Recombinant Bacillus subtilis Uncharacterized protein ybeF (ybeF)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Recombinant Production and Purification

ybeF is commercially produced for research purposes, with standardized protocols for heterologous expression and purification:

ParameterDetailsSource
Host SystemsE. coli (common), yeast, baculovirus, mammalian cells, or in vitro systems
Purification MethodSDS-PAGE (≥85% purity)
Storage BufferTris-based buffer with 50% glycerol, optimized for stability
Storage Conditions-20°C or -80°C (long-term), 4°C (short-term working aliquots)

Recombinant ybeF is often tagged for efficient purification, though specific tag types are not disclosed in commercial listings .

Functional Insights and Regulatory Roles

While ybeF remains uncharacterized, systems biology studies reveal its involvement in transcriptional regulation and metabolic networks:

Key Findings

  1. Motility and Chemotaxis:

    • Deletion of ybeF in B. subtilis downregulates lrhA (a repressor of flagellar genes) and upregulates flhC (a component of the FlhDC complex), suggesting a role in modulating motility .

    • The FlhDC iModulon (genes regulated by FlhDC) is upregulated in ybeF mutants, linking ybeF to flagellar biosynthesis .

  2. Carbon Source Utilization:

    • ybeF interacts with regulators like CitR (a citrate lyase repressor) and DhfA (a formate/glycerol utilization activator), influencing gene clusters involved in citrate metabolism and alternative carbon sources .

  3. Cross-Species Regulatory Networks:

    • Homologs of ybeF in E. coli (e.g., ybeF = ECK0622) belong to the LysR family of transcriptional regulators, though functional divergence between species is likely .

Applications in Research and Biotechnology

ybeF serves as a model for studying:

  • Transcriptional Regulation: Its role in modulating operons like lrhA and flhDC highlights its potential as a target for genetic engineering to enhance motility or biofilm formation .

  • Metabolic Engineering: Interactions with carbon source utilization pathways suggest applications in optimizing B. subtilis for bioproduction .

  • Protein Secretion: Recombinant ybeF production leverages B. subtilis’s secretion systems, which are widely used for industrial protein synthesis .

Table 2: Functional Interactions and Pathways

Regulated Gene/OperonFunctionImpact of ybeF DeletionSource
lrhARepresses flagellar genes (e.g., flhDC)Downregulated (4.3-fold)
flhDCRegulates flagellar biosynthesisUpregulated (via FlhDC iModulon)
citCDEFGCitrate lyase genesIndirectly regulated via CitR

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference in order notes for customized preparation.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs unless dry ice shipping is requested in advance. Additional fees apply for dry ice shipping.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to consolidate the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50%, provided as a guideline for your reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors, including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized formulations have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquot to prevent repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing.
The tag type is determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
ybeF; BSU02150; Uncharacterized protein YbeF
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-82
Protein Length
full length protein
Species
Bacillus subtilis (strain 168)
Target Names
ybeF
Target Protein Sequence
MDELDIAFFILPLGIMLLSIVGTCICKNPYLMPMLSLVISLVLTFTIFNQSFLGWAVVYS LVSLALSYITLIVVRKRKESGN
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Database Links
Subcellular Location
Cell membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is YbeF and how is it classified within protein families?

YbeF is an uncharacterized protein from Bacillus subtilis that has been putatively identified as a LysR-type transcriptional regulator (LTF) . The protein contains a characteristic DNA-binding helix-turn-helix motif in its N-terminal region, which is a defining feature of LysR-type transcriptional regulators . LysR-type regulators represent one of the largest families of prokaryotic transcription factors and typically function as either activators or repressors of gene expression. YbeF belongs to a group of 19 LTFs in E. coli whose functions were previously unknown but have recently been subjects of investigative research using transcriptomic approaches . The conservation of YbeF across multiple bacterial species suggests it plays an important regulatory role that has been maintained throughout bacterial evolution . Despite being classified as "uncharacterized," recent studies have begun to shed light on its potential functions and regulatory roles.

What is currently known about the genomic context and conservation of the ybeF gene?

The ybeF gene is highly conserved across various bacterial species including Escherichia coli K12, Escherichia albertii, Shigella sonnei, Citrobacter koseri, Salmonella enterica, and Salmonella bongori, indicating its functional importance . In terms of genomic context, research has identified ybeF in proximity to the lipA gene (encoding lipoyl synthase) and genes involved in citrate metabolism (citA, citB) . This genomic organization is illustrated in Figure 2F of the referenced study, suggesting possible functional relationships between these genes . The conservation pattern of ybeF alongside these metabolic genes across multiple bacterial species provides clues about potential regulatory roles. Transcriptomic analyses indicate that ybeF might be functionally connected to the regulation of citrate metabolism pathways, though direct evidence of binding to these promoters was not detected in the studies reviewed . The genomic context analysis represents a powerful approach for generating hypotheses about the functional roles of uncharacterized proteins like YbeF.

