AF_0585 is expressed in heterologous systems to enable large-scale purification. Comparative details of production platforms are provided below:
Reconstitution protocols recommend dissolving the protein in Tris/PBS-based buffers with trehalose or glycerol to stabilize against aggregation .
While AF_0585’s exact biological role remains unknown, its genomic and structural features provide clues:
Genomic Context: The AF_0585 gene is part of the A. fulgidus genome, which encodes proteins involved in energy metabolism and stress responses .
Structural Features: The protein contains hydrophobic regions suggestive of membrane association or protein-protein interactions .
Heat Shock Response: A. fulgidus upregulates numerous uncharacterized proteins, including AF_0585, under thermal stress .
AF_0585 is primarily used in structural and functional studies:
Structural Biology: Full-length AF_0585 serves as a model for resolving archaeal protein architectures .
Interaction Studies: Preliminary data suggest involvement in uncharacterized pathways, necessitating proteomic screens for binding partners .
Biophysical Assays: Its stability at high temperatures makes it suitable for studying extremophilic protein folding .
The lack of functional annotation limits AF_0585’s utility. Key research priorities include:
KEGG: afu:AF_0585
STRING: 224325.AF0585
For optimal storage and reconstitution of recombinant AF_0585:
Storage Parameter | Recommendation |
---|---|
Short-term storage | 4°C for up to one week |
Long-term storage | -20°C to -80°C |
Storage buffer | Tris/PBS-based buffer with 6% Trehalose, pH 8.0 |
Reconstitution | Briefly centrifuge vial before opening |
Reconstitution medium | Deionized sterile water to 0.1-1.0 mg/mL |
Cryoprotectant | Add 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) |
Aliquoting | Recommended to avoid freeze-thaw cycles |
For maximum protein stability, repeated freezing and thawing should be avoided. Lyophilized powder forms typically have a shelf life of approximately 12 months at -20°C/-80°C, while liquid forms maintain stability for about 6 months under the same conditions .
Recombinant AF_0585 has been successfully expressed using various host systems:
Expression System | Tag | Protein Length | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
E. coli | His | Full length (1-90) | Most commonly used system; offers high yield |
Yeast | Various | Partial/Full length | Used for expression of partial constructs |
Mammalian cells | Various | Variable | Used when post-translational modifications are required |
E. coli remains the predominant expression system due to its efficiency and cost-effectiveness for producing AF_0585. When using E. coli, the protein is typically fused to an N-terminal His tag to facilitate purification. The resulting recombinant protein demonstrates greater than 90% purity as determined by SDS-PAGE analyses .
Archaeoglobus fulgidus is a hyperthermophilic sulfate-reducing archaeon with the following characteristics:
Characteristic | Details |
---|---|
Taxonomy | Domain: Archaea; Phylum: Euryarchaeota; Class: Archaeoglobi |
Growth temperature | 60-95°C (optimal growth at 83°C) |
Metabolism | Anaerobic; sulfate-reducing; can grow as chemoorganoheterotroph or chemolithoautotroph |
Carbon sources | Fatty acids, amino acids, aldehydes, organic acids, and possibly CO |
Natural habitats | Hydrothermal vents, oil deposits, hot springs, deep subsurface environments |
Pressure tolerance | Moderately piezophilic for heterotrophic growth (optimal at 20 MPa); piezotolerant for autotrophic growth (up to 40 MPa) |
Genome | Circular chromosome of 2,178,000 base pairs |
A. fulgidus can produce biofilms when subjected to environmental stresses such as extreme pH or temperature, high metal concentrations, or exposure to antibiotics, xenobiotics, or oxygen. These archaeons are known to cause corrosion of iron and steel in oil and gas processing systems by producing iron sulfide .
Several uncharacterized proteins have been identified in the A. fulgidus genome, including:
Protein | UniProt ID | Length (aa) | Notable Features |
---|---|---|---|
AF_0585 | O29670 | 90 | Membrane-associated; multiple transmembrane domains |
AF_0052 | O30184 | 158 | MAVSIEEFSR IIIATLDLNF QILENFFTLL VVSATNSSLV SQGANLNFSN... |
AF_0540 | O29710 | 228 | GDVVNLTLNEQATVTLDECMYFLDTLQNSSTLPPGEYGIKITHSCLGNEQIEIRTNTTTD... |
Unlike AF_0585, AF_0052 and AF_0540 have different structural characteristics suggesting diverse cellular functions. While AF_0585 appears to be membrane-associated, AF_0052 and AF_0540 may have different subcellular localizations and functions. Comparative analysis of these uncharacterized proteins could provide insights into their potential roles in A. fulgidus biology .
To determine the subcellular localization of AF_0585, researchers can employ the following methodologies:
Computational prediction tools:
TMHMM, HMMTOP, or Phobius for transmembrane domain prediction
SignalP for signal peptide identification
PSORT for general localization prediction
Experimental approaches:
Membrane fractionation: Separate membrane and cytosolic fractions using ultracentrifugation followed by Western blot analysis
Immunogold electron microscopy: Using antibodies against AF_0585 or its tags
Fluorescence microscopy: Using GFP-fusion constructs in heterologous expression systems
Protease accessibility assays: To determine protein topology within membranes
Protein extraction methodology:
Use different detergents (mild to strong) to extract the protein from membranes
Compare extraction efficiency under various conditions to confirm membrane association
The hydrophobic nature of the AF_0585 sequence strongly suggests membrane localization, but experimental verification is necessary to determine its precise subcellular localization and membrane topology .
