Recombinant Anopheles gambiae Protein lingerer (lig), partial

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your preferred format in order notes for customized preparation.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on purchasing method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs unless dry ice is specifically requested in advance. Additional charges apply for dry ice shipping.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to collect the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50%, which can be used as a reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized formulations have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquot for multiple uses to prevent repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing.
The tag type is determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
lig; AGAP004817Protein lingerer
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Protein Length
Partial
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Anopheles gambiae (African malaria mosquito)
Target Names
lig
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function

This protein functions within the nervous system to regulate the control of copulatory organs during courtship behavior.

Database Links
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm.

Q&A

What is the Anopheles gambiae lingerer (lig) protein and what is its significance in mosquito biology?

The lingerer (lig) protein in Anopheles gambiae is part of the complex protein network in this major malaria vector in sub-Saharan Africa. While the specific function of lingerer remains under investigation, mosquito proteins generally fall into functional categories including immune response, olfaction, metabolism, and reproduction. Similar to characterized proteins like LRIM1 and APL1C, lingerer may have specialized functions within the mosquito's physiological systems .

Research approaches to understand its significance include:

  • Comparative sequence analysis with homologs in other insect species

  • Expression pattern analysis across different developmental stages

  • RNAi-mediated gene silencing to observe phenotypic effects

  • Co-immunoprecipitation studies to identify interaction partners

How does the recombinant partial lingerer protein differ from the native protein?

Recombinant partial lingerer protein represents a segment of the full-length native protein, produced through heterologous expression systems. Key differences include:

CharacteristicNative ProteinRecombinant Partial Protein
SizeFull-lengthTruncated (partial sequence)
Post-translational modificationsComplete native PTMsMay lack some or all native PTMs
FoldingNative conformationMay have altered tertiary structure
Biological activityFull activityPotentially reduced or altered activity
SolubilityVariableOften optimized for solubility

Researchers should consider these differences when designing experiments and interpreting results, particularly since recombinant proteins may not fully recapitulate the behavior of native proteins in the mosquito hemolymph .

What expression systems are most suitable for producing recombinant A. gambiae lingerer protein?

Selection of an appropriate expression system depends on research objectives and protein characteristics:

Expression SystemAdvantagesConsiderations for Lingerer Protein
E. coliHigh yield, cost-effective, rapidMay lack proper folding and PTMs observed in eukaryotic systems
Insect cells (Sf9, S2)More native-like processing, better for complex proteinsCloser to native environment, better for functional studies
Yeast (P. pastoris)Eukaryotic processing, high yieldBalance between bacterial and mammalian systems
Mammalian cellsMost complete PTMs, complex foldingHighest cost, lower yield, relevant for interaction studies

When expressing A. gambiae proteins, researchers often use approaches similar to those used for other mosquito proteins like AgamOBP1, where specialized vectors and optimized conditions ensure proper protein folding .

What are the optimal methods for purifying recombinant A. gambiae lingerer protein?

Purification strategies should be tailored to the protein's characteristics and downstream applications:

  • Affinity Chromatography: Using his-tag, GST, or other fusion tags is the most common first-step approach

    • His-tagged purification under native conditions preserves structural integrity

    • Denaturing conditions may be necessary if inclusion bodies form

  • Size Exclusion Chromatography: Essential for obtaining homogeneous protein preparations

    • Effective for separating monomeric from multimeric forms

    • Critical for structural studies requiring high purity

  • Ion Exchange Chromatography: Based on the theoretical pI of lingerer protein

    • Particularly useful as a polishing step after affinity chromatography

  • Quality Control Checkpoints:

    • SDS-PAGE with Coomassie staining to assess purity

    • Western blotting to confirm identity

    • Mass spectrometry to verify sequence integrity and PTMs

Similar approaches have been successfully applied to other A. gambiae proteins like those found in the mosquito midgut peritrophic matrix .

How can I design functional assays to study protein-protein interactions involving lingerer protein?

Designing robust interaction assays requires multiple complementary approaches:

  • In vitro binding assays:

    • Pull-down assays using immobilized recombinant lingerer to identify binding partners

    • Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) for quantitative binding kinetics

    • Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC) for thermodynamic parameters

  • Cell-based assays:

    • Yeast two-hybrid screening to identify potential interactors

    • Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC) in cultured cells

    • FRET/BRET assays for real-time interaction monitoring

  • In vivo validation:

    • Co-immunoprecipitation from mosquito tissue extracts

    • Proximity ligation assays in fixed tissues

    • RNAi knockdown followed by phenotypic analysis

When designing these assays, consider the approach used to study LRIM1 and APL1C interactions with TEP1, where researchers generated protein variants with altered structural elements to map interaction domains .

What controls should be included when studying the function of recombinant lingerer protein?