What expression systems are recommended for recombinant YbeF production?

While specific expression protocols for YbeF are not detailed in the available literature, researchers working with Bacillus subtilis proteins have successfully employed genetic code expansion systems that can be adapted for YbeF expression . A recent study demonstrated broad and efficient genetic code expansion in B. subtilis by incorporating 20 distinct non-standard amino acids within proteins using three different families of genetic code expansion systems and two choices of codons . This approach could be particularly valuable for YbeF expression with additional functional groups for downstream applications. For heterologous expression, E. coli systems have been successfully used for other B. subtilis proteins, as demonstrated in the study where the overlapping yaaG and yaaF genes from B. subtilis were cloned and overexpressed in E. coli . When designing an expression construct for YbeF, researchers should consider including affinity tags such as His6 or GST to facilitate purification while ensuring these tags don't interfere with the protein's DNA-binding domain. Expression conditions would likely need optimization regarding temperature, inducer concentration, and duration to maximize soluble protein yield while minimizing inclusion body formation.

What methodological approaches are most effective for studying YbeF's regulatory function?

Transcriptomic analysis through RNA-seq of ybeF deletion mutants has proven effective for identifying genes potentially regulated by YbeF . This approach revealed that YbeF deletion affects the expression of lrhA (downregulation) and flhC (upregulation), suggesting YbeF's involvement in flagellar biosynthesis regulation . To complement transcriptomic studies, chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-seq) or ChIP-exo would be valuable for identifying direct YbeF binding sites throughout the genome. While not specifically employed for YbeF, ChIP-exo was successfully used to identify binding sites for other LTFs in the same study, such as the binding of DhfA upstream of the dhaKLM operon . For functional validation of potential regulatory targets, reporter gene assays using promoter regions of suspected target genes fused to fluorescent or enzymatic reporters would provide quantitative measures of YbeF's regulatory effects. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) could directly demonstrate YbeF binding to specific DNA sequences, while in vitro transcription assays would clarify whether YbeF functions as an activator or repressor for specific promoters.

How can researchers effectively create and validate ybeF deletion or knockout mutants?

Creation of ybeF deletion mutants in B. subtilis can be achieved through homologous recombination techniques using plasmid-based systems that contain flanking regions of the ybeF gene surrounding a selectable marker . The pMutin system, commonly used in B. subtilis, allows for gene disruption while simultaneously placing downstream genes under an inducible promoter if needed. Following transformation and selection, candidate mutants should be verified through PCR amplification using primers that flank the intended deletion site, with subsequent sequencing to confirm the precise genetic modification. Successful deletion mutants can be further validated through RT-PCR or RNA-seq to confirm the absence of ybeF transcripts . Phenotypic validation should include growth analyses under various conditions, particularly examining motility phenotypes given YbeF's potential role in flagellar gene regulation . Complementation studies, where the wild-type ybeF gene is reintroduced into the deletion strain (either at the original locus or at an ectopic site), are essential to confirm that observed phenotypes are specifically due to ybeF deletion rather than polar effects or secondary mutations. This comprehensive validation approach ensures reliable mutants for downstream functional studies.

What evidence suggests YbeF's role in flagellar biosynthesis regulation?

Transcriptomic analysis of a ybeF deletion mutant revealed significant effects on genes involved in flagellar biosynthesis and motility . Specifically, deletion of ybeF resulted in downregulation of lrhA by approximately 2-fold, while causing upregulation of flhC . This regulatory relationship is particularly interesting because LrhA is known to function as an LysR-type transcriptional factor that represses flhDC, genes responsible for flagellar biosynthesis, motility, and chemotaxis . Further evidence comes from iModulon analysis (a method for identifying sets of genes that are co-regulated) which showed that the FlhDC iModulon was substantially upregulated in the ybeF mutant strain . This pattern strongly suggests a regulatory connection between YbeF and flagella biosynthesis pathways . The cascading nature of this regulation (YbeF → LrhA → FlhDC → flagellar genes) exemplifies the complex hierarchical organization of bacterial transcriptional networks. While direct binding of YbeF to lrhA promoter regions was not detected or predicted in the studies reviewed, the consistent expression changes observed in the deletion mutant provide compelling evidence for YbeF's involvement in this regulatory pathway, either directly or indirectly.

What potential connections exist between YbeF and metabolic regulation?

Analysis of the genomic context across multiple bacterial species reveals that ybeF is frequently located in proximity to genes involved in citrate metabolism, specifically citA and citB . This conserved genomic organization suggests a potential functional relationship between YbeF and citrate utilization pathways. While direct binding evidence is lacking, the transcriptomic effects observed in ybeF deletion mutants potentially implicate this regulatory protein in metabolic processes . The co-occurrence of ybeF with lipA (encoding lipoyl synthase) in several bacterial genomes further suggests possible involvement in pathways related to lipoic acid metabolism, which is an essential prosthetic group in several metabolic pathways . YbeF's classification as a LysR-type transcriptional regulator is also consistent with potential metabolic regulatory functions, as many LTFs are known to regulate metabolic processes in bacteria. To fully elucidate these connections, further studies combining metabolomic approaches with transcriptomics in ybeF mutants under various nutrient conditions would be particularly informative. Carbon source utilization phenotyping, particularly with citrate as a carbon source, might reveal functional consequences of ybeF deletion that would support its role in metabolic regulation.

How can transcriptomic data be effectively analyzed to identify YbeF regulatory targets?

Transcriptomic analysis through RNA-sequencing represents a powerful approach for identifying genes potentially regulated by YbeF . Researchers should begin by comparing gene expression profiles between wild-type and ybeF deletion mutants under multiple growth conditions to capture condition-specific regulatory effects. Differential expression analysis should employ robust statistical methods with appropriate false discovery rate controls to identify genes with significant expression changes. Integration with iModulonDB, as demonstrated in the referenced study, enables the identification of co-regulated gene sets (iModulons) affected by ybeF deletion . This approach revealed that the FlhDC iModulon was substantially upregulated in the ybeF mutant strain, providing insights into YbeF's regulatory network . To distinguish direct from indirect regulatory targets, researchers should cross-reference differentially expressed genes with potential YbeF binding sites identified through bioinformatic motif analysis or ChIP-based methods. Pathway enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes can further reveal biological processes under YbeF regulation. Time-course experiments capturing dynamic expression changes following conditional ybeF expression can provide additional insights into primary versus secondary regulatory effects. This multi-layered analytical approach maximizes the biological insights derived from transcriptomic data.

What bioinformatic approaches can identify potential YbeF binding sites?

Identification of potential YbeF binding sites can begin with motif discovery in promoter regions of genes differentially expressed in ybeF deletion mutants . As YbeF belongs to the LysR-type transcriptional regulator family, researchers can leverage known binding motifs from related LTFs as starting points for motif searches. Position weight matrices (PWMs) derived from experimentally validated binding sites of similar LTFs can be used with tools like MEME, FIMO, or HOMER to scan genomic regions for potential YbeF binding sites. Comparative genomic approaches examining the conservation of predicted binding sites across related bacterial species can strengthen predictions, as functionally important binding sites tend to be evolutionarily conserved. Integration of binding site predictions with transcriptomic data from ybeF mutants enables prioritization of sites associated with expression changes. Advanced approaches could include DNase-seq or ATAC-seq to identify accessible chromatin regions where YbeF might bind, or in silico molecular docking studies to predict DNA-protein interactions based on structural models of YbeF's DNA-binding domain. These complementary bioinformatic approaches can generate testable hypotheses about YbeF's direct regulatory targets for subsequent experimental validation.

What novel techniques could advance understanding of YbeF's in vivo dynamics?

Genetic code expansion in B. subtilis, as demonstrated in recent research incorporating 20 distinct non-standard amino acids within proteins, offers powerful approaches for studying YbeF dynamics . This technique could enable site-specific incorporation of photo-crosslinking amino acids into YbeF to capture in vivo protein-protein or protein-DNA interactions under physiologically relevant conditions . Click-chemistry compatible amino acids could facilitate specific labeling of YbeF for super-resolution microscopy to track its subcellular localization and dynamics throughout the cell cycle or in response to environmental stimuli . Translational titration approaches through genetic code expansion could enable precise modulation of YbeF levels to determine threshold effects in regulatory networks . CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) systems adapted for B. subtilis would allow for tunable and reversible repression of ybeF to study temporal aspects of its regulatory function. Single-molecule tracking approaches could reveal the kinetics of YbeF-DNA interactions in living cells. Integration of these cutting-edge techniques with traditional biochemical and genetic approaches would provide unprecedented insights into YbeF's function and dynamics in vivo, potentially revealing regulatory mechanisms impossible to detect through static analyses.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.