To investigate the potential functions of AF_0585, researchers should consider a multi-faceted approach:
Approach | Methodology | Expected Insights |
---|---|---|
Bioinformatic analysis | Sequence homology, motif identification, structural prediction | Initial functional hypotheses |
Gene knockout/knockdown | CRISPR-Cas9, antisense RNA | Phenotypic effects, growth changes |
Protein-protein interaction | Pull-down assays, yeast two-hybrid, crosslinking | Interacting partners |
Transcriptional analysis | RNA-seq under various conditions | Expression patterns, co-regulated genes |
Biochemical assays | Substrate binding, enzymatic activity | Direct functional evidence |
Stress response studies | Heat shock, pressure, pH changes | Role in stress adaptation |
Of particular interest would be investigating AF_0585's expression under heat shock conditions. Research on A. fulgidus has identified approximately 350 of its 2,410 open reading frames (14%) that exhibit altered transcript abundance in response to heat shock. These genes span a range of cell functions including energy production, amino acid metabolism, and signal transduction .
AF_0585 may play a role in A. fulgidus adaptation to extreme environments through the following potential mechanisms:
Membrane stability: As a putative membrane protein, AF_0585 could contribute to maintaining membrane integrity under extreme temperatures (60-95°C) and pressures (up to 40 MPa).
Stress response: Similar to the heat shock regulator HSR1 (AF1298) which was identified as part of a heat shock response operon in A. fulgidus, AF_0585 could be involved in stress response pathways .
Pressure adaptation: Given A. fulgidus' piezotolerant and piezophilic characteristics (growth observed up to 40-50 MPa), AF_0585 might contribute to membrane adaptations required for pressure tolerance .
Biofilm formation: A. fulgidus produces biofilms under environmental stress, and membrane proteins like AF_0585 could participate in cell-cell communication or adhesion mechanisms necessary for biofilm development .
To investigate these possibilities, researchers should examine AF_0585 expression under various stress conditions and assess the phenotypic effects of gene disruption on stress tolerance .
For studying AF_0585 regulation, the following expression profiling strategies would be most effective:
Strategy | Methodology | Advantages |
---|---|---|
Whole-genome microarrays | Hybridization-based analysis | Comprehensive gene expression overview |
RNA-Seq | Next-generation sequencing | Higher sensitivity, ability to detect novel transcripts |
qRT-PCR | Targeted amplification | Precise quantification of specific transcripts |
Proteomics | Mass spectrometry | Protein-level confirmation of expression |
Reporter gene assays | Promoter fusion to reporter genes | Direct visualization of promoter activity |
For experimental design, researchers should consider:
Varying environmental conditions: Temperature gradients (60-95°C), pressure ranges (0.3-60 MPa), and different carbon sources to identify condition-specific regulation.
Time-course experiments: Similar to studies of heat shock response in A. fulgidus, where expression profiles were analyzed at different time points after stress induction.
Comparative analysis: Examine expression in parallel with known stress-responsive genes like AF1298 (HSR1), which was identified as one of the most highly induced genes at 5 minutes post-heat shock .
Investigating the structure-function relationship of AF_0585 requires a multi-dimensional approach:
Structural prediction and analysis:
Use bioinformatics tools (AlphaFold, SWISS-MODEL) to generate structural models
Analyze transmembrane topology using specialized prediction algorithms
Identify conserved domains and structural motifs
Experimental structure determination:
X-ray crystallography (challenging for membrane proteins)
NMR spectroscopy for specific domains
Cryo-electron microscopy for membrane protein complexes
Mutagenesis studies:
Site-directed mutagenesis of conserved residues
Domain swapping with homologous proteins
Truncation analysis to determine functional domains
Functional validation:
Express mutant variants in E. coli or native host
Assess changes in localization, interaction partners, or phenotype
Complement knockout strains with wild-type or mutant variants
Comparative analysis with related proteins:
For studying protein-protein interactions involving AF_0585, the following protocols can be employed, with special considerations for membrane proteins:
Technique | Protocol Considerations | Advantages/Limitations |
---|---|---|
Pull-down assays | Use His-tagged AF_0585 as bait; crosslink before cell lysis | Good for stable interactions; may lose weak interactions |
Co-immunoprecipitation | Requires specific antibodies or epitope tags | Preserves native complexes; challenging for membrane proteins |
Yeast two-hybrid | Consider using membrane yeast two-hybrid systems | Good for library screening; high false positive rate |
Protein crosslinking | Use membrane-permeable crosslinkers | Captures transient interactions; complex data analysis |
BioID or APEX2 proximity labeling | Fusion of biotin ligase to AF_0585 | Maps proximal proteins in vivo; no direct interaction evidence |
Blue native PAGE | Gentle detergent solubilization | Preserves native complexes; limited resolution |
When working with membrane proteins like AF_0585, careful optimization of detergent conditions is critical for maintaining protein structure and interactions. For example, studying heat shock proteins in A. fulgidus required specialized approaches for membrane-associated proteins. Research on the AAA protein from A. fulgidus (AMA) has demonstrated that these proteins can form hexameric complexes, and similar quaternary structures might be relevant for AF_0585 .
