Recombinant Antechinus stuartii Glutathione S-transferase

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder. We will ship the format in stock. If you have special format requirements, please note them when ordering.
Lead Time
Delivery time may vary based on purchase method and location. Consult local distributors for specific delivery times. All proteins are shipped with blue ice packs by default. For dry ice shipping, contact us in advance; extra fees apply.
Notes
Avoid repeated freezing and thawing. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening. Reconstitute protein in sterile deionized water to 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. Add 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquot for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default final glycerol concentration is 50%.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on storage conditions, buffer ingredients, storage temperature, and protein stability. Liquid form: 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. Lyophilized form: 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
Glutathione S-transferase; EC 2.5.1.18; GST class-alpha) [Cleaved into: Glutathione S-transferase; N-terminally processed]
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-221
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Antechinus stuartii (Brown marsupial mouse)
Target Protein Sequence
MAGEQNIKYF NIKGRMEAIR WLLAVAGVEF EEKFFETKEQ LQKLKETVLL FQQVPMVEID GMKLVQTRAI LHYIAEKYNL LGKDMKEHAQ IIMYSEGTMD LMELIMIYPF LKGEEKKQRL VEIANKAKGR YFPAFENVLK THGQNFLVGN QLSMADVQLF EAILMVEEKV PDALSGFPLL QAFKTRISNI PTVKTFLAPG SKRKPVPDAK YVEDIIKIFY F
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Conjugates reduced glutathione to various exogenous and endogenous hydrophobic electrophiles.
Protein Families
GST superfamily, Alpha family
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm.

Q&A

What is Glutathione S-transferase from Antechinus stuartii and what characterizes its isoenzymes?

Glutathione S-transferase from Antechinus stuartii is a family of detoxification enzymes involved in conjugating reduced glutathione to various electrophilic compounds. The five identified isoenzymes from hepatic cytosol are characterized by their structural and catalytic properties, including:

  • Apparent molecular weight and isoelectric point

  • Substrate specificity toward model substrates

  • Kinetic parameters

  • Sensitivity to inhibitors

  • Cross-reactivity with antisera raised against human GSTs

The alpha class GST (Antechinus GST 1-1) shows high activity with cumene hydroperoxide, which is characteristic of alpha class GSTs. This predominant isoenzyme appears to play a crucial role in peroxidase activity and detoxification metabolism in marsupials .

How can native Glutathione S-transferase be purified from Antechinus stuartii tissues?

Purification of native Glutathione S-transferase from Antechinus stuartii involves a multi-step process similar to that used for other species:

  • Tissue preparation: Harvest and homogenize hepatic tissue in a suitable buffer

  • Subcellular fractionation: Isolate cytosolic fraction through differential centrifugation

  • Affinity chromatography: Utilize GSH-agarose or S-hexyl GSH-agarose columns in series

  • Further purification: Apply anion exchange chromatography to separate individual isoforms

  • Confirmation: Analyze purified fractions by RP-HPLC to confirm purity

This approach has been successfully used for GST purification from other species and can be adapted for Antechinus stuartii . The purified enzymes should be characterized by substrate specificity assays, particularly using 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (CDNB) as a standard substrate .

What expression systems are recommended for recombinant production of Antechinus stuartii Glutathione S-transferase?

Several expression systems can be used for recombinant production of Antechinus stuartii Glutathione S-transferase:

  • Bacterial expression (E. coli):

    • Vectors: pBEST or pET vectors are suitable for high-level expression

    • Advantages: Quick growth, high protein yields, well-established protocols

    • Considerations: Lack of post-translational modifications, potential inclusion body formation

  • Mammalian expression (COS or CHO cells):

    • Vectors: pME18S-FL3 vector

    • Advantages: Proper folding and post-translational modifications

    • Methods: Calcium phosphate precipitation, electroporation, or lipofectamine transfection

  • Insect cell expression (Baculovirus):

    • Advantages: Higher eukaryotic system with proper folding

    • Suitable for marsupial proteins due to closer evolutionary relationship than bacteria

The choice depends on research objectives - bacterial systems are preferable for structural studies requiring high yields, while mammalian systems may be better for functional studies where proper folding and modifications are critical .

What is the general workflow for cloning and expressing recombinant Antechinus stuartii Glutathione S-transferase?

