Recombinant Aspergillus clavatus Flap endonuclease 1 (fen1)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Overview of Recombinant FEN1

Flap endonuclease 1 (FEN1) is a structure-specific metallonuclease critical for DNA replication, repair, and genome stability. Recombinant FEN1 refers to the enzyme produced via genetic engineering in heterologous expression systems (e.g., E. coli or yeast) to study its biochemical properties or therapeutic potential. While Aspergillus clavatus FEN1 has not been explicitly studied in the available literature, insights can be drawn from homologs in related species, such as Aspergillus niger and other eukaryotes.

Production and Purification

Recombinant Aspergillus niger FEN1 (UniProt: A5ABU3) is produced in E. coli with the following parameters :

  • Sequence: 395 amino acids, including conserved catalytic residues (e.g., D86 in human FEN1, critical for phosphate steering ).

  • Purity: >85% via SDS-PAGE.

  • Storage: Stable at -80°C with 50% glycerol.

For A. clavatus, analogous protocols would likely apply, leveraging codon optimization and affinity tags (e.g., Strep-tag) for purification.

4.1. Unanswered Questions

  • No peer-reviewed studies specifically address A. clavatus FEN1.

  • Structural and kinetic data (e.g., flap-length specificity ) remain undefined for this species.

4.2. Potential Applications

  • Biotechnology: Optimizing fungal DNA repair pathways for industrial enzyme production.

  • Therapeutics: Inhibitors targeting FEN1’s active site could exploit synthetic lethality in cancers with homologous recombination defects .

Future Directions

  • Crystallography: Resolve the 3D structure of A. clavatus FEN1 to compare with human (PDB: 5UM9 ) and A. niger homologs.

  • Functional Studies: Characterize RNA/DNA substrate preferences and partnerships with BER enzymes (e.g., APE1 ).

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder. We will ship the in-stock format by default. If you have special format requirements, please note them when ordering.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary by purchase method and location. Consult your local distributor for specific delivery times. Proteins are shipped with blue ice packs by default. Request dry ice in advance for an extra fee.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening. Reconstitute in sterile deionized water to 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. Add 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquot for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default final glycerol concentration is 50% for reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on storage conditions, buffer components, storage temperature, and protein stability. Liquid form: 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. Lyophilized form: 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
fen1; ACLA_034020Flap endonuclease 1; FEN-1; EC 3.1.-.-; Flap structure-specific endonuclease 1
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-395
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Aspergillus clavatus (strain ATCC 1007 / CBS 513.65 / DSM 816 / NCTC 3887 / NRRL 1)
Target Names
Target Protein Sequence
MGIKHLFQVI QENAPDAVKS GDIKNHFGRK VAIDASMSIY SFLIAVRSEG QQLMSESGET TSHLMGMFYR TLRMVDNGIK PLYVFDGAPP KLKSGELAKR TARKAEATEA HEEAKETGTA EEIEKFSRRT VRVTREHNAE CKKLLKLMGV PYIDAPTEAE AQCAVLARAG KVYAAASEDM DTLCFEAPIL LRHLTFSEQR KEPIQEIHLN RVLEGLDMDR SQFIDMCILL GCDYLEPIPK VGPNTALKLI REHGSLEKVV EAIESDPKKK YVIPEDWPYQ DARELFHHPD VRAADHPECD FKWEAPDIEA LVDFLVKDKG FNEDRVRNGA ARLQKNLKTA QQSRLEGFFK PVAKTDAEKA SLKRKHDEKL QEQKKRKKEE AKAKKEAKAK PRGAA
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Flap endonuclease 1 (FEN1) is a structure-specific nuclease with 5'-flap endonuclease and 5'-3' exonuclease activities involved in DNA replication and repair. It removes the 5'-overhanging flap during DNA replication, leaving a nick for ligation. It is also involved in long patch base excision repair (LP-BER) by cleaving within the AP site-terminated flap. FEN1 stabilizes the genome, preventing flap structures that can cause duplications and deletions. It also exhibits 5'-3' exonuclease activity on nicked or gapped DNA and RNase H activity. Additionally, it participates in rDNA replication and repair, and mitochondrial DNA repair.
Database Links
Protein Families
XPG/RAD2 endonuclease family, FEN1 subfamily
Subcellular Location
Nucleus, nucleolus. Nucleus, nucleoplasm. Mitochondrion.

Q&A

Basic Research Questions

  • What is the functional significance of Aspergillus clavatus FEN1 in DNA metabolism?

