Recombinant Arabidopsis thaliana Protein PHLOEM PROTEIN 2-LIKE A2 (PP2A2) is a recombinant protein derived from the model organism Arabidopsis thaliana, commonly known as thale cress. This protein is part of a large gene family and is similar to phloem protein 2 found in cucumber. The PP2A2 protein is encoded by the gene AT4G19850 and is a member of the phloem protein family, which plays roles in plant development and possibly in defense mechanisms .
The recombinant PP2A2 protein is typically expressed in Escherichia coli or through cell-free expression systems. It is available in various formats, including lyophilized powder and liquid solutions containing glycerol. The protein has a molecular weight of approximately 22,480 Da and consists of 194 amino acids .
Plant Development Studies: Understanding the role of PP2A2 in plant development could lead to new strategies for improving crop yields and plant health.
Defense Mechanisms: Investigating PP2A2's involvement in plant defense could reveal novel pathways for enhancing resistance against pathogens.
Biotechnology: Recombinant PP2A2 could be used in biotechnological applications, such as developing new plant-based products or improving existing ones.
STRING: 3702.AT4G19850.2
Arabidopsis thaliana Protein PHLOEM PROTEIN 2-LIKE A2 (PP2A2) is a 194 amino acid protein with a molecular mass of approximately 22.5 kDa. Its complete amino acid sequence is MRVKRRKTVSCCTREISQLHGQSLKQINIGVGSLILTKHQGYEFYCKKVTFVFFCFFKISLNSAYLYTLYSDVRTEVAKMERVAWLEVVGKFETEKLTPNSLYEVVFVVKLIDSAKGWDFRVNFKLVLPTGETKERRENVNLLERNKWVEIPAGEFMISPEHLSGKIEFSMLEVKSDQWKSGLIVKGVAIRPKN . The protein belongs to the PP2 superfamily, which is characterized by a conserved PP2 domain typically located in the central and C-terminal regions of the protein . Like other members of this family, PP2A2 likely contains the conserved A, C, and D motifs that are highly preserved across species, with a less conserved B motif .
Although they share similar acronyms, PP2A2 (Protein PHLOEM PROTEIN 2-LIKE A2) and PP2A (Protein Phosphatase 2A) are distinct proteins with different functions in Arabidopsis thaliana. PP2A2 belongs to the phloem protein 2 family, which are abundant proteins in the phloem sap with potential lectin activity and RNA-binding properties . In contrast, PP2A refers to Protein Phosphatase 2A, a serine/threonine phosphatase composed of three subunits (A, B, and C) that plays crucial roles in biotic and abiotic stress signaling pathways . Protein Phosphatase 2A functions as a holoenzyme with the B subunit recognizing specific substrates, the C subunit directly acting on these substrates, and the A subunit bringing the B and C subunits together . The similar acronyms often cause confusion in literature and database searches.
PP2A2 belongs to the PP2 superfamily, which has ancient origins in the plant kingdom. The wide distribution of PP2-like genes across 17 angiosperm and gymnosperm genera indicates they are common and ancient in vascular plants . PP2-like genes appear to have evolved and specialized in parallel with the development of vascular tissues, suggesting they play important roles in vascular function . Their presence in cereals and gymnosperms, which lack structural P-protein, further supports that these proteins have wider physiological roles beyond structural functions . The conservation of the PP2 domain across diverse plant species highlights its evolutionary importance in plant development and function.
Based on studies of similar PP2-like proteins in plants, PP2A2 is likely specifically expressed in the phloem tissue, particularly in the sieve element-companion cell complex . In studies of PP2 genes in celery (Apium graveolens), expression of PP2 genes was shown to be tightly linked to vascular differentiation, with mRNA accumulating in both immature and differentiated sieve element-companion cell complexes . In situ hybridization experiments with related PP2 genes have demonstrated strong signal in the companion cell-sieve element complex in the phloem of petioles . This expression pattern is consistent with the role of PP2 proteins in phloem function and suggests that PP2A2 in Arabidopsis may follow a similar tissue-specific expression pattern.