To investigate the effects of high hydrostatic pressure (HHP) on AF_0585 expression and function, researchers should consider:
Expression analysis under pressure:
Cultivate A. fulgidus under varying pressures (0.3-60 MPa)
Measure AF_0585 transcript and protein levels
Compare expression patterns between heterotrophic and autotrophic growth conditions
Experimental considerations:
Use specialized high-pressure cultivation vessels
Consider the impact of decompression-repressurization cycles on cellular physiology
Monitor morphological changes associated with pressure stress
Functional implications:
Assess membrane integrity and cell morphology at different pressures
Investigate potential interactions with other pressure-responsive proteins
Determine if AF_0585 is involved in the observed morphological changes at pressures above 40 MPa
Research has shown that A. fulgidus exhibits different growth patterns under varying pressures, with heterotrophic growth being moderately piezophilic (optimal at 20 MPa) and autotrophic growth being piezotolerant (similar growth rates from 0.3 to 40 MPa). At pressures above 40 MPa, cells show morphological changes from coccoid to irregular and elongated forms, which could involve membrane proteins like AF_0585 .
Comparative genomics approaches that can help infer the function of AF_0585 include:
Homology-based analysis:
Identify homologs across Archaea and other domains
Generate multiple sequence alignments to identify conserved residues
Construct phylogenetic trees to understand evolutionary relationships
Genomic context analysis:
Examine gene neighborhood conservation
Identify co-occurring genes across genomes
Look for operonic structures that include AF_0585
Domain architecture analysis:
Compare domain organization with functionally characterized proteins
Identify novel domain combinations that might suggest function
Comparative expression analysis:
Analyze expression patterns across conditions and compare with known genes
Identify co-expressed genes across multiple species
Cross-species complementation:
Test functional complementation in related Archaeoglobus species
Assess phenotype rescue in heterologous systems
This approach is particularly valuable as comparative genomic studies on archaeal genomes have revealed important evolutionary relationships. For example, research has identified conserved signature proteins that connect Archaeoglobus with methanogens and Thermococci, suggesting shared ancestry or lateral gene transfer events .
Purifying recombinant AF_0585 for structural studies presents several challenges due to its membrane-associated nature:
Challenge | Best Practice | Rationale |
---|---|---|
Low expression levels | Optimize codon usage; use strong promoters; consider fusion tags | Improves translation efficiency and protein yield |
Membrane extraction | Test different detergents (DDM, LDAO, Triton X-100) | Different detergents vary in extraction efficiency while preserving structure |
Protein instability | Include stabilizing agents (glycerol, specific lipids) | Maintains native-like environment |
Aggregation | Add solubilizing agents; optimize buffer conditions | Prevents non-specific aggregation |
Maintaining structure | Consider native lipid addition; use lipid nanodiscs or amphipols | Recreates native membrane environment |
Purity assessment | Use multiple techniques (SDS-PAGE, SEC, DLS) | Ensures homogeneity required for structural studies |
Express with N-terminal His-tag in E. coli
Solubilize membranes with appropriate detergent
Purify using Ni-NTA affinity chromatography
Perform size exclusion chromatography
Assess purity (>95% for structural studies)
Concentrate to 5-10 mg/mL in appropriate buffer
For structural studies, consider reconstitution into lipid nanodiscs or amphipols to stabilize the protein in a native-like membrane environment while making it amenable to techniques like cryo-EM .
Studying AF_0585 can advance our understanding of extremophile adaptation through several avenues:
Membrane adaptation mechanisms:
AF_0585's putative membrane localization may reveal how extremophiles maintain membrane fluidity and integrity at high temperatures (60-95°C) and pressures (up to 40 MPa)
Could provide insights into lipid-protein interactions critical for thermostability
Evolutionary insights:
Comparing AF_0585 with homologs in other extremophiles may reveal conserved adaptations
Could identify convergent evolution strategies across different extremophile lineages
Biotechnological applications:
Understanding AF_0585's role could inform the development of thermostable membrane systems for industrial applications
May guide engineering of pressure-tolerant microorganisms for various biotechnological processes
Astrobiology implications:
A. fulgidus thrives in conditions potentially analogous to extraterrestrial environments
Studying its adaptive mechanisms may inform our search for life in extreme environments elsewhere
Biofilm formation in extreme conditions:
If AF_0585 is involved in biofilm formation, it could reveal how multicellular structures provide protection in extreme environments
May provide insights into biocorrosion mechanisms relevant to industrial settings
Understanding the function of uncharacterized proteins like AF_0585 is crucial for completing our picture of how extremophiles like A. fulgidus adapt to their challenging environments, with potential implications for evolutionary biology, biotechnology, and astrobiology .