As part of the COX complex (EC 1.9.3.1), this subunit contributes to:
Tissue Specificity: Primarily expressed in root/shoot meristems, vascular tissues, and reproductive organs (anthers, stigma)
Developmental Regulation:
Promoter Features:
A comparison of COX subunits reveals evolutionary divergence:
This recombinant protein is commercially available (CUSABIO Cat# CSB-CF866973DOA) for:
This protein is a nuclear-encoded polypeptide chain of cytochrome c oxidase, the terminal oxidase in the mitochondrial electron transport chain.
The recombinant full-length Arabidopsis thaliana Probable cytochrome c oxidase subunit 5C-3 (At5g61310) is a 64-amino acid protein (residues 1-64) with UniProt ID Q9FLK2. Its amino acid sequence is MAGHKIAHATLKGPSVVKELVIGLTLGLAAGGLWKMHHWNEQRKTRVFYDLLERGEIGVVVTEE . For research applications, the protein is typically expressed in E. coli with an N-terminal His-tag to facilitate purification. The protein is available in lyophilized powder form with greater than 90% purity as determined by SDS-PAGE analysis .
At5g61310 expression exhibits distinct tissue-specific patterns that can be visualized using the gus reporter gene system. Expression is predominantly localized in:
Root and shoot meristems
Actively growing tissues
Vascular strands
Floral tissues (specifically anthers, stigma, and receptacle)
Researchers investigating tissue-specific expression should note that GUS activity measurements in protein extracts from transformed plants indicate that At5g61310's expression levels exceed those observed with the constitutive CaMV 35S promoter, making it particularly valuable for studies requiring high expression in specific tissues .
The leader intron in the 5'-non-coding region of At5g61310 plays a critical role in gene expression regulation. Experimental evidence demonstrates that removal of this leader intron results in a significant decrease in expression to levels only slightly higher than those observed with a promoterless gus gene .
Methodologically, this can be investigated through:
Constructing gene fusions with and without the leader intron
Transforming plants with these constructs
Measuring GUS activity quantitatively in protein extracts
Performing histochemical staining to visualize spatial expression patterns
When the leader intron is removed, expression becomes restricted primarily to pollen, suggesting that regulatory elements capable of directing pollen-specific expression reside upstream of the intron . The intron also appears to enhance translation efficiency of the corresponding mRNA, as evidenced by comparisons of GUS activity values with transcript levels .
Investigating At5g61310's role in mitochondrial function requires a multi-faceted experimental approach:
Protein localization studies: Use fluorescently tagged At5g61310 constructs to confirm mitochondrial localization and association with Complex IV.
Respiratory measurements: Assess oxygen consumption rates in wild-type plants versus those with altered At5g61310 expression using oxygen electrodes.
Blue Native PAGE: Analyze intact respiratory complexes to determine if At5g61310 modifications affect assembly or stability of Complex IV.
Proteomics analysis: Employ comparative proteomics to identify changes in the mitochondrial proteome resulting from altered At5g61310 expression.
Environmental stress tests: Evaluate the impact of stressors (particularly low temperature) on At5g61310 expression and mitochondrial function.
These approaches should be adapted from experimental designs used in studies of other mitochondrial respiratory chain components, such as those employed in studying complex I and III subunits under various environmental conditions .
To effectively compare functional differences between At5g61310 (COX5c-3) and other COX5c isoforms, researchers should implement a systematic experimental design following these methodological steps:
Gene expression profiling: Analyze transcript abundance of all COX5c isoforms across tissues and under various environmental conditions.
Mutant analysis: Generate single and multiple knockout/knockdown lines for COX5c isoforms using CRISPR/Cas9 or T-DNA insertion lines.
Complementation studies: Perform cross-complementation experiments by expressing each isoform in knockout backgrounds of other isoforms.
Protein-protein interaction studies: Use techniques such as yeast two-hybrid or co-immunoprecipitation to identify differential interactions between isoforms and other respiratory complex components.
Respiratory activity measurements: Compare cytochrome c oxidase activity in plants with altered expression of different isoforms.