To track the subcellular localization of PP2A2, researchers can employ several complementary approaches:
Fluorescent protein fusion: Creating a PP2A2-GFP (or other fluorescent protein) fusion construct and transforming it into Arabidopsis allows for real-time visualization of protein localization using confocal microscopy.
Immunolocalization: Developing specific antibodies against PP2A2 enables detection of the native protein in fixed tissue sections using immunofluorescence microscopy.
Subcellular fractionation: Isolating different cellular components (membrane, cytosol, nucleus) followed by Western blotting with PP2A2-specific antibodies can determine the protein's distribution across cellular compartments.
Co-localization studies: Combining PP2A2 detection with markers for different cellular structures (e.g., ER, Golgi, plasma membrane) can precisely determine its subcellular residence.
The variations in the pI of PP2-like proteins observed in Arabidopsis suggest potential differences in subcellular localization among family members , making it important to specifically characterize PP2A2 localization rather than inferring it from other family members.
PP2 proteins, including PP2A2, are among the most abundant proteins in phloem sap and possess several important functional properties . They have demonstrated lectin activity (ability to bind carbohydrates) and RNA-binding properties, which may exert effects over long distances through the phloem translocation stream . While the specific functions of PP2A2 are still being elucidated, related PP2 proteins are thought to be involved in:
Phloem transport regulation
Defense against pathogens through their lectin activity
Long-distance signaling via RNA-binding and transport
Vascular tissue development and differentiation
Potential roles in stress responses
The presence of PP2 genes in cereals and gymnosperms, which lack structural P-protein, supports that these proteins have functions beyond structural roles in the phloem . The considerable size polymorphism and variations in electric charge among PP2 family members suggest functional diversification within this protein family .
While specific protein interactions of PP2A2 are not fully characterized in the available search results, insights can be drawn from studies of related proteins. Some PP2-like proteins in Arabidopsis contain N-terminal extensions with protein-protein interaction motifs such as F-box domains, suggesting they participate in processes requiring protein-protein interactions .
For experimental characterization of PP2A2 protein interactions, researchers could employ:
Yeast two-hybrid screening: To identify potential protein partners
Co-immunoprecipitation: To confirm direct interactions in plant tissues
Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC): To visualize interactions in planta
Protein microarrays: For high-throughput screening of potential interactors
Proximity-dependent biotin identification (BioID): To identify proteins in close proximity to PP2A2 in living cells
Understanding these interactions would provide insights into the signaling pathways and cellular processes in which PP2A2 participates.
For producing recombinant PP2A2, researchers can consider several expression systems with their respective advantages:
| Expression System | Advantages | Limitations | Typical Yield |
|---|---|---|---|
| E. coli | - Rapid growth - High expression levels - Cost-effective - Simple cultivation | - Lack of post-translational modifications - Potential inclusion body formation - Endotoxin contamination | 10-100 mg/L |
| Yeast (P. pastoris) | - Eukaryotic post-translational modifications - High-density cultivation - Protein secretion possible | - Longer expression time - Hyperglycosylation possible - More complex media requirements | 50-300 mg/L |
| Insect cells | - More complex eukaryotic modifications - Proper folding of plant proteins - Low endotoxin | - Higher cost - Longer cultivation time - More specialized equipment needed | 5-50 mg/L |
| Plant-based systems | - Native-like modifications - Proper folding environment - Reduced immunogenicity | - Lower yields - Longer production time - Extraction challenges | 1-10 mg/kg biomass |
For optimal results with PP2A2, the choice of expression tag (e.g., His, GST, MBP) should be considered based on the downstream application and protein solubility requirements. Commercial recombinant protein services, as mentioned in search result , offer expression options starting at $99 plus $0.30 per amino acid, with completion times as fast as two weeks .