The workflow involves these methodological steps:

  • cDNA synthesis:

    • Extract total RNA from Antechinus stuartii hepatic tissue

    • Synthesize full-length cDNA using oligo-capping methods and specialized primers

    • Verify full-length status using ATGpr or comparison with ESTs

  • Vector construction:

    • Clone the verified cDNA into an appropriate expression vector (e.g., pBluescript for cloning, pET for expression)

    • Perform ligation using standard restriction enzyme methods

  • Transformation and expression:

    • Transform host cells with the constructed vector

    • Induce expression under optimized conditions

    • Monitor expression using SDS-PAGE and Western blotting

  • Purification:

    • Lyse cells using appropriate buffer systems

    • Utilize affinity chromatography (GSH-agarose columns)

    • Apply additional purification steps as needed (ion exchange, gel filtration)

  • Validation:

    • Verify enzymatic activity using standard GST substrates

    • Compare structural and functional properties with native enzyme

How do the kinetic parameters of recombinant and native Antechinus stuartii Glutathione S-transferase compare?

When comparing recombinant and native forms of GST, several kinetic parameters should be evaluated:

ParameterMethodologyExpected Comparison
Km for GSHVarying GSH concentration with fixed CDNBShould be comparable between forms if properly folded
Km for CDNBVarying CDNB with fixed GSHMay show slight differences due to expression system
VmaxMichaelis-Menten kineticsShould be within 10-15% if functional equivalence exists
Catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km)Derived from kinetic dataCritical for establishing functional equivalence
Substrate specificityActivity with various substrates (CDNB, ethacrynic acid, cumene hydroperoxide)Should maintain relative preferences across substrates

Based on studies with other recombinant GSTs, properly produced recombinant enzymes typically show comparable enzymatic activity to their native counterparts. For example, in studies with Alternaria alternata GST, recombinant and native forms demonstrated similar enzymatic activities and thermal stability with melting temperatures of 57°C and 59°C respectively .

The most significant challenge is maintaining the quaternary structure of GST isoenzymes, as they function as dimers. Verification of proper dimerization in recombinant preparations is essential for ensuring native-like activity .

What approaches can be used to improve the solubility and yield of recombinant Antechinus stuartii Glutathione S-transferase?

Improving solubility and yield requires methodological optimization at multiple levels:

  • Expression vector optimization:

    • Use vectors with optimal promoters for the host system

    • Include solubility-enhancing fusion tags (MBP, SUMO, or thioredoxin)

    • Incorporate appropriate secretion signals if using eukaryotic systems

  • Expression conditions optimization:

    • Reduce expression temperature (16-25°C) to slow folding and prevent aggregation

    • Use specialized E. coli strains (Rosetta, Origami) that enhance disulfide bond formation

    • Co-express molecular chaperones to assist folding

    • Optimize induction conditions (IPTG concentration, induction time)

  • Buffer optimization during purification:

    • Include stabilizing agents (glycerol 5-10%, reducing agents)

    • Optimize pH based on isoelectric points of GST isoforms

    • Add low concentrations of substrate or product analog to stabilize active site

  • Refolding strategies for inclusion bodies:

    • Solubilize with mild detergents rather than high concentrations of denaturants

    • Use step-wise dialysis with decreasing denaturant concentrations

    • Include oxidized/reduced glutathione pairs to facilitate correct disulfide formation

Yield improvements of 3-5 fold are typically achievable through systematic optimization of these parameters, while maintaining functional equivalence to the native enzyme.

How can site-directed mutagenesis be used to investigate functional roles of specific amino acid residues in Antechinus stuartii Glutathione S-transferase?

Site-directed mutagenesis provides a powerful approach to understand structure-function relationships:

  • Target selection strategies:

    • Identify conserved residues across GST classes through multiple sequence alignment

    • Focus on residues in the G-site (glutathione binding) and H-site (hydrophobic substrate binding)

    • Examine residues at subunit interfaces important for dimerization

  • Mutagenesis approach:

    • Use PCR-based methods like QuikChange for single residue substitutions

    • Create conservative substitutions first (e.g., Asp→Glu) before more disruptive changes

    • Introduce mutations that alter charge, hydrophobicity, or size based on specific hypotheses

  • Functional analysis of mutants:

    • Compare kinetic parameters (Km, Vmax, kcat) with wild-type enzyme

    • Assess substrate specificity changes across multiple substrates

    • Evaluate structural changes using circular dichroism or thermal stability assays

    • Analyze dimerization using size-exclusion chromatography

  • Structure-based interpretation:

    • Map mutations onto homology models or crystal structures

    • Correlate functional changes with structural perturbations

    • Use molecular dynamics simulations to predict effects of mutations

This approach has been successfully used with other GSTs to identify catalytic residues, substrate-specificity determinants, and stability factors, and can be applied to understand the unique properties of Antechinus stuartii GST isoforms.