When designing these experiments, it's critical to control for extraneous variables and properly formulate testable hypotheses regarding isoform-specific functions . This approach can reveal whether subunit swapping occurs among COX5c isoforms similar to what has been observed in other respiratory complexes .
For optimal expression and purification of recombinant At5g61310, researchers should follow this detailed protocol:
Expression system selection: Use E. coli as the expression host with an N-terminal His-tag fusion for purification purposes .
Culture conditions: Grow transformed E. coli under standard conditions with appropriate antibiotic selection.
Induction optimization: Test various IPTG concentrations and induction temperatures to maximize protein yield while maintaining proper folding.
Purification protocol:
Storage recommendations:
Store as lyophilized powder at -20°C/-80°C
After reconstitution in deionized sterile water (0.1-1.0 mg/mL), add glycerol to a final concentration of 5-50% (50% is recommended)
Aliquot for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles
Quality control: Verify protein identity by mass spectrometry and assess activity if functional assays are available.
Based on studies of other mitochondrial respiratory chain components, researchers investigating At5g61310 responses to environmental stressors should consider the following methodological approach:
Transcriptomic analysis: Monitor At5g61310 transcript levels under various stressors, particularly low temperature (LT), using RT-qPCR or RNA-seq.
Protein abundance quantification: Use Western blotting or quantitative proteomics to determine if At5g61310 protein levels change in response to stressors.
Stress treatment regimens:
Acute cold stress (e.g., 4°C for 48h)
Gradual temperature reduction
Varying light conditions during stress
Combined stressors (e.g., cold and drought)
Functional analysis:
Measure respiratory rates under stress conditions
Assess ROS production
Evaluate mitochondrial membrane potential
Current evidence suggests that mitochondrial respiratory complexes undergo compositional changes in response to LT, including potential subunit swapping . For instance, some complex III subunits (UCR1) decrease in abundance under severe cold stress but increase under milder cold conditions . Similar responses might occur with At5g61310, potentially as an adaptive mechanism to maintain respiratory function under stress.
To effectively study the regulatory elements in the At5g61310 promoter and leader intron, researchers should employ these methodological approaches:
Promoter deletion analysis: Create a series of constructs with progressive deletions of the 5' upstream region fused to a reporter gene (e.g., GUS).
Intron deletion/mutation analysis: Generate constructs with:
Complete intron removal
Partial intron deletions
Site-directed mutations of putative regulatory motifs
Reporter gene assays: Transform plants with these constructs and assess:
Promoter-intron swapping experiments: Test whether the At5g61310 intron can enhance expression when placed in the context of unrelated promoters, such as the COX5b-1 promoter .
Transcription factor binding studies:
Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA)
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)
Yeast one-hybrid screens
This experimental approach has revealed that the COX5c-2 intron increases GUS expression levels when fused in the correct orientation with the promoter of the unrelated COX5b-1 gene, suggesting that the intron contains orientation-dependent enhancer elements .
For researchers working with recombinant At5g61310 protein, optimal storage and reconstitution protocols are critical for maintaining protein stability and activity:
Storage conditions:
Store lyophilized powder at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt
After reconstitution, store in aliquots at -20°C/-80°C
Working aliquots may be stored at 4°C for up to one week
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles as this can compromise protein integrity
Reconstitution protocol:
Briefly centrifuge the vial prior to opening to bring contents to the bottom
Reconstitute in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL
Add glycerol to a final concentration of 5-50% (recommended: 50%)
The protein is typically supplied in a Tris/PBS-based buffer containing 6% Trehalose at pH 8.0, which helps maintain stability in the lyophilized form .
When designing experiments to study At5g61310 function under varying environmental conditions, researchers should apply these structured experimental design principles:
Clearly define variables:
Formulate testable hypotheses:
Design treatments with appropriate controls:
Control for confounding variables:
Data analysis considerations:
This methodical approach ensures that experiments yield reliable and reproducible results regarding At5g61310's response to environmental stimuli.
