Recombinant Archaeoglobus fulgidus Uncharacterized protein AF_2160 (AF_2160)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Introduction to Recombinant Archaeoglobus fulgidus Uncharacterized Protein AF_2160 (AF_2160)

Recombinant Archaeoglobus fulgidus Uncharacterized Protein AF_2160 (AF_2160) is a protein derived from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Archaeoglobus fulgidus. This organism is known for its ability to thrive in extremely high temperatures and is often studied for its unique metabolic processes, including sulfur metabolism . The AF_2160 protein is expressed in Escherichia coli and is available in a recombinant form, making it accessible for various research applications .

Characteristics of Recombinant AF_2160 Protein

The recombinant AF_2160 protein is a full-length protein consisting of 161 amino acids. It is His-tagged, which facilitates purification and detection using affinity chromatography . The protein is typically supplied in a lyophilized form and requires reconstitution in sterile water for use. The recommended concentration for reconstitution is between 0.1 and 1.0 mg/mL, with the addition of glycerol for long-term storage .

Research Applications and Pathways

While the specific function of AF_2160 remains uncharacterized, it is involved in several biochemical pathways and interacts with other proteins. These interactions and pathways are crucial for understanding its potential roles within Archaeoglobus fulgidus and its applications in biotechnology and basic research .

Pathways and Interactions:

Pathway NameRelated Proteins
Various metabolic pathwaysSpecific proteins involved in these pathways are available from suppliers like Creative BioMart .

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder.
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference in order notes for customized preparation.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs unless dry ice shipping is requested in advance. Additional fees apply for dry ice shipping.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to consolidate the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50%, provided as a guideline.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors, including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized formulations have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquoting is essential for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during the manufacturing process.
The specific tag type is determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
AF_2160; Uncharacterized protein AF_2160
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-161
Protein Length
full length protein
Species
Archaeoglobus fulgidus (strain ATCC 49558 / VC-16 / DSM 4304 / JCM 9628 / NBRC 100126)
Target Names
AF_2160
Target Protein Sequence
MVKSCSVGWGAKVAAVFAALYTSILGLAVLIPHANSAIEVFSAVMAAGLGILIALLAVPF ISEITDKTETLEVEVIGEVVVEDSLSFGGANAGLKSERIFVADKGLVIDGYLFEWQKIKF EIEKDEIILRLPSGRRLPIPYSEELAEMLRKSKTSYFIDTK
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Database Links

KEGG: afu:AF_2160

STRING: 224325.AF2160

Subcellular Location
Cell membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

How should recombinant AF_2160 protein be stored to maintain its stability?

The recommended storage conditions for recombinant AF_2160 protein are:

Storage PurposeTemperatureBuffer Conditions
Short-term storage (up to one week)4°CTris-based buffer with 50% glycerol
Long-term storage-20°CTris-based buffer with 50% glycerol
Extended storage-80°CTris-based buffer with 50% glycerol

It is strongly recommended to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles as this can compromise protein integrity. Working aliquots should be prepared and stored at 4°C for up to one week to minimize freeze-thaw damage .

What expression systems are suitable for producing recombinant AF_2160?

Recombinant AF_2160 can be successfully expressed in E. coli expression systems with appropriate tags (commonly His-tag) for purification. When designing expression strategies, researchers should consider:

  • Codon optimization for the expression host

  • Inclusion of appropriate fusion tags to aid solubility and purification

  • Temperature conditions that accommodate the thermophilic nature of the protein

  • Buffer systems that maintain protein stability during expression and purification

For hyperthermophilic archaeal proteins like AF_2160, expression at lower temperatures (15-18°C) may improve protein folding despite the protein's native high-temperature environment .

What analytical techniques are most effective for characterizing the structure of AF_2160?