What techniques are most effective for structural characterization of recombinant Antechinus stuartii Glutathione S-transferase?

A comprehensive structural characterization requires multiple complementary techniques:

  • Secondary structure analysis:

    • Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy to determine α-helix and β-sheet content

    • Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) for additional secondary structure information

    • Thermal denaturation studies to determine melting temperature and stability

  • Tertiary structure determination:

    • X-ray crystallography for high-resolution structure (requires crystals of purified protein)

    • Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) for solution structure (limited by protein size)

    • Cryo-electron microscopy for larger complexes or challenging proteins

  • Quaternary structure analysis:

    • Size-exclusion chromatography to confirm dimerization

    • Analytical ultracentrifugation for precise molecular weight and shape determination

    • Dynamic light scattering for homogeneity assessment

  • Protein dynamics:

    • Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry to probe conformational flexibility

    • Molecular dynamics simulations based on structural models

For recombinant Antechinus stuartii GST, comparing these structural features with the native enzyme is essential to confirm proper folding and functional equivalence. Previous studies with other GSTs have shown that recombinant and native forms typically exhibit comparable secondary structures with similar melting temperatures, as seen in Alternaria alternata GST where the recombinant and native forms had melting temperatures of 57°C and 59°C, respectively .

How do post-translational modifications differ between recombinant and native Antechinus stuartii Glutathione S-transferase?

Post-translational modifications (PTMs) may differ significantly between recombinant and native GSTs depending on the expression system:

PTM TypeNative GSTBacterial ExpressionMammalian ExpressionDetection Method
PhosphorylationPotential regulatory sitesAbsentSimilar to nativePhospho-specific antibodies, MS
GlycosylationMinimal in cytosolic GSTsAbsentSimilar to nativeGlycan staining, MS
AcetylationPotential N-terminal modificationOften missingSimilar to nativeMS analysis
Disulfide bondsImportant for stabilityMay form incorrectlyProperly formedNon-reducing SDS-PAGE
Proteolytic processingMature formMay retain Met startProperly processedN-terminal sequencing, MS

For Antechinus stuartii GST, the impact of these modifications on function must be evaluated experimentally. Approaches include:

  • Mass spectrometry-based proteomics to map all modifications

  • Activity comparisons between different expression systems

  • Site-directed mutagenesis to eliminate potential modification sites

While bacterial systems lack most eukaryotic PTMs, they often produce functionally equivalent GSTs since many cytosolic GSTs have minimal essential modifications. For studies where PTMs are critical, mammalian expression systems (COS or CHO cells) would be recommended .

How can recombinant Antechinus stuartii Glutathione S-transferase be used as a model to study marsupial detoxification systems?

Recombinant Antechinus stuartii GST provides a valuable model for studying marsupial detoxification systems through several research approaches:

  • Comparative biochemistry:

    • Compare substrate preferences and kinetic parameters with GSTs from other marsupials

    • Identify marsupial-specific adaptations in detoxification pathways

    • Correlate GST properties with ecological niche and diet (insectivorous in Antechinus)

  • Xenobiotic metabolism studies:

    • Test activity against natural and synthetic toxins

    • Compare detoxification efficiency between marsupial and eutherian GSTs

    • Investigate the role of alpha class GSTs in peroxidase activity in marsupials

  • Evolutionary studies:

    • Perform phylogenetic analysis of GST sequences across marsupial species

    • Identify conserved and divergent regions that reflect evolutionary pressures

    • Compare with both herbivorous marsupials (e.g., brushtail possum) and humans

  • Environmental toxicology applications:

    • Develop recombinant GST-based assays for environmental contaminants

    • Use as biomarkers for environmental exposure in marsupial conservation

The evolutionary conservation of a predominant alpha class GST with peroxidase activity across different marsupial species suggests an important role in detoxification metabolism in these unique mammals . Recombinant GST allows for detailed mechanistic studies without requiring additional samples from wild populations.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.