Recombinant ATP synthase lipid-binding protein, mitochondrial (CBG11706)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: We will prioritize shipping the format that we have in stock. However, if you have a specific format requirement, please indicate it in your order notes. We will accommodate your request whenever possible.
Lead Time
Delivery time may vary based on the purchasing method and location. Please consult your local distributors for specific delivery estimates.
Note: Our proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. If you require dry ice shipping, please inform us in advance as additional fees will apply.
Notes
Repeated freezing and thawing of the product is not recommended. For optimal use, store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
We recommend briefly centrifuging the vial prior to opening to ensure the contents settle at the bottom. Reconstitute the protein in deionized sterile water to a final concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting the solution for storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50%. Customers may use this as a reference point.
Shelf Life
The shelf life is influenced by various factors, including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and the inherent stability of the protein.
Generally, the shelf life of the liquid form is 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. The shelf life of the lyophilized form is 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquoting is necessary for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type will be determined during the manufacturing process.
The tag type will be decided during the production process. If you have a specific tag type requirement, please inform us, and we will prioritize developing the specified tag.
Synonyms
CBG11706; ATP synthase lipid-binding protein, mitochondrial; ATPase protein 9; ATPase subunit c
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
25-116
Protein Length
Full Length of Mature Protein
Species
Caenorhabditis briggsae
Target Names
CBG11706
Target Protein Sequence
MENAVAARMISTTVARKDIDSAAKYIGAGAATVGVAGSGAGIGNVFGALVIGYARNPSLK QQLFSYAILGFALSEAMGLFCLTMGFMILFAL
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Mitochondrial membrane ATP synthase (F(1)F(0) ATP synthase or Complex V) is responsible for producing ATP from ADP in the presence of a proton gradient across the membrane. This gradient is generated by electron transport complexes within the respiratory chain. F-type ATPases comprise two structural domains: F(1), containing the extramembraneous catalytic core, and F(0), containing the membrane proton channel. These domains are linked via a central stalk and a peripheral stalk. During catalysis, ATP synthesis within the catalytic domain of F(1) is coupled to proton translocation through a rotary mechanism of the central stalk subunits. The F(0) domain includes a homomeric c-ring, likely composed of 10 subunits, which forms part of the complex rotary element.
Database Links

KEGG: cbr:CBG11706

STRING: 6238.CBG11706

Protein Families
ATPase C chain family
Subcellular Location
Mitochondrion membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is the role of the lipid-binding protein in mitochondrial ATP synthase function?

The lipid-binding protein in mitochondrial ATP synthase plays a critical role in mediating interactions between the enzyme complex and membrane lipids, particularly cardiolipins. These interactions are essential for proper ATP synthase function as a molecular motor that couples energy generated by oxidative metabolism to ATP synthesis . Specifically, lipid-binding proteins help maintain the structural integrity of the rotor-stator interface and contribute to proton translocation efficiency. Research has demonstrated that cardiolipins bind at specific sites along the horizontal helices of subunit a, flanking both sides of helices H5 and H6, with their acyl chains extending toward the rotor-stator interface . This arrangement appears to seal the F₀ complex against proton leakage by creating a high density of acyl chains, effectively separating lipid and aqueous environments near the half-channels involved in proton translocation.

How does the recombinant ATP synthase lipid-binding protein differ from native protein in terms of structural characteristics?

Key differences include:

  • Addition of affinity tags (such as hexahistidine tags) that facilitate purification and oriented reconstitution into lipid bilayers

  • Potential alterations in post-translational modifications depending on the expression system used

  • Possible differences in protein stability or folding kinetics in vitro

For structural studies, researchers should verify that the recombinant protein maintains native-like lipid-binding capacity through lipid-binding assays or structural characterization methods such as electron microscopy or atomic force microscopy .

What experimental evidence demonstrates the specificity of cardiolipin binding to ATP synthase?

