Recombinant Ashbya gossypii Protein EFR3 (EFR3), partial

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

General Information

EFR3 is a protein encoded by the EFR3 gene in Ashbya gossypii . Orthologs of EFR3 can be found in other organisms .

Function and Localization of Bud3 Protein

Bud3 acts as a landmark, tagging future septal sites, and is involved in the positioning of the contractile ring, but does not direct lateral branching .

Key aspects of Bud3 protein function:

  • Cell Division: Bud3 is crucial for coordinating cell division, including determining the division site, forming the actomyosin ring, and chitin deposition at septal sites .

  • Localization: Bud3 fused to green fluorescent protein (GFP) localizes transiently as a single ring to multiple future septation sites or as a double ring to newly established septa .

  • Impact of Deletion: Deleting AgBUD3 causes changes in actin ring localization and mislocalization of AgCyk1, which is needed for actin ring assembly, leading to aberrant chitin accumulation and delocalized septa .

AgBUD3 Homologue Isolation and Characterization

To examine the role of a landmark protein during septation in a filamentous ascomycete, a BUD3 orthologue from Ashbya gossypii was isolated, and its cellular distribution was characterized using green fluorescent protein (GFP) .

Key findings:

  • Localization Details: Bud3 localization is transient and precedes septation, marking future septation sites. It is also present at sites of ongoing septation but disappears after septum completion and is not seen in older hyphal segments .

  • Septation Process: Septation in A. gossypii proceeds from basal regions to the hyphal tip, with Bud3 localization indicating septum completion .

  • N and C Terminal Functions: The C terminus of AgBud3 is sufficient for correct localization, while the N-terminal half is not involved .

Protein Secretion and Stress Response

Insights into the protein secretory pathway of Ashbya gossypii have been gained through genome-wide analyses, exploring its secretome and transcriptional responses to protein secretion stress .

Key points:

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference during ordering for customized preparation.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs unless dry ice shipping is specifically requested and arranged in advance. Additional fees apply for dry ice shipping.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to collect the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50%, provided as a guideline for customers.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on several factors: storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized formulations have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquot for multiple uses to prevent repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during the manufacturing process.
The tag type is determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
EFR3; AER343CProtein EFR3
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Protein Length
Partial
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Ashbya gossypii (strain ATCC 10895 / CBS 109.51 / FGSC 9923 / NRRL Y-1056) (Yeast) (Eremothecium gossypii)
Target Names
EFR3
Uniprot No.

Q&A

What is the structural characterization of EFR3 in Ashbya gossypii?

EFR3 (Eighty-Five Requiring 3) in A. gossypii belongs to the armadillo-like family of superhelical proteins, characterized by an extended rod-like structure . The protein features a distinctive N-terminal region with armadillo repeat motifs (ARM) and a C-terminal region with triple helical motifs . To properly characterize this structure in your research, begin with sequence alignment against well-characterized EFR3 proteins from model organisms, followed by structure prediction software analysis. For definitive structural determination, consider X-ray crystallography or cryo-electron microscopy of the purified recombinant protein.

How does the molecular function of A. gossypii EFR3 compare to homologs in other organisms?

Based on comparative studies, EFR3 proteins primarily function as plasma membrane peripheral proteins involved in anchoring phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase A (PI4KA) complexes . In A. gossypii, the protein likely mediates similar membrane-associated processes as observed in other filamentous fungi, though with specific adaptations to hyphal growth patterns characteristic of A. gossypii . To investigate functional conservation, researchers should employ complementation assays using EFR3-deficient strains from model organisms (e.g., S. cerevisiae) transfected with A. gossypii EFR3, measuring rescue of phenotypes related to membrane organization, phosphoinositide metabolism, and hyphal growth.

What expression systems are most effective for producing recombinant A. gossypii EFR3?