Rigorous controls are essential for reliable interpretation of experimental results:

Control TypePurposeImplementation
Positive controlsVerify assay functionalityUse well-characterized protein interactions (e.g., LRIM1/APL1C complex)
Negative controlsEstablish baseline/backgroundNon-binding protein variants, irrelevant proteins of similar size
Expression tag controlsDistinguish tag vs. protein effectsExpress and test tag-only constructs
Denatured protein controlsConfirm structure-function relationshipHeat-denatured or chemically denatured protein samples
Concentration gradientsEstablish dose-dependenceTitration series with multiple protein concentrations
Competitive inhibitionConfirm binding specificityPre-incubation with unlabeled protein or peptide competitors

These controls help distinguish specific biological interactions from experimental artifacts, particularly important when working with recombinant partial proteins that may have altered binding properties.

How can I determine the three-dimensional structure of recombinant lingerer protein?

Multiple complementary structural biology approaches can be employed:

  • X-ray Crystallography:

    • Screen multiple crystallization conditions (sparse matrix approach)

    • Consider surface entropy reduction for improved crystal packing

    • Use molecular replacement with homologous structures if available

  • NMR Spectroscopy:

    • Most suitable for smaller domains (< 25 kDa)

    • Requires isotope labeling (15N, 13C)

    • Provides dynamic information about flexible regions

  • Cryo-Electron Microscopy:

    • Increasingly viable for medium-sized proteins

    • No crystallization required

    • May reveal conformational heterogeneity

  • Computational Structure Prediction:

    • Homology modeling based on related proteins

    • Ab initio modeling for novel domains

    • Molecular dynamics simulations to study flexibility

Researchers studying AgamOBP1 successfully employed computational modeling approaches to determine ligand binding sites, which could serve as a methodological template for lingerer protein structural studies .

How does post-translational modification affect lingerer protein function?

Post-translational modifications (PTMs) often critically influence protein function:

  • Identification of PTMs:

    • Mass spectrometry (MS/MS) analysis of native and recombinant protein

    • Specific antibodies against common PTMs (phosphorylation, glycosylation)

    • Staining methods (Pro-Q Diamond for phosphorylation, PAS for glycosylation)

  • Functional impact assessment:

    • Site-directed mutagenesis of modified residues

    • Enzymatic removal of modifications (phosphatases, glycosidases)

    • Comparison of proteins expressed in systems with different PTM capabilities

  • Common PTMs in A. gambiae proteins:

    • N-glycosylation and O-glycosylation sites are predicted in many A. gambiae proteins

    • Phosphorylation often regulates protein activity and interactions

    • Disulfide bonds are critical for structural integrity, as demonstrated in LRIM1/APL1C complex formation

Analyzing both N-linked and O-linked glycosylation is particularly relevant, as these modifications often influence protein stability and interaction capabilities in mosquito proteins.

How can I assess the evolutionary conservation of lingerer protein across Anopheles species?

Evolutionary analysis provides insights into functional constraints and adaptation:

  • Sequence comparison approaches:

    • Multiple sequence alignment of lingerer orthologs

    • Calculation of dN/dS ratios to detect selection signatures

    • Identification of conserved domains and variable regions

  • Phylogenetic analysis:

    • Maximum likelihood or Bayesian tree construction

    • Reconciliation with species phylogeny

    • Testing for co-evolution with interacting partners

  • Comparative genomics:

    • Synteny analysis to identify genomic context conservation

    • Assessment of gene duplication events

    • Examination of intron-exon structure conservation

When conducting these analyses, consider approaches used to study speciation in the Anopheles complex, which revealed different patterns of genomic differentiation across chromosomes, with the X chromosome showing stronger barriers to introgression compared to autosomes .

How can I improve solubility of recombinant lingerer protein during expression?

Solubility challenges are common with recombinant mosquito proteins:

  • Expression optimization strategies:

    • Lower induction temperature (16-20°C)

    • Reduced inducer concentration

    • Co-expression with molecular chaperones (GroEL/GroES, DnaK)

  • Construct design approaches:

    • Express individual domains rather than full-length protein

    • Use solubility-enhancing fusion partners (MBP, SUMO, TRX)

    • Remove hydrophobic regions predicted to cause aggregation

  • Buffer optimization:

    • Screen different pH conditions (typically pH 6.0-8.5)

    • Include stabilizing additives (glycerol, low concentrations of detergents)

    • Test various salt concentrations to maintain solubility

  • Refolding strategies (if inclusion bodies form):

    • Gradual dilution or dialysis-based refolding

    • On-column refolding during purification

    • Pulse refolding with redox pairs for proteins with disulfide bonds

Similar approaches have been successful for other A. gambiae proteins like those found in the mosquito midgut peritrophic matrix proteome .

