The Recombinant Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus Occlusion-derived virus envelope protein E56 (ODVP6E) is a specific protein encoded by the Autographa californica multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus (AcMNPV). This protein is crucial for the structure and function of occlusion-derived viruses (ODVs), which are essential for the oral infectivity and host range of the virus. Despite the lack of specific references to "ODVP6E" in the provided search results, the protein in question is closely related to the ODV-E56 protein, which has been extensively studied.
Structure: The ODV-E56 protein is an envelope protein of occlusion-derived viruses, with a molecular weight of approximately 56 kDa. It is localized to the envelope of ODVs and plays a significant role in the formation and stability of these viral particles .
Function: ODV-E56 is involved in the oral infectivity of the virus. Studies have shown that mutations affecting this protein can significantly impair the virus's ability to infect hosts orally . Additionally, ODV-E56 is enriched in viral-induced intranuclear microvesicles, suggesting its involvement in viral replication and assembly processes .
Impaired Oral Infectivity: Recombinant viruses lacking the ODV-E56 protein exhibit reduced oral infectivity compared to wild-type viruses. This reduction is reversed when the native or a closely related ODV-E56 gene is reintroduced into the virus .
Host Range Determinant: The ODV-E56 protein is under positive selection pressure, indicating its potential role as a determinant of the virus's host range .
Localization: ODV-E56 is primarily localized to the envelope of occlusion-derived viruses and is also found in intranuclear microvesicles .
Trafficking: The protein's trafficking to intranuclear membranes is influenced by specific viral factors, such as the C-terminal portion of the protein itself .
| Protein | Molecular Weight | Localization | Function |
|---|---|---|---|
| ODV-E56 | Approximately 56 kDa | ODV Envelope, Intranuclear Microvesicles | Oral Infectivity, Host Range Determinant |
| BV/ODV-E26 | Approximately 26 kDa | BV and ODV Envelopes, Intranuclear Microvesicles | Structural Protein, Involved in Virus Assembly |
Structural protein involved in the initial stages of per os larval infection.
KEGG: vg:1403981
ODVP6E (Occlusion-Derived Virus Envelope Protein E56) is a specific envelope protein found in occlusion-derived viruses (ODVs) of baculoviruses, including the Autographa californica Multiple Nucleopolyhedrovirus (AcMNPV). This protein is encoded by the odv-e56 gene and is integrated into the viral envelope structure. The primary function of ODVP6E is to facilitate oral infectivity of the virus, serving as a critical component for the initial infection process in host organisms.
The protein has been identified in various baculovirus species including Orgyia pseudotsugata multicapsid polyhedrosis virus (OpMNPV), Choristoneura fumiferana nuclear polyhedrosis virus (CfMNPV), and Bombyx mori nuclear polyhedrosis virus (BmNPV) . Research has demonstrated that when ODVP6E synthesis is eliminated, the oral infectivity of the virus is profoundly impaired, highlighting its essential role in the infection cycle. This protein does not affect other aspects of viral replication such as polyhedron production, morphogenesis, or the production of infectious budded virus in cell culture .
Recombinant ODVP6E protein for research purposes is typically produced using bacterial expression systems, predominantly Escherichia coli (E. coli). This approach involves cloning the odv-e56 gene into an expression vector that includes appropriate promoters for protein expression and affinity tags (commonly histidine tags) for subsequent purification.
The production process follows these methodological steps:
Amplification of the odv-e56 gene from the viral genome using PCR with specific primers
Cloning of the amplified gene into an expression vector containing a histidine tag sequence
Transformation of the recombinant vector into competent E. coli cells
Induction of protein expression in bacterial culture under controlled conditions
Cell lysis to release the expressed protein
Purification using affinity chromatography methods that exploit the histidine tag
Verification of protein purity and functionality through analytical methods
Various commercial providers offer recombinant full-length ODVP6E proteins from different viral sources. For example, His-tagged recombinant ODVP6E is available from sources like Orgyia pseudotsugata multicapsid polyhedrosis virus (OpMNPV), Choristoneura fumiferana nuclear polyhedrosis virus (CfMNPV), and Bombyx mori nuclear polyhedrosis virus (BmNPV) . These recombinant proteins typically encompass the full-length sequence (e.g., amino acids 1-374 for OpMNPV, 1-379 for CfMNPV, and 1-375 for BmNPV) .
ODVP6E is a viral envelope protein with distinctive structural characteristics that enable its function in the baculovirus infection process. While the search results don't provide comprehensive details on the three-dimensional structure, several important structural features can be identified:
ODVP6E proteins from different baculovirus species have similar lengths but with minor variations:
OpMNPV ODVP6E: 374 amino acids in length
CfMNPV ODVP6E: 379 amino acids in length
These length differences suggest structural variations that may relate to host specificity or functional adaptations for different viral species. The protein is likely membrane-associated, given its role as an envelope protein, and contains domains critical for membrane insertion and interaction with host cell receptors during the infection process.
For functional studies and structural analysis, researchers often use recombinant versions of the protein with affinity tags (typically histidine tags) added to facilitate purification and detection . These modified versions maintain the core structural features necessary for studying the protein's function while providing practical advantages for laboratory manipulation.
ODVP6E plays a critical role in the oral infectivity of baculoviruses, functioning as a key mediator in the initial stages of host infection. Experimental evidence clearly demonstrates its importance, as elimination of ODV-E56 protein synthesis through genetic modification results in profoundly impaired oral infectivity compared with wild-type and control recombinant viruses across multiple lepidopteran host species .
The specific mechanisms through which ODVP6E contributes to viral infectivity include:
Facilitating virus entry into midgut epithelial cells during the primary infection phase
Potentially mediating specific interactions with host cell receptors
Contributing to the structural integrity and functionality of the ODV envelope
Importantly, research shows that while ODVP6E is essential for oral infectivity, it does not affect other aspects of the viral replication cycle. Recombinant viruses lacking functional ODVP6E showed no alterations in polyhedron production and morphogenesis or in the production of infectious budded virus in cell culture . This indicates that ODVP6E's role is specific to the initial infection process rather than affecting subsequent viral replication stages.
The functionality of ODVP6E appears to be conserved across baculovirus species, as evidenced by rescue experiments where oral infectivity was fully restored by marker rescue of odv-e56 mutant viruses with either the AcMNPV or the RoMNPV odv-e56 gene . This conservation suggests a fundamental role in the baculovirus infection mechanism that has been maintained through evolutionary processes.
Several sophisticated experimental approaches can be employed to study ODVP6E function, each offering unique insights into different aspects of the protein's biological role:
Gene Knockout and Rescue Studies: This approach involves the construction of recombinant viral clones with disrupted odv-e56 genes, often accomplished by inserting reporter gene cassettes such as β-galactosidase (lacZ) into the open reading frame. For example, researchers have constructed recombinant AcMNPV clones (Ac69GFP-e56lacZ and AcIEGFP-e56lacZ) to eliminate ODV-E56 protein synthesis . These modified viruses are then used in comparative studies with wild-type viruses to assess functional changes, followed by rescue experiments where the native gene is reintroduced to confirm its specific role.
Cross-Species Gene Substitution: This method involves replacing the native odv-e56 gene with orthologues from related viral species. Researchers have constructed recombinant viruses like Ac69GFP-Roe56, where the AcMNPV odv-e56 was replaced with that from RoMNPV to investigate host range determinants . This approach allows for the exploration of species-specific functional differences in the protein.
Bioassays for Virulence Assessment: Oral infectivity can be quantitatively assessed through standardized bioassays using lepidopteran host species. These assays typically involve feeding host larvae with controlled doses of occlusion bodies from various viral constructs and monitoring infection rates, mortality, and calculating LC50 values (lethal concentration killing 50% of test subjects) .
The experimental design should include:
Proper controls (wild-type virus, vector-only constructs)
Multiple host species to assess host range effects
Replication to ensure statistical validity
When implementing these approaches, researchers must carefully control for extraneous variables and clearly define independent variables (viral constructs) and dependent variables (infectivity measures, mortality rates) .
Analysis of selective pressure on the odv-e56 gene requires a combination of molecular evolutionary approaches and computational methodologies. Previous research has identified that this gene is under positive selection pressure, suggesting its potential role in host range determination . Here's a methodological framework for conducting such analysis:
Sequence Collection and Alignment:
Gather odv-e56 gene sequences from multiple baculovirus species and strains
Perform multiple sequence alignment using software such as MUSCLE, MAFFT, or ClustalW
Ensure high-quality alignment with manual curation if necessary
Evolutionary Model Selection:
Determine the most appropriate nucleotide substitution model using statistical criteria (AIC, BIC)
Implement model testing using software like ModelTest or jModelTest
Detection of Selection Pressure:
Calculate the ratio of non-synonymous to synonymous substitutions (dN/dS or ω) across the gene
Values of ω > 1 indicate positive selection, ω = 1 suggests neutral evolution, and ω < 1 indicates purifying selection
Employ codon-based methods such as PAML, HyPhy, or MEGA for site-specific selection analysis
Site-Specific Selection Analysis:
Apply methods such as SLAC, FEL, MEME, or FUBAR to identify specific codons under selection
Perform Bayes Empirical Bayes (BEB) analysis to calculate posterior probabilities for sites under positive selection
Structural Mapping:
Map positively selected sites onto the protein's structural model (if available)
Analyze the distribution of selected sites relative to functional domains
Validation Through Experimental Approaches:
Design mutation studies focusing on positively selected sites
Assess functional changes through infectivity assays to confirm the adaptive significance of these sites
This comprehensive approach allows researchers to not only identify the presence of selective pressure but also understand its functional implications and evolutionary significance in the context of viral host adaptation.
Investigating ODVP6E's role in host range determination requires a multi-faceted methodological approach that combines molecular manipulations with carefully designed bioassays. Based on previous research suggesting that odv-e56 may be a determinant of virus host range due to positive selection pressure , the following methodologies are recommended:
Chimeric Virus Construction:
Create recombinant viruses with odv-e56 genes from different baculovirus species
Ensure that genetic backgrounds are otherwise identical to isolate the effects of ODVP6E variation
Include control viruses with wild-type genes for comparison
Example: Construction of Ac69GFP-Roe56 where the AcMNPV odv-e56 gene was replaced with the RoMNPV orthologue
Comparative Bioassays:
Test viral constructs against multiple host species with known differential susceptibility
Establish dose-response relationships by challenging hosts with varying concentrations of viral occlusion bodies
Calculate and compare LC50 values (lethal concentration killing 50% of subjects) across different viral constructs and host species
Example: Bioassays using host species that are more susceptible to RoMNPV than to AcMNPV to evaluate whether odv-e56 substitution affects virulence
Time-Course Infection Studies:
Monitor the progression of infection at different time points post-exposure
Use fluorescent-tagged viruses to visualize infection spread in real time
Compare infection establishment rates between different viral constructs
Receptor Binding Assays:
Develop in vitro assays to assess ODVP6E binding to midgut cell preparations from different host species
Compare binding efficiencies of ODVP6E variants from different viral species
Identify potential host receptors using pull-down or co-immunoprecipitation approaches
Systematic Domain Swapping:
Create constructs with chimeric ODVP6E proteins containing domains from different viral species
Map specific regions of the protein responsible for host specificity
When designing these experiments, researchers should follow the key principles of experimental design: properly defined variables, controlled conditions, appropriate sample sizes, and rigorous statistical analysis . By combining these methodologies, researchers can systematically evaluate the contribution of ODVP6E to baculovirus host range determination.
When researchers encounter contradictory data while studying ODVP6E function, a systematic approach to data analysis and interpretation is essential. This situation is not uncommon in complex biological systems, and the following methodological framework can help researchers navigate these challenges:
Thorough Data Examination:
Reassessment of Experimental Design:
Evaluate whether the experimental setup adequately controlled for all relevant variables
Consider whether the sample size was sufficient for statistical power
Assess whether the methods used were appropriate for the research question
Review the selection of control groups and potential confounding factors
Alternative Hypothesis Formulation:
Methodological Refinement:
Synthetic Analysis:
Integrate contradictory findings into a more complex model of ODVP6E function
Consider whether the contradictions might reveal new aspects of protein function
Look for conditional relationships that explain when different functions predominate
Develop testable predictions based on the integrated model
For example, if replacement of the AcMNPV odv-e56 gene with the RoMNPV orthologue does not increase virulence as expected , researchers should consider whether:
Other viral factors might compensate for or interact with ODVP6E
The host range determinant might involve multiple viral proteins acting in concert
Different experimental conditions might reveal the expected effect
The function of ODVP6E might be necessary but not sufficient for host range determination
By approaching contradictory data as an opportunity for deeper understanding rather than a failure, researchers can develop more nuanced and accurate models of ODVP6E function.
Designing rigorous experiments to compare ODVP6E variants across different viral species requires careful consideration of multiple factors to ensure valid and reproducible results. The following best practices should be implemented:
Strategic Selection of Viral Species:
Choose virus species with well-documented differences in host range or virulence
Include both closely related species (e.g., AcMNPV and RoMNPV) and more distantly related baculoviruses
Ensure availability of complete genome sequences and established laboratory protocols
Consider evolutionary relationships to contextualize functional differences
Standardized Cloning and Expression Systems:
Comprehensive Experimental Design:
Clearly define independent variables (viral species source of ODVP6E) and dependent variables (functional measures)
Include appropriate positive and negative controls
Design experiments with sufficient statistical power through adequate replication
Implement randomization and blinding where applicable to minimize bias
Multifaceted Functional Assays:
Develop a suite of assays that test different aspects of ODVP6E function
Include both in vitro binding assays and in vivo infection studies
Measure multiple parameters (binding affinity, infection rate, virus production)
Test function across a range of environmental conditions (pH, temperature, ionic strength)
Host Range Testing Protocol:
Data Analysis Framework:
Establish statistical analysis protocols before conducting experiments
Use appropriate statistical tests based on data distribution and experimental design
Apply multiple comparison corrections when testing several variants
Consider developing mathematical models to integrate multiple data types
Chimeric Protein Approach:
Create domain-swapped versions of ODVP6E to map functional regions
Design proteins with systematic substitutions at positively selected sites
Test the effects of specific amino acid changes identified through evolutionary analyses
An exemplary experimental design would include creating a panel of recombinant viruses, each containing ODVP6E from a different viral species but otherwise genetically identical. These viruses would then be tested against multiple host species under standardized conditions, with quantitative assessment of infection parameters. This approach, similar to that used in the construction of Ac69GFP-Roe56 , provides a robust framework for comparative functional analysis of ODVP6E variants.