Experimental evidence for cardiolipin binding specificity comes from multiple complementary approaches. High-resolution cryo-electron microscopy structures, such as those determined for the ATP synthase from Euglena gracilis, have directly visualized bound cardiolipins at specific sites within the complex . Molecular dynamics simulations further support these findings, demonstrating that cardiolipins have approximately 2.5 times higher residence times at binding sites compared to other phospholipids, indicating specific rather than random interactions .

The cardiolipin binding specificity is mediated by:

  • Positively charged residues (particularly arginines) that coordinate the negatively charged cardiolipin headgroups

  • Specific architectural features that accommodate the four acyl chains of cardiolipin molecules

  • Conservation of binding sites across evolutionarily diverse ATP synthases, suggesting functional importance

Experimentally, the specific binding of cardiolipins has been confirmed through reconstitution studies where cardiolipin content affects ATP synthase activity, stability, and proper assembly into functional complexes .

What are the optimal methods for purifying recombinant ATP synthase lipid-binding protein for structural studies?

The optimal purification strategy for recombinant ATP synthase lipid-binding protein combines multiple techniques to achieve high purity while maintaining native-like structure. Based on published protocols, the following methodological approach is recommended:

  • Engineer the recombinant protein with an affinity tag (preferably hexahistidine) positioned to not interfere with lipid-binding domains

  • Express the protein in a eukaryotic system that supports proper folding and post-translational modifications

  • Solubilize the membrane fraction using mild detergents (e.g., digitonin, DDM, or LMNG) that preserve protein-lipid interactions

  • Implement a multi-step purification strategy:

    • Initial capture using immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC)

    • Intermediate purification using ion exchange chromatography

    • Final polishing step using size exclusion chromatography

For structural studies, it's crucial to maintain a controlled lipid environment throughout purification. Researchers have successfully used detergent removal from ternary mixtures (lipid, detergent, and protein) to reconstitute the purified protein into proteoliposomes or two-dimensional crystals . When using hexahistidine-tagged constructs, the supported monolayer technique has proven effective for growing two-dimensional crystals with unidirectional orientation, exposing the F₁ domain to the lipid monolayer and the F₀ membrane region to bulk solution .

How can researchers effectively reconstitute ATP synthase lipid-binding protein into lipid bilayers for functional studies?

Effective reconstitution of ATP synthase lipid-binding protein into lipid bilayers requires careful consideration of lipid composition, protein-to-lipid ratio, and reconstitution methodology. Two established approaches have been particularly successful:

Method 1: Detergent Removal from Ternary Mixtures

  • Prepare a ternary mixture containing purified protein, appropriate lipids (including cardiolipins), and a mild detergent

  • Remove detergent gradually using either:

    • Biobeads or Amberlite XAD-2 absorption

    • Dialysis against detergent-free buffer

    • Cyclodextrin-mediated detergent sequestration

  • Monitor proteoliposome formation using dynamic light scattering or negative stain electron microscopy

  • Verify protein orientation and density using biochemical assays or imaging techniques

Method 2: Supported Monolayer Technique for 2D Crystallization

  • Form a lipid monolayer at an air-water interface

  • Add the His-tagged protein to the subphase buffer

  • Allow protein binding to the lipid monolayer via Ni²⁺-NTA lipids

  • Harvest the protein-lipid layer for structural analysis by electron or atomic force microscopy

This second approach is particularly valuable for structural studies as it ensures unidirectional orientation of the protein, with the F₁ catalytic subcomplex facing the lipid monolayer and the F₀ membrane region exposed to the solution .

What imaging techniques are most effective for visualizing ATP synthase-lipid interactions?

Multiple complementary imaging techniques have proven effective for visualizing ATP synthase-lipid interactions, each with specific advantages:

For the highest resolution studies of specific lipid binding sites, cryo-electron microscopy has been most successful, enabling researchers to identify individual cardiolipin molecules and their binding coordination with specific amino acid residues, as demonstrated in the E. gracilis ATP synthase structure where 37 associated native lipids were visualized at 2.8Å resolution .

How do specific lipids modulate the rotary mechanism of ATP synthase?

Specific lipids, particularly cardiolipins, modulate the rotary mechanism of ATP synthase through several mechanistic pathways that affect both structural stability and functional dynamics. Research evidence indicates that cardiolipins bound at the rotor-stator interface likely provide a molecular environment that optimizes proton translocation efficiency and mechanical coupling .

The modulation occurs through:

Experimental approaches to study these mechanisms include site-directed mutagenesis of lipid-coordinating residues, reconstitution with different lipid compositions, and high-resolution structural studies combined with functional assays.

What is the evolutionary significance of cardiolipin binding sites in ATP synthase across different species?

The evolutionary significance of cardiolipin binding sites in ATP synthase reflects both conservation of fundamental mechanisms and adaptation to specific cellular environments. Comparative analysis across evolutionary diverse species reveals interesting patterns:

  • Functional Conservation with Structural Divergence: While the core function of cardiolipin binding (optimizing proton translocation and stabilizing the complex) appears conserved, the specific protein structures mediating these interactions show remarkable divergence. For example, the E. gracilis ATP synthase has a structurally distinct subunit a compared to other mitochondrial ATP synthases, yet maintains specific cardiolipin binding sites .

  • Environmental Adaptation: Species from different environments show variations in cardiolipin binding sites that may reflect adaptation to different membrane compositions, metabolic requirements, or bioenergetic demands.

  • Coevolution with Membrane Architecture: The arrangement of cardiolipin binding sites correlates with the role of ATP synthase dimers in shaping mitochondrial cristae. In E. gracilis, a peripheral membrane subcomplex creates a cardiolipin-filled cavity that contributes to membrane curvature , suggesting coevolution of lipid binding with membrane-shaping functions.

  • Mechanistic Innovation: Some species exhibit novel mechanisms, such as the functional substitution of a mitochondrially conserved glutamate with a histidine residue in E. gracilis , demonstrating how lipid-protein interactions can be maintained despite significant changes in the protein components.

These evolutionary patterns suggest that cardiolipin binding represents a critical constraint on ATP synthase evolution, with diverse structural solutions converging on similar functional outcomes.

How do mutations in the lipid-binding regions of ATP synthase affect mitochondrial bioenergetics?

Mutations in lipid-binding regions of ATP synthase can have profound effects on mitochondrial bioenergetics through multiple mechanisms. The severity and specific consequences depend on the particular binding site affected and the nature of the mutation.

Key consequences include:

  • Altered Proton Translocation Efficiency: Mutations affecting cardiolipin binding sites near the rotor-stator interface can compromise the integrity of proton channels, leading to proton leakage or decreased coupling efficiency. This directly impacts the proton motive force conversion to ATP synthesis .

  • Compromised Dimer Stability: Mutations in lipid-binding regions at the dimer interface can destabilize ATP synthase dimers, affecting cristae morphology and potentially compromising respiratory chain supercomplex assembly and function .

  • Protein Misfolding or Aggregation: Some mutations may disrupt the lipid environment required for proper folding or stability of ATP synthase subunits, leading to protein aggregation or premature degradation.

  • Altered Membrane Curvature: Mutations affecting the peripheral lipid-binding cavity can alter membrane curvature, potentially compromising the high surface-to-volume ratio of cristae that supports efficient oxidative phosphorylation .

Experimentally, these effects can be studied through:

  • Site-directed mutagenesis of key lipid-coordinating residues

  • Functional assays measuring ATP synthesis rates, proton leakage, and coupling efficiency

  • Structural studies assessing changes in protein conformation or lipid binding

  • Imaging studies examining effects on cristae morphology

  • Molecular dynamics simulations to predict changes in lipid-protein interactions

What are the key considerations for designing molecular dynamics simulations to study ATP synthase-lipid interactions?

