Serine/threonine-protein kinase potentially functioning as a signaling receptor for extracellular matrix components.
WAKL2 (Wall-associated receptor kinase-like 2) belongs to the WAK/WAKL family of receptor-like kinases (RLKs). Its structure includes:
A carboxyl-terminal cytoplasmic region containing a Ser/Thr kinase active site
An amino-terminal extracellular region containing several motifs, including epidermal growth factor (EGF) repeats, Ca²⁺-binding EGF domains and EGF2-like domains
A transmembrane domain linking the extracellular and cytoplasmic regions
WAKL2 is part of a 7-gene cluster (WAKL1-WAKL7) positioned within a 23-kb region on chromosome 1, with all seven genes predicted to be transcribed in the same direction . The WAKL proteins are highly similar in their cytoplasmic regions but more divergent in their predicted extracellular ligand-binding regions, suggesting adaptation to different ligands .
The WAKL gene family has a unique genomic organization in Arabidopsis:
The WAK/WAKL family consists of 26 members in Arabidopsis that can be divided into four groups
Approximately 80% of WAK/WAKL family members occur in tandem repeats on chromosome I within a region spanning less than 12 centiMorgans
WAKL1-WAKL7 form a cluster positioned approximately 4.5 centiMorgans distal to the WAK1-WAK5 cluster
Sequence analysis confirmed two predicted intron sites for WAKL1 to WAKL5
Comparative analysis suggests that the WAKL and WAK gene clusters arose independently
WAKL2 shows distinct tissue-specific expression patterns as demonstrated through promoter::GUS studies:
GUS activity driven by the WAKL2 promoter was observed in multiple organs including anthers, young embryos/seeds, and rosette stipules
In young seedlings, WAKL2::GUS is predominantly active in the cotyledon hydathodes, observable shortly after germination
Minimal GUS staining was detected in mature WAKL2::GUS rosette leaves, while heavy staining was found in rosette stipules
Unlike WAK members whose expressions were predominately in green tissues, WAKL genes (including WAKL2) are highly expressed in roots and flowers
These expression patterns suggest WAKL2 may have specific developmental roles distinct from other family members.
WAKL2, like other non-abbreviated WAKLs, is associated with the cell wall. Research methods to determine localization include:
Protein gel-blot and immunolocalization analyses have been used to show that WAKL6 (another member of the cluster) is associated with the cell wall
Topological experiments have demonstrated that WAKs localize to the plasma membrane and are tightly associated with the extracellular matrix (ECM)
Based on sequence homology, WAKL2 likely shares similar topology with WAKs, being localized at the plasma membrane with its extracellular domain interacting with cell wall components
For investigating WAKL2 localization specifically, researchers commonly use:
Fusion proteins with fluorescent tags (GFP, YFP) for live-cell imaging
Immunolocalization with specific antibodies (commercially available, e.g., CSB-PA773503XA01DOA)
Subcellular fractionation followed by immunoblotting
While direct evidence for WAKL2 in PTI is limited, research on the WAK/WAKL family provides insights:
Recent studies challenge the long-held belief that WAKs are receptors for oligogalacturonides (OGs), as deletion mutants lacking all five WAK genes (WAK1-5) retained full responsiveness to OGs
WAK/WAKL proteins may serve as accessory components in pattern recognition receptor (PRR) complexes rather than primary receptors
Some WAK/WAKL family members have been implicated in the perception of pathogen-derived molecules - for example, Arabidopsis WAK3 is required for immune responses induced by bacterial harpins
In rice, OsWAKL21.2 (a rice WAK-like kinase) has dual kinase and guanylate cyclase activities that activate immune responses through different mechanisms in rice and Arabidopsis
For studying WAKL2's potential role in PTI, researchers should consider:
Generation of WAKL2 knockout or overexpression lines
Analysis of immune outputs (ROS production, MAPK activation, defense gene expression) in response to various MAMPs
Co-immunoprecipitation studies to identify potential interactions with known PRR complex components
To study WAKL2 expression patterns, researchers typically employ:
Promoter-reporter gene fusion:
Quantitative RT-PCR (RT-qPCR):
RNA-seq analysis:
Transcriptome analysis under different conditions or in different tissues
Differential expression analysis to identify conditions affecting WAKL2 expression
In situ hybridization:
Use of gene-specific probes to detect WAKL2 mRNA in tissue sections
Provides cellular resolution of expression patterns
Several complementary approaches are recommended for investigating WAKL2 protein interactions:
Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC):
Split-Luciferase (Split-LUC) assay:
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):
Yeast two-hybrid screening:
Using WAKL2 domains (kinase domain or extracellular domain) as bait
Screening of Arabidopsis cDNA libraries to identify potential interactors
Advanced biochemical characterization of WAKL2 kinase activity can be approached through:
