The Recombinant Bacillus pseudofirmus UPF0754 protein BpOF4_11355, hereafter referred to as BpOF4_11355, is a recombinant protein derived from the bacterium Bacillus pseudofirmus. This protein is expressed in Escherichia coli and is fused with an N-terminal His tag for easier purification and identification. The BpOF4_11355 protein consists of 379 amino acids and is classified under the UPF0754 family of proteins, which are often associated with unknown functions but are conserved across various bacterial species.
Species: Bacillus pseudofirmus
Source: Expressed in Escherichia coli
Tag: N-terminal His tag
Protein Length: Full-length, 379 amino acids
Form: Lyophilized powder
Purity: Greater than 90% as determined by SDS-PAGE
Storage Conditions: Store at -20°C or -80°C; avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles
| Specification | Description |
|---|---|
| Species | Bacillus pseudofirmus |
| Source | Escherichia coli |
| Tag | N-terminal His tag |
| Protein Length | 379 amino acids |
| Form | Lyophilized powder |
| Purity | >90% by SDS-PAGE |
| Storage Conditions | -20°C or -80°C |
- Creative Biomart. Recombinant Full Length Bacillus Pseudofirmus UPF0754 Protein Bpof4_11355 (Bpof4_11355) Protein, His-Tagged.
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your preferred format in order notes for customized preparation.
Note: Standard shipping includes blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires prior arrangement and incurs additional charges.
The tag type will be determined during the production process. If you require a specific tag type, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
KEGG: bpf:BpOF4_11355
STRING: 398511.BpOF4_11355
BpOF4_11355 is a full-length (1-379 amino acids) recombinant protein from Bacillus pseudofirmus that belongs to the UPF0754 protein family. While its precise function remains under investigation, structural analysis suggests potential roles in cellular processes typical of this alkaliphilic bacterium . To determine structure-function relationships, researchers should consider:
X-ray crystallography to resolve three-dimensional structure
Circular dichroism spectroscopy to analyze secondary structure elements
Computational modeling using homology-based approaches to predict functional domains
Functional assays based on hypothesized biochemical activities
The recombinant version available for research includes a histidine tag for purification purposes, which should be considered when interpreting structural data or designing experiments .
The commercially available BpOF4_11355 protein is expressed in E. coli expression systems . For researchers developing their own expression protocols, consider:
| Expression System | Advantages | Challenges | Recommended Applications |
|---|---|---|---|
| E. coli | High yield, cost-effective, rapid growth | Limited post-translational modifications, potential inclusion body formation | Basic functional studies, structural analysis |
| Insect cells | Better folding, some post-translational modifications | Higher cost, longer production time | Studies requiring properly folded protein |
| Mammalian cells | Full range of post-translational modifications | Highest cost, complex protocols | Interaction studies with mammalian proteins |
When using E. coli systems, optimization of induction conditions (temperature, IPTG concentration) and lysis protocols are critical for obtaining soluble protein. Consider testing multiple strains (BL21(DE3), Rosetta, Origami) to identify optimal expression conditions for this particular alkaliphile-derived protein.
Given that BpOF4_11355 contains a histidine tag, immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) is the primary purification method . A comprehensive purification strategy should include:
Initial capture using Ni-NTA or Co-based IMAC under native or denaturing conditions
Secondary purification using ion exchange chromatography based on the protein's theoretical pI
Final polishing step using size exclusion chromatography
Quality control assessment using SDS-PAGE and Western blotting
The purification buffer composition should account for the alkaliphilic nature of the source organism. Consider testing buffers with pH ranges of 8.0-10.0 to maintain native conformation. For functional studies, determine whether the His-tag affects activity and consider tag removal using appropriate proteases if necessary.
