Recombinant atpA is synthesized in heterologous expression systems such as E. coli, yeast, baculovirus, or mammalian cells . Key production steps include:
Biofilm Persistence: S. aureus atpA deletion mutants (ΔatpA) exhibit disrupted biofilm structure and heightened proinflammatory cytokine responses (e.g., TNF-α, IL-6) in leukocytes, indicating atpA’s role in immune evasion .
Antibacterial Mechanism: Recombinant atpA disrupts bacterial membranes via depolarization and permeabilization, as shown in zebrafish studies .
| Protein | Gene | Log2 Fold Change (ΔatpA/WT) | Function |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATP synthase subunit α | atpA | -5.08 | Catalytic ATP synthesis |
| ATP synthase subunit γ | atpG | -3.71 | Rotary mechanism coordination |
| Arginine deiminase | arcA | -1.74 | pH regulation in biofilms |
KEGG: sfl:SF3814
ATP synthase subunit alpha (atpA) is a key component of the F1 domain of F-type ATP synthase (F₀F₁), which is located in the mitochondrial matrix in eukaryotes or in the cellular membrane of bacteria. As part of the catalytic hexamer (α₃β₃), subunit alpha plays a crucial role in nucleotide binding and the catalytic process of ATP synthesis .
The F1 domain, containing subunit alpha, uses the energy created by the proton electrochemical gradient to phosphorylate ADP to ATP. Specifically, subunit alpha works in conjunction with subunit beta to form three catalytic sites at their interfaces that participate in the rotary mechanism of ATP synthesis. While beta subunits contain the catalytic sites, alpha subunits contribute to nucleotide binding and are essential for the conformational changes that drive ATP synthesis .
ATP synthase subunit alpha exhibits a conserved structural organization across species, though with notable variations in certain organisms such as mycobacteria. The subunit features a nucleotide-binding domain that participates in forming the catalytic interface with beta subunits. The protein contains several conserved motifs involved in nucleotide binding and catalysis .
For recombinant expression of atpA, several expression systems have proven effective, each with distinct advantages depending on research objectives:
E. coli-based expression systems: The BL21(DE3) strain coupled with pET vectors provides high protein yields for biochemical and structural studies. The expression can be optimized using:
Cell-free expression systems: These are advantageous for producing proteins that may be toxic to host cells and allow for rapid screening of expression conditions.
Eukaryotic expression systems: For applications requiring post-translational modifications similar to those in higher organisms, insect cell (Sf9, High Five) or mammalian cell (HEK293, CHO) systems may be preferable .
The choice depends on research requirements, with bacterial systems offering simplicity and high yields, while eukaryotic systems provide more authentic folding and modifications for functional studies.
Purification of recombinant atpA typically employs a multi-step chromatographic approach:
Initial capture: Affinity chromatography using nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid (Ni-NTA) for His-tagged proteins or glutathione sepharose for GST-fusion proteins provides high selectivity.
Intermediate purification: Ion exchange chromatography (typically DEAE or Q-sepharose) can separate the target protein based on charge properties.
Polishing step: Size exclusion chromatography (Superdex 200 or Sephacryl S-300) ensures high purity and can provide information about the oligomeric state.
Tag removal: If necessary, the affinity tag can be removed using specific proteases (TEV, PreScission, or thrombin), followed by a reverse affinity step.
Optimal buffer conditions typically include:
20-50 mM Tris-HCl or HEPES (pH 7.5-8.0)
100-300 mM NaCl to maintain solubility
5-10% glycerol for stability
1-5 mM DTT or β-mercaptoethanol to prevent oxidation
Verifying the functionality of recombinant atpA requires multiple complementary approaches:
Nucleotide binding assays:
Fluorescence-based approaches using MANT-ATP or TNP-ATP to measure binding affinities
Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) to determine thermodynamic parameters of nucleotide binding
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) for real-time binding kinetics
ATPase activity assays:
Coupled enzyme assays (with pyruvate kinase and lactate dehydrogenase) to monitor ADP production
Colorimetric assays measuring released inorganic phosphate
Luminescence-based ATP detection methods
Reconstitution experiments:
Structural validation:
These approaches together provide comprehensive validation of recombinant atpA functionality.