Designing effective molecular dynamics (MD) simulations for ATP synthase-lipid interactions requires careful consideration of multiple factors to ensure meaningful results:

  • System Preparation:

    • Use high-resolution structural data (preferably <3Å) as starting points

    • Include all relevant subunits that contact lipids

    • Incorporate a realistic mixed-lipid membrane environment with appropriate cardiolipin percentage (typically 15-20%)

    • Maintain physiologically relevant ion concentrations

    • Consider protonation states carefully, especially for residues in proton channels

  • Simulation Parameters:

    • Select appropriate force fields validated for membrane proteins and lipids

    • Use a sufficiently large simulation box to prevent artificial boundary effects

    • Implement long equilibration periods (>100ns) before production runs

    • Conduct production runs of sufficient duration to capture lipid binding events (typically microseconds)

    • Consider enhanced sampling techniques for rare events

  • Analysis Approaches:

    • Calculate lipid residence times at binding sites to quantify specificity

    • Analyze lipid diffusion rates in proximity to protein

    • Measure protein-lipid contacts and binding energies

    • Monitor conformational changes in protein structure induced by lipid binding

Successful studies have implemented coarse-grained MD simulations to achieve longer timescales, as demonstrated in the analysis of the E. gracilis ATP synthase, where simulations showed that cardiolipins had approximately 2.5 times higher residence times in binding sites compared to other lipid types . Complementary all-atom simulations can then be used to refine understanding of specific interaction details.

How can researchers distinguish between specific and non-specific lipid interactions with ATP synthase?

Distinguishing between specific and non-specific lipid interactions requires a multi-faceted experimental approach combined with careful data analysis:

ParameterSpecific InteractionsNon-specific InteractionsExperimental Approach
Binding AffinityHigher affinity (Kd in nM-μM range)Lower affinity (Kd in mM range)Isothermal titration calorimetry; Surface plasmon resonance
Residence TimeLonger duration (μs-ms)Shorter duration (ns-μs)Molecular dynamics simulations; NMR relaxation measurements
StereoselectivityDemonstrates preference for specific lipid speciesSimilar affinity for various lipid typesCompetitive binding assays with different lipids
Binding Site ConservationConserved across speciesVariable or absent in homologsComparative structural analysis; Sequence alignment
Structural SpecificityDefined binding pocket with specific interactionsSurface adsorption without defined pocketHigh-resolution structure determination (cryo-EM, X-ray)
Mutation SensitivitySignificantly altered by point mutationsMinimally affected by point mutationsSite-directed mutagenesis; Functional assays

In the case of ATP synthase, cryo-EM structures have revealed specific cardiolipin binding sites coordinated by positively charged residues (particularly arginines) . Molecular dynamics simulations further confirmed specificity by showing that cardiolipins had 2.5 times higher residence times at these sites compared to other phospholipids . This combination of structural visualization with dynamic analysis provides compelling evidence for specific rather than non-specific interactions.

What quality control measures should be implemented when expressing recombinant ATP synthase lipid-binding proteins?

Rigorous quality control is essential when expressing recombinant ATP synthase lipid-binding proteins to ensure structural and functional integrity. A comprehensive quality control workflow should include:

  • Expression Optimization and Monitoring:

    • Screen multiple expression systems (bacterial, yeast, insect, mammalian) to identify optimal conditions

    • Monitor expression levels using Western blotting with specific antibodies

    • Assess solubility in different detergent systems

    • Optimize induction parameters (temperature, time, inducer concentration)

  • Purification Quality Metrics:

    • Verify protein purity using SDS-PAGE with appropriate molecular weight standards

    • Confirm identity using mass spectrometry or N-terminal sequencing

    • Assess monodispersity using size exclusion chromatography

    • Verify oligomeric state using analytical ultracentrifugation or native PAGE

  • Structural Integrity Assessment:

    • Analyze secondary structure content using circular dichroism spectroscopy

    • Verify thermal stability using differential scanning fluorimetry

    • Assess tertiary structure using intrinsic fluorescence or limited proteolysis

    • Confirm lipid binding capacity using fluorescence-based lipid binding assays

  • Functional Validation:

    • Verify lipid binding using liposome flotation assays

    • Assess incorporation into lipid bilayers using electron microscopy

    • Confirm proper folding through binding to known interaction partners

    • Validate functional activity in reconstituted systems if applicable

For hexahistidine-tagged constructs specifically designed for two-dimensional crystallization, additional quality control should verify that the tag is accessible for binding to Ni²⁺-NTA lipids and that the protein orientation in reconstituted systems is unidirectional as expected .