Aspergillus clavatus Flap Endonuclease 1 (FEN1) is a structure-specific nuclease that plays critical roles in DNA replication and repair. As a member of the FEN1 family (UniProt ID: A1CJ75), it possesses both 5'-flap endonuclease and 5'-3' exonuclease activities essential for genomic integrity . Its primary functions include:

  • Processing of Okazaki fragments during lagging strand DNA synthesis

  • Participation in long-patch base excision repair (LP-BER)

  • Resolution of DNA structures at stalled replication forks

  • Contribution to homologous recombination and the prevention of repeat sequence instability

The enzyme recognizes and cleaves specific DNA structures, particularly 5'-flap substrates formed during DNA replication and repair. Its activity is critical for maintaining genomic stability in filamentous fungi, and dysfunction in FEN1 homologs has been associated with various pathological conditions including cancer .

  • How do expression systems affect the production of functional recombinant A. clavatus FEN1?

When expressing recombinant A. clavatus FEN1, researchers must carefully select expression systems based on experimental requirements. Based on data from similar fungal FEN1 proteins, the following expression strategies yield different outcomes:

Expression SystemAdvantagesLimitationsTypical YieldRecommended Applications
E. coliHigh yield, economical, rapid expressionMay lack proper folding or PTMs>85% purity (SDS-PAGE) Biochemical assays, structural studies
Yeast (P. pastoris)Eukaryotic PTMs, proper foldingSlower, lower yield>90% purity Functional studies requiring PTMs
Cell-free systemsRapid, avoids toxicity issuesHigher cost70-80% Quick production for activity screening

A methodological approach involves:

  • Clone the full-length A. clavatus FEN1 gene (based on homology with A. niger FEN1's 395 amino acids )

  • Optimize codon usage for the selected expression system

  • Include appropriate purification tags (His, Strep, GST) based on downstream applications

  • Control induction conditions to maximize soluble protein production

  • Implement multi-step purification to achieve >90% purity

  • Validate activity using structure-specific nuclease assays

  • What are the optimal conditions for measuring A. clavatus FEN1 enzymatic activity?

Establishing optimal reaction conditions is crucial for reliable measurement of A. clavatus FEN1 activity. Based on studies with other FEN1 homologs:

ParameterOptimal ConditionEffect on ActivityMeasurement Method
pH8.0 >80% activity between pH 7.5-8.5Flap substrate cleavage assay
Temperature35-40°C Temperature-dependent catalytic rateRapid quench-flow kinetics
Divalent Metals5-10 mM Mg²⁺Essential for catalytic activityMetal-dependent activity assays
Salt Concentration50-100 mM NaCl/KClModerate ionic strength stabilizes enzyme-substrate interactionsVaried salt concentration assays
Reducing Agents1-5 mM DTTPrevents oxidation of catalytic cysteine residuesActivity with/without reducing agents

For accurate enzymatic measurements, researchers should:

  • Prepare double-flap DNA substrates consisting of three annealed oligonucleotides forming a 5'-flap (7 nucleotides) and 1-nucleotide 3'-flap structure

  • Use radiolabeled (³²P) or fluorescently-labeled oligonucleotides for sensitive detection

  • Implement rapid quench-flow techniques for pre-steady-state kinetic analysis

  • Separate reaction products using denaturing PAGE followed by phosphorimaging quantification

  • Calculate enzymatic parameters (kcat, KM) from multiple independent experiments

  • How does substrate structure influence A. clavatus FEN1 processing efficiency?

A. clavatus FEN1, like other FEN1 enzymes, exhibits different processing efficiencies depending on substrate structural characteristics:

Substrate TypeRelative Processing EfficiencyRate-Limiting StepBiological Relevance
Short 5'-flaps (≤30 nt)High, comparable rates regardless of length Product releaseOkazaki fragment processing
Long 5'-flaps (>30 nt)Lower, length-dependent decrease Chemistry or pre-chemistry stepAberrant replication products
TNR-containing flapsProcessed more slowly than mixed sequences Likely impeded by secondary structure formationGenetic instability in repeat regions
Double-flap structuresHighest specificity (1-nt 3'-flap)Precise positioning at cleavage sitePhysiological replication intermediates
Gap substratesLower activity (GEN activity) Recognition and proper positioningStalled replication fork repair

To experimentally determine these differences:

  • Design substrate panels with systematic variations in flap length, sequence composition, and structure

  • Employ rapid quench-flow kinetics to measure single-turnover rates

  • Compare multiple-turnover conditions to identify rate-limiting steps

  • Analyze cleavage products using high-resolution gel electrophoresis

  • Correlate structural features with processing efficiency using kinetic modeling

Intermediate Research Questions

  • How does A. clavatus FEN1 compare structurally and functionally to FEN1 from other Aspergillus species?

