Recombinant Ashbya gossypii Lon protease homolog, mitochondrial (PIM1), partial is an ATP-dependent serine protease mediating the selective degradation of misfolded, unassembled, or oxidatively damaged polypeptides, as well as certain short-lived regulatory proteins within the mitochondrial matrix. It may also function as a chaperone in the assembly of inner membrane protein complexes. PIM1 participates in regulating mitochondrial gene expression and maintaining mitochondrial genome integrity. It exhibits site-specific binding to mitochondrial DNA.
KEGG: ago:AGOS_AFR013C
STRING: 33169.AAS53384
PIM1 in A. gossypii is a mitochondrial ATP-dependent protease homologous to the well-characterized Lon protease family found across various organisms. It exhibits over 30% identity with ATP-dependent protease La from Escherichia coli, Lon from Bacillus brevis, and related proteases from other organisms . The protein functions within the mitochondrial matrix and plays crucial roles in mitochondrial genome maintenance and protein quality control.
A. gossypii PIM1 shares significant functional and structural similarities with S. cerevisiae PIM1. Both are mitochondrial ATP-dependent proteases involved in mitochondrial genome integrity. In S. cerevisiae, PIM1 is 1133 amino acids long with a putative mitochondrial import signal in the N-terminal region . Studies have shown that in both organisms, the absence of functional PIM1 leads to an inability to utilize nonfermentable carbon sources and maintain functional mitochondrial DNA . The extensive synteny between A. gossypii and S. cerevisiae genomes supports their functional conservation, making findings in one organism often applicable to the other .
PIM1 serves multiple essential functions in mitochondria:
Maintenance of mitochondrial genome integrity
Selective degradation of misfolded or damaged proteins in the mitochondrial matrix
Cooperation with the mitochondrial Hsp70 system to prevent protein aggregation
Regulation of mitochondrial gene expression by controlling the translation of genes like cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (CoxI) and cytochrome b (Cob)
Involvement in the splicing of COXI and COB transcripts, particularly introns encoding mRNA maturases
Response to thermal stress, suggesting a role in the heat shock response
A. gossypii is an increasingly important model organism for several reasons:
It exhibits extensive synteny with the S. cerevisiae genome, facilitating comparative genomics
It has a filamentous growth pattern useful for studying the evolution of fungal morphology
It naturally overproduces riboflavin, making it industrially relevant
Multiple genetic manipulation tools have been developed for A. gossypii, including CRISPR/Cas9 and CRISPR-Cpf1 systems
Its genome has been completely sequenced and well-annotated, with telomere-to-telomere coverage of all 14 chromosome ends
Based on available data, recombinant A. gossypii PIM1 can be effectively expressed in several host systems:
| Expression System | Advantages | Considerations |
|---|---|---|
| E. coli | High yield, cost-effective, rapid expression | May require optimization for proper folding of larger proteins |
| Yeast (S. cerevisiae) | Post-translational modifications, proper folding of eukaryotic proteins | Moderate yield compared to bacterial systems |
| Baculovirus/Insect cells | Superior for large complex eukaryotic proteins, proper folding | Higher cost, longer production time |
| Mammalian cells | Best for maintaining native structure and function | Highest cost, lowest yield, complex protocols |
Most commercially available recombinant PIM1 preparations use one of these systems, with purities typically greater or equal to 85% as determined by SDS-PAGE .
When designing expression constructs for A. gossypii PIM1, researchers should consider:
Inclusion of the appropriate mitochondrial targeting sequence if studying import mechanisms
Selection of purification tags that won't interfere with PIM1's ATPase or protease activities
Codon optimization based on the expression host
Selection of a vector with an appropriate inducible promoter system
Consideration of expressing full-length protein versus functional domains
For functional studies, it's crucial to determine whether to include or exclude the mitochondrial targeting sequence, as this affects cellular localization. When studying enzyme kinetics, the N-terminal protease domain and the C-terminal ATPase domain must both be properly folded for activity .
Optimal purification strategies for maintaining PIM1 activity include:
Affinity chromatography using nickel or cobalt resins for His-tagged PIM1
Ion exchange chromatography as a secondary purification step
Size exclusion chromatography for final polishing and buffer exchange
Maintaining buffer conditions that preserve ATP binding capacity (typically including Mg²⁺)
Including ATP or non-hydrolyzable ATP analogs during purification to stabilize the protein
Avoiding harsh elution conditions that might denature the protein
Maintaining a temperature of 4°C throughout purification and including protease inhibitors in early purification steps is critical for preserving activity. Commercial preparations typically achieve ≥85% purity as determined by SDS-PAGE .
The ATPase activity of recombinant PIM1 can be measured using several methods:
Malachite green phosphate assay: Measures inorganic phosphate released during ATP hydrolysis
Advantages: High sensitivity, suitable for kinetic measurements
Protocol: Incubate PIM1 with ATP, stop reaction with malachite green reagent, measure absorbance at 620-640 nm
Coupled enzyme assay: Using pyruvate kinase and lactate dehydrogenase
Advantages: Continuous real-time monitoring of activity
Protocol: Measure decrease in NADH absorbance at 340 nm as ATP is regenerated from ADP
Radioactive [γ-³²P]ATP assay: Measures release of radioactive phosphate
Advantages: Extremely sensitive, can detect very low activity levels
Protocol: Separate released phosphate by thin-layer chromatography and quantify by scintillation counting
When designing these experiments, include appropriate controls such as PIM1 without substrate, heat-inactivated PIM1, and known ATPase inhibitors to validate specificity .