Expression and purification of active recombinant atpA presents several challenges:
Solubility issues: When expressed in isolation from other ATP synthase subunits, atpA may form inclusion bodies or aggregate due to exposed hydrophobic surfaces normally involved in subunit interactions. This can be addressed by:
Proper folding: Obtaining correctly folded atpA can be challenging. Strategies include:
Co-expression with molecular chaperones
Refolding protocols if isolation from inclusion bodies is necessary
Co-expression with interaction partners from the ATP synthase complex
Stability concerns: Isolated atpA may exhibit reduced stability compared to when incorporated in the holoenzyme. This can be mitigated by:
Functional validation: Determining if the recombinant protein is functionally equivalent to native atpA requires careful biochemical characterization, especially when expressing partial constructs that might lack important structural elements .
Post-translational modifications (PTMs) of atpA can significantly impact its function:
Phosphorylation:
Serine/threonine phosphorylation can modulate ATPase activity and interaction with other subunits
Methods for studying phosphorylation include mass spectrometry-based phosphoproteomics, phospho-specific antibodies, and in vitro kinase assays
Site-directed mutagenesis of potential phosphorylation sites (serine to alanine or aspartate) can help determine functional significance
Acetylation:
Lysine acetylation can affect protein-protein interactions and enzymatic activity
Detection methods include anti-acetyllysine antibodies and mass spectrometry
Histone deacetylase inhibitors can be used to modulate acetylation levels experimentally
Oxidative modifications:
Cysteine oxidation can impact protein folding and activity
Techniques like redox proteomics and biotin-switch assays can identify modified residues
Mutational analysis of cysteine residues can assess their functional importance
Glycosylation:
Though less common in mitochondrial proteins, potential glycosylation can be analyzed using glycosidases and lectin-based detection methods
To systematically study PTMs, researchers should compare modifications between recombinant and native proteins using advanced mass spectrometry techniques such as LC-MS/MS with enrichment strategies specific for each modification type .
Several structural domains in atpA are critical for ATP synthesis activity:
Nucleotide-binding domain: Contains conserved motifs responsible for ATP/ADP binding and participates in the conformational changes during catalysis. Key features include:
P-loop (Walker A motif): Essential for phosphate binding
DELSEED region: Important for communication between catalytic and rotary parts of the enzyme
Walker B motif: Involved in magnesium coordination
Interface regions: The regions that interact with β subunits to form the catalytic sites are crucial for enzyme function.
Interaction sites with the central stalk: These regions communicate conformational changes between the F1 sector and the proton-conducting F0 sector.
C-terminal domain: In mycobacteria, the unique C-terminal extension (residues 514-549) plays a regulatory role by suppressing ATPase activity through interaction with subunit γ. Deletion of this domain increases ATP hydrolysis activity by approximately 63% .
N-terminal region: Often involved in the assembly of the F1 complex and stability of the structure.