Due to the uncharacterized nature of AF_2160, a multi-technique approach is recommended:

TechniqueApplicationAdvantages
X-ray CrystallographyHigh-resolution 3D structureProvides atomic-level details of protein structure
Cryo-EMStructural analysis without crystallizationUseful for membrane proteins that resist crystallization
Circular Dichroism (CD)Secondary structure analysisRapid assessment of α-helix, β-sheet content
NMR SpectroscopySolution structure and dynamicsInformation on protein flexibility and domain movements
Bioinformatic AnalysisStructure predictionComputational insights when experimental data is limited

For transmembrane proteins like AF_2160 appears to be, detergent screening and lipid nanodisc reconstitution may be necessary steps prior to structural analysis to maintain native conformation.

How can researchers design experiments to determine the function of AF_2160?

A systematic approach to functional characterization should include:

  • Comparative Genomics Analysis:

    • Identify AF_2160 homologs in related organisms

    • Analyze genomic context for co-regulated genes

    • Search for conserved domains and motifs

  • Expression Profiling:

    • Determine conditions under which AF_2160 is expressed

    • Use whole-genome microarrays similar to those employed for heat shock response studies in A. fulgidus

    • Analyze if AF_2160 is co-expressed with genes of known function

  • Protein-Protein Interaction Studies:

    • Employ pull-down assays using tagged AF_2160

    • Use yeast two-hybrid screening

    • Conduct co-immunoprecipitation experiments

  • Gene Knockout/Knockdown:

    • Generate AF_2160 deletion mutants if genetic systems exist for A. fulgidus

    • Analyze phenotypic changes in growth, stress response, or metabolism

  • Biochemical Assays:

    • Test for enzymatic activities based on predicted protein properties

    • Examine binding to potential substrates or interacting molecules

What purification strategies are most effective for recombinant AF_2160 protein?

Given the potential membrane association of AF_2160, specialized purification approaches may be necessary:

  • Affinity Chromatography:

    • Utilize His-tag affinity purification under native or denaturing conditions

    • Consider optimizing imidazole concentration in buffers to reduce non-specific binding

  • Membrane Protein Extraction:

    • Screen detergents (DDM, CHAPS, Triton X-100) for optimal solubilization

    • Consider native nanodiscs or amphipols for maintaining native conformation

  • Size Exclusion Chromatography:

    • Use as a polishing step and to analyze oligomeric state

    • Buffer conditions should include stabilizing agents (glycerol, reducing agents)

  • Ion Exchange Chromatography:

    • May be useful as an additional purification step

    • Requires determination of protein pI and optimal pH for binding

  • Thermal Stability Considerations:

    • Leverage the thermophilic nature of the protein during purification

    • Consider heat treatment steps to eliminate less stable contaminants

How might the hyperthermophilic nature of A. fulgidus influence the structural and functional properties of AF_2160?

A. fulgidus thrives at temperatures of 60-95°C, which has significant implications for its proteins:

  • Structural Adaptations:

    • Increased hydrophobic core packing

    • Higher proportion of charged surface residues

    • More extensive ion-pair networks

    • Reduced surface loop flexibility

  • Thermostability Mechanisms:

    • Analysis of the AF_2160 sequence suggests potential thermostabilizing features such as:

      • Multiple charged residues (E and K) that may form salt bridges

      • Compact hydrophobic regions within transmembrane domains

      • Reduced occurrence of thermolabile residues (Asn, Gln)

  • Functional Implications:

    • Enzymatic activity (if present) likely optimized for high temperatures

    • Protein-protein interactions may differ significantly from mesophilic counterparts

    • Membrane association properties adapted to maintain integrity at elevated temperatures

Research approaches should incorporate temperature as a critical variable in all functional and structural studies.

What can comparative analysis between AF_2160 and heat shock proteins like HSR1 (AF1298) reveal about archaeal stress response mechanisms?

