Recombinant Arabidopsis thaliana Protein PHLOEM PROTEIN 2-LIKE A10, referred to here as PP2A10, is a protein derived from the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana. This protein is part of the broader family of proteins involved in various cellular processes, including signaling and regulation within plant tissues. The recombinant form of PP2A10 is produced through biotechnological methods, allowing for its use in research and potential applications in biotechnology.
PP2A10 is produced in various expression systems, including yeast, E. coli, baculovirus, and mammalian cells, depending on the desired characteristics and applications of the protein . This flexibility in production systems allows researchers to tailor the protein's properties, such as purity and stability, to specific experimental needs.
| Production System | Characteristics | Applications |
|---|---|---|
| Yeast | High purity, cost-effective | Basic research, biotechnology |
| E. coli | Rapid production, scalable | Large-scale biotechnology applications |
| Baculovirus | High expression levels, complex post-translational modifications | Advanced biotechnology, vaccine development |
| Mammalian cells | Native-like post-translational modifications, high complexity | Pharmaceutical applications, advanced research |
Given the importance of Arabidopsis thaliana as a model organism in plant biology, proteins like PP2A10 could have potential applications in:
Biotechnology: Enhancing stress tolerance or improving growth characteristics in crops.
Basic Research: Understanding cellular signaling pathways and protein function in plants.
Pharmaceuticals: Exploring novel therapeutic targets based on plant-derived proteins.
While the abbreviation may cause confusion, these are distinct proteins with different functions. PHLOEM PROTEIN 2-LIKE A10 belongs to the phloem protein family involved in phloem structure and function, whereas Protein Phosphatase 2A is a heterotrimeric complex comprising catalytic (C), regulatory (B), and scaffolding (A) subunits that functions as a Ser/Thr phosphatase. The Arabidopsis genome encodes multiple isoforms for each PP2A subunit (3 As, 17 Bs, and 5 Cs) . When working with either protein, researchers should clearly specify which one they are investigating to avoid misinterpretation of results.
PP2A10 expression should be analyzed using multiple complementary approaches:
RT-qPCR analysis across different tissues and developmental stages
Promoter-reporter fusion constructs (PP2A10pro:GUS or PP2A10pro:GFP) to visualize tissue-specific expression
RNA-seq data analysis from public databases such as TAIR or BAR
Immunolocalization using specific antibodies if available
Researchers should compare expression data with other phloem-related genes to contextualize the spatiotemporal patterns of PP2A10 expression in vascular tissues.
The recommended purification protocol involves:
Cloning the full PP2A10 coding sequence into an expression vector with appropriate tags (His, GST, or MBP)
Expressing in E. coli (BL21 strain) or insect cell systems for higher eukaryotic protein processing
Inducing expression at lower temperatures (16-18°C) to enhance proper folding
Cell lysis under native conditions using appropriate buffers (typically containing 20-50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 100-300 mM NaCl, 5-10% glycerol)
Affinity chromatography based on the fusion tag
Size exclusion chromatography for final purification
Analysis by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting to confirm purity
Researchers should optimize buffer conditions and expression systems based on the specific properties of PP2A10 to maximize yield and activity.