Comparative analysis of FEN1 across Aspergillus species reveals important insights into evolutionary conservation and specialization:

Aspergillus SpeciesUniProt IDLengthSequence Identity to A. clavatus FEN1Distinguishing Features
A. clavatusA1CJ75 ~395 aa100%Structure-specific endonuclease activity
A. fumigatusQ4WF29 ~380 aa~85-90%*Found in pathogenic species with high recombination rate
A. nigerA5ABU3 395 aa~80-85%*Full sequence characterized, recombinant expression validated
A. flavusN/A (inferred)~380-400 aa*~80%*Associated with aflatoxin production

*Estimated based on typical conservation patterns among Aspergillus species

Despite high sequence similarity, functional differences may exist related to:

  • DNA substrate specificity and processing rates (measurable through comparative enzyme kinetics)

  • Interaction with species-specific protein partners (identifiable via co-immunoprecipitation studies)

  • Regulation by post-translational modifications (analyzable through mass spectrometry)

  • Contribution to species-specific DNA repair pathways (assessable through genetic complementation)

  • Relationship to recombination rates (A. fumigatus has an exceptionally high recombination rate of 29.9 crossovers per chromosome pair )

For comparative functional studies:

  • Express and purify FEN1 from multiple Aspergillus species under identical conditions

  • Perform side-by-side activity assays with standardized substrates

  • Analyze structural differences using homology modeling and potentially X-ray crystallography

  • Assess cellular localization patterns using fluorescently tagged constructs

  • Create chimeric proteins to identify domains responsible for species-specific properties

  • How can recombinant A. clavatus FEN1 stability be optimized for long-term experimental use?

Maintaining enzymatic activity during storage is crucial for consistent experimental results:

Storage ConditionExpected StabilityRecommended Buffer CompositionStability Indicators
-80°C (long-term)≥12 months 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT, 50% glycerol>90% retention of activity
-20°C (medium-term)6-12 months Same as above>80% retention of activity
4°C (short-term)1-2 weeks 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT, 0.1 mM EDTAGradual activity loss
Lyophilized form12+ months Reconstitute in deionized water to 0.1-1.0 mg/mLActivity recovery upon reconstitution

To methodically optimize storage conditions:

  • Aliquot purified protein in small volumes to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles

  • Test activity retention in different buffer formulations at regular intervals

  • Add stabilizing agents (glycerol, BSA, specific ligands) to enhance longevity

  • Monitor protein state using techniques such as dynamic light scattering to detect aggregation

  • Establish a standard quality control protocol with activity measurements before each experimental series

  • If lyophilizing, include cryoprotectants and optimize reconstitution protocols

  • What kinetic mechanisms explain the substrate discrimination patterns of A. clavatus FEN1?

Understanding the kinetic basis of A. clavatus FEN1 substrate discrimination provides insights into its biological function:

Kinetic ParameterShort Flaps (≤30 nt)Long Flaps (>30 nt)TNR-containing FlapsMechanistic Implication
kcat (single-turnover)Similar values regardless of length Decreases with length Lower than mixed sequences Reflects chemistry step efficiency
KMLower (higher affinity)Higher (lower affinity)Sequence-dependentReflects substrate binding efficiency
Rate-limiting stepProduct release Chemistry or pre-chemistry step Likely impeded by secondary structureExplains functional specialization
Effect of protein partnersEnhancement of turnoverMay enable processing of otherwise poor substratesMay prevent secondary structure formationReveals biological regulation mechanisms

To experimentally elucidate these mechanisms:

  • Perform pre-steady-state kinetic analysis using rapid quench-flow techniques

  • Measure binding affinities using fluorescence anisotropy or surface plasmon resonance

  • Employ substrate competition assays to determine relative preferences

  • Create mutant enzymes targeting specific domains (helical clamp, hydrophobic wedge) to identify structural elements responsible for discrimination

  • Analyze temperature and viscosity effects to distinguish binding from chemical steps

  • Develop kinetic models that account for the observed substrate discrimination patterns

  • How does A. clavatus FEN1 contribute to DNA repair pathways in filamentous fungi?