While AF_2160 is not identified as a heat shock protein in the available literature, comparative analysis with known heat shock response elements like HSR1 (AF1298) could provide valuable insights:

  • Regulatory Patterns:

    • Determine if AF_2160 expression changes during heat shock similar to the ~350 genes (14% of genome) that respond to heat shock in A. fulgidus

    • Analyze promoter regions for the CTAAC-N5-GTTAG motif identified in heat shock-regulated genes

  • Protein Domain Comparison:

    • Examine for structural similarities with known heat shock proteins

    • Identify potential DNA-binding or chaperone-like domains

  • Evolutionary Conservation:

    • Compare conservation patterns between AF_2160 and HSR1 across archaeal species

    • Analyze if AF_2160 shows similar patterns of conservation as known stress response proteins

A microarray approach similar to that used in heat shock studies of A. fulgidus could reveal whether AF_2160 belongs to stress response pathways .

How can researchers address the challenges of functional characterization for an uncharacterized protein from a hyperthermophilic archaeon?

Uncharacterized proteins from extremophiles present unique research challenges:

  • Heterologous Expression Challenges:

    • Codon usage optimization for expression host

    • Temperature optima mismatch between expression host and native conditions

    • Potential toxicity to host cells

  • Assay Development:

    • Design biochemical assays that function at elevated temperatures

    • Ensure buffer stability and substrate integrity at high temperatures

    • Develop specialized equipment for high-temperature assays

  • Structural Analysis Considerations:

    • Crystal formation may require specialized conditions for thermophilic proteins

    • NMR experiments may need to account for different dynamics at elevated temperatures

    • Consider native-like membrane environments for structural studies

  • Informatics Approaches:

    • Leverage specialized databases for extremophilic organisms

    • Use structure prediction algorithms trained on thermophilic proteins

    • Employ phylogenetic profiling across extremophiles

  • Experimental Controls:

    • Include appropriate thermophilic positive controls in all assays

    • Design experiments with temperature gradient analysis

What protocols can be used to study potential RNA-protein interactions involving AF_2160?

While there is no direct evidence linking AF_2160 to RNA binding in the available literature, investigating potential RNA interactions could provide functional insights:

  • RNA Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA):

    • Similar to the approach used for studying HSR1-DNA interactions

    • Test binding with various RNA substrates at different temperatures

    • Include competition assays to determine specificity

  • UV Crosslinking and Immunoprecipitation:

    • Can identify direct RNA-protein contacts in vivo

    • Requires development of specific antibodies against AF_2160

  • RNA Footprinting:

    • DNase I footprinting techniques (as used for HSR1 ) can be adapted for RNA

    • Reveals specific RNA regions protected by protein binding

  • Systematic Evolution of Ligands by Exponential Enrichment (SELEX):

    • Identifies preferred RNA binding motifs

    • Can be conducted at elevated temperatures to mimic native conditions

  • Fluorescence Anisotropy:

    • Measures binding affinities in solution

    • Can be performed across temperature ranges

How should researchers approach experimental design when studying potential membrane association of AF_2160?

The amino acid sequence of AF_2160 suggests potential membrane association:

  • Membrane Localization Studies:

    • Fluorescent protein tagging for localization

    • Subcellular fractionation to determine membrane association

    • Immunogold electron microscopy for precise localization

  • Membrane Topology Analysis:

    • Protease protection assays to determine exposed domains

    • Cysteine scanning mutagenesis

    • Fluorescence quenching experiments

  • Lipid Interaction Studies:

    • Liposome binding assays

    • Monolayer penetration experiments

    • Surface plasmon resonance with immobilized lipids

  • Detergent Solubilization Screening:

    • Systematic testing of detergent types and concentrations

    • Analysis of protein stability in different detergent micelles

    • Native PAGE to assess oligomeric state in different detergents

Detergent ClassExamplesAppropriate for
Non-ionicDDM, OG, Triton X-100Initial extraction screening
ZwitterionicCHAPS, LDAOMaintaining protein-protein interactions
Steroid-basedDigitonin, CholatePreserving supramolecular assemblies
AmphipolsA8-35Long-term stability studies

What strategies can overcome the technical challenges of crystallizing an uncharacterized protein like AF_2160?