To investigate protein-protein interactions involving BpOF4_11355, researchers should employ multiple complementary techniques:
| Technique | Information Provided | Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pull-down assays | Direct binding partners | Simple execution, good for initial screening | May miss weak interactions |
| Co-immunoprecipitation | In vivo interactions | Captures physiologically relevant complexes | Requires specific antibodies |
| Yeast two-hybrid | Binary interactions | High-throughput screening capability | High false positive rate |
| Surface plasmon resonance | Binding kinetics | Quantitative, real-time analysis | Requires purified protein |
| Crosslinking-MS | Interaction interfaces | Identifies interaction sites | Complex data analysis |
When designing these experiments, consider both the His-tag's potential interference with interactions and the native cellular environment of Bacillus pseudofirmus. Control experiments should include testing interactions with known bacterial proteins from similar pathways to validate experimental conditions .
When designing expression constructs for functional characterization, consider these methodological approaches:
Generate multiple constructs with varying tag positions (N-terminal, C-terminal) to assess tag influence on function
Include constructs with different tag types (His, GST, MBP) to optimize solubility and activity
Consider domain-based constructs if bioinformatic analysis predicts multiple functional domains
Design site-directed mutagenesis constructs targeting predicted catalytic or binding residues
Use codon optimization for the expression system of choice, particularly important when expressing this alkaliphilic bacterial protein in heterologous systems. Include appropriate protease cleavage sites for tag removal if native protein is required for functional assays.
To understand the physiological role of BpOF4_11355 in its native context:
Generate knockout mutants using CRISPR-Cas9 or traditional homologous recombination
Perform complementation studies with wild-type and mutant variants
Conduct phenotypic assays under different environmental conditions (pH variations, salt stress)
Analyze global effects of gene deletion using transcriptomics or proteomics
When designing these experiments, consider the alkaliphilic nature of Bacillus pseudofirmus and ensure that growth conditions reflect its natural environment. Control experiments should include monitoring growth rates, morphology, and stress responses under standard and challenge conditions.
Quality control is essential for reliable research results. For BpOF4_11355, consider this analytical workflow:
| Analytical Method | Purpose | Acceptance Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| SDS-PAGE | Assess purity and molecular weight | >95% purity, band at ~42 kDa (including His-tag) |
| Western blot | Confirm identity | Strong single band with anti-His antibody |
| Mass spectrometry | Verify sequence and modifications | Mass within 0.1% of theoretical value |
| Circular dichroism | Evaluate secondary structure | Profile consistent with predicted structure |
| Dynamic light scattering | Assess aggregation state | Monodisperse population |
Ensure that quality control data is thoroughly documented for reproducibility. The molecular weight calculation should account for the full-length protein (379 amino acids) plus the His-tag . Consider establishing release criteria for protein preparations based on these analytical methods.
When facing challenges with BpOF4_11355 expression or solubility, implement this systematic troubleshooting approach:
Expression optimization:
Test multiple E. coli strains (BL21, Rosetta, Arctic Express)
Vary induction conditions (0.1-1.0 mM IPTG, 16-37°C)
Try auto-induction media for gradual protein expression
Solubility enhancement:
Co-express with molecular chaperones (GroEL/ES, DnaK/J)
Test fusion partners (MBP, SUMO, TrxA) known to improve solubility
Optimize lysis buffer composition (detergents, salt concentration)
Refolding strategies if inclusion bodies persist:
Develop on-column refolding protocols during IMAC purification
Test stepwise dialysis with decreasing denaturant concentrations
Screen additives (L-arginine, glycerol, sucrose) that promote folding
Monitor results using SDS-PAGE analysis of soluble and insoluble fractions at each optimization step.