Creating and validating knockout lines requires a systematic approach:
CRISPR/Cas9 targeting:
Design at least 2-3 guide RNAs targeting different regions of the PP2A10 gene
Use Arabidopsis-optimized CRISPR/Cas9 vectors
Transform via Agrobacterium-mediated floral dip method
T-DNA insertion lines:
Obtain existing T-DNA insertion lines from stock centers (ABRC, NASC)
Screen using PCR-based genotyping with gene-specific and T-DNA border primers
Validation steps:
Genotyping PCR to confirm mutation
RT-qPCR to verify reduced/absent transcript levels
Western blotting using specific antibodies to confirm protein absence
Complementation with functional PP2A10 to rescue phenotypes
Analysis of off-target effects in CRISPR lines
Phenotypic characterization:
Careful examination of plant development, especially vascular tissues
Microscopic analysis of phloem structure
Translocation assays using radioactive tracers or fluorescent dyes
Multiple complementary techniques should be employed:
| Method | Advantages | Limitations | Key Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yeast Two-Hybrid (Y2H) | High-throughput screening | Prone to false positives | Use appropriate controls; verify interactions with other methods |
| Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) | Detects interactions in native context | Requires specific antibodies | Use mild detergent conditions to preserve interactions |
| Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC) | Visualizes interactions in planta | Irreversible complex formation | Include proper negative controls and analyze subcellular localization |
| Pull-down assays | Tests direct interactions | Uses in vitro conditions | Ensure proper protein folding of recombinant proteins |
| Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) | Real-time interaction dynamics | Complex setup and analysis | Careful fluorophore selection and controls for spectral overlap |
As demonstrated in studies with Protein Phosphatase 2A, assessing protein interactions with transcription factors like SPCH requires careful experimental design to detect transient interactions . The same principles apply when investigating PP2A10 interaction partners.
Developing a specific antibody requires:
Epitope selection:
Analyze the protein sequence for unique regions not conserved in other family members
Select 15-20 amino acid peptides from exposed regions
Alternative: use recombinant full-length protein as antigen
Immunization:
Use KLH or BSA conjugated peptides
Immunize rabbits or other appropriate host species
Follow a standard immunization schedule with boosters
Antibody purification:
Affinity purification using the antigen
Cross-adsorption against related proteins to reduce cross-reactivity
Validation:
Western blot using wild-type and knockout tissues
Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry
Immunolocalization comparing signal in wild-type and knockout plants
Peptide competition assays to confirm specificity
Investigating functional relationships requires multiple approaches:
Comparative phylogenetic analysis:
Align PP2A10 with other phloem proteins
Construct phylogenetic trees to identify closely related members
Analyze conserved domains and motifs
Expression correlation:
Analyze co-expression networks from RNA-seq data
Identify genes with similar expression patterns across tissues and conditions
Mutant phenotype comparison:
Compare phenotypes of pp2a10 mutants with other phloem protein mutants
Generate double or triple mutants to test for genetic interactions
Analyze phenotypes under different environmental conditions
Biochemical function analysis:
Characterize protein localization and mobility
Compare protein-protein interaction networks
Evaluate roles in callose deposition and phloem transport
Effective techniques include:
Phloem loading/unloading assays:
Use fluorescent dyes (e.g., CFDA) to track phloem transport
Employ radioactive tracers (14C-sucrose) for quantitative analysis
Compare transport dynamics between wild-type and pp2a10 mutants
Graft compatibility studies:
Create grafts between wild-type and pp2a10 mutants
Analyze phloem reconnection and long-distance signaling
Evaluate transport of RNA, proteins, and hormones
Phloem sap collection and analysis:
Use stylectomy or EDTA-facilitated exudation methods
Analyze phloem sap composition by mass spectrometry
Compare metabolite and protein profiles between genotypes
Real-time imaging:
Use PP2A10-GFP fusions to track protein dynamics
Employ FRAP (Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching) to assess mobility
Apply correlative light and electron microscopy for ultrastructural context
When faced with contradictory results:
Critically evaluate experimental conditions:
Compare growth conditions, developmental stages, and tissue specificity
Analyze genetic backgrounds and potential compensatory mechanisms
Consider post-translational modifications affecting protein function
Design decisive experiments:
Develop tissue-specific or inducible knockout/overexpression lines
Use multiple independent lines to rule out insertion effects
Employ complementation with site-directed mutants to test mechanistic hypotheses
Integrate multiple data types:
Combine transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics approaches
Analyze global changes in mutant backgrounds
Develop mathematical models to reconcile seemingly contradictory data
Consider protein complexes:
Investigate if PP2A10 functions in different protein complexes
Test if environmental conditions affect complex formation
Analyze post-translational modifications that might regulate function
Translating research requires:
Identification of orthologs:
BLAST searches against crop genomes
Phylogenetic analysis to confirm orthology relationships
Domain structure comparison to validate functional conservation
Functional conservation testing:
Complement Arabidopsis pp2a10 mutants with crop orthologs
Create crop CRISPR knockouts based on Arabidopsis phenotypes
Compare expression patterns in corresponding tissues
Application strategies:
Develop molecular markers for breeding programs
Create transgenic crops with modified ortholog expression
Target upstream regulators identified in Arabidopsis
Similar approaches have been successful in translating other Arabidopsis discoveries to crops. Studies conducted by Corteva Agriscience from 2000 to 2018 used Arabidopsis as a pre-screening platform for candidate genes, testing 35,000 genes identified from Arabidopsis in maize field trials, resulting in 22 promising genes for crop improvement .