For recombinant production of A. gossypii EFR3, several expression systems can be employed with varying advantages:

Expression SystemAdvantagesLimitationsTypical Yield
E. coliHigh yield, cost-effective, rapid growthPossible improper folding, lack of post-translational modifications5-10 mg/L
S. cerevisiaeProper folding, post-translational modifications, genetic similarity to A. gossypiiLower yields than bacterial systems1-3 mg/L
P. pastorisHigher yields than S. cerevisiae, proper foldingLonger development time2-5 mg/L
A. gossypii itselfNative post-translational modificationsComplex culturing requirements0.5-2 mg/L

The most effective approach often involves using the S. cerevisiae expression system with codon optimization, as demonstrated in homologous protein expression studies in A. gossypii . Transformation protocols similar to those used for expressing AgBUD3 in S. cerevisiae can be adapted for EFR3 expression .

What is the optimal protocol for generating EFR3 deletion strains in A. gossypii?

Creating EFR3 deletion strains in A. gossypii requires precise genetic manipulation. The following methodology is recommended:

  • Design recombinogenic flanks (40-45 bp) homologous to sequences adjacent to the EFR3 gene

  • Construct a deletion cassette with a selectable marker (typically G418 resistance) flanked by these sequences

  • Transform A. gossypii spores or germlings using a protocol similar to that described for other A. gossypii gene deletions

  • Isolate primary heterokaryotic transformants on G418-containing medium

  • Induce sporulation to obtain homokaryotic deletion strains

  • Verify genomic integration via PCR and Southern blotting

  • Confirm phenotype through morphological and functional analyses

The successful generation of gene deletion strains in A. gossypii has been demonstrated for multiple genes including BUD3 and BOI1/2 , providing a methodological framework adaptable to EFR3 deletion.

How can researchers effectively visualize EFR3 localization in A. gossypii hyphae?

For subcellular localization studies of EFR3 in A. gossypii, researchers should consider:

  • Creating C-terminal or N-terminal GFP fusion constructs using in vivo recombination methods similar to those used for AgBUD3-GFP

  • Generating fragments encompassing either full-length EFR3 or specific domains fused to GFP to determine localization signals

  • Employing the A. gossypii TEF1 promoter for constitutive expression or the native EFR3 promoter for physiological expression levels

  • Using confocal microscopy with appropriate filter sets (488 nm excitation for GFP)

  • Performing co-localization studies with membrane markers and known interacting proteins

  • Implementing time-lapse microscopy to capture dynamic localization during hyphal growth

Based on localization studies of other membrane-associated proteins in A. gossypii, EFR3 would likely show plasma membrane localization with potential enrichment at hyphal tips or sites of septation .

What techniques are most reliable for measuring protein-protein interactions involving EFR3 in A. gossypii?

To investigate protein-protein interactions of EFR3 in A. gossypii, researchers should employ multiple complementary approaches:

TechniqueApplication in A. gossypiiAdvantagesLimitations
Co-immunoprecipitationPull-down of tagged EFR3 followed by mass spectrometryDetects native complexesMay miss transient interactions
Yeast two-hybridScreening using EFR3 domains as baitHigh-throughput capabilityPotential false positives/negatives
Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC)In vivo visualization of interactionsDirect visualization in cellsIrreversible complex formation
Proximity labeling (BioID/TurboID)Identifying proximity partners in hyphal tipsCaptures transient interactionsRequires genetic modification
FRET/FLIMMeasuring direct interactions with candidate partnersQuantitative, spatiotemporal resolutionTechnically demanding

Based on known EFR3 interactions in other organisms, researchers should focus on potential interactions with components of phosphoinositide signaling pathways and membrane organization factors in A. gossypii .

How does EFR3 contribute to hyphal growth regulation in A. gossypii?

Based on comparative analyses of hyphal growth mechanisms in filamentous fungi, EFR3 likely contributes to A. gossypii hyphal development through:

  • Regulation of phosphoinositide distribution in hyphal membranes, particularly at growing tips

  • Organization of signaling platforms that coordinate polarized growth

  • Potential interactions with Rho-type GTPases (like AgRho3) that prevent nonpolar growth at hyphal tips

  • Facilitation of vesicle trafficking to support rapid hyphal extension

To investigate these functions, researchers should analyze hyphal morphology, growth rates, and branching patterns in EFR3 deletion or overexpression strains. Particular attention should be given to analyzing phosphoinositide distribution using fluorescent biosensors and examining potential genetic interactions with known polarity regulators like AgBoi1/2 .