Effective purification of recombinant PP2A2 typically involves a multi-step strategy:
Initial clarification: Centrifugation and filtration to remove cellular debris
Capture step: Affinity chromatography based on the fusion tag (e.g., IMAC for His-tagged proteins)
Intermediate purification: Ion exchange chromatography utilizing PP2A2's predicted isoelectric point
Polishing step: Size exclusion chromatography to achieve high purity
Tag removal: If necessary, proteolytic cleavage of fusion tags followed by a second affinity step
A typical purification workflow might include:
| Purification Step | Technique | Expected Purity | Typical Recovery |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capture | Ni-NTA affinity for His-tagged PP2A2 | 70-80% | 70-90% |
| Intermediate | Q or S ion exchange (depending on pI) | 85-95% | 60-80% |
| Polishing | Superdex 75/200 size exclusion | >95% | 80-90% |
| Tag removal | TEV/PreScission protease + reverse IMAC | >98% | 70-85% |
Assessment of protein purity should include SDS-PAGE, Western blotting, and possibly mass spectrometry to confirm protein identity and integrity. The simulated SDS-PAGE in search result indicates the expected migration pattern, though it notes that actual molecular weight may vary depending on the tag type and expression method .
Post-translational modifications (PTMs) likely play crucial roles in regulating PP2A2 function, although specific information about PP2A2 modifications is limited in the search results. For related proteins in the PP2 family, variations in charge (as indicated by different predicted pI values) suggest potential differences in PTMs . These modifications could affect:
Protein-protein interactions: PTMs may modulate the ability of PP2A2 to interact with other proteins
Subcellular localization: Modifications like phosphorylation could alter trafficking and compartmentalization
Stability and turnover: Ubiquitination and other modifications might regulate protein half-life
Activity regulation: Phosphorylation or other modifications could activate or inhibit protein function
Stress response signaling: Dynamic modifications might occur in response to biotic or abiotic stresses
To study these modifications, researchers can employ phosphoproteomics, ubiquitin profiling, and other PTM-specific analytical techniques. Site-directed mutagenesis of potential modification sites could help determine their functional significance in plant development and stress responses.
While PP2A2 (Protein PHLOEM PROTEIN 2-LIKE A2) and PP2A (Protein Phosphatase 2A) are distinct proteins, understanding potential functional relationships between them could provide insights into plant developmental regulation. Protein Phosphatase 2A has been established as a positive regulator of stomatal development in Arabidopsis . PP2A promotes SPCH (SPEECHLESS) protein stability, with SPCH directly binding to PP2A-A subunits in vitro . Mutations in genes encoding PP2A subunits result in lowered stomatal production .
Potential research questions exploring relationships between these proteins include:
Does PP2A2 expression correlate with PP2A activity in tissues undergoing stomatal development?
Could PP2A2 interact with any PP2A subunits or complexes?
Do PP2A2 and PP2A participate in common or parallel signaling pathways?
How do environmental stresses affect the expression or activity of both proteins?
Experimental approaches to address these questions could include co-expression analysis, protein-protein interaction studies, and phenotypic analysis of single and double mutants affecting both proteins.
Comprehensive -omics approaches can uncover novel functions of PP2A2 in plant signaling networks:
Transcriptomic approaches:
RNA-seq analysis of PP2A2 overexpression/knockout lines: Identifying differentially expressed genes when PP2A2 levels are altered
Temporal transcriptomic profiling: Monitoring expression changes during development and stress responses
Single-cell RNA-seq of phloem tissues: Resolving cell-specific expression patterns
Comparative transcriptomics across species: Identifying conserved PP2A2-associated gene networks
Proteomic approaches:
Quantitative proteomics of PP2A2 mutants: Detecting protein abundance changes
Interaction proteomics (IP-MS): Identifying PP2A2 protein interaction partners
Phosphoproteomics: Analyzing phosphorylation changes in PP2A2 mutants
Protein correlation profiling: Determining PP2A2 complex membership
Integrated approaches:
Multi-omics integration: Combining transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic data
Network analysis: Constructing regulatory networks centered on PP2A2
Systems biology modeling: Predicting PP2A2 functions in cellular processes
These approaches would generate testable hypotheses about PP2A2 function in diverse cellular contexts and environmental conditions.
