterin guanylyltransferase (MobA) or CTP:molybdopterin cytidylyltransferase (MocA) catalyze the addition of GMP or CMP
Structural basis for nucleotide specificity:
The N-terminal domain determines nucleotide recognition and binding
Specific amino acid motifs in the N-terminal domain control GTP vs. CTP specificity
Exchange of five key amino acids can alter nucleotide preference
Evolutionary implications:
MobA and MocA share 22% sequence identity despite different nucleotide preferences
Paralogue evolution from gene duplication and specialization
Potential for similar specialization in other components of the pathway
Research applications:
Researchers may encounter several technical issues:
Expression challenges:
Insoluble protein formation or inclusion bodies
Low expression yield
Improper folding in heterologous systems
Purification difficulties:
Co-purification of host proteins
Aggregation during concentration
Loss of activity during purification steps
Solutions and optimization strategies:
Adjusting expression temperature (typically lower temperatures improve folding)
Co-expression with chaperones or partner proteins
Testing different fusion tags (His, GST, MBP) for improved solubility
Optimizing buffer conditions with stabilizing additives
Using mild detergents to prevent aggregation
When facing activity issues, consider:
Protein integrity verification:
Confirm full-length protein by mass spectrometry
Verify correct disulfide bond formation
Check for post-translational modifications
Partner protein requirements:
Ensure availability of properly activated MoaD (with thiocarboxylate)
Verify complex formation between MoaE and MoaD
Test different ratios of subunits
Assay conditions optimization:
Vary buffer composition, pH, and ionic strength
Test different metal ion requirements
Optimize substrate concentration
Ensure anaerobic conditions if required
Stability considerations:
Multiple complementary techniques provide comprehensive characterization:
Binding affinity determination:
Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC) for thermodynamic parameters
Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) for association/dissociation kinetics
Microscale Thermophoresis (MST) for interactions in solution
Fluorescence-based assays with labeled substrates or inhibitors
Structural characterization:
X-ray crystallography of enzyme-substrate or enzyme-inhibitor complexes
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) for conformational changes
NMR for dynamic interactions in solution
Cryo-EM for larger complexes
Functional analysis:
Several promising approaches emerge:
Inhibitor development strategy:
Structure-based design of specific inhibitors targeting the active site
Allosteric inhibitors disrupting protein-protein interactions
Peptidomimetics based on the MoaD C-terminal region
Small molecule screening against the purified enzyme
Delivery methods:
Development of inhibitor-impregnated bed nets
Baited traps containing enzyme inhibitors
Transgenic approaches affecting AGAP004290 expression
Resistance management:
Target conserved regions resistant to mutation
Develop combination approaches targeting multiple pathway steps
Monitor for resistance development in field populations
Validation approach:
Critical knowledge gaps include:
Regulatory mechanisms:
How is AGAP004290 expression regulated during different life stages?
What controls the balance between MoaE and MoaD production?
Are there post-translational modifications affecting activity?
Structural details:
Complete structure of A. gambiae molybdopterin synthase with bound substrate
Conformational changes during catalysis
Species-specific structural features
Metabolic integration:
Connection between molybdoenzymes and mosquito metabolism
Role in response to environmental stressors
Potential involvement in insecticide resistance mechanisms
Population variation:
Integrative approaches offer comprehensive insights:
Multi-omics integration:
Combine transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics data
Map AGAP004290 function within broader metabolic networks
Identify compensatory mechanisms when the enzyme is inhibited
Computational modeling:
Develop metabolic flux models incorporating molybdoenzymes
Simulate effects of AGAP004290 inhibition on cellular metabolism
Predict system-level consequences of targeted interventions
Ecological context:
Correlate molybdenum availability in different habitats with enzyme activity
Model population-level effects of enzyme inhibition
Predict evolutionary responses to selective pressure
Translational applications: