Recombinant Anopheles gambiae Protein cueball (cue), partial

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Identification and Nomenclature Challenges

  • Search Result describes a recombinant An. gambiae protein termed "white (w)", which shares structural and functional parallels with other mosquito proteins.

  • No references to "cueball" were identified in studies on An. gambiae proteases, cuticular proteins, odorant-binding proteins (OBPs), or immune-related molecules (e.g., TEP1, CLIPB10, FREP1) .

This suggests either:

  1. A typographical error in the protein name (e.g., confusion with "white" or another homolog).

  2. The protein is not widely studied or published under this designation.

Comparison with Related Proteins

While "cueball" remains uncharacterized, insights can be drawn from analogous An. gambiae proteins:

ProteinFunction/RoleKey FindingsSource
White (w)Partial recombinant proteinExpressed in mammalian cells; >85% purity; stored at -20°C/-80°C .
CLIPB10Clip domain serine proteaseActivates prophenoloxidase (proPO); inhibited by Serpin 2; redundant with CLIPB9 .
TEP1Thioester-containing protein 1Polymorphic immune gene; TEP1s (susceptible) vs. TEP1r (resistant) alleles .
CPBAg1/CPBAg2Midgut carboxypeptidasesUpregulated during Plasmodium infection; targeted for transmission-blocking vaccines .
OBP1Odorant-binding proteinBinds indole; co-expressed with OBP4 in antennal sensilla .

Hypothesized Characteristics of "cueball (cue)"

Assuming "cueball" refers to a hypothetical or misidentified protein, its potential roles could align with:

  • Immune Regulation: Similar to CLIPB10 or TEP1, which modulate melanization and parasite resistance .

  • Metabolic Processes: Analogous to carboxypeptidases (CPBAg1/2), which influence parasite development .

  • Structural Roles: Comparable to cuticular proteins (CPLC families), which form exoskeletal structures .

Critical Data Gaps and Recommendations

  1. Nomenclature Clarification: Verify the protein’s official name via UniProt or VectorBase.

  2. Experimental Validation:

    • Recombinant Production: Follow protocols for "white (w)" , including:

      • Reconstitution: 0.1–1.0 mg/mL in deionized water with 5–50% glycerol.

      • Storage: Lyophilized form stable for 12 months at -20°C/-80°C .

    • Functional Assays: Test interactions with serpins (e.g., SRPN2) or protease cascades (e.g., proPO activation) .

  3. Phylogenetic Analysis: Compare with An. gambiae proteins like CLIPB9/10 or OBPs to infer evolutionary relationships .

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder

Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify any format requirements in your order notes. We will accommodate your request if possible.

Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchase method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.

Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs unless otherwise requested. Dry ice shipping requires advance notification and incurs additional charges.

Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to collect the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default glycerol concentration is 50% and may serve as a useful reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquoting is necessary for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during the manufacturing process.

The specific tag type is determined during production. If you require a particular tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.

Synonyms
cue; AGAP007023Protein cueball
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Protein Length
Partial
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Anopheles gambiae (African malaria mosquito)
Target Names
cue
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function

Plays a role in spermatogenesis and oogenesis.

Database Links
Protein Families
Cueball family
Subcellular Location
Cell membrane; Single-pass type I membrane protein.

Q&A

What is the Anopheles gambiae Protein cueball and how is it related to mosquito physiology?

Anopheles gambiae Protein cueball (cue) belongs to a family of proteins involved in the physiological processes of the malaria-transmitting mosquito Anopheles gambiae. While specific information about cueball is limited in the current literature, research on Anopheles gambiae proteins generally indicates their importance in various biological functions including detoxification mechanisms and insecticide resistance. Similar to characterized proteins like glutathione S-transferases (GSTs), cueball protein may play a role in the mosquito's ability to metabolize xenobiotics or withstand environmental stressors .

What techniques are recommended for initial identification of recombinant Anopheles gambiae proteins?

For initial identification of recombinant Anopheles gambiae proteins, researchers should employ a combination of techniques including:

  • SDS-PAGE for molecular weight determination and purity assessment

  • Western blotting with specific antibodies (when available)

  • Mass spectrometry for protein sequence confirmation

  • Immunocrossreactivity tests against known protein fractions

As demonstrated with Anopheles gambiae GSTs, partly purified enzymes can be resolved by SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, and probed with antisera against the expressed proteins to confirm identity . This approach helps verify the recombinant protein matches its native counterpart from mosquito extracts.

How does seasonal variation affect expression of Anopheles gambiae proteins in wild populations?

Seasonal variation significantly impacts the expression profiles of Anopheles gambiae proteins in wild populations. Research indicates that malaria vector populations exhibit strong seasonal fluctuations in abundance, being present in large numbers during the rainy season but dropping to extremely low levels during dry periods . These environmental pressures likely induce adaptive protein expression patterns.

Key physiological changes observed during dry seasons include:

  • Reduced reproduction capacity

  • Decreased flight activity

  • Increased desiccation tolerance (attributed to changes in cuticular hydrocarbons)

  • Significant metabolic and protein expression modifications

These adaptations suggest that protein expression, including potentially cueball protein, may vary seasonally as part of the mosquito's survival mechanisms in challenging environmental conditions.

What expression systems are most effective for producing functional recombinant Anopheles gambiae Protein cueball?

While specific expression systems for Protein cueball are not well-documented, successful approaches for other Anopheles gambiae proteins can inform methodology. Based on research with GSTs from Anopheles gambiae, effective expression systems typically include:

  • Bacterial expression systems (E. coli) for high yield but potential issues with post-translational modifications

  • Baculovirus-insect cell systems for more authentic post-translational modifications

  • Cell-free expression systems for rapid screening

The choice depends on research objectives. If enzymatic activity is critical, insect cell systems may better preserve native conformation and function. For structural studies requiring large quantities, bacterial systems optimized for soluble expression may be preferred .

What purification strategies yield the highest purity and activity for recombinant Anopheles gambiae proteins?

Based on successful approaches with related Anopheles gambiae proteins, an optimal purification strategy would involve:

  • Initial capture using affinity chromatography (His-tag or GST-tag depending on the construct design)

  • Intermediate purification via ion exchange chromatography to separate protein variants

  • Polishing step using size exclusion chromatography for final purity

For Anopheles gambiae GSTs, sequential column chromatography successfully separated peaks of activity, each containing multiple enzymes . Maintaining reducing conditions throughout purification and including stabilizing agents (glycerol, specific ions) helps preserve activity. Quality assessment should include both purity (SDS-PAGE) and activity measurements with appropriate substrates.

How can researchers troubleshoot low expression yields of recombinant Anopheles gambiae Protein cueball?

When encountering low expression yields of recombinant Anopheles proteins, researchers should implement a systematic troubleshooting approach:

  • Codon optimization: Adapt codon usage to the expression host by synthesizing a codon-optimized gene sequence

  • Fusion partners evaluation: Test different fusion tags (SUMO, MBP, TRX) known to enhance solubility

  • Expression conditions optimization: Systematically vary temperature, induction timing, and media composition

  • Construct design refinement: Create truncation variants to identify minimal functional domains

  • Host strain selection: Test specialized strains containing additional chaperones or rare tRNAs

For challenging insect proteins like those from Anopheles gambiae, combining these approaches often yields better results than relying on a single optimization strategy.

What are the standard methods for determining enzymatic activity of Anopheles gambiae proteins?

Standard methods for determining enzymatic activity depend on the specific protein function. For well-characterized proteins like Anopheles gambiae GSTs, activity is typically measured using:

  • Spectrophotometric assays with model substrates (e.g., CDNB for GSTs)

  • Specific substrate conversion assays (e.g., DDT dehydrochlorinase activity for detoxification enzymes)

  • Coupled enzyme assays for complex reactions

When determining kinetic parameters, researchers should measure initial rates across a range of substrate concentrations to determine Km, Kcat, and catalytic efficiency (Kcat/Km). As shown in Table 1, these parameters provide valuable insights into enzyme function.

Table 1. Example of Kinetic Parameters for Recombinant Anopheles gambiae GSTs

EnzymeVmax (μmol/min per mg)Kcat (s^-1)Km (mM) GlutathioneKm (mM) CDNBKcat/Km (mM^-1·s^-1) GlutathioneKcat/Km (mM^-1·s^-1) CDNB
agGST1-583.5140.470.8220.09949410
agGST1-6348.35136.20.8070.123120792

Values represent means from two separate assays

How can researchers accurately assess the thermodynamic stability of recombinant Anopheles gambiae proteins?

Assessing thermodynamic stability of recombinant Anopheles gambiae proteins requires multiple complementary approaches:

  • Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC): Measures the melting temperature (Tm) and enthalpy of unfolding

  • Circular Dichroism (CD) Spectroscopy: Monitors secondary structure changes during thermal or chemical denaturation

  • Proteolysis-based stability assays: Modern high-throughput approaches like cDNA display proteolysis can measure thermodynamic folding stability by exposing proteins to different concentrations of proteases (trypsin and chymotrypsin) and quantifying survival through deep sequencing

  • Computational prediction: Molecular dynamics simulations can complement experimental approaches

For the most reliable results, researchers should employ a combination of these techniques. The proteolysis-based method has proven particularly effective, allowing for measurement of up to 900,000 protein domains in a single week-long experiment .

What structural analysis techniques provide the most valuable insights into Anopheles gambiae protein folding?

For comprehensive structural analysis of Anopheles gambiae proteins, researchers should consider a multi-technique approach:

For proteins like cueball where structural information may be limited, homology modeling based on related proteins can provide initial structural insights to guide experimental design.

How do researchers establish the relationship between Anopheles gambiae proteins and insecticide resistance?

Establishing the relationship between Anopheles gambiae proteins and insecticide resistance involves a systematic approach:

  • Comparative analysis: Compare protein expression levels between susceptible and resistant mosquito strains. For example, GSTs from peaks 4, 5, and 6 have been shown to be involved in DDT resistance by comparing enzymes isolated from susceptible (G3) and DDT-resistant (ZANDS) strains .

  • Activity assays with insecticides: Measure direct metabolism of insecticides by recombinant proteins. The DDT dehydrochlorinase activity of partly purified peak 4 GSTs showed no detectable activity in susceptible strains but was present in resistant strains .

  • Gene knockdown studies: Use RNAi or CRISPR to reduce expression and observe effects on resistance phenotype.

  • Transgenic expression: Express the protein in model organisms to confirm its ability to confer resistance.

  • Field correlation studies: Analyze protein expression in wild populations with varying resistance profiles.

This multi-faceted approach provides strong evidence for a protein's role in resistance mechanisms.

What are the best methods for studying the physiological role of Anopheles gambiae proteins in malaria vector biology?

To study physiological roles of Anopheles gambiae proteins in vector biology, researchers should employ:

  • Temporal and spatial expression profiling: Examine expression patterns across developmental stages, tissues, and in response to environmental factors. Anopheles mosquito populations show marked seasonality in reproductive physiology and protein expression patterns that support survival throughout dry seasons .

  • Genetic manipulation: Use CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing to create knockout or knockdown mosquitoes.

  • Protein-protein interaction studies: Identify binding partners through techniques like co-immunoprecipitation or yeast two-hybrid screening.

  • Ex vivo tissue studies: Examine protein function in isolated tissues or organs.

  • Ecological experiments: Conduct controlled studies under laboratory or semi-field conditions to complement genetic approaches, as these methods are known to complement each other when investigating vector persistence mechanisms .

These approaches provide comprehensive insights into protein function within the complex biology of malaria vectors.

How can recombinant Anopheles gambiae proteins contribute to novel vector control strategies?

Recombinant Anopheles gambiae proteins can advance vector control strategies through several research applications:

  • Inhibitor development: Using recombinant proteins for high-throughput screening to identify small molecules that can inhibit essential mosquito proteins.

  • Vaccine development: Exploring transmission-blocking vaccines that target mosquito proteins involved in Plasmodium development.

  • Genetic manipulation strategies: Designing gene drive systems that target specific protein functions critical for mosquito survival or reproduction.

  • Biomarkers for surveillance: Developing antibody-based detection methods for proteins associated with insecticide resistance, allowing for more effective monitoring of resistance in field populations .

  • Ecological risk assessment: Using recombinant proteins to test the specificity of novel control measures and assess potential impacts on non-target organisms.

Understanding the structure-function relationship of these proteins is critical for rational design of control strategies that specifically target disease vectors while minimizing environmental impact.

What high-throughput genetic approaches are most effective for studying Anopheles gambiae protein variants?

For comprehensive analysis of Anopheles gambiae protein variants, several high-throughput genetic approaches have proven effective:

  • Barcoding methods: High-throughput genetic barcoding provides a reliable and cost-effective approach for surveillance of Anopheles gambiae complex mosquitoes in malaria-endemic regions . This method enables rapid identification of species variants.

  • Deep mutational scanning: This approach combines protein display technologies with next-generation sequencing to assess thousands of protein variants simultaneously.

  • CRISPR-based screens: Using pooled CRISPR libraries to create and screen numerous genetic variants affecting protein function or expression.

  • cDNA display proteolysis: This method can measure thermodynamic folding stability for up to 900,000 protein domains in a one-week experiment, enabling assessment of all single amino acid variants and selected double mutants .

  • Population genomics approaches: Analyzing natural variation across mosquito populations to identify functionally important protein variants.

These methods generate rich datasets that can be mined to understand evolutionary constraints, structure-function relationships, and adaptive mechanisms in mosquito proteins.

How can researchers integrate computational and experimental approaches in studying Anopheles gambiae protein function?

Effective integration of computational and experimental approaches for studying Anopheles gambiae proteins requires:

  • Iterative modeling and validation: Start with computational predictions (homology modeling, molecular dynamics) that inform targeted experiments, then refine models based on experimental results.

  • Machine learning applications: Train models on experimental protein stability data to predict effects of mutations. Recent advances in DNA sequencing and machine learning are providing insights into protein sequences and structures on an enormous scale .

  • Systems biology integration: Combine protein-level data with transcriptomics, metabolomics, and phenotypic data to construct comprehensive models of protein function within biological networks.

  • Evolutionary analysis: Use computational phylogenetics to identify conserved domains and predict functional importance, then verify experimentally.

  • Virtual screening and experimental validation: Use in silico docking to identify potential binding partners or inhibitors, followed by experimental binding assays.

This integrated approach leverages the strengths of both computational efficiency and experimental accuracy to advance understanding of complex protein functions.

What are the most significant challenges in translating in vitro findings about Anopheles gambiae proteins to field applications?

Translating laboratory findings about Anopheles gambiae proteins to field applications faces several significant challenges:

  • Genetic diversity: Laboratory studies often use standardized strains, while field populations exhibit extensive genetic diversity. High-throughput genetic surveillance methods are essential for capturing this variation .

  • Environmental factors: Laboratory conditions cannot fully replicate the complex environmental factors affecting protein function in the field. For instance, seasonal adaptations in mosquito populations involve complex physiological changes affecting multiple proteins .

  • Resistance evolution: Mosquitoes rapidly evolve resistance to control measures, necessitating continuous monitoring and adaptation of strategies. The mechanisms of persistence through dry seasons (e.g., aestivation vs. long-distance migration) impact how resistance genes spread .

  • Scale-up limitations: Methods optimized for laboratory-scale protein production may face significant challenges in scaling to levels needed for field applications.

  • Ecological complexity: The interaction of multiple vector species with varying protein expression profiles complicates the implementation of targeted control strategies.

Addressing these challenges requires collaborative approaches combining laboratory research with field studies and implementation science to ensure laboratory findings translate effectively to real-world vector control solutions.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.