In vitro kinase assays:
Expression and purification of recombinant WAKL2 kinase domain
Testing autophosphorylation and trans-phosphorylation activities with potential substrates
Comparison with kinase activities of other WAK/WAKL family members
Phosphorylation site identification:
Mass spectrometry analysis to identify autophosphorylation sites
Phosphoproteomic approaches to identify in vivo substrates
Structure-function analysis:
Generation of kinase-dead versions through mutation of key residues in the catalytic domain
Functional complementation studies in wakl2 mutant backgrounds
Potential substrates may include:
Transcription factors involved in defense responses
Components of MAPK cascades
Membrane transporters (as seen with WAKL4, which phosphorylates the cadmium transporter NRAMP1 at Tyr488)
Sequence analysis of the WAK/WAKL family has revealed interesting evolutionary patterns:
Ratios of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitutions suggest that the extracellular region of WAKLs is subject to diversifying selection
WAKL proteins are highly similar in their cytoplasmic regions but more divergent in their predicted extracellular ligand-binding regions
This pattern suggests adaptation to different ligands, potentially allowing perception of various environmental or pathogen-derived signals
Research approaches to investigate this include:
Phylogenetic analysis of WAKL2 orthologs across plant species
Domain swapping experiments between WAKL members
Structure prediction and ligand-binding studies of the extracellular domain
Investigation of natural variation in WAKL2 across Arabidopsis ecotypes
Understanding WAKL2's role in broader signaling networks requires integrated approaches:
Multi-omics integration:
Transcriptomics of wakl2 mutants under various stresses
Phosphoproteomics to identify changes in signaling cascades
Metabolomics to identify changes in defense-related metabolites
Network analysis:
Protein interaction networks including WAKL2 and other immune components
Analysis of gene regulatory networks downstream of WAKL2 activation
Genetic interaction studies:
Generation of higher-order mutants combining wakl2 with mutations in other receptor kinases
Analysis of epistatic relationships in immune response pathways
Current data suggests WAKL2 may interact with several proteins relevant to immunity:
RLP2 (Receptor-like protein 2) with a confidence score of 0.709
PUB17 (U-box domain-containing protein 17, an E3 ubiquitin ligase) with a confidence score of 0.598
CML38 (Calcium-binding protein CML38) with a confidence score of 0.575
These interactions suggest WAKL2 may function in calcium signaling, protein degradation pathways, and receptor complex formation during immune responses.
Generating and properly characterizing WAKL2 mutants presents several challenges:
Genetic redundancy:
Cluster organization challenges:
The tandem arrangement of WAKL1-7 makes traditional crossing approaches difficult
Targeted mutagenesis approaches like CRISPR/Cas9 are preferable for manipulating genes in the cluster
Phenotypic analysis considerations:
Verification methods:
For recombinant WAKL2 production and purification:
Expression systems:
Construct design considerations:
Full-length vs. domain-specific constructs (kinase domain, extracellular domain)
Tag selection (His-tag, GST, MBP) affects solubility and purification efficiency
Codon optimization for the expression system
Purification strategy:
For kinase domain: Affinity chromatography followed by size exclusion
For extracellular domain: Consider including stabilizing agents if cell wall binding properties are to be maintained
For membrane-bound full-length protein: Detergent selection is critical
Functional validation:
In vitro kinase assays to confirm activity
Binding assays to identify potential ligands for the extracellular domain
Translational research potential for WAKL2 includes:
Comparative genomics approaches:
Identification of WAKL2 orthologs in crop species
Functional characterization in crops to determine conservation of function
Analysis of natural variation in WAKL genes associated with stress tolerance
Heterologous expression studies:
Crop improvement strategies:
CRISPR/Cas9 editing of WAKL2 orthologs in crops
Overexpression approaches using tissue-specific or stress-inducible promoters
Targeting the extracellular domain for altered ligand specificity
Recent studies with other RLKs demonstrate the potential of translating Arabidopsis research to crops:
Heterologous expression of OsWAKL21.2 in Arabidopsis induced plant defense responses and conferred enhanced tolerance to bacterial infection
Arabidopsis genes like PLETHORA5 have been used to enhance transformation efficiency in recalcitrant crops
Future research directions for understanding WAKL2's role in cell wall integrity and development include:
Investigation of WAKL2's interaction with cell wall components:
Cell wall integrity sensing:
Developmental phenotypes:
The combined analysis of developmental and defense functions may reveal how WAKL2 integrates cell wall status with growth and stress responses, potentially uncovering new strategies for improving plant resilience.