What is the relationship between EFR3 and membrane raft organization in A. gossypii?

EFR3 proteins have been implicated in membrane raft organization through interactions with proteins like flotillin-2 . In A. gossypii, researchers should investigate:

  • Co-localization of EFR3 with membrane raft markers (e.g., sterols, GPI-anchored proteins)

  • Changes in membrane domain organization in EFR3 mutants using:

    • Detergent resistance assays

    • Super-resolution microscopy with raft-specific probes

    • Lipidomic analysis of membrane fractions

  • Functional interactions with A. gossypii homologs of known raft-associated proteins

  • Impact of membrane-disrupting agents on EFR3 localization and function

Understanding this relationship is particularly relevant in filamentous fungi like A. gossypii, where membrane organization at hyphal tips is critical for polarized growth mechanisms.

How does EFR3 function in phosphoinositide metabolism pathways specific to A. gossypii?

In A. gossypii, as in other eukaryotes, EFR3 likely plays a crucial role in phosphoinositide metabolism by:

  • Facilitating the plasma membrane recruitment of PI4K complexes

  • Regulating the spatial distribution of phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate (PI4P)

  • Influencing downstream phosphoinositide-dependent processes

To characterize this function in A. gossypii specifically, researchers should:

  • Map the phosphoinositide distribution in wild-type vs. EFR3 mutant strains using fluorescent biosensors

  • Analyze genetic interactions between EFR3 and genes encoding other components of phosphoinositide metabolism

  • Measure phosphoinositide levels using biochemical assays or mass spectrometry

  • Investigate the impact of EFR3 mutations on processes dependent on phosphoinositide signaling, such as hyphal growth, septation, and response to environmental stresses

How can synthetic biology approaches leverage EFR3 to improve biotechnological applications of A. gossypii?

A. gossypii has demonstrated potential as a biotechnological platform, particularly for producing compounds like sabinene . Researchers could leverage EFR3 manipulation to enhance these applications through:

  • Engineering EFR3 variants with modified membrane-targeting properties to create optimized subcellular microenvironments for heterologous enzyme activity

  • Utilizing EFR3's role in membrane organization to improve the localization of pathway enzymes involved in compound production

  • Developing EFR3-based biosensors to monitor membrane dynamics during bioprocesses

  • Creating synthetic signaling circuits anchored by EFR3 to control metabolic flux in response to industrial conditions

For implementation, researchers should consider techniques such as domain swapping between EFR3 homologs, directed evolution of EFR3 variants, and construction of chimeric EFR3 proteins with added functionalities for industrial strain improvement .

What are the experimental challenges in resolving contradictory data about EFR3 function across different fungal species?

Researchers often encounter contradictory findings when comparing EFR3 function across fungal species due to:

  • Evolutionary divergence in protein function despite sequence conservation

  • Context-dependent protein interactions in different cellular environments

  • Varying experimental conditions and methodologies

  • Differences in growth morphologies (yeast-like vs. filamentous)

To address these contradictions when studying A. gossypii EFR3, implement:

  • Rigorous comparative studies using identical experimental conditions across species

  • Domain-swapping experiments to identify functionally divergent regions

  • Heterologous expression with careful phenotypic characterization

  • Quantitative phenotyping using standardized metrics

  • Systems biology approaches to map the entire interaction network in each species

These approaches can help determine whether observed functional differences represent true biological divergence or experimental artifacts.

What novel microscopy techniques are most promising for studying EFR3 dynamics during hyphal growth and development?