How should researchers analyze and present ATP synthase structural data in publications?

Effective analysis and presentation of ATP synthase structural data requires appropriate methodologies and clear formatting to ensure transparency and reproducibility:

  • Table Formats for Structural Parameters:

Publications should include tables with comprehensive structural parameters for clarity and comparison with other structures . For example:

ParameterValueComparison to Related Structures
Resolution (Å)X.XRange in published structures
Map Sharpening B-factor (Ų)XXXStandard range for technique
Number of protein subunitsXXConservation across species
Number of bound lipidsXXTypical range in similar complexes
Buried surface area at interfaces (Ų)XXXXComparison to other ATP synthases

Following these guidelines ensures that structural data on ATP synthase lipid-binding proteins is presented in a manner that facilitates understanding, comparison, and future research building on the findings .

What are the most common pitfalls in interpreting lipid-protein interaction data for ATP synthase?

Researchers should be aware of several common pitfalls when interpreting lipid-protein interaction data for ATP synthase:

  • Misattribution of Density to Lipids:

    • Pitfall: Incorrectly assigning density in structural maps to lipids when it could represent detergent molecules, buffer components, or protein segments

    • Mitigation: Validate lipid assignments through multiple methods, including mass spectrometry of co-purified lipids and molecular dynamics simulations; consider resolution limitations

  • Overlooking Detergent Effects:

    • Pitfall: Failing to account for detergent-induced alterations in lipid binding or protein conformation

    • Mitigation: Compare results across multiple detergent systems; validate findings in more native-like environments such as nanodiscs or liposomes

  • Static Interpretation of Dynamic Interactions:

    • Pitfall: Treating cryo-EM or X-ray structures as representing a single fixed state rather than one snapshot of a dynamic interaction

    • Mitigation: Complement structural studies with dynamic techniques (MD simulations, hydrogen-deuterium exchange, NMR) to capture the full spectrum of interaction states

  • Overinterpreting Conservation:

    • Pitfall: Assuming that lipid binding sites must be conserved across species when evolutionary divergence may have created alternative but functionally equivalent solutions

    • Mitigation: Consider functional conservation separate from structural conservation; examine adaptation in context of species-specific membrane compositions

  • Neglecting Membrane Environment Complexity:

    • Pitfall: Simplified reconstitution systems may not capture the complexity of the native membrane environment

    • Mitigation: Use lipid compositions that better reflect native environments; consider the role of membrane potential, pH gradients, and membrane curvature in modulating interactions

To address these pitfalls, researchers should implement triangulation approaches using multiple complementary techniques and carefully distinguish between direct experimental observations and model-based interpretations in their publications.

How can researchers effectively compare lipid binding patterns across different ATP synthase variants?

Effective comparison of lipid binding patterns across ATP synthase variants requires systematic approaches and appropriate normalization strategies:

  • Standardized Experimental Conditions:

    • Use consistent lipid compositions across experiments

    • Maintain identical buffer conditions, temperature, and pH

    • Apply uniform protein-to-lipid ratios in reconstitution systems

    • Process all samples through identical purification protocols

  • Quantitative Comparison Metrics:

    • Calculate lipid binding stoichiometry for each variant

    • Determine binding affinities (Kd values) using isothermal titration calorimetry or surface plasmon resonance

    • Measure lipid residence times through MD simulations

    • Quantify the number of coordinating interactions per lipid

  • Structural Alignment Approaches:

    • Superimpose structures based on conserved core elements

    • Calculate RMSD values for lipid binding site architectures

    • Map conservation of lipid-coordinating residues

    • Generate distance matrices for key interaction points

  • Visualization and Presentation Strategies:

Comparison AspectVisualization MethodAdvantages
Binding Site ConservationHeat maps on protein structureIntuitive visualization of conservation patterns
Affinity DifferencesBar charts with error barsClear comparison of quantitative differences
Binding Site ArchitectureSuperimposed structures with varied coloringDirect visualization of structural differences
Lipid SpecificityRadar plots showing relative affinities for different lipidsMulti-dimensional comparison across variants
  • Statistical Analysis:

    • Apply appropriate statistical tests to determine significance of observed differences

    • Use multiple replicates to establish confidence intervals

    • Consider Bayesian approaches for comparing binding models

    • Implement clustering algorithms to identify patterns across multiple variants

This systematic approach enables researchers to distinguish between conserved features that likely represent fundamental functional requirements and variable elements that may reflect adaptation to specific cellular environments or evolutionary divergence.