A. clavatus FEN1 plays crucial roles in multiple DNA repair pathways, with important implications for fungal genome maintenance:

Repair PathwayFEN1 FunctionExperimental ApproachPotential Fungal-Specific Aspects
Long-patch BERRemoves 5'-flap during repair synthesis In vitro reconstitution, DNA glycosylase couplingMay have enhanced importance in environmental DNA damage response
Okazaki fragment processingPrecise cleavage at RNA-DNA junctionsReplication fork reconstitutionPotentially adapted to high GC content in fungal genomes
Double-strand break repairResolution of intermediates during HRγ-H2AX foci formation after DNA damageMay contribute to the high recombination rate in Aspergillus species
Resolution of TNR structuresPrevention of repeat expansion TNR stability assays in FEN1-depleted cellsCould influence adaptation through genomic plasticity
Stalled replication fork restartGap endonuclease activity on fork structures DNA combing, fork progression analysisMay be critical for resistance to genotoxic environmental agents

To systematically investigate these functions:

  • Generate conditional FEN1 mutants in A. clavatus (as complete knockouts may be lethal )

  • Assess sensitivity to various DNA-damaging agents (MMS, UV, hydroxyurea)

  • Measure mutation rates and spectra in FEN1-deficient strains

  • Analyze genetic interactions with other DNA repair genes using synthetic genetic array analysis

  • Perform ChIP-seq to identify genomic binding sites following DNA damage

  • Quantify recombination rates and patterns in FEN1-deficient backgrounds

Advanced Research Questions

  • What molecular interactions govern the rate-determining step switch in A. clavatus FEN1 activity?

The kinetic switch in the rate-determining step of FEN1 from product release to chemistry (or pre-chemistry) as flap length increases represents a fundamental aspect of its regulation:

Flap LengthRate-Determining StepStructural Elements InvolvedMolecular Interactions
Short (≤30 nt)Product release C-terminal domain, hydrophobic wedgeDNA-protein contacts at cleavage site
Long (>30 nt)Chemistry or pre-chemistry Helical clamp (arch) regionssDNA threading through protein structure
TNR-containingLikely secondary structure resolutionHelical clamp, upstream duplex binding siteCompetition between intrastrand and protein-DNA interactions

To elucidate these molecular mechanisms:

  • Generate structure-based mutants targeting specific domains:

    • Helical clamp mutations to disrupt DNA threading

    • Active site mutations affecting metal coordination

    • C-terminal mutations affecting product release

  • Perform pre-steady-state kinetic analysis of these mutants with varied substrates

  • Employ spectroscopic techniques (FRET, fluorescence stopped-flow) to monitor conformational changes

  • Use molecular dynamics simulations to model the threading mechanism and identify rate-limiting conformational changes

  • Develop a comprehensive kinetic model incorporating structural transitions and substrate recognition steps

  • How might post-translational modifications regulate A. clavatus FEN1 in response to cellular stresses?

Post-translational modifications (PTMs) likely play critical roles in regulating A. clavatus FEN1 activity in response to cellular conditions:

ModificationPotential SitesExpected Functional EffectDetection MethodBiological Context
PhosphorylationSer residues (analogous to human Ser187) Altered subcellular localization, activity modulationPhospho-specific antibodies, mass spectrometryCell cycle regulation, DNA damage response
AcetylationLys residues in DNA-binding regionsReduced DNA binding affinityMass spectrometry, acetylation-mimicking mutationsReplication stress response
SUMOylationLys residues in regulatory domainsAltered protein interactionsSUMO-pulldown assaysReplication fork stalling
UbiquitinationLys residues throughout proteinProteasomal degradationUbiquitin remnant profilingCell cycle exit, apoptosis

A comprehensive experimental approach would:

  • Identify PTMs using mass spectrometry under various cellular conditions:

    • Normal growth

    • DNA damage (UV, MMS exposure)

    • Replication stress (hydroxyurea treatment)

    • Oxidative stress (H2O2 exposure, relevant to host-pathogen interactions)

  • Create site-specific mutants that either prevent modification or mimic constitutive modification

  • Assess the impact of these mutations on:

    • Enzymatic activity using in vitro assays

    • Subcellular localization using fluorescent tagging

    • Protein-protein interactions using co-immunoprecipitation

    • Fungal fitness under various stress conditions

  • Identify the enzymes responsible for adding and removing these modifications

  • How could A. clavatus FEN1 be exploited as a target for antifungal development?

Given FEN1's essential role in DNA metabolism, it represents a potential target for antifungal development:

Targeting StrategySelectivity BasisScreening ApproachDevelopment Challenges
Direct enzymatic inhibitionStructural differences between fungal and human FEN1High-throughput fluorescent nuclease assaysAchieving fungal selectivity
Disruption of protein-protein interactionsUnique fungal protein partnersProtein fragment complementation assaysIdentifying critical fungal-specific interactions
Synthetic lethalityGenetic interactions specific to fungiCombination screens with existing antifungalsUnderstanding compensatory mechanisms
Stress-induced vulnerabilityConditional essentiality under stressGrowth inhibition under DNA-damaging conditionsTranslating to in vivo efficacy

A systematic development pathway would include:

  • Structural analysis to identify unique features of A. clavatus FEN1 compared to human FEN1

  • Virtual screening of compound libraries targeting fungal-specific pockets

  • Biochemical validation of hit compounds using recombinant protein

  • Structure-activity relationship studies to optimize selectivity

  • Testing for synergy with existing antifungals (based on findings that FEN1/SUR4 deletions sensitize fungi to amphotericin B )

  • Assessment of resistance development potential through directed evolution experiments

  • In vivo efficacy testing in appropriate infection models

  • How does A. clavatus FEN1 contribute to the repair of oxidative DNA damage in this filamentous fungus?

Understanding A. clavatus FEN1's role in oxidative damage repair provides insights into fungal stress responses:

Oxidative LesionRepair PathwayFEN1 RoleExperimental ApproachFungal-Specific Considerations
8-oxoguanineLong-patch BER5'-flap removal after DNA glycosylase actionReconstituted BER assaysPotential adaptation to oxidative environments
Abasic sitesLong-patch BERRemoval of displaced strand during repair synthesisAP site-containing substrate processingMay be critical for survival during host immune response
Single-strand breaksSingle-strand break repairProcessing of 5'-terminusSSB repair reconstitutionCould influence pathogenicity in invasive aspergillosis
Clustered lesionsComplex repair pathwaysResolution of complex DNA structuresDefined damaged DNA substratesMay reflect adaptation to environmental stresses

To methodically investigate these functions:

  • Create oxidative damage-containing DNA substrates with defined lesions

  • Measure processing efficiency of these substrates by A. clavatus FEN1

  • Reconstitute complete repair pathways using purified proteins

  • Assess oxidative stress sensitivity in FEN1-depleted fungal strains

  • Compare with human FEN1 to identify potential functional differences

  • Investigate how over-expression of FEN1 affects oxidative stress tolerance, similar to how it was shown to enhance T. cruzi parasite survival to H2O2

  • What is the relationship between A. clavatus FEN1 activity and genomic recombination rates?

The relationship between FEN1 activity and the extraordinarily high recombination rates observed in some Aspergillus species (e.g., A. fumigatus with 29.9 crossovers per chromosome pair ) presents an intriguing research direction:

Recombination ContextPotential FEN1 RoleExperimental ApproachEvolutionary Implications
Meiotic recombinationProcessing of recombination intermediatesGenetic mapping in FEN1 mutant backgroundsCould influence species adaptation rates
Mitotic recombinationResolution of stalled replication forksSister chromatid exchange assaysMay affect genomic plasticity during asexual growth
Double-strand break repairProcessing of DNA ends during HRγ-H2AX foci resolution kineticsCould contribute to antifungal resistance development
Repeat sequence stabilityPrevention of repeat expansion/contractionPCR-based repeat stability assaysMay influence genome architecture evolution

A comprehensive research approach would:

  • Generate conditional FEN1 mutants in A. clavatus

  • Measure recombination rates using genetic markers in sexual crosses

  • Analyze sister chromatid exchange frequencies during mitotic growth

  • Assess the stability of repetitive DNA elements in FEN1-deficient backgrounds

  • Perform genome-wide mapping of recombination hotspots and correlate with FEN1 binding sites

  • Compare with related Aspergillus species to establish evolutionary patterns

  • How does A. clavatus FEN1 interact with viral DNA during fungal virus infections?

Fungi, including Aspergillus species, can be infected by mycoviruses, and FEN1 may play roles in viral DNA processing:

Viral ContextPotential FEN1 RoleExperimental ApproachBiological Significance
Viral genome replicationProcessing of replication intermediatesIn vitro replication assays with viral componentsCould affect mycovirus persistence
Viral integrationResolution of integration intermediatesIntegration site mappingMay influence horizontal gene transfer
Viral DNA repairProcessing of damaged viral DNARepair assays with damaged viral substratesCould affect viral mutation rates
Host-virus interactionsViral manipulation of FEN1 (similar to HCMV IE1 protein )Protein-protein interaction studiesMay represent viral adaptation strategy

To investigate these interactions:

  • Screen for direct interactions between A. clavatus FEN1 and mycoviral proteins

  • Assess how viral infection affects FEN1 localization and post-translational modifications

  • Determine if FEN1 activity is altered in virus-infected fungal cells

  • Create FEN1 mutants resistant to viral manipulation and assess their impact on viral replication

  • Compare A. clavatus FEN1 with FEN1 from virus-resistant Aspergillus strains to identify potential resistance mechanisms

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.