A comprehensive stress analysis would include:
Expression analysis under stress conditions:
Quantify PP2A10 transcript and protein levels under drought, salt, heat, cold, and pathogen stresses
Analyze promoter activity using reporter lines under stress
Compare with known stress-responsive genes
Phenotypic characterization:
Evaluate pp2a10 mutant responses to multiple stresses
Measure physiological parameters (photosynthesis, transpiration, ROS levels)
Assess recovery after stress removal
Biochemical interaction changes:
Determine if stress alters PP2A10's interaction partners
Analyze post-translational modifications under stress
Test if stress affects protein stability or localization
Grafting experiments:
Graft pp2a10 scions to wild-type rootstocks and vice versa
Apply stress and analyze systemic responses
Determine if PP2A10 affects long-distance stress signaling
Research contributions include:
Pathogen response studies:
Challenge pp2a10 mutants with diverse pathogens
Analyze changes in susceptibility or resistance
Examine phloem-based defense responses
Defense signaling mechanisms:
Test if PP2A10 affects salicylic acid, jasmonic acid, or ethylene pathways
Analyze systemic acquired resistance in mutants
Investigate interactions with known defense regulators
Translational applications:
Develop diagnostic markers based on PP2A10 expression changes during infection
Create transgenic plants with modified PP2A10 expression
Target PP2A10 regulators for enhanced disease resistance
Studies in Arabidopsis have already demonstrated success in translating defense-related discoveries to crops. For example, host-induced gene silencing using RNAi to target the root-knot nematode parasitism gene 16D10 was first demonstrated in Arabidopsis before application in crops .
Inconsistent activity could result from:
Protein folding issues:
Test different expression systems (bacterial, yeast, insect cells)
Optimize induction conditions (temperature, IPTG concentration)
Include molecular chaperones during expression
Use fusion tags known to enhance solubility (MBP, SUMO)
Post-translational modifications:
Analyze purified protein by mass spectrometry to identify modifications
Express in eukaryotic systems to allow for proper modification
Test the effect of phosphatase or kinase treatment on activity
Buffer optimization:
Systematically test buffers with different pH values (pH 6.0-8.0)
Vary salt concentrations (50-500 mM NaCl)
Include stabilizing agents (glycerol, reducing agents)
Test different detergents for membrane-associated forms
Protein quality control:
Analyze batch-to-batch variation by SDS-PAGE and activity assays
Implement strict storage protocols to prevent degradation
Consider freeze-thaw effects and use fresh preparations when possible
Cross-reactivity can be addressed by:
Antibody purification strategies:
Perform affinity purification against the specific antigen
Include negative selection against related proteins
Use differential adsorption to remove cross-reactive antibodies
Epitope refinement:
Design new antibodies targeting unique regions of PP2A10
Use shorter peptides from highly specific regions
Consider monoclonal antibody development for higher specificity
Validation with controls:
Always include pp2a10 knockout samples as negative controls
Use recombinant proteins of related family members to test cross-reactivity
Perform peptide competition assays to confirm specificity
Alternative approaches:
Use epitope-tagged PP2A10 expressed under native promoter
Apply proximity labeling methods to avoid antibody limitations
Consider CRISPR/Cas9-mediated tagging of endogenous PP2A10