What are the most promising future directions for research on ATP synthase lipid-binding proteins?

Research on ATP synthase lipid-binding proteins is poised for significant advances in several promising directions that build on recent methodological developments and emerging biological questions:

  • Time-Resolved Structural Studies: Implementing time-resolved cryo-EM or spectroscopic techniques to capture dynamic conformational changes during the catalytic cycle and understand how lipid interactions modulate these transitions. This approach would move beyond static snapshots to reveal the dynamic interplay between lipids and protein components during ATP synthesis.

  • Single-Molecule Biophysics: Applying single-molecule techniques to directly observe how lipid binding affects rotary dynamics and coupling efficiency in real-time. These approaches could reveal heterogeneity in behavior that is masked in ensemble measurements and provide insights into the mechanical consequences of specific lipid-protein interactions.

  • Synthetic Biology Approaches: Engineering ATP synthase variants with modified lipid-binding sites to create systems with altered efficiency, regulatory properties, or environmental responsiveness. Such designed systems could both test mechanistic hypotheses and potentially lead to applications in bioenergetics or nanomedicine.

  • Integration with Membrane Biology: Exploring how ATP synthase lipid interactions contribute to larger-scale membrane organization, including the formation and maintenance of mitochondrial cristae, respiratory chain supercomplexes, and lipid microdomains. This research direction connects molecular-scale interactions to cellular-scale membrane architecture.

  • Therapeutic Targeting: Investigating how specific modulation of ATP synthase-lipid interactions might be leveraged for therapeutic interventions in mitochondrial disorders, metabolic diseases, or cancer. This translational direction could open new avenues for drug development targeting bioenergetic pathways.

Each of these directions benefits from the convergence of structural biology, biophysics, and computational approaches, promising a more complete understanding of how lipid interactions tune the function of this fundamental molecular machine.

How do findings on recombinant ATP synthase lipid-binding proteins inform our understanding of mitochondrial diseases?

Findings on recombinant ATP synthase lipid-binding proteins provide crucial insights into mitochondrial disease mechanisms through several pathways:

  • Mechanistic Basis for Pathogenic Mutations: Research on lipid-binding sites helps interpret how specific mutations found in patients with mitochondrial diseases disrupt ATP synthase function. When mutations affect residues involved in coordinating cardiolipins, they may compromise proton translocation efficiency, complex stability, or assembly—all potentially leading to bioenergetic deficiencies.

  • Role in Mitochondrial Membrane Architecture: Studies revealing how lipid-protein interactions contribute to cristae formation provide insight into morphological abnormalities observed in mitochondrial diseases. Since proper cristae structure is essential for efficient oxidative phosphorylation, disruptions to lipid-binding regions that shape membrane curvature may contribute to disease pathology .

  • Potential Compensatory Mechanisms: Understanding the diverse evolutionary solutions for lipid-protein interactions across species suggests potential compensatory mechanisms that might be therapeutically exploited. For instance, if a disease-causing mutation disrupts one lipid-binding site, enhancing interactions at alternative sites might partially restore function.

  • Biomarker Development: Changes in cardiolipin content, composition, or ATP synthase-lipid interactions could serve as biomarkers for mitochondrial dysfunction. Recombinant protein systems provide platforms for developing assays to detect such changes in patient samples.

  • Drug Development Targets: Lipid-binding sites represent potential targets for therapeutic intervention. Compounds that stabilize critical lipid-protein interactions or compensate for their loss could potentially address bioenergetic deficiencies in mitochondrial diseases.

These connections highlight how fundamental research on ATP synthase lipid interactions directly informs our understanding of disease mechanisms and potential therapeutic approaches for mitochondrial disorders.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.