ATL16 (also known as At5g43420 or MWF20.13) is a member of the ATL family in Arabidopsis thaliana that encodes a RING-H2 finger domain protein. The protein functions as a RING-type E3 ubiquitin transferase, playing a crucial role in the ubiquitin/26S proteasome pathway that regulates protein degradation in plants . The full-length protein consists of 375 amino acids and contains characteristic domains including a transmembrane domain, a GLD motif following the transmembrane domain, and a RING-H2 finger domain that is essential for its E3 ligase activity .
ATL16 is one of 80 members of the ATL family identified in Arabidopsis thaliana. This family is part of a larger class of approximately 470 RING zinc-finger domain proteins that function as ubiquitin ligases . The ATL family is characterized by a highly conserved RING-H2 finger domain that is critical for ubiquitin ligase activity. Like about 90% of ATL genes, ATL16 is intronless, suggesting that the basic ATL protein structure evolved as a functional module. Comparative analysis with the 121 ATL members found in Oryza sativa (rice) shows that many Arabidopsis ATLs, including ATL16, have potential orthologous genes in rice with sequence similarities beyond the conserved ATL features .
For expression of recombinant ATL16:
Expression System: The full-length protein (amino acids 1-375) is typically expressed in E. coli with an N-terminal His tag .
Vector Selection: A bacterial expression vector containing a strong promoter (such as T7) and an N-terminal His-tag sequence is recommended.
Culture Conditions: Standard E. coli culture conditions with IPTG induction are effective for ATL16 expression.
Purification Protocol:
Lyse cells in a Tris/PBS-based buffer
Perform affinity chromatography using Ni-NTA resin to capture the His-tagged protein
Wash extensively to remove contaminants
Elute with an imidazole gradient
Perform size exclusion chromatography if higher purity is required
Assess purity by SDS-PAGE (should be >90%)
Lyophilize the purified protein in Tris/PBS-based buffer with 6% Trehalose, pH 8.0
For optimal stability and activity of recombinant ATL16:
Storage Temperature: Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt.
Aliquoting: Divide into small working aliquots to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Short-term Storage: Working aliquots can be stored at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution Protocol:
Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening
Reconstitute in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL
Add glycerol to a final concentration of 5-50% (recommended: 50%)
Aliquot for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C
Critical Precautions: Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles as they can significantly reduce protein activity
To investigate the E3 ubiquitin ligase activity of ATL16:
In vitro Ubiquitination Assay:
Components needed: Purified recombinant ATL16, E1 enzyme, E2 enzyme (UBC), ubiquitin (preferably labeled), ATP, potential substrate proteins
Reaction buffer: Typically Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), MgCl₂, DTT, ATP
Controls: Reactions without E1, E2, ATL16, or ATP
Detection: Western blot analysis using anti-ubiquitin antibodies
Substrate Identification:
Yeast two-hybrid screening to identify potential protein interactions
Co-immunoprecipitation with epitope-tagged ATL16
Proteomic analysis comparing ubiquitinated proteins in wild-type vs. ATL16 knockout plants
Structure-Function Analysis:
To elucidate ATL16's physiological functions:
Genetic Approaches:
T-DNA insertion mutants or CRISPR/Cas9-generated knockout lines
Overexpression lines using constitutive (35S) or inducible promoters
Tissue-specific expression using appropriate promoters
Complementation studies with wild-type or mutated ATL16
Expression Analysis:
qRT-PCR to determine tissue-specific expression patterns
Analysis under various stress conditions (drought, salinity, pathogen infection)
Reporter gene fusions (ATL16 promoter:GUS) to visualize expression patterns
Comparison with expression patterns of other ATL family members
Phenotypic Analysis:
When confronted with contradictory data in ATL16 research:
Structured Contradiction Analysis:
Identify the interdependent data items (α)
Enumerate the contradictory dependencies defined by domain experts (β)
Determine the minimal number of Boolean rules required to assess these contradictions (θ)
Apply notation (α, β, θ) to classify the contradiction pattern
Methodological Approaches to Resolve Contradictions:
Validate key results using multiple experimental approaches
Ensure biological replicates are sufficient (n≥3)
Control for environmental variables that might affect plant phenotypes
Consider genetic background effects that might influence results
Test for gene redundancy among ATL family members
Data Integration Strategies:
The ATL family in Arabidopsis comprises 80 members with varying degrees of sequence similarity and potentially different functions:
| Feature | ATL16 | ATL Family Range | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein Length | 375 aa | 250-450 aa | ATL16 is within the typical size range |
| Intron Structure | Intronless | 90% intronless | Consistent with family pattern |
| Transmembrane Domain | Present | Present in most | Critical for membrane localization |
| RING-H2 Domain | C-X₂-C-X₁₂-C-X-H-X₂-C-X₂-C-X₁₆-C-X₂-C | Conserved spacing | Essential for E3 ligase activity |
| Expression Pattern | Variable | Diverse | Some have tissue-specific expression |
| Known Function | E3 ubiquitin transferase | E3 ubiquitin transferase | Different members target different substrates |
Key differences include substrate specificity, expression patterns, and responses to environmental cues. While ATL8 is mainly expressed in young siliques and appears essential for viability, ATL43 has been shown to be involved in ABA response pathways. These functional differences likely reflect evolutionary divergence despite structural conservation of the core RING-H2 domain .
Comparative analysis of Arabidopsis ATL16 with rice ATL homologs reveals:
Conservation Patterns:
Approximately 60% of rice ATLs cluster with Arabidopsis ATLs
Many show sequence similarities beyond the conserved ATL features
This suggests orthologous relationships and conserved functions
Evolutionary Implications:
The high percentage of intronless genes (90%) suggests that ATL proteins evolved as functional modules
The expansion of the ATL family (80 in Arabidopsis vs. 121 in rice) indicates lineage-specific duplication events
Sequence divergence outside the RING-H2 domain likely reflects adaptation to different substrates and functions
Functional Divergence Assessment:
Researchers often encounter several challenges when working with recombinant ATL16:
Protein Solubility Issues:
Challenge: RING-H2 proteins can aggregate during expression
Solution: Express at lower temperatures (16-18°C), use solubility enhancing tags (MBP, SUMO), optimize buffer conditions with stabilizing agents (6% Trehalose)
Maintaining Protein Activity:
Challenge: Loss of zinc coordination and structural integrity
Solution: Include zinc in purification buffers, add reducing agents (DTT or β-mercaptoethanol), avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles
Substrate Identification:
Challenge: Unknown physiological substrates complicates functional studies
Solution: Employ proteomics approaches comparing ubiquitination patterns in wild-type vs. ATL16 mutants, use proximity labeling techniques (BioID, APEX)
Specificity in Ubiquitination Assays:
For comprehensive analysis of ATL16 across tissues and developmental stages:
Expression System Selection:
Stable transformation: Use for consistent, heritable expression
Transient expression: Suitable for rapid testing in specific tissues
Inducible systems: Control expression timing for developmental studies
Tissue-Specific Analysis Strategies:
Promoter:reporter constructs (ATL16pro:GUS or ATL16pro:GFP)
Tissue-specific promoters for targeted expression
Cell-type specific isolation techniques (FACS of GFP-marked cells)
Laser capture microdissection for precise tissue sampling
Developmental Stage Considerations:
Synchronize plant growth for consistent developmental staging
Use multiple biological replicates at each developmental stage
Implement time-course experiments to capture dynamic changes
Compare results with expression data from public repositories
Integration of Multiple Data Types: