Recombinant Bacillus subtilis Uncharacterized peptidase ygaJ (ygaJ)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Molecular Overview of YgaJ

YgaJ is annotated as a putative peptidase encoded by the ygaJ gene in B. subtilis (UniProt ID: P71089) . Key features include:

  • Gene locus: ygaJ (Gene ID: 939241) .

  • Protein properties: Predicted molecular weight and structure remain unverified, but homology modeling suggests it belongs to a metalloprotease or serine protease family, given its conserved catalytic motifs .

  • Recombinant expression: Produced as a His-tagged protein in E. coli or yeast systems, yielding >80% purity via affinity chromatography .

Expression Systems and Purification

Recombinant YgaJ is generated using plasmid-based systems optimized for B. subtilis. Key methodologies include:

2.1. Vector Design and Host Strains

  • Expression hosts: E. coli or yeast (e.g., Saccharomyces cerevisiae) for cytoplasmic production .

  • Tags: N- or C-terminal His-tag for simplified purification .

  • Secretion: While B. subtilis is renowned for secretory pathways (e.g., Sec or Tat systems) , YgaJ is typically expressed intracellularly in heterologous hosts due to unresolved secretion signals .

2.2. Production Parameters

ParameterSpecificationSource
Expression systemE. coli or yeast
Purification methodImmobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC)
Purity>80% (SDS-PAGE verified)
StorageLiquid or lyophilized powder (-20°C to -80°C)

3.1. Catalytic Mechanism

Though uncharacterized, YgaJ shares sequence homology with bacterial proteases featuring:

  • A conserved HEXXH metalloprotease motif or serine protease catalytic triad .

  • Potential substrate specificity for small peptides or misfolded proteins, akin to B. subtilis HtrA proteases .

3.2. Comparative Analysis with Characterized Proteases

ProteaseFamilyFunctionCatalytic Residues
YgaJUnclassifiedPutative peptide hydrolysisUndetermined
HtrAS1CQuality control, stress responseSer-His-Asp
SppAS49Signal peptide degradationSer-Lys dyad

4.1. Potential Biotechnological Uses

  • Enzyme engineering: YgaJ could be modified for industrial peptide synthesis or waste degradation if substrate specificity is resolved .

  • Stress response studies: B. subtilis proteases like HtrA are critical for bacterial fitness under secretion stress ; YgaJ may have analogous roles.

4.2. Limitations

  • Functional ambiguity: No kinetic data (e.g., k<sub>cat</sub>, K<sub>m</sub>) or in vivo substrates are reported .

  • Structural data: No crystal or cryo-EM structures are available, unlike B. subtilis SppA .

Future Directions

  1. CRISPR/Cas9-assisted editing: Marker-free chromosomal integration, as demonstrated for γ-glutamyl transpeptidase , could enable stable YgaJ expression in B. subtilis.

  2. High-throughput screening: Combinatorial signal peptide libraries may optimize YgaJ secretion in native hosts.

  3. Proteomic assays: Activity-based probes could map YgaJ’s interactome and substrates .

Q&A

What is the current understanding of ygaJ's functional characterization in Bacillus subtilis?

Despite sequence similarity to peptidase E, research indicates that the ygaJ gene from Bacillus subtilis does not encode an aspartyl-specific peptidase, contrary to initial hypotheses . Experimental evidence suggests that while ygaJ shares sequence homology with peptidases, its actual biochemical function remains incompletely characterized. Current research indicates:

  • The B. subtilis ygaJ gene was amplified by PCR from strain DB104 using specific primers (BsPepE1 and BsPepE2), resulting in a 750-bp product

  • When cloned into the EcoRI/BamHI sites of pSE380 to produce pCM440, and subsequently expressed, the protein showed distinct properties from serovar Typhimurium PepE

  • Growth assays on minimal medium containing various peptides (Asp-Leu, Glu-Leu, Lys-Leu, Tyr-Leu, Thr-Leu, and Asn-Leu) demonstrated that ygaJ does not exhibit the same peptidase activity as PepE

Researchers should note this represents a case where sequence homology alone proved insufficient for functional prediction, highlighting the importance of biochemical verification.

What expression systems are most effective for recombinant ygaJ production?

For optimal expression of recombinant ygaJ, several systems have been evaluated, with E. coli and B. subtilis showing distinct advantages:

coli expression system:

  • Commonly utilizes pSE380 vector with an IPTG-inducible promoter for controlled expression

  • Expression typically conducted at 30°C under shaking conditions with 1 mM IPTG induction

  • Cell extract preparation via sonication and centrifugation yields soluble protein fractions

subtilis expression system:

  • Exploits the secretory pathway for potential extracellular production

  • Provides GRAS (Generally Recognized as Safe) status for downstream applications

  • Mini-Bacillus chassis (e.g., strain PG10 lacking ~36% of genome) offers advantages for difficult-to-produce proteins with reduced protease activity

For advanced applications requiring secreted protein, the B. subtilis system offers advantages, though researchers must consider potential bottlenecks in the secretion pathway and implement appropriate protease deficient strains .

What purification strategies yield highest purity recombinant ygaJ protein?

Multi-step chromatographic approaches have demonstrated greatest efficacy for ygaJ purification:

Purification StepBuffer CompositionFlow RateElution MethodExpected Results
Gel Filtration20 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl0.5 ml/minIsocraticInitial separation at ~25 kDa molecular weight
Ion Exchange (DEAE)20 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.5)2 ml/minLinear gradient 0-1.0 M NaCl (200 ml total)Separation based on charge properties
Final Gel Filtration20 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl0.5 ml/minIsocraticPolishing step for >85% purity

For proteins expressed with affinity tags, researchers may consider His-tag purification approaches similar to those used for other B. subtilis recombinant proteins . Protein stability assessments recommend storage in PBS buffer at 4°C for short-term use or -20°C to -80°C for extended storage .

How can researchers design experimental assays to characterize potential ygaJ enzymatic activity?

Given the uncharacterized nature of ygaJ, a systematic approach to enzymatic characterization is recommended:

  • Substrate screening: Test various peptide substrates with N-terminal aspartic acid (Asp-X) to evaluate potential aspartyl-specific peptidase activity

  • Activity assays: Monitor hydrolysis using methods such as:

    • HPLC-based peptide degradation analysis

    • Colorimetric assays for released amino acids

    • Mass spectrometry for product identification

  • Site-directed mutagenesis: Target conserved Ser, His, and Asp residues to identify catalytic sites, using methodology similar to that employed for PepE characterization where Ser120, His157, and Asp135 were found essential for activity

  • Kinetic parameter determination: For any identified activity, determine:

    • Km and Vmax values using varying substrate concentrations

    • pH and temperature optima

    • Effects of potential inhibitors

    • Cofactor requirements

For comparative analysis, include appropriate controls such as known peptidases (PepE) and negative controls (mutated catalytic residues).

What genomic context insights help understand potential ygaJ function?

Genomic context analysis provides valuable clues for functional prediction:

  • The ygaJ gene in B. subtilis shares genomic neighborhood characteristics with several uncharacterized proteins in the B. subtilis genome

  • Comparative genomics reveals that ygaJ is conserved among Bacillus species but with varying sequence conservation

  • Unlike other characterized genes (e.g., yabG), ygaJ lacks the SigK-dependent promoter sequence that characterizes sporulation-specific genes

Advanced genomic analysis should include:

  • RNA-seq data to identify co-expressed genes under various conditions

  • ChIP-seq for identifying transcription factors regulating ygaJ expression

  • Comparative genomics across diverse Bacillus species to identify conserved synteny patterns

What techniques are most effective for studying protein-protein interactions involving ygaJ?

For investigating potential protein-protein interactions:

  • Pull-down assays:

    • Express ygaJ with affinity tags (His-tag) to capture interaction partners from B. subtilis lysates

    • Analyze captured proteins using LC-MS/MS on high-resolution mass spectrometers (e.g., Q Exactive™ Plus Hybrid Quadrupole-Orbitrap™)

  • Bacterial two-hybrid systems:

    • Adapt systems for gram-positive bacteria to identify potential interacting partners

    • Validate interactions using co-immunoprecipitation approaches

  • Crosslinking mass spectrometry:

    • Use chemical crosslinkers to stabilize transient interactions

    • Analyze crosslinked peptides using specialized mass spectrometry workflows

  • Proximity labeling:

    • Fuse ygaJ to enzymes like BioID or APEX2 to biotinylate proximal proteins

    • Identify labeled proteins through streptavidin purification and mass spectrometry

How should researchers approach the study of uncharacterized proteins like ygaJ compared to characterized homologs?

A systematic comparative approach is recommended:

  • Sequence analysis pipeline:

    • Multiple sequence alignment with characterized peptidases and related proteins

    • Structure prediction using AlphaFold or similar tools

    • Active site prediction and comparison with known peptidases

  • Comparative phenotypic analysis:

    • Generate B. subtilis strain with ygaJ inactivated by insertion of antibiotic resistance gene

    • Compare phenotypes for:

      • Vegetative growth parameters

      • Spore resistance to heat, chloroform, and lysozyme

      • Germination efficiency in various media

      • Protein composition analysis under stress conditions

  • Complementation studies:

    • Test if ygaJ can functionally replace related genes in heterologous systems

    • Express ygaJ in strains lacking peptidase E to determine functional complementation

  • Evolutionary analysis:

    • Investigate phylogenetic distribution of ygaJ homologs

    • Examine patterns of selection pressure on different protein domains

What are the latest methodological advances for studying uncharacterized proteins in B. subtilis?

Recent technological developments have expanded the toolkit for studying proteins like ygaJ:

  • Genome engineering approaches:

    • Mini-Bacillus systems (e.g., strain PG10) with reduced genome complexity for improved recombinant protein production

    • CRISPR-Cas9 based genome editing for precise genetic manipulation

  • Modular pathway engineering:

    • Division of metabolic networks into modules for systematic optimization

    • Two-promoter systems with different promoter types and strengths for combinatorial assembly of expression cassettes

  • Synthetic small regulatory RNAs:

    • Repression of gene expression through synthetic sRNAs combined with Hfq protein expression

    • Fine-tuning expression levels of target genes for optimal protein production

  • Protein localization approaches:

    • Fluorescent protein fusions (e.g., ygaJ-GFP) to determine subcellular localization

    • Time-lapse fluorescence microscopy to track dynamics during different growth phases

How does experimental evolution inform our understanding of genes like ygaJ in B. subtilis?

Experimental evolution provides valuable insights into gene function and adaptation:

  • Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) studies:

    • Serial dilution evolution experiments in presence of foreign DNA from diverse species

    • Analysis of acquisition patterns of foreign DNA and integration hotspots

  • Stress adaptation studies:

    • Evolution under specific selective pressures (e.g., high salinity)

    • Identification of genetic variations that emerge during adaptation

  • Comparative genomics of evolved populations:

    • Sequencing of evolved populations to identify genomic events

    • Analysis of clustering patterns of HGT fragments and mutations

These approaches reveal how genes like ygaJ may contribute to adaptability and stress response in B. subtilis, providing context for understanding their evolutionary significance.

What contradictions exist in the literature regarding ygaJ function, and how should researchers address them?

Several contradictions regarding ygaJ merit careful consideration:

  • Functional annotation discrepancies:

    • While sequence homology suggests similarity to peptidase E, experimental evidence indicates ygaJ does not encode an aspartyl-specific peptidase

    • This highlights the importance of functional verification beyond sequence analysis

  • Methodological considerations:

    • Growth assays using peptides (Asp-Leu, Glu-Leu, Lys-Leu, Tyr-Leu, Thr-Leu, Asn-Leu) show different results for ygaJ compared to characterized peptidases

    • Researchers should perform comprehensive biochemical characterization using multiple substrates and assay conditions

  • Research approach recommendations:

    • Implement parallel techniques (genetic, biochemical, structural) rather than relying on single approaches

    • Use both gain-of-function and loss-of-function studies to triangulate function

    • Consider potential moonlighting functions or condition-specific activities

To resolve these contradictions, researchers should design experiments that directly test competing hypotheses about ygaJ function, using rigorous controls and multiple complementary methodologies.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.