When investigating how At5g61310 expression and function compare to other cytochrome c oxidase subunits under stress conditions, researchers should implement comparative experimental approaches:
Simultaneous expression analysis:
Perform RT-qPCR or RNA-seq to quantify transcript levels of multiple COX subunits
Compare expression patterns across tissues and stress conditions
Analyze correlation between expression of different subunits
Protein abundance comparisons:
Use quantitative proteomics to measure changes in multiple COX subunits simultaneously
Apply western blotting with subunit-specific antibodies
Assess stoichiometric relationships between subunits
Functional analysis:
Compare phenotypes of mutants affected in different COX subunits
Evaluate respiratory parameters in these mutants under stress
Assess mitochondrial morphology and dynamics
Available data on other respiratory chain components suggest that different subunits can show distinct responses to stress. For example, while some complex III subunits (UCR1) decrease in abundance under severe cold stress, others like QCR7−1 and CYC1−1 increase, while their isoforms QCR7−2 and CYC1−2 decrease . This suggests the possibility of subunit swapping as an adaptive response to stress, a phenomenon that might also apply to cytochrome c oxidase subunits including At5g61310.
To effectively compare the tissue-specific roles of different COX5c isoforms, researchers should employ these methodological approaches:
Promoter-reporter gene fusions:
Isoform-specific antibodies:
Develop antibodies specific to each COX5c isoform
Perform immunolocalization studies
Use western blotting to compare protein levels across tissues
Isoform-specific knockout/knockdown lines:
Generate CRISPR/Cas9 or RNAi lines for each isoform
Compare phenotypes, particularly in tissues where expression overlaps
Assess respiratory parameters in affected tissues
Complementation studies with tissue-specific promoters:
Express each isoform under the control of tissue-specific promoters in knockout backgrounds
Determine if isoforms can functionally substitute for each other in specific tissues
Cell-type specific transcriptomics:
Use fluorescence-activated cell sorting or laser capture microdissection
Compare isoform expression in specific cell types
Identify co-expressed genes that might indicate functional specialization
This comparative approach has revealed that regulatory elements in the 5'-non-coding regions, particularly leader introns, are essential for the tissue-specific expression patterns of COX5c genes .
Investigating potential post-translational modifications (PTMs) of At5g61310 requires sophisticated analytical techniques:
Mass spectrometry-based approaches:
Perform LC-MS/MS analysis of purified At5g61310 protein
Use multiple protease digestions to achieve comprehensive sequence coverage
Apply PTM-specific enrichment strategies (e.g., phosphopeptide enrichment)
Quantify modification stoichiometry under different conditions
Site-directed mutagenesis:
Mutate potential PTM sites identified by mass spectrometry
Express mutant proteins in planta
Assess functional consequences of preventing specific modifications
In vitro modification assays:
Test susceptibility of purified At5g61310 to various modifying enzymes
Determine how modifications affect protein-protein interactions or activity
Modification-specific antibodies:
Develop antibodies that recognize specific PTMs on At5g61310
Use these for western blotting and immunoprecipitation experiments
Assess changes in modification status under different conditions
Given that respiratory complex subunits often undergo PTMs in response to environmental stresses , investigating how such modifications might regulate At5g61310 function represents an important area for future research.
Advanced gene editing approaches offer powerful tools for studying At5g61310 function:
CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing:
Generate complete knockout lines by introducing frameshift mutations
Create specific amino acid substitutions to study structure-function relationships
Develop conditional knockout systems (e.g., with inducible promoters)
Implement multiplexed editing to target multiple COX5c isoforms simultaneously
Base editing approaches:
Introduce specific point mutations without double-strand breaks
Target conserved residues predicted to be functionally important
Create subtle mutations that may not completely abolish function
Epitope tagging at endogenous loci:
Add fluorescent protein or affinity tags to the endogenous At5g61310 gene
Maintain native expression patterns and regulatory elements
Enable visualization of subcellular localization and protein complex formation
Promoter editing:
Modify regulatory elements in the promoter or leader intron
Assess effects on tissue-specific expression patterns
Create plants with altered expression levels but maintaining tissue specificity
These advanced gene editing approaches, combined with proper experimental design principles , will enable more precise dissection of At5g61310 function than traditional methods like T-DNA insertions or constitutive overexpression.