Crystallizing membrane or transmembrane proteins presents significant challenges:

  • Construct Optimization:

    • Design multiple constructs with varying N- and C-terminal boundaries

    • Remove flexible regions identified by limited proteolysis

    • Consider fusion partners that promote crystallization (T4 lysozyme, BRIL)

  • Crystallization Condition Screening:

    • Utilize sparse matrix screens designed for membrane proteins

    • Test lipidic cubic phase (LCP) crystallization

    • Screen detergent types and concentrations

    • Include additives that mimic the native environment of thermophiles

  • Alternative Approaches:

    • Antibody fragment co-crystallization to stabilize flexible regions

    • Nanobody-assisted crystallography

    • Cryo-EM as an alternative to crystallography

  • Thermostability Optimization:

    • Thermal shift assays to identify stabilizing conditions

    • Engineer disulfide bonds to enhance stability

    • Screen for stabilizing ligands or binding partners

  • Specialized Techniques for Thermophilic Proteins:

    • Consider crystallization at elevated temperatures

    • Include ions found in native A. fulgidus environment

    • Test pressure crystallization techniques

How can researchers integrate structural, functional, and genomic data to develop comprehensive models of AF_2160's role?

A holistic approach to data integration can overcome the limitations of individual techniques:

  • Multi-omics Data Integration:

    • Combine proteomics, transcriptomics, and metabolomics data

    • Correlate expression patterns with cellular conditions

    • Identify co-regulated genes and proteins

  • Structure-Function Correlation:

    • Map conserved residues onto structural models

    • Identify potential active sites or binding pockets

    • Design targeted mutations to test functional hypotheses

  • Network Analysis:

    • Position AF_2160 within protein-protein interaction networks

    • Identify metabolic pathways potentially involving AF_2160

    • Analyze gene neighborhood and operon structures

  • Comparative Genomics:

    • Analyze distribution and conservation of AF_2160 across archaeal species

    • Identify co-evolved gene pairs that might functionally interact

    • Examine synteny patterns that might suggest function

  • Phylogenetic Profiling:

    • Correlate presence/absence patterns with ecological niches

    • Identify evolutionary patterns that might suggest function

    • Compare with proteins of known function showing similar profiles

What bioinformatic approaches are most useful for generating testable hypotheses about AF_2160 function?

Computational methods can guide experimental design for uncharacterized proteins:

  • Sequence-Based Analysis:

    • Profile-profile alignments to detect distant homologs

    • Identification of conserved motifs and domains

    • Prediction of post-translational modifications

  • Structure Prediction:

    • Ab initio modeling using AlphaFold2 or RoseTTAFold

    • Template-based modeling if distant homologs exist

    • Molecular dynamics simulations to assess stability and dynamics

  • Function Prediction:

    • Gene Ontology term prediction

    • Enzyme classification prediction

    • Ligand binding site prediction

  • Genome Context Methods:

    • Gene neighborhood analysis

    • Gene fusion detection

    • Phylogenetic profiling

  • Text Mining:

    • Literature-based knowledge discovery

    • Extraction of functional associations from publications

    • Identification of experimental approaches used for similar proteins

Each computational prediction should be formulated as a testable hypothesis for subsequent experimental validation.

What are the most promising research directions for elucidating the role of AF_2160 in A. fulgidus biology?

Based on current knowledge and methodological capabilities, several research directions hold particular promise:

  • Integration with Systems Biology:

    • Global analyses of A. fulgidus under various stress conditions

    • Metabolic modeling to predict potential roles in cellular processes

    • Network-based approaches to position AF_2160 in biological pathways

  • Comparative Studies Across Archaea:

    • Functional characterization of homologs in genetically tractable archaeal species

    • Evolutionary analysis to trace functional adaptations

    • Cross-species complementation studies

  • Application of Emerging Technologies:

    • Cryo-electron tomography for in situ structural analysis

    • Single-cell transcriptomics to capture expression heterogeneity

    • CRISPR-based approaches if genetic systems become available

  • Ecological Context:

    • Studies linking AF_2160 function to ecological adaptations

    • Investigation of potential roles in interspecies interactions

    • Analysis in the context of extreme environment adaptation

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.