How do I interpret conflicting results in functional studies of recombinant lingerer protein?

Conflicting results are common in protein functional studies and require systematic investigation:

  • Source of variability assessment:

    • Protein batch-to-batch variation (purity, aggregation state)

    • Experimental condition differences (buffer composition, temperature)

    • Cell/tissue type variations in cell-based assays

  • Reconciliation approaches:

    • Repeat experiments with standardized protocols across laboratories

    • Use multiple complementary techniques to address the same question

    • Consider protein conformation and PTM differences between studies

  • Biological versus technical variation:

    • Determine if differences reflect true biological complexity

    • Quantify technical variability through replicate analysis

    • Consider context-dependent protein functions

When analyzing conflicting results, consider the approach used in studies of the LRIM1/APL1C complex, where researchers systematically mapped functional domains through mutagenesis to resolve apparent contradictions in protein interaction data .

What statistical methods are appropriate for analyzing protein interaction data involving lingerer?

Statistical analysis must be tailored to the experimental approach:

  • For binding affinity measurements:

    • Nonlinear regression for Kd determination

    • Analysis of variance (ANOVA) to compare multiple conditions

    • Bootstrap methods for confidence interval estimation

  • For co-immunoprecipitation and pull-down assays:

    • Quantify band intensities using densitometry

    • Apply paired t-tests for treated vs. control comparisons

    • Consider Bland-Altman plots for method comparison

  • For high-throughput interaction studies:

    • Multiple testing correction (FDR, Bonferroni)

    • Enrichment analysis for functional categories

    • Network analysis to identify interaction clusters

  • Sample size considerations:

    • Power analysis to determine required replicate numbers

    • Biological replicates (different protein preparations)

    • Technical replicates (repeated measurements of the same sample)

Statistical approaches should account for the complexity of protein interaction networks, similar to those required for analyzing the multiple TEP protein interactions with the LRIM1/APL1C complex in A. gambiae .

How might lingerer protein function be related to mosquito immunity against Plasmodium?

Investigating potential immune roles requires systematic approaches:

  • Expression analysis during infection:

    • qRT-PCR to measure transcriptional changes

    • Western blotting to detect protein level alterations

    • Immunolocalization to identify cellular distribution changes

  • Functional assessment approaches:

    • RNAi-mediated knockdown followed by parasite challenge

    • Transgenic overexpression to test for enhanced resistance

    • In vitro binding assays with parasite proteins

  • Comparative analysis with known immune factors:

    • Co-expression pattern with established immunity genes

    • Regulatory pathway analysis (IMD, Toll, JAK/STAT)

    • Potential interaction with complement-like proteins such as TEP1 and the LRIM1/APL1C complex

This investigation would parallel studies of other A. gambiae proteins that have revealed their roles in defense against Plasmodium parasites.

What approaches can be used to study the tissue and developmental expression patterns of lingerer protein?

Understanding expression patterns provides functional insights:

  • Transcriptional analysis:

    • RNA-seq across tissues and developmental stages

    • Single-cell transcriptomics for cellular resolution

    • In situ hybridization to visualize mRNA localization

  • Protein-level detection:

    • Generation of specific antibodies for immunohistochemistry

    • Western blotting of tissue extracts

    • Mass spectrometry-based proteomics across tissues

  • Reporter gene approaches:

    • Transgenic mosquitoes expressing lingerer promoter-reporter constructs

    • CRISPR/Cas9-mediated endogenous tagging

  • Functional correlation:

    • Relate expression patterns to physiological processes

    • Compare with expression patterns of interacting proteins

    • Analyze expression changes in response to environmental stimuli

These approaches are similar to those used to study odorant binding proteins in A. gambiae, where tissue-specific expression patterns provided insights into protein function .

How can CRISPR/Cas9 technology be applied to study lingerer protein function in vivo?

CRISPR/Cas9 offers powerful approaches for functional genomics:

  • Gene knockout strategies:

    • Complete gene deletion to assess null phenotype

    • Introduction of premature stop codons

    • Frame-shifting indels in early exons

  • Precise gene editing:

    • Point mutations to test specific amino acid functions

    • Domain deletions to map functional regions

    • Introduction of human disease-associated variants

  • Protein tagging:

    • C-terminal or N-terminal fluorescent protein fusions

    • Epitope tagging for immunoprecipitation

    • BioID or APEX2 fusions for proximity labeling

  • Regulatory element manipulation:

    • Promoter modifications to alter expression levels

    • Enhancer deletion to understand tissue-specific regulation

    • Engineering inducible expression systems

These approaches could help resolve questions about lingerer protein function in the context of speciation barriers and introgression patterns observed in the Anopheles species complex .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.