Protease activity of recombinant PIM1 can be assessed through:
Fluorogenic peptide substrates: Use commercially available Lon protease substrates with fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) pairs
Advantages: Real-time kinetic measurements, high sensitivity
Protocol: Measure increase in fluorescence as the substrate is cleaved
SDS-PAGE degradation assay: Monitor degradation of known substrate proteins
Advantages: Demonstrates activity against physiologically relevant substrates
Protocol: Incubate PIM1 with substrate protein in the presence of ATP, analyze by SDS-PAGE over time
Western blot analysis: For detection of specific substrate degradation
Advantages: Highly specific, can monitor endogenous substrate levels
Protocol: Perform western blot analysis using antibodies against known PIM1 substrates
Critical controls should include reactions without ATP (as PIM1 is ATP-dependent), heat-inactivated PIM1, and specific protease inhibitors .
The role of PIM1 in mitochondrial quality control can be studied through:
Gene knockout/knockdown approaches:
Fluorescence microscopy with mitochondrial markers:
Mitochondrial respiration analysis:
Assessment of mitochondrial genome stability:
Substrate identification studies:
Recombinant PIM1 can be instrumental in studying mitochondrial protein import through:
In organello import assays:
Reconstitution experiments:
Direct cleavage assays:
These approaches have revealed that PIM1-mediated cleavage is coupled to import, such that reducing PIM1 activity can induce accumulation of proteins at the mitochondrial surface .
Studying PIM1 in relation to mitochondrial diseases can provide several key insights:
Understanding basic mechanisms of mitochondrial protein quality control
Identification of how defects in protein processing contribute to mitochondrial dysfunction
Development of potential therapeutic strategies targeting protein quality control
Research has shown that PIM1/Lon protease is involved in the PINK1-Parkin pathway, which is implicated in Parkinson's disease. In human cells, the MPP (mitochondrial processing peptidase) is involved in PINK1 import and processing, affecting mitochondrial quality control. When mitochondria are damaged (depolarized), PINK1 accumulates on the mitochondrial surface and recruits Parkin, leading to mitophagy. Similar mechanisms may operate in fungal systems with PIM1 playing comparable roles .
A. gossypii is known for naturally overproducing riboflavin (vitamin B2), a property that has been exploited commercially. The relationship between PIM1 and riboflavin production may involve several mechanisms:
Mitochondrial integrity and metabolism:
Protein quality control:
Stress response:
These connections suggest that PIM1 function may indirectly influence riboflavin biosynthesis through its effects on mitochondrial function and stress response pathways.
Common challenges and solutions when working with recombinant PIM1 include:
| Challenge | Possible Causes | Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| Low expression yield | Codon bias, protein toxicity, improper folding | Optimize codon usage, use low-temperature induction, co-express with chaperones |
| Poor solubility | Improper folding, hydrophobic regions | Express as fusion protein with solubility tags, optimize buffer conditions |
| Low enzymatic activity | Improper folding, missing cofactors, degradation | Include ATP in purification buffers, add Mg²⁺, use protease inhibitors |
| Aggregation | Protein instability, concentration too high | Add glycerol to storage buffer, maintain low concentration, avoid freeze-thaw cycles |
| Inconsistent activity results | Batch variation, storage conditions | Use internal standards, standardize storage conditions, prepare fresh aliquots |
Additionally, when studying mitochondrial functions with isolated organelles, ensure mitochondrial integrity is preserved by monitoring membrane potential and respiration capacity as control measures .
When investigating PIM1's role in mitochondrial RNA processing, consider these optimization strategies:
RNA extraction and preservation:
Use specialized extraction methods for mitochondrial RNA
Include RNase inhibitors to prevent degradation
Process samples quickly and maintain cold temperatures
Comparison of wild-type and PIM1-deficient strains:
Generate clean knockout strains using CRISPR-Cpf1 system
Use conditional expression systems to study essential functions
Include complementation controls to confirm phenotype specificity
Transcript analysis methods:
Use Northern blotting for specific transcripts
Apply RT-qPCR for quantitative analysis
Employ RNA-seq for genome-wide effects
Splicing analysis:
Design primers spanning intron-exon junctions
Use PCR to amplify spliced and unspliced forms
Sequence products to confirm precise splicing defects
Research has shown that PIM1 mutants exhibit deficiencies in the splicing of COXI and COB transcripts, particularly introns encoding mRNA maturases, and these transcripts are degraded in the absence of PIM1 .
Critical controls for PIM1 knockdown/knockout studies include:
Verification of knockdown/knockout efficiency:
Confirm at both mRNA level (RT-qPCR) and protein level (Western blot)
Quantify the degree of reduction in gene expression
Phenotypic specificity controls:
Complementation with wild-type PIM1 to rescue phenotypes
Use of catalytically inactive PIM1 mutants as negative controls
Comparison with knockdowns of related mitochondrial proteases
Assessment of mitochondrial integrity:
Monitor membrane potential using fluorescent dyes
Assess respiration capacity
Check levels and processing of mitochondrial proteins
Examine mitochondrial morphology by microscopy
Functional controls:
Test growth on fermentable versus non-fermentable carbon sources
Assess mitochondrial genome stability
Measure ATP production capacity
Advanced multi-omics strategies to investigate PIM1's regulatory network could include:
Integrated genomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics:
Genome sequencing of wild-type and PIM1 mutant strains to identify genetic variants
RNA-seq to detect changes in gene expression and splicing patterns
Proteomics to identify changes in protein abundance and post-translational modifications
Integration of these datasets to construct comprehensive regulatory networks
Metabolomics profiling:
Analysis of metabolite changes in PIM1 mutants
Focus on mitochondrial metabolites and riboflavin precursors
Correlation of metabolite levels with transcriptomic and proteomic changes
Protein-protein interaction studies:
Immunoprecipitation coupled with mass spectrometry to identify interacting partners
Yeast two-hybrid screens or BioID proximity labeling
Validation of interactions through co-immunoprecipitation and functional assays
Chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq):
Identify transcription factors affected by PIM1 activity
Map changes in chromatin accessibility and histone modifications
Studies on riboflavin-overproducing A. gossypii mutants have already employed some of these approaches, revealing mutations in genes involved in amino acid metabolism, the TCA cycle, and purine/pyrimidine metabolism that contribute to the phenotype .
Several sophisticated mechanisms may explain substrate selectivity of PIM1 protease:
Structural recognition elements:
Specific amino acid sequences or structural motifs may serve as recognition sites
Conformational changes in substrates may expose or mask these recognition elements
Post-translational modifications might alter substrate recognition
Co-chaperone interactions:
Interaction with mitochondrial Hsp70 systems may facilitate substrate delivery
Different co-chaperones may target specific substrate classes to PIM1
Competition between chaperones and PIM1 for binding to misfolded proteins
Compartmentalization within mitochondria:
Microdomains within the mitochondrial matrix may concentrate PIM1 and specific substrates
Substrate localization may determine accessibility to PIM1
Membrane association may protect some proteins from degradation
Allosteric regulation:
Binding of specific metabolites or signaling molecules may alter PIM1 conformation and substrate specificity
ATP levels may differentially affect recognition and processing of various substrates
Oligomeric state changes might influence substrate selection
Research has shown that PIM1-mediated proteolysis is remarkably sensitive to certain substrates, with even modest reductions in PIM1 levels causing significant accumulation of specific proteins while minimally affecting others .
Comparative analysis of PIM1 across fungal species offers powerful insights:
Evolutionary conservation and divergence:
Identification of conserved domains and residues critical for function
Discovery of species-specific adaptations in substrate recognition
Understanding how PIM1 function has evolved with changes in mitochondrial genome size and complexity
Correlation with ecological niches:
Analysis of how PIM1 function differs between species with different lifestyles
Examination of adaptations in thermotolerant versus mesophilic fungi
Investigation of changes in oxidative stress response mechanisms
Differential regulation:
Comparison of PIM1 expression regulation across species
Analysis of how stress responses involving PIM1 have evolved
Investigation of species-specific regulatory networks
Functional complementation studies:
Cross-species complementation experiments to test functional conservation
Domain-swapping between orthologues to identify regions responsible for species-specific functions
Engineering of chimeric proteins to understand structure-function relationships
The research community has already begun such comparative work, with PIM1 homologs characterized in diverse fungi including S. cerevisiae, A. gossypii, and various other species, revealing both conserved functions in mitochondrial genome maintenance and species-specific adaptations .
The coordination between mitochondrial stress and nuclear gene expression involving PIM1 may occur through:
Retrograde signaling pathways:
PIM1 dysfunction may generate specific signaling molecules
Accumulation of unprocessed proteins in PIM1-deficient mitochondria may trigger stress responses
These signals could modulate nuclear gene expression through dedicated pathways
Dual-localization proteins:
Some proteins may shuttle between mitochondria and nucleus
PIM1 may regulate the abundance or processing of these dual-localized proteins
Changes in their localization or abundance could affect nuclear gene expression
Metabolic intermediates as signals:
Mitochondrial dysfunction due to PIM1 deficiency may alter metabolite levels
These metabolites may serve as signals affecting nuclear transcription factors
Riboflavin or its precursors might serve as such signaling molecules in A. gossypii
Integration with cell cycle regulation:
PIM1-dependent mitochondrial quality control may be coordinated with cell cycle progression
Defects in mitochondrial function could trigger cell cycle checkpoints
This coordination ensures proper mitochondrial inheritance during cell division
Studies in riboflavin-overproducing A. gossypii mutants have identified changes in gene expression and mutations in pathways that might be involved in such regulatory networks, suggesting complex interactions between mitochondrial function and nuclear gene expression .