Advanced microscopy methods particularly suited for studying EFR3 dynamics in A. gossypii include:

TechniqueApplication to EFR3 ResearchAdvantagesTechnical Considerations
Single-molecule trackingFollowing individual EFR3 molecules in living hyphaeReveals diffusion dynamics and binding kineticsRequires photoactivatable/photoswitchable fluorescent tags
Lattice light-sheet microscopy3D visualization of EFR3 distribution across entire hyphal networksReduced phototoxicity, fast volumetric imagingComplex setup, specialized equipment
FRAP/FLIPMeasuring EFR3 mobility and exchange rates at hyphal tipsQuantitative measurement of protein dynamicsRequires optimization for each fusion construct
Super-resolution microscopy (STORM/PALM)Nanoscale organization of EFR3 relative to membrane domainsResolution beyond diffraction limitSample preparation challenges, longer acquisition times
FCS/FCCSMeasuring diffusion and concentration of EFR3 in specific cellular regionsQuantitative, sensitive to low concentrationsRequires careful calibration and controls

When designing these experiments, researchers should consider the multimodal growth characteristics of A. gossypii, from spore germination through hyphal development and branching , capturing EFR3 dynamics at each developmental stage.

How can researchers address the challenges of protein solubility when purifying recombinant A. gossypii EFR3?

Purification of recombinant EFR3 often presents solubility challenges due to its membrane association properties. To overcome these issues:

  • Optimize extraction conditions using different detergents:

    • Test mild detergents (DDM, CHAPS) at various concentrations

    • Consider detergent screening panels to identify optimal solubilization conditions

    • Explore detergent-lipid mixed micelles to maintain native structure

  • Design soluble truncation constructs:

    • Generate constructs lacking the membrane-binding regions

    • Focus on specific domains of interest (e.g., the armadillo repeat region)

    • Implement fusion partners that enhance solubility (MBP, SUMO, thioredoxin)

  • Adjust purification protocols:

    • Use affinity tags suited for membrane proteins (His10 rather than His6)

    • Include glycerol (10-15%) in all buffers to stabilize the protein

    • Consider on-column detergent exchange during purification

    • Implement size-exclusion chromatography as a final polishing step

  • Validate protein functionality:

    • Develop binding assays to confirm that purified protein retains activity

    • Implement thermal shift assays to assess protein stability

    • Verify correct folding using circular dichroism spectroscopy

What are the best approaches for resolving technical issues in gene targeting of EFR3 in A. gossypii?

When targeting the EFR3 gene in A. gossypii, researchers may encounter several technical challenges. Here are recommended approaches to address common issues:

  • For low transformation efficiency:

    • Optimize germling preparation by carefully controlling germination time

    • Increase homologous recombination efficiency using longer flanking sequences (80-100 bp)

    • Test different transformation methods (electroporation vs. chemical transformation)

    • Include a transient expression of a recombinase to enhance integration

  • For off-target integrations:

    • Design targeting sequences with minimal similarity to other genomic regions

    • Verify integration sites by whole-genome sequencing of transformed strains

    • Implement CRISPR-Cas9 to create targeted double-strand breaks at the EFR3 locus

  • For difficulties in obtaining homokaryotic transformants:

    • Extend the sporulation period for heterokaryotic primary transformants

    • Implement additional selection rounds with increased antibiotic concentration

    • Use fluorescent markers to distinguish between heterokaryotic and homokaryotic mycelia

Previous work with gene targeting in A. gossypii provides valuable precedents for these approaches, as demonstrated in studies targeting other genes such as AgBUD3 and establishing homokaryotic deletion strains .

What are the emerging research directions for EFR3 in A. gossypii that show the most promise?

The most promising research directions for A. gossypii EFR3 include:

  • Comparative functional genomics between A. gossypii EFR3 and homologs in pathogenic fungi to identify potential intervention targets

  • Integration of EFR3 into synthetic biology platforms for enhancing A. gossypii as a production host for terpenoids and other valuable compounds

  • Exploration of EFR3's role in membrane organization during the transition from yeast-like to hyphal growth

  • Investigation of potential regulatory mechanisms controlling EFR3 function during environmental adaptation

  • Development of EFR3-based tools for manipulating phosphoinositide distribution and signaling in fungal systems

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.