Researchers working with recombinant PP2A2 may encounter several challenges:
| Challenge | Potential Causes | Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| Low expression yield | - Codon bias - Protein toxicity - Inefficient transcription/translation | - Optimize codon usage for expression host - Use inducible expression systems - Test different promoters and expression conditions |
| Protein insolubility | - Improper folding - Hydrophobic interactions - Aggregation | - Lower expression temperature - Co-express with chaperones - Use solubility-enhancing tags (MBP, SUMO) - Screen different buffer conditions |
| Degradation | - Proteolytic sensitivity - Inherent instability | - Include protease inhibitors - Optimize purification speed - Store with stabilizing additives (glycerol, reducing agents) |
| Inconsistent activity | - Loss of cofactors - Oxidation - Improper folding | - Supplement with potential cofactors - Maintain reducing environment - Validate with activity assays |
| Poor antibody recognition | - Conformational epitopes - Low immunogenicity | - Use multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes - Generate custom antibodies - Validate with recombinant standards |
When evaluating recombinant PP2A2 quality, researchers should assess protein purity, integrity, folding status, and functional activity before proceeding with experimental applications.
Effective genetic manipulation strategies for PP2A2 functional studies include:
Loss-of-function approaches:
T-DNA insertion lines: Identify and characterize existing Arabidopsis T-DNA insertion mutants in PP2A2
CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing: Generate precise knockout or domain-specific mutations
RNA interference (RNAi): Design constructs targeting PP2A2-specific sequences
Artificial microRNAs: Create specific silencing constructs with minimal off-target effects
VIGS (Virus-Induced Gene Silencing): For rapid, transient knockdown experiments
Gain-of-function approaches:
Constitutive overexpression: Using strong promoters like 35S
Tissue-specific overexpression: Using phloem-specific promoters
Inducible expression systems: For temporal control (e.g., estradiol, dexamethasone)
Fusion with protein stabilization domains: To increase protein half-life
Heterologous expression: Testing PP2A2 function in different species or cell types
Complementation strategies:
Native promoter complementation: Rescue loss-of-function mutants with wild-type PP2A2
Site-directed mutagenesis: Introduce specific mutations to test domain functions
Domain swapping: Exchange domains with related proteins to test specificity
Ortholog complementation: Test functional conservation with PP2 proteins from other species
These approaches should be validated with molecular characterization (qRT-PCR, Western blotting) and appropriate phenotypic assays.
While specific roles of PP2A2 in stress responses are not fully characterized in the search results, related PP2A proteins play important roles in biotic and abiotic stress signaling pathways . Potential roles of PP2A2 in stress responses could include:
Drought response: PP2A2 might influence phloem transport under water-limiting conditions
Pathogen defense: The lectin activity of PP2 proteins could contribute to recognition or defense against pathogens
Temperature stress: PP2A2 might participate in signaling cascades activated during heat or cold stress
Nutrient deficiency responses: Regulation of nutrient allocation through the phloem
Salt stress: Overexpression of related PP2A-C5 gene confers increased salt tolerance
Future research could investigate how PP2A2 expression and protein levels change under different stress conditions, and whether PP2A2 overexpression or knockout affects plant tolerance to various stresses. Comparative studies across different plant species could reveal conserved stress-response functions of PP2A2 orthologs.
Emerging technologies offer exciting opportunities to elucidate PP2A2 function:
Single-cell omics: Single-cell RNA-seq and proteomics can reveal cell-specific expression patterns and functions of PP2A2 within the sieve element-companion cell complex
Spatial transcriptomics/proteomics: These approaches can map the distribution of PP2A2 expression across tissues with high spatial resolution
Live-cell imaging advances: Super-resolution microscopy and new fluorescent protein tags enable tracking of PP2A2 dynamics in living cells
Optogenetics: Light-controlled protein activation/inactivation tools allow precise temporal control of PP2A2 function
Proximity labeling methods: BioID and APEX2 can identify proteins in close proximity to PP2A2 in living cells
CRISPR-based transcriptional regulators: CRISPRa/CRISPRi systems allow modulation of PP2A2 expression without altering the genomic sequence
Protein structure prediction: AlphaFold and similar tools can predict PP2A2 structure and potential interaction interfaces
Nanobody-based tools: Developing nanobodies against PP2A2 could enable acute protein degradation or functional perturbation
Integration of these technologies will provide unprecedented insights into PP2A2 function at molecular, cellular, and organismal levels.