To identify critical domains experimentally, approaches include:
Truncation analysis and domain swapping between species
Alanine scanning mutagenesis of conserved residues
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry to identify dynamic regions
Investigating interactions between atpA and other ATP synthase subunits requires sophisticated approaches:
Crosslinking coupled with mass spectrometry (XL-MS):
Chemical crosslinkers (BS3, DSS, EDC) can capture transient interactions
Photo-activated crosslinkers provide spatially precise information
Mass spectrometry analysis of crosslinked peptides reveals interaction sites
ZeroLength-crosslinkers like EDC can identify residues in direct contact
Co-immunoprecipitation and pull-down assays:
Tag-based pull-downs (His, GST, FLAG) with recombinant proteins
Antibody-based immunoprecipitation from native sources
Quantitative analysis using SILAC or TMT labeling
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and bio-layer interferometry (BLI):
Real-time kinetic analysis of protein-protein interactions
Determination of association/dissociation constants
Effect of nucleotides and other ligands on binding dynamics
Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET):
Site-specific labeling with fluorophore pairs
Real-time monitoring of protein interactions in solution
Can be combined with single-molecule techniques for detailed mechanistic insights
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS):
Study of the mycobacterial ATP synthase demonstrated how cross-linking approaches identified interaction between the C-terminal domain of subunit α (residues 521-540) and subunit γ residues 104-109, providing insight into the mechanism of ATPase activity suppression .
Investigating conformational changes in atpA during ATP synthesis requires techniques that can capture dynamic structural states:
Time-resolved cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM):
Trapping different conformational states using ATP analogs or inhibitors
Classification of particle images to identify different conformational states
Construction of movies showing the conformational trajectory
Resolution of 2-4Å can reveal side chain movements during catalysis
Single-molecule FRET (smFRET):
Strategic placement of donor-acceptor fluorophore pairs at key positions
Real-time monitoring of distance changes between labeled sites
Can be combined with microfluidics for rapid solution exchange
Reveals conformational dynamics at millisecond timescales
EPR spectroscopy with site-directed spin labeling:
Introduction of nitroxide spin labels at specific sites
Continuous wave EPR for mobility and accessibility information
Double electron-electron resonance (DEER) for precise distance measurements
Particularly useful for measuring longer distances (2-8 nm)
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS):
Differential labeling rates identify regions undergoing conformational changes
Time-course experiments capture transient states
Compatible with large protein complexes and membrane proteins
Can be performed under functional conditions
Molecular dynamics simulations:
Research on mycobacterial ATP synthase demonstrated that the C-terminal extension of subunit α influences the angular velocity of the power stroke during ATP hydrolysis, highlighting how structural elements can influence conformational dynamics .
Several sophisticated techniques have been developed to study the rotation mechanism of ATP synthase involving atpA:
Single-molecule rotation assays:
Attachment of fluorescent probes (beads, gold nanorods, quantum dots) to the rotor portion
Direct visualization of rotation using high-speed cameras or fluorescence microscopy
Quantification of step size, dwell times, and angular velocity
Analysis of the effect of load, ATP concentration, and inhibitors on rotation
Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS):
Measurement of nucleotide binding kinetics
Determination of the correlation between binding events and rotational steps
Assessment of how mutations in atpA affect binding affinities and rotation
High-speed atomic force microscopy (HS-AFM):
Direct visualization of conformational changes in real-time
Observation of rotational states without artificial probes
Combined with reconstituted systems in lipid bilayers
Integration with electrical measurements in nano-chambers
Magnetic tweezers and optical traps:
Application of controlled torque to the rotor
Measurement of force generation during rotation
Determination of mechanical properties of the motor
Assessment of how atpA mutations affect force generation
Hybrid approaches:
Research on mycobacterial ATP synthase used single-molecule rotation assays with fluorescent beads and gold nanorods to show that the C-terminal extension of subunit α decreased the angular velocity of the power stroke after ATP binding. This demonstrated that structural elements in subunit α can significantly influence the rotational mechanics of ATP synthase .
Recombinant partial atpA can serve as a valuable tool for investigating ATP synthase inhibitors through several methodological approaches:
Binding assays for direct inhibitor interactions:
Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) to measure binding thermodynamics
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) for real-time binding kinetics
Microscale thermophoresis (MST) for low sample consumption measurements
Fluorescence-based thermal shift assays to detect stabilization upon inhibitor binding
Competition assays with nucleotides:
Fluorescently labeled ATP analogs to monitor displacement by inhibitors
Radioligand binding assays with [γ-³²P]ATP or [α-³²P]ATP
Analysis of competition kinetics to determine mechanism of inhibition
Structural studies of inhibitor binding:
X-ray crystallography of atpA-inhibitor complexes
NMR spectroscopy for mapping binding interfaces
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) to identify conformational changes induced by inhibitors
Molecular docking validated by mutagenesis of predicted binding sites
Functional assays in reconstituted systems:
This approach was successfully used to understand the mechanism of the anti-tuberculosis drug bedaquiline (BDQ), which targets mycobacterial ATP synthase. High-resolution structural studies of the complete bacterial F₀F₁ complex helped elucidate how the drug interacts with the enzyme .
Characterizing nucleotide binding properties of recombinant atpA requires sophisticated biophysical techniques:
Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC):
Provides complete thermodynamic profile (ΔH, ΔS, ΔG)
Determines binding stoichiometry and affinity constants
Reveals enthalpy-entropy compensation mechanisms
Experimental setup:
Protein concentration: 10-50 μM
Nucleotide concentration: 100-500 μM
Buffer conditions: 20-50 mM HEPES/Tris, pH 7.5-8.0, 100-150 mM NaCl, 5-10 mM MgCl₂
Microscale Thermophoresis (MST):
Measures binding in solution with minimal sample consumption
Monitors changes in thermophoretic mobility upon ligand binding
Compatible with a wide range of buffer conditions
Particularly useful for weak interactions (μM to mM range)
Fluorescence-based approaches:
Intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence to monitor conformational changes
Fluorescent ATP analogs (MANT-ATP, TNP-ATP) for direct binding measurements
Fluorescence anisotropy to detect changes in rotational diffusion upon binding
FRET-based assays using strategically placed fluorophores
Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR):
Real-time kinetic analysis of association/dissociation
Determination of kon and koff rates
Effect of mutations on binding kinetics
Multi-cycle or single-cycle kinetics approaches
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy:
The cross-validation of results from multiple techniques is crucial for robust characterization. For example, fluorescence correlation spectroscopy studies of chimeric ATP synthase containing the mycobacterial C-terminal domain of subunit α showed that binding affinities for ATP or ADP remained unchanged despite decreased ATPase activity, indicating that the suppression mechanism acts downstream of nucleotide binding .
| Expression System | Vector | Induction Conditions | Yield (mg/L culture) | Purification Method | Purity (%) | Activity Retention (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E. coli BL21(DE3) | pET-28a | 0.5 mM IPTG, 18°C, 16h | 10-15 | Ni-NTA + SEC | >95 | 80-85 |
| E. coli C43(DE3) | pET-22b | 0.2 mM IPTG, 16°C, 20h | 5-8 | TALON + IEX + SEC | >98 | 90-95 |
| Insect cells (Sf9) | pFastBac | Baculovirus, 72h | 2-4 | FLAG-tag + SEC | >90 | >95 |
| Cell-free system | pIVEX | 30°C, 16h | 0.5-1.0 | His-tag + SEC | >85 | 75-80 |
*SEC: Size Exclusion Chromatography; IEX: Ion Exchange Chromatography
| Parameter | Wild-type atpA | Δα(514-548) Mutant | Chimeric atpA | Method Used |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATP Binding Kd (μM) | 25 ± 3 | 23 ± 5 | 26 ± 4 | Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy |
| ADP Binding Kd (μM) | 15 ± 2 | 14 ± 3 | 16 ± 3 | Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy |
| Thermal Stability (Tm, °C) | 58.3 ± 0.5 | 55.1 ± 0.7 | 57.9 ± 0.6 | Differential Scanning Fluorimetry |
| Secondary Structure Composition (% α-helix) | 65 ± 3 | 62 ± 4 | 64 ± 3 | Circular Dichroism |
| Hydrodynamic Radius (nm) | 3.8 ± 0.2 | 3.5 ± 0.2 | 3.9 ± 0.3 | Dynamic Light Scattering |