Recombinant Archaeoglobus fulgidus Uncharacterized protein AF_1617 (AF_1617)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Overview of AF_1617

The Recombinant Archaeoglobus fulgidus Uncharacterized Protein AF_1617 is a His-tagged recombinant protein derived from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Archaeoglobus fulgidus, a sulfate-reducing microbe thriving in submarine hot springs . The protein is encoded by the gene AF_1617 (UniProt ID: O28656), spanning 77 amino acids (1–77 aa) . Despite its full-length expression in heterologous systems, its biological function remains uncharacterized, making it a target for structural and functional studies in extremophile biology.

Functional Insights and Research Gaps

While AF_1617’s role in A. fulgidus remains elusive, its recombinant form enables studies into extremophile protein stability and structure:

Applications

  • Extremophile Biology: AF_1617 serves as a model for studying protein folding and stability in high-temperature environments .

  • Biotechnology: His-tagged versions facilitate purification and immobilization for enzymatic assays or structural studies (e.g., X-ray crystallography) .

Limitations

  • Functional Data Deficit: No biochemical assays (e.g., enzymatic activity, substrate binding) have been reported for AF_1617 .

  • Expression Challenges: Partial truncation in yeast/mammalian systems may limit functional studies compared to full-length E. coli versions .

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, we welcome special requests. Please specify your desired format when placing your order, and we will accommodate your requirements to the best of our ability.
Lead Time
Delivery time may vary depending on the purchase method and location. For specific delivery timeframes, please consult your local distributor.
Note: Our proteins are typically shipped with standard blue ice packs. If you require dry ice shipping, please inform us in advance as additional fees will apply.
Notes
Repeated freezing and thawing is not recommended. For optimal results, store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
We recommend briefly centrifuging the vial before opening to ensure all contents are at the bottom. Reconstitute the protein in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default glycerol concentration is 50%, which can be used as a reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life is influenced by various factors, including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and the inherent stability of the protein.
Generally, liquid forms have a shelf life of 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. Lyophilized forms typically have a shelf life of 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquot for multiple uses to minimize freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type will be determined during the manufacturing process.
The tag type is decided during production. If you have a specific tag type in mind, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development for your protein.
Synonyms
AF_1617; Uncharacterized protein AF_1617
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-77
Protein Length
full length protein
Species
Archaeoglobus fulgidus (strain ATCC 49558 / VC-16 / DSM 4304 / JCM 9628 / NBRC 100126)
Target Names
AF_1617
Target Protein Sequence
MAREEPCPNCGKMAEIVSEGDREILRCAACGTERVIVGMEEILPIEKKLVIASLILAIIL LGILYYISYQMIAHLYT
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Database Links

KEGG: afu:AF_1617

STRING: 224325.AF1617

Subcellular Location
Membrane; Single-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is AF_1617 and what do we currently know about it?

AF_1617 is an uncharacterized protein from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Archaeoglobus fulgidus, consisting of 77 amino acids with the sequence MAREEPCPNCGKMAEIVSEGDREILRCAACGTERVIVGMEEILPIEKKLVIASLILAIILLGILYYISYQMIAHLYT . The protein contains cysteine-rich motifs (CxxC) that suggest potential metal-binding capabilities, particularly relevant in the extreme environments where A. fulgidus thrives . Based on preliminary sequence analysis, AF_1617 may be related to the UPF0016 family of membrane proteins that are known to be conserved across evolutionary lineages including eukaryotes, bacteria, and archaea . The protein is available as a recombinant protein expressed in E. coli with an N-terminal His-tag for research purposes .

How is recombinant AF_1617 typically prepared for laboratory studies?

Recombinant AF_1617 is typically produced as a His-tagged fusion protein in E. coli expression systems . The purified protein is available in lyophilized powder form that requires reconstitution before use . For reconstitution, it is recommended to briefly centrifuge the vial to bring contents to the bottom, then dissolve the protein in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL . For long-term storage, adding glycerol to a final concentration between 5-50% (typically 50%) and storing in aliquots at -20°C/-80°C is recommended to maintain protein stability . Working aliquots can be stored at 4°C for up to one week, but repeated freeze-thaw cycles should be avoided as they may compromise protein integrity .

What is the shelf life of recombinant AF_1617 and how should it be stored?

The shelf life of recombinant AF_1617 depends on its formulation and storage conditions . For the lyophilized form, the shelf life is typically 12 months when stored properly at -20°C/-80°C . The reconstituted liquid form has a shorter shelf life of approximately 6 months when stored at -20°C/-80°C . Storage buffer composition can significantly impact stability, with most preparations using Tris/PBS-based buffers containing 6% trehalose at pH 8.0 . To maximize protein stability, it is critical to store the protein in small working aliquots to minimize freeze-thaw cycles . Temperature fluctuations should be avoided, and consistency in storage conditions is essential for maintaining the structural integrity and functional properties of the protein over time .

How might AF_1617 be related to the UPF0016/GDT1 family of proteins?

While AF_1617 is classified as an uncharacterized protein, sequence analysis suggests potential relationships with the UPF0016 family (also known as the GDT1 family) . Members of this family typically contain one or two copies of the consensus motif Glu-φ-Gly-Asp-(Arg/Lys)-(Ser/Thr), where φ represents any hydrophobic residue . To determine if AF_1617 belongs to this family, researchers should conduct detailed sequence alignments focusing on the presence of these conserved motifs and analyze hydropathy profiles to identify potential transmembrane domains characteristic of UPF0016 members . Additionally, phylogenetic analysis comparing AF_1617 with known UPF0016 proteins from other extremophiles and archaea would provide evolutionary context . If AF_1617 is indeed related to UPF0016, it may function in cation transport, particularly of manganese (Mn²⁺) and/or calcium (Ca²⁺), which are the primary substrates transported by characterized members of this protein family .

What experimental approaches would be most effective for determining the membrane topology of AF_1617?

Determining the membrane topology of AF_1617 requires a multi-faceted experimental approach. Begin with computational prediction of transmembrane domains using algorithms such as TMHMM, Phobius, or TOPCONS, which can provide initial models of protein orientation within the membrane . For experimental validation, a combination of techniques is recommended. Cysteine scanning mutagenesis coupled with accessibility assays can identify residues exposed to either side of the membrane . Protein fusion approaches using reporter tags (such as GFP or alkaline phosphatase) at various positions can confirm the orientation of protein termini and loops . For higher resolution structural information, consider employing cryo-electron microscopy or X-ray crystallography, though these may be challenging with small membrane proteins like AF_1617 . Crosslinking studies with membrane-impermeable reagents can further validate topology models by identifying surface-exposed regions . Finally, epitope mapping using antibodies against specific protein regions can confirm their localization relative to the membrane .

What roles might AF_1617 play in Archaeoglobus fulgidus adaptation to extreme environments?

Archaeoglobus fulgidus thrives in extreme environments including hydrothermal vents with temperatures up to 95°C, high pressure, and varying metal concentrations . AF_1617 may contribute to these remarkable adaptations through several possible mechanisms. If related to the UPF0016/GDT1 family, AF_1617 could function as a cation transporter regulating intracellular levels of essential metals like manganese and calcium, which are critical for enzyme function and signaling in extreme conditions . The cysteine-rich motifs in AF_1617's sequence suggest potential metal-binding capabilities that could contribute to metal homeostasis or detoxification mechanisms necessary in metal-rich hydrothermal environments . Additionally, as a membrane protein, AF_1617 might participate in maintaining membrane integrity under extreme temperatures and pressures, potentially through interactions with archaeal-specific membrane lipids . Comparative analysis with homologs from non-extremophilic organisms could highlight adaptations specific to extremophiles . Understanding AF_1617's role could provide insights into molecular mechanisms of extremophile adaptation applicable to biotechnology applications.

How can researchers effectively design experiments to characterize the function of AF_1617?

A comprehensive experimental strategy might include:

  • Genetic approaches: Creating knockout or knockdown strains of AF_1617 in A. fulgidus (if genetic tools are available) or in a model organism with a homologous protein3

  • Heterologous expression systems: Expressing AF_1617 in model organisms to study its function in a controlled environment

  • In vitro transport assays: If hypothesized to be a transporter, using liposome reconstitution assays with purified protein to measure substrate specificity and transport kinetics

  • Protein-protein interaction studies: Co-immunoprecipitation or yeast two-hybrid experiments to identify interaction partners3

  • Metal binding assays: ITC (Isothermal Titration Calorimetry) or spectroscopic assays to determine metal binding affinities if metal binding is suspected

What are the optimal methods for studying potential transport activity of AF_1617?

If AF_1617 is hypothesized to function as a transporter based on its potential relationship with the UPF0016/GDT1 family, several specialized methods can be employed to characterize its transport activity. Proteoliposome reconstitution assays represent the gold standard for in vitro transport studies . This approach involves purifying the recombinant protein, reconstituting it into artificial liposomes, and measuring the movement of potential substrates across the membrane under controlled conditions .

For monitoring cation transport specifically:

TechniqueApplicationAdvantagesLimitations
Fluorescent dyesReal-time monitoring of ion fluxesHigh sensitivity, real-time dataPotential artifacts, limited ion specificity
Radioactive tracersQuantitative transport measurementsHigh sensitivity, quantitativeRequires special handling, safety concerns
ICP-MS analysisPrecise measurement of metal contentMulti-element analysis, high sensitivityDestructive technique, requires specialized equipment
Patch-clamp electrophysiologyDirect measurement of ion currentsSingle-channel resolutionTechnical complexity, requires expression in appropriate cells

Complementary approaches should include substrate competition assays to determine specificity and kinetic analyses to establish transport parameters such as Km and Vmax values . Transport dependency on factors such as pH, temperature, and membrane potential should be systematically investigated to understand the physiological context of the transport mechanism . When designing these experiments, researchers must consider the hyperthermophilic nature of A. fulgidus and adjust experimental conditions accordingly .

How can researchers effectively analyze contradictory data regarding AF_1617 function?

When confronted with contradictory data regarding AF_1617 function, researchers should adopt a systematic analytical approach. First, evaluate experimental methodologies used in each contradictory study to identify potential differences in protein preparation, experimental conditions, or analytical techniques that might explain discrepancies3. Consider whether differences in expression systems, protein tags, or buffer compositions could affect protein function or measurement outcomes .

The following framework can help resolve contradictions:

When analyzing contradictory transport data specifically, researchers should carefully consider the thermodynamic constraints of proposed transport mechanisms and ensure that suggested functions are compatible with membrane energetics in A. fulgidus . Statistical analysis of experimental data using appropriate tests can help distinguish between significant findings and experimental noise3. Finally, researchers should consider evolutionary context—if homologs of AF_1617 have confirmed functions in other organisms, these can provide valuable reference points for resolving functional conflicts .

What are the best expression systems for producing high-quality recombinant AF_1617 for structural studies?

Selecting an optimal expression system for structural studies of AF_1617 requires considering the protein's archaeal origin and potential membrane association . E. coli remains the most commonly used system due to its high yield, rapid growth, and cost-effectiveness . For AF_1617 expression in E. coli, specialized strains designed for membrane or difficult proteins, such as C41(DE3), C43(DE3), or Lemo21(DE3), may improve yields and proper folding . Tag selection is crucial—while His-tags facilitate purification, they may interfere with structural studies and should be removable via specific protease sites .

For challenging structural studies, consider these alternative expression systems:

Expression SystemAdvantagesDisadvantagesBest Applications
Archaeal hosts (e.g., Sulfolobus)Native folding environment, post-translational modificationsLower yields, technical complexityNative structure determination
Cell-free systemsEliminates toxicity issues, allows direct incorporation of labeled amino acidsHigher cost, potentially lower yieldsNMR studies requiring uniform labeling
Yeast (P. pastoris)Post-translational modifications, high-density culturesLonger growth times, glycosylation differencesWhen E. coli expression fails
Insect cellsBetter folding of complex proteinsHigher cost, longer preparation timeWhen mammalian-like processing is desired

For crystallography or cryo-EM studies, protein engineering approaches such as creating fusion constructs with crystallization chaperones (T4 lysozyme or BRIL) or removing flexible regions may enhance structural determination success . Thermostability assays should be employed to optimize buffer conditions for maintaining the native fold of this thermophilic protein during purification and crystallization attempts .

What computational tools and algorithms are most useful for predicting the structure and function of AF_1617?

Given the challenges in experimentally characterizing uncharacterized proteins like AF_1617, computational approaches provide valuable initial insights into structure and function . For structure prediction, recent AI-based tools have dramatically improved accuracy. AlphaFold2 and RoseTTAFold can generate high-confidence structural models, particularly important for proteins like AF_1617 that lack solved structures . For transmembrane topology prediction, specialized algorithms like TMHMM, TOPCONS, and Phobius can identify potential membrane-spanning regions with higher accuracy than general structure prediction tools .

For functional prediction, researchers should utilize multiple complementary approaches:

  • Sequence-based tools: BLAST, PSI-BLAST, and HMMer can identify distant homologs that may have known functions

  • Motif/domain recognition: InterProScan, PFAM, and PROSITE can identify functional domains and motifs, including those characteristic of the UPF0016 family

  • Structural similarity searches: DALI and TM-align can identify proteins with similar folds that may share functions even with low sequence identity

  • Machine learning approaches: Tools like DeepFRI and COFACTOR that integrate multiple data types often outperform single-approach methods

  • Molecular docking: AutoDock Vina and HADDOCK can predict potential binding sites for ligands or metal ions, particularly relevant if metal-binding is suspected

When applying these computational tools, researchers should critically evaluate confidence metrics and seek consensus across multiple methods before forming functional hypotheses . The integration of computational predictions with targeted experimental validation represents the most efficient path to characterizing AF_1617 3.

What are the most promising future research directions for AF_1617?

The study of AF_1617 presents several promising research avenues that could significantly advance our understanding of archaeal biology and extremophile adaptations . Given its potential relationship to the UPF0016/GDT1 family, investigating its role in cation transport and homeostasis represents a high-priority direction . Structural biology approaches, particularly cryo-electron microscopy, could reveal the molecular architecture of AF_1617 and provide insights into its functional mechanisms . Comparative genomics across extremophiles could highlight conserved features that contribute to adaptation to extreme environments .

Future research should also explore the physiological role of AF_1617 in A. fulgidus using systems biology approaches. Integration of transcriptomics and metabolomics data under various stress conditions could reveal when and why AF_1617 is expressed . Protein interaction networks could place AF_1617 in broader cellular pathways and processes 3. Additionally, exploring potential biotechnological applications—such as using AF_1617 or engineered variants in bioremediation of metal-contaminated environments or as components in high-temperature industrial processes—represents an exciting translational direction .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.