Without established functional assays for this specific protein, researchers should develop activity tests based on bioinformatic predictions:
If sequence analysis suggests enzymatic activity:
Design substrate screening assays for hydrolase, transferase, or other predicted activities
Monitor potential cofactor requirements (metal ions, nucleotides)
Test activity under various pH conditions (pH 7-11) reflecting the alkaliphilic nature
If structural analysis suggests binding functions:
Perform ligand binding assays using thermal shift assays
Conduct isothermal titration calorimetry with potential binding partners
Use microscale thermophoresis for quantitative binding analysis
For all functional assessments:
Include appropriate positive and negative controls
Compare wild-type and mutant protein variants
Test activity under conditions mimicking Bacillus pseudofirmus cellular environment
To elucidate pathway involvement, implement these advanced research strategies:
Interactome analysis:
Perform BioID or APEX proximity labeling with BpOF4_11355 as bait
Conduct quantitative proteomics to identify pathway components
Validate key interactions using co-immunoprecipitation or FRET
Functional genomics:
Analyze phenotypic consequences of gene deletion under various conditions
Perform transcriptomic analysis comparing wild-type and knockout strains
Conduct synthetic lethal screens to identify genetic interactions
Metabolomic analysis:
Compare metabolite profiles between wild-type and mutant strains
Track metabolic fluxes using stable isotope labeling
Correlate metabolic changes with phenotypic observations
These approaches should be conducted under conditions relevant to Bacillus pseudofirmus physiology, particularly considering its alkaliphilic nature.
For comprehensive structural characterization, consider this hierarchical approach:
| Technique | Information Provided | Resolution | Sample Requirements |
|---|---|---|---|
| Homology modeling | Predicted structure | Low | Sequence only |
| Hydrogen-deuterium exchange | Dynamic regions, flexibility | Medium | Purified protein (mg) |
| Small-angle X-ray scattering | Solution conformation, shape | Low-medium | Purified protein (mg) |
| Cryo-electron microscopy | 3D structure | Medium-high | Purified protein (mg) |
| X-ray crystallography | Atomic resolution structure | High | Diffracting crystals |
| NMR spectroscopy | Structure and dynamics | High | Isotope-labeled protein |
Begin with computational approaches to guide experimental design. For experimental methods, ensure protein purity exceeds 95% and assess sample homogeneity using dynamic light scattering before structural studies. Consider the impact of the His-tag on structure and remove it if necessary for high-resolution studies .
Although bacterial proteins typically have fewer post-translational modifications (PTMs) than eukaryotic proteins, several approaches can identify potential modifications:
Mass spectrometry-based analysis:
Perform bottom-up proteomics with multiple proteases for comprehensive coverage
Use electron transfer dissociation for labile modification detection
Implement targeted approaches for specific modifications (phosphorylation, methylation)
Site-specific analysis:
Generate antibodies against predicted modified peptides
Perform site-directed mutagenesis of potential modification sites
Use chemical labeling strategies for specific modifications
Functional correlation:
Compare activity of protein expressed in different systems (E. coli vs. B. pseudofirmus)
Assess activity changes under conditions that might regulate modifications
Test modification-mimicking mutations (e.g., phosphomimetics)
When analyzing PTMs, consider the native environment of Bacillus pseudofirmus, particularly its alkaliphilic nature which may influence modification patterns.
To ensure reproducibility in BpOF4_11355 research, implement these comprehensive documentation practices:
Experimental materials documentation:
Methodological documentation:
Create detailed protocols with timing, temperatures, and equipment settings
Record any deviations from standard protocols
Document equipment calibration and validation data
Data collection and analysis:
Maintain raw data files in non-proprietary formats where possible
Document all data processing steps and parameters
Record statistical analysis methods and justification
Consider adopting electronic laboratory notebook systems with version control to ensure complete experiment tracking. This approach facilitates both internal reproducibility and method sharing with the broader research community.
When preparing manuscripts on BpOF4_11355 research, adhere to these reporting guidelines:
| Research Aspect | Information to Include |
|---|---|
| Protein production | Expression system, vector, induction conditions, purification steps |
| Protein characterization | Purity assessment, yields, storage conditions, stability data |
| Structural studies | Sample preparation, experimental parameters, data processing, validation metrics |
| Functional assays | Complete protocol details, controls, statistical analysis, biological replicates |
| Computational methods | Software versions, parameters, reference databases, validation approaches |
Include sufficient methodological detail for other researchers to reproduce the work. Use appropriate tables and figures to present data efficiently while maintaining clarity . Ensure proper citation of sources and methods, particularly for adapted protocols. Consider publishing detailed protocols in method-focused journals or repositories to supplement research articles.