Recombinant Bacillus cereus Serine hydroxymethyltransferase (glyA)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder. We will preferentially ship the available format, but if you have special requirements, please note them when ordering, and we will fulfill your request.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary by purchase method and location. Consult your local distributor for specific delivery information. All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. For dry ice shipment, contact us in advance; extra fees apply.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Working aliquots can be stored at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening. Reconstitute the protein in sterile deionized water to 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. Add 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquot for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default final glycerol concentration is 50%.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on storage conditions, buffer components, storage temperature, and protein stability. Liquid form: 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. Lyophilized form: 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
The tag type will be determined during the manufacturing process. If you have a specific tag type requirement, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
glyA; BCQ_5156Serine hydroxymethyltransferase; SHMT; Serine methylase; EC 2.1.2.1
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-413
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Bacillus cereus (strain Q1)
Target Names
glyA
Target Protein Sequence
MDHLKRQDEK VFAAIEAELG RQRSKIELIA SENFVSEAVM EAQGSVLTNK YAEGYPGKRY YGGCEHVDVV EDIARDRVKE IFGAEHVNVQ PHSGAQANMA VYFTILEQGD TVLGMNLSHG GHLTHGSPVN FSGVQYNFVE YGVDAESHRI NYDDVLAKAK EHKPKLIVAG ASAYPRVIDF KRFREIADEV GAYLMVDMAH IAGLVAAGLH PNPVPHAHFV TTTTHKTLRG PRGGMILCEE QFAKQIDKSI FPGIQGGPLM HVIAAKAVAF GEALQDDFKT YAQNIINNAN RLAEGLQKEG LTLVSGGTDN HLILIDVRNL EITGKVAEHV LDEVGITVNK NTIPFETASP FVTSGVRIGT AAVTSRGFGL EEMDEIASLI AYTLKNHENE AALEEARKRV EALTSKFPMY TDL
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Catalyzes the reversible interconversion of serine and glycine using tetrahydrofolate (THF) as the one-carbon carrier. This reaction is a primary source of one-carbon units for biosynthesis of purines, thymidylate, methionine, and other biomolecules. Also exhibits THF-independent aldolase activity towards beta-hydroxyamino acids, producing glycine and aldehydes via a retro-aldol mechanism.
Database Links

KEGG: bcq:BCQ_5156

Protein Families
SHMT family
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm.

Q&A

What is Serine Hydroxymethyltransferase (glyA) and what is its primary function in Bacillus cereus?

Serine hydroxymethyltransferase (SHMT) encoded by the glyA gene is a pyridoxal-5'-phosphate (PLP)-dependent enzyme that catalyzes the reversible conversion of serine to glycine while transferring a one-carbon unit to tetrahydrofolate to form 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate. In Bacillus cereus, SHMT plays a crucial role in one-carbon metabolism, amino acid biosynthesis, and nucleotide synthesis. The enzyme exhibits dual functionality, with its primary role being the interconversion of serine and glycine, while also possessing aldole cleavage activity toward L-threonine, converting it to glycine with approximately 4% of the efficiency observed with L-serine as substrate . This multifunctional nature makes SHMT an essential enzyme for bacterial growth and metabolism in B. cereus, a gram-positive, spore-forming bacterium widely distributed in the environment .

What are the established methods for cloning the glyA gene from Bacillus cereus?

The glyA gene from Bacillus cereus can be cloned using PCR-based methods similar to those employed for other bacterial species. Based on established protocols, researchers can:

  • Design primers based on the known B. cereus glyA sequence, with appropriate restriction sites added to facilitate subsequent cloning steps.

  • Amplify the entire glyA gene using high-fidelity DNA polymerase to minimize introduction of mutations.

  • Clone the amplified fragment into an appropriate expression vector (such as pET series vectors for E. coli expression systems).

For example, following the approach used for other bacterial glyA genes, primers can be designed to amplify the ~1.3 kb glyA gene with added restriction sites (e.g., BamHI and SalI) . This approach allows for directional cloning into expression vectors containing appropriate promoters (such as T7 or tac promoters) for controlled expression of the recombinant protein.

How does B. cereus SHMT differ structurally and functionally from SHMT in other bacterial species?

While maintaining the core catalytic function conserved across species, B. cereus SHMT possesses distinctive structural features that influence its substrate specificity and catalytic efficiency. Like other SHMTs, the B. cereus enzyme contains PLP as a cofactor bound to a conserved lysine residue in the active site.

The enzyme exists as a homodimer or homotetramer, with each subunit containing distinct domains for PLP binding, substrate recognition, and tetrahydrofolate binding. When compared to SHMT from other bacterial sources, B. cereus SHMT exhibits:

  • Unique amino acid substitutions in the active site that influence substrate binding and catalysis

  • Potential differences in oligomeric state stability

  • Variations in secondary activities, particularly the efficiency of aldol cleavage reactions

For instance, while the B. cereus enzyme shares the ability to catalyze threonine aldolase reactions with enzymes from other species like Corynebacterium glutamicum, the relative efficiency of this secondary activity might differ between species, impacting their metabolic roles .

What are the optimal conditions for recombinant expression of B. cereus glyA in E. coli expression systems?

For efficient recombinant expression of B. cereus glyA in E. coli, the following optimized conditions are recommended:

Expression System:

  • Host strain: E. coli BL21(DE3) or E. coli M15/pREP4 for high-level expression

  • Vector: pET series vectors (particularly pET28a) for T7 promoter-driven expression with N-terminal His-tag for purification

Culture Conditions:

  • Medium: LB broth supplemented with appropriate antibiotics (50 μg/ml carbenicillin and 25 μg/ml kanamycin for pREP4-containing strains)

  • Growth temperature: 37°C until OD600 reaches 0.6, then reduce to 25-30°C post-induction

  • Induction: 0.5-1.0 mM IPTG

  • Post-induction growth: 3-4 hours at reduced temperature

Harvest and Lysis:

  • Centrifugation at 5,000 × g for 15 minutes at 4°C

  • Resuspension in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 10 mM imidazole)

  • Cell disruption via sonication (10-15 cycles of 10-second pulses with 20-second cooling intervals)

  • Clarification by centrifugation at 15,000 × g for 30 minutes at 4°C

This protocol typically yields 15-25 mg of soluble recombinant SHMT per liter of culture, with enzyme activity preserved through addition of PLP (0.1 mM) to all buffers during purification.

What purification strategy yields the highest purity and activity for recombinant B. cereus SHMT?

A multi-step purification strategy is recommended to obtain highly pure and active recombinant B. cereus SHMT:

Affinity Chromatography (Primary Purification):

  • Load clarified lysate onto Ni²⁺-NTA resin pre-equilibrated with binding buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 10 mM imidazole, 0.1 mM PLP)

  • Wash extensively with wash buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 20 mM imidazole, 0.1 mM PLP)

  • Elute with elution buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 250 mM imidazole, 0.1 mM PLP)

Size Exclusion Chromatography (Secondary Purification):

  • Pool and concentrate affinity-purified fractions

  • Apply to Superdex 200 column equilibrated with gel filtration buffer (50 mM potassium phosphate pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM PLP, 1 mM DTT)

  • Collect fractions corresponding to tetrameric SHMT (molecular weight ~220 kDa)

Final Polishing (Optional):

  • Ion-exchange chromatography using a MonoQ column with a linear gradient of NaCl (0-500 mM) in 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0

This purification protocol typically achieves >95% purity as assessed by SDS-PAGE and yields enzyme with specific activity of approximately 2-3 μmol min⁻¹ mg⁻¹ for the serine-to-glycine reaction.

What enzyme assays are recommended for accurately measuring B. cereus SHMT activity?

Several complementary assay methods are recommended for comprehensive characterization of B. cereus SHMT activity:

1. Spectrophotometric Coupled Assay:

  • Principle: Coupling SHMT reaction to NADH oxidation via methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase

  • Reaction mixture: 50 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.5), 0.1 mM PLP, 1 mM L-serine, 0.4 mM tetrahydrofolate, 0.25 mM NADH, 0.01 U methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase

  • Detection: Monitor decrease in absorbance at 340 nm (ε = 6,220 M⁻¹ cm⁻¹)

  • Advantages: Continuous measurement, high sensitivity

2. Aldol Cleavage Activity Assay:

  • Principle: Direct measurement of acetaldehyde formation from L-threonine cleavage

  • Reaction mixture: 50 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.5), 0.1 mM PLP, 10 mM L-threonine

  • Detection: Derivatize acetaldehyde with 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine and measure absorbance at 520 nm

  • Calculated activity: As demonstrated in research with similar enzymes, the aldole cleavage activity with L-threonine as substrate is typically about 1.3 μmol min⁻¹ mg⁻¹, which is approximately 4% of the activity with L-serine as substrate

3. Radiochemical Assay (Most Sensitive):

  • Principle: Measure conversion of [³H]-L-serine to [³H]-glycine

  • Reaction mixture: 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 0.1 mM PLP, 0.5 mM [³H]-L-serine (specific activity 5 Ci/mol), 0.2 mM tetrahydrofolate

  • Detection: Separate products by ion-exchange chromatography and quantify by scintillation counting

  • Advantages: Highest sensitivity, direct measurement of primary reaction

Each assay offers different advantages for specific research questions, with the spectrophotometric assay being most convenient for routine activity measurements and the radiochemical assay providing the highest sensitivity for kinetic studies.

How can site-directed mutagenesis be used to enhance the catalytic efficiency of B. cereus SHMT?

Site-directed mutagenesis represents a powerful approach for enhancing the catalytic properties of B. cereus SHMT. Based on structural analysis and homology modeling with related enzymes, several strategic approaches can be employed:

Targeting Substrate-Binding Residues:
Molecular docking studies suggest that forming a triangular binding region with specific amino acid substitutions can enhance substrate affinity and catalytic activity. For example, modifications to residues equivalent to Gly94, Gly14, and Ile191 (as identified in other enzymes) might create an improved substrate interaction network .

Multiple-Round Saturation Mutagenesis Strategy:

  • Identify low-conserved residues in the protein's second shell through conservation analysis and molecular docking

  • Perform consecutive rounds of saturation mutagenesis, starting with single mutations and building toward combined variants

  • Screen each generation for enhanced activity using the spectrophotometric coupled assay

Mutation Strategy Table:

RoundTarget ResiduesScreening MethodExpected Improvement
1Second-shell residues near active siteActivity assay2-3× wild-type activity
2Combine best mutations from round 1Activity assay + kinetic analysis3-4× wild-type activity
3Additional residues influenced by round 2Comprehensive kinetic characterization4-6× wild-type activity

This approach mirrors successful strategies applied to other enzymes, where third-round combined mutants (similar to N97F/N192S/E198G in glucose dehydrogenase) demonstrated >5-fold improvement in specific activity compared to wild-type enzyme .

How does the dual functionality of B. cereus SHMT (serine hydroxymethyltransferase and threonine aldolase activities) affect its potential biotechnological applications?

The dual functionality of B. cereus SHMT presents unique opportunities and challenges for biotechnological applications:

Advantages for Biocatalysis:

  • Multi-catalytic Platform: The ability to catalyze both serine hydroxymethyltransferase and threonine aldolase reactions within a single enzyme provides a versatile biocatalytic platform for synthetically useful C-C bond formation and cleavage reactions.

  • Glycine Production: The threonine aldolase activity (approximately 4% of the serine hydroxymethyltransferase activity) enables direct production of glycine from threonine, a pathway that could be exploited in metabolic engineering of amino acid production strains .

  • Aldol Addition Reactions: The reverse threonine aldolase activity can be harnessed for stereoselective aldol addition reactions to produce β-hydroxy-α-amino acids, valuable chiral building blocks for pharmaceutical synthesis.

Challenges and Engineering Approaches:

  • Activity Ratio Engineering: The relative activities (SHMT:TA ≈ 25:1) may require optimization for specific applications through protein engineering. Mutations targeting the substrate binding pocket could potentially shift this ratio.

  • Substrate Specificity Expansion: Engineering efforts could focus on expanding the acceptance of non-natural aldehydes and amino acid donors to increase the synthetic utility of the enzyme.

  • Stability Enhancement: Modifications to improve thermostability and solvent tolerance would enhance the enzyme's utility in industrial biocatalysis settings.

Application-Specific Considerations:

ApplicationRequired PropertyEngineering Strategy
Asymmetric synthesisStereospecificityActive site mutations to control facial selectivity
One-pot cascade reactionsMulti-substrate toleranceSurface engineering to prevent product inhibition
Continuous bioprocessingOperational stabilityImmobilization and stabilizing mutations

The dual functionality of B. cereus SHMT thus represents a valuable starting point for developing specialized biocatalysts for various synthetic applications through targeted protein engineering.

What are the key structural determinants for substrate specificity in B. cereus SHMT, and how do they differ from those in human SHMT?

The substrate specificity of B. cereus SHMT is governed by several key structural determinants that can be contrasted with those in human SHMT to guide selective inhibitor design and enzyme engineering:

Active Site Architecture:

  • PLP-Binding Pocket: B. cereus SHMT contains a conserved lysine residue that forms a Schiff base with the PLP cofactor. While this feature is conserved across species, subtle differences in surrounding residues affect cofactor orientation.

  • Substrate-Binding Cleft: The serine/threonine binding site in B. cereus SHMT likely contains more hydrophobic residues compared to human SHMT, contributing to differences in substrate preference.

  • Folate-Binding Domain: The tetrahydrofolate binding site demonstrates significant structural divergence between bacterial and human SHMTs, offering potential targets for selective inhibition.

Structural Elements Influencing Catalysis:
Molecular dynamics simulations of related enzymes reveal five regions with significant conformational flexibility that influence catalytic properties:

  • α2 helix region

  • α3 helix region

  • α5 helix + β4 sheet

  • α8 helix + β5 sheet region

  • α13-14 helix region

These regions demonstrate altered flexibility in engineered variants with enhanced activity, suggesting they play key roles in substrate binding and product release .

Evolutionary Divergence Areas:
The greatest structural differences between B. cereus and human SHMT occur in:

  • The N-terminal region controlling oligomerization state

  • Surface loops controlling access to the active site

  • The C-terminal domain involved in tetrahydrofolate binding

These structural distinctions, particularly in regions controlling substrate access and binding, provide rational targets for developing selective inhibitors of B. cereus SHMT that would have minimal effect on the human enzyme.

What are common expression and purification challenges with recombinant B. cereus SHMT and how can they be addressed?

Researchers frequently encounter several challenges when working with recombinant B. cereus SHMT. Here are the most common issues and their solutions:

Expression Challenges:

ChallengePotential CausesSolutions
Low expression levelsCodon bias, toxicity to hostUse codon-optimized sequence; employ tight expression control with IPTG-inducible promoters; lower induction temperature to 25°C
Inclusion body formationRapid overexpression, improper foldingReduce IPTG concentration (0.1-0.2 mM); add 0.1 mM PLP to culture medium; co-express with chaperones like GroEL/GroES
Loss of PLP cofactorInsufficient PLP during expressionSupplement growth medium with 0.1 mM PLP; maintain PLP in all buffers during purification

Purification Challenges:

ChallengePotential CausesSolutions
Low binding to Ni-NTAHis-tag accessibility issuesTry C-terminal His-tag instead of N-terminal; increase imidazole concentration in binding buffer to 20 mM
Enzymatic activity loss during purificationCofactor loss, oxidationAdd 0.1 mM PLP and 1 mM DTT to all purification buffers; handle samples under nitrogen atmosphere when possible
Heterogeneous oligomeric statesConcentration-dependent equilibriumAdd 0.5 mM PLP to stabilize tetrameric form; perform size-exclusion chromatography to separate oligomeric states
Contaminant E. coli proteinsNon-specific bindingInclude a wash step with 20-40 mM imidazole; consider an additional ion-exchange chromatography step

Special Considerations for B. cereus SHMT:

  • The enzyme may exhibit significant activity only when in the PLP-bound holoenzyme form, so maintaining PLP throughout purification is critical.

  • Similar to other bacterial SHMTs, the B. cereus enzyme might be sensitive to oxidation of catalytically important cysteine residues, necessitating the presence of reducing agents in all buffers.

  • Techniques developed for isolating SHMT from E. coli (using Ni²⁺-nitrilotriacetic acid affinity chromatography) can be readily adapted for B. cereus SHMT .

How should researchers interpret and address inconsistent kinetic data when studying B. cereus SHMT catalysis?

Inconsistent kinetic data is a common challenge when characterizing B. cereus SHMT due to its complex catalytic mechanism and sensitivity to experimental conditions. Here's a systematic approach to troubleshooting and interpreting such data:

Common Sources of Inconsistency:

  • Variable PLP Occupancy:

    • Symptom: Batch-to-batch variation in specific activity

    • Diagnosis: Measure A280/A415 ratio (should be ~9-10 for fully PLP-saturated enzyme)

    • Solution: Reconstitute enzyme with excess PLP (5-10×) and remove unbound PLP by dialysis

  • Oligomeric State Heterogeneity:

    • Symptom: Non-linear Lineweaver-Burk plots, variable Km values

    • Diagnosis: Analyze enzyme by native PAGE or analytical SEC

    • Solution: Standardize enzyme concentration in assays; pre-incubate enzyme under assay conditions

  • Tetrahydrofolate (THF) Degradation:

    • Symptom: Decreasing reaction rates over time, poor reproducibility

    • Diagnosis: Monitor THF stability by spectrophotometry

    • Solution: Prepare fresh THF solutions under nitrogen; add reducing agents

Data Analysis Recommendations:

  • Progress Curve Analysis:

    • Collect complete reaction progress curves rather than initial rates only

    • Fit data to integrated rate equations that account for potential product inhibition

    • Use global fitting approaches that simultaneously analyze multiple datasets

  • Statistical Validation:

    • For each kinetic parameter, conduct a minimum of three independent determinations

    • Report mean values with standard deviations rather than single measurements

    • Use statistical tests (ANOVA) to validate significance of differences between variants

  • Controls for Mechanism Validation:

    • Include dead-end inhibition studies to confirm proposed mechanisms

    • Validate kinetic models through isotope effects if inconsistencies persist

    • Consider alternative reaction mechanisms when traditional models fail to fit data

By implementing these approaches, researchers can differentiate between genuine mechanistic complexities and experimental artifacts when encountering inconsistent kinetic data with B. cereus SHMT.

What computational approaches are most effective for predicting mutagenesis targets to enhance B. cereus SHMT catalytic efficiency?

Multiple computational approaches can be integrated to identify promising mutagenesis targets for enhancing B. cereus SHMT catalytic efficiency:

Structure-Based Computational Methods:

  • Molecular Dynamics (MD) Simulations:

    • Perform extended (>200 ns) simulations to identify flexible regions influencing active site dynamics

    • Analyze Root Mean Square Fluctuation (RMSF) data to identify regions with altered conformational behavior in the protein structure

    • Focus on five key regions identified in related enzymes that show significant conformational changes: α2 helix, α3 helix, α5 helix + β4 sheet, α8 helix + β5 sheet, and α13-14 helix regions

  • Molecular Docking Studies:

    • Employ ensemble docking against multiple MD-derived conformations

    • Identify residues forming triangular binding regions that enhance substrate affinity

    • Target second-shell residues that influence active site geometry without directly contacting substrates

  • Quantum Mechanics/Molecular Mechanics (QM/MM):

    • Model the reaction transition state to identify rate-limiting steps

    • Calculate activation energy changes for potential mutations

    • Focus on residues involved in proton transfer networks

Sequence-Based Methods:

  • Evolutionary Conservation Analysis:

    • Identify low-conserved residues in the protein's second shell as likely targets for mutation

    • Generate sequence alignments of SHMT from diverse species

    • Target residues showing variation in organisms with higher SHMT activity

  • Correlated Mutation Analysis:

    • Identify networks of co-evolving residues that may function cooperatively

    • Target multiple residues within a network rather than individual positions

Integrated Prediction Workflow:

StepMethodExpected Outcome
1Conservation analysisIdentification of ~10-15 variable positions
2MD simulationsNarrowing to 5-7 positions affecting dynamics
3Molecular dockingPrioritization of 3-4 high-impact positions
4In silico mutagenesisPrediction of beneficial mutation combinations
5Energy calculationsRanking of mutants by predicted stability/activity

This multi-tiered computational approach, similar to strategies successfully applied to enhance other enzymes like glucose dehydrogenase, has demonstrated the ability to identify mutations that increase catalytic efficiency by more than 5-fold compared to wild-type enzymes .

How might B. cereus SHMT be engineered for applications in synthetic biology and metabolic engineering?

B. cereus SHMT presents several engineering opportunities for synthetic biology and metabolic engineering applications:

Pathway Integration Strategies:

  • One-Carbon Metabolism Enhancement:

    • Engineer SHMT variants with increased catalytic efficiency for improved one-carbon unit flux

    • Integrate with formate assimilation pathways for C1 compound utilization

    • Coordinate expression with other folate-dependent enzymes to balance metabolic flux

  • Amino Acid Production:

    • Leverage the reverse threonine aldolase activity to develop novel pathways for β-hydroxy-α-amino acid synthesis

    • Engineer variants with altered substrate specificity to accept non-natural aldehydes

    • Create synthetic operons linking SHMT activity to downstream biosynthetic pathways

  • Metabolic Sensor Development:

    • Exploit the glycine/serine interconversion to create biosensors for one-carbon metabolism status

    • Link SHMT activity to reporter gene expression for monitoring cellular metabolic state

Engineering Approaches:

  • Directed Evolution Strategies:

    • Develop high-throughput screening systems based on colorimetric detection of formaldehyde production

    • Apply PACE (phage-assisted continuous evolution) to rapidly evolve variants with enhanced activity

    • Implement semi-rational approaches targeting residues identified through computational analysis

  • Synthetic Biology Applications:

    • Create chimeric enzymes fusing B. cereus SHMT with complementary activities

    • Develop scaffold-based enzyme assemblies to enhance metabolic channeling

    • Engineer allosterically regulated variants responsive to specific metabolic signals

  • Whole-Cell Biocatalyst Development:

    • Integrate engineered SHMT variants into robust B. cereus strains for whole-cell biocatalysis

    • Exploit the innate antibacterial properties of B. cereus for self-sterilizing biocatalysts

    • Co-express with complementary enzymes for multi-step transformations

The engineering of B. cereus SHMT for synthetic biology applications benefits from approaches similar to those used with other enzymes like glucose dehydrogenase, where enhanced variants have been successfully deployed to improve bacterial antibacterial activity and other biotechnological applications .

What is the current understanding of the structural basis for the dual SHMT/threonine aldolase activity in B. cereus SHMT?

The structural basis for the dual SHMT/threonine aldolase activity in B. cereus SHMT is beginning to be elucidated through comparative analysis with related enzymes:

Key Structural Determinants:

  • Active Site Architecture:

    • The SHMT active site contains a PLP cofactor covalently bound to a conserved lysine residue

    • The spatial arrangement of catalytic residues allows both retro-aldol cleavage (threonine aldolase activity) and hydroxymethyl transfer (SHMT activity)

    • The relative positioning of these residues likely dictates the ratio of SHMT:TA activities (approximately 25:1)

  • Substrate Binding Pocket:

    • The binding pocket must accommodate both serine and the bulkier threonine

    • Comparative studies with related enzymes suggest that residues forming a triangular binding region similar to Gly94, Gly14, and Ile191 may influence substrate specificity

    • The flexibility of loops surrounding the active site likely permits adaptation to different substrates

  • Catalytic Residues:

    • A conserved histidine residue serves as the catalytic base for both reactions

    • The orientation of this histidine relative to the substrate dictates whether hydroxymethyl transfer or aldol cleavage predominates

    • Interactions with the PLP cofactor influence the electrophilicity of the substrate's Cα

Mechanistic Implications:

The dual activity arises from the ability of the enzyme to:

  • Abstract the α-proton from both serine and threonine

  • Stabilize the resulting carbanion through the PLP cofactor

  • Direct the reaction toward either THF-dependent hydroxymethyl transfer or aldol cleavage

Experimental evidence from related enzymes indicates that the aldole cleavage activity with L-threonine as substrate is typically about 1.3 μmol min⁻¹ mg⁻¹, which is approximately 4% of the activity with L-serine as substrate . This relatively low but significant threonine aldolase activity has important metabolic implications, particularly in amino acid metabolism.

Understanding these structural determinants provides a foundation for rational engineering efforts to modulate the ratio of these activities for specific biotechnological applications.

How can researchers address the challenges of integrating recombinant B. cereus SHMT into multi-enzyme biocatalytic cascades?

Integrating recombinant B. cereus SHMT into multi-enzyme biocatalytic cascades presents several challenges that can be systematically addressed:

Compatibility Challenges and Solutions:

  • pH and Buffer Optimization:

    • Challenge: Different optimal pH requirements between SHMT and partner enzymes

    • Solution: Conduct multi-parameter optimization to identify compromise conditions; engineer SHMT variants with broader pH optima through surface charge modifications

  • Cofactor Regeneration:

    • Challenge: Maintaining sufficient tetrahydrofolate and PLP levels for continuous operation

    • Solution: Incorporate enzymatic cofactor regeneration systems (dihydrofolate reductase for THF; PLP kinase for PLP); immobilize cofactors to prevent loss

  • Reaction Equilibrium Constraints:

    • Challenge: Unfavorable equilibrium for desired reaction direction

    • Solution: Couple SHMT reactions to subsequent enzymes that consume products; implement in situ product removal strategies

Engineering Approaches for Cascade Integration:

  • Enzyme Immobilization Strategies:

    • Approach: Co-immobilization of SHMT with partner enzymes to create spatial proximity

    • Methods: Encapsulation in sol-gel matrices; attachment to nanoparticles; incorporation into enzyme membrane reactors

    • Benefits: Enhanced stability; improved substrate channeling; easier catalyst recovery

  • Protein Fusion Technologies:

    • Approach: Create artificial multi-enzyme complexes through fusion protein engineering

    • Design Considerations: Optimize linker length and flexibility; consider domain orientation to minimize steric hindrance

    • Example: Fusion of SHMT with methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase for enhanced one-carbon transfer

  • Compartmentalization Approaches:

    • Approach: Create artificial microcompartments mimicking bacterial microcompartments

    • Methods: Liposome encapsulation; polymerosome assembly; protein-based nanocontainers

    • Advantages: Protection from inhibitors; concentration of intermediates; control of reaction microenvironment

Case-Specific Design Considerations:

Cascade TypeKey ChallengeEngineering Strategy
C1 utilization pathwaysTHF oxidationAnaerobic operation, THF regeneration enzymes
Chiral amino acid synthesisStereoselectivityEngineer SHMT for enhanced threonine aldolase activity with preferred stereoselectivity
One-pot glycine derivatizationCompeting side reactionsSpatial separation through compartmentalization

By systematically addressing these challenges, researchers can effectively integrate B. cereus SHMT into multi-enzyme cascades for various synthetic applications, potentially using approaches similar to those that have successfully enhanced other enzymes like glucose dehydrogenase in biocontrol microorganisms .

What are the most promising future research directions for B. cereus SHMT engineering and application?

The future of B. cereus SHMT research presents several promising directions that build upon current understanding while addressing key challenges:

  • Structure-Guided Protein Engineering:

    • Application of advanced computational techniques to design SHMT variants with enhanced catalytic efficiency

    • Development of variants with altered substrate specificity for non-natural reactions

    • Creation of stable, immobilized SHMT formulations for industrial biocatalysis

  • Systems Biology Integration:

    • Exploration of SHMT's role in B. cereus pathogenicity and metabolism

    • Investigation of SHMT as a potential antimicrobial target, leveraging its structural differences from human SHMT

    • Integration of engineered SHMT variants into synthetic metabolic pathways for production of value-added compounds

  • Synthetic Biology Applications:

    • Development of SHMT-based biosensors for one-carbon metabolite detection

    • Creation of artificial enzyme cascades incorporating SHMT for multi-step transformations

    • Exploration of SHMT's potential in cell-free enzymatic systems

The approaches that have successfully enhanced other bacterial enzymes, such as the multi-round mutagenesis strategies applied to glucose dehydrogenase in Bacillus cereus to improve antibacterial activity, provide valuable templates for future SHMT engineering efforts . As our understanding of structure-function relationships in SHMT continues to deepen, increasingly sophisticated engineering approaches will enable novel applications in biocatalysis, metabolic